What the fuck is the point of posting this? This is fucking useless.maybe he just wanted some time off and had no more sick relatives to use for excuses.. he found a loop hole
Yo! You're not logged in. Why am I seeing this ad?
Manny Suspended 50 Games For HCG
#253
Posted 07 May 2009 - 11:38 AM
Amateur athletes competing at the international level have had to do this for years, it's not that hard - and you don't need to hire a guy of your own for it, there are tons of resources available to help athletes avoid testing positive for taking the wrong thing.Seriously, how stupid do you have to be to get caught? Given the potential reprecussions, if I were a multimillionaire athlete, I'd hire a guy to test every medication and supplement I put into my body, even if it was just a Tylenol.
This certainly puts his LA performance last fall in a different light.
#254
Posted 07 May 2009 - 11:38 AM
Yup, nobody's fighting anything, according to Manny's statement. He's already consulted with the union.I also think Manny is full of shit. Do you honestly believe that the Player's Union would not be fighting this suspension to the death if it were an honest mistake due to a prescription??? Horseshit. Manny cheated and got caught, that's why they aren't fighting it.
#255
Posted 07 May 2009 - 11:38 AM
Where did you get the idea that HGH is the most effective PED. There have been clinical studies that conclusively confirm that most anabolic steriods increase strength as well as promote growth. There is great debate as to whether HGH actually increases strength or speed at all.
Well for one the bodybuilding community has found HGH to be extremely powerful (I'll leave the most powerful PED debate alone).
The Bodybuilding community is (and prob always will be) light yrs ahead of doctors and nutritionists when it comes to PED's, diet & excercise etc. so based on their view of it I would say the shit works.
#259
Posted 07 May 2009 - 11:39 AM
Give it up dude. You were totally wrong then, and you're totally wrong now. You keep pretending that Clemens was completely immune to age regression. He was a very obvious steroid user with a suspicious career profile. The Houston peak was not "one year". And once again, you're talking about Barry Bonds, which is completely pointless, as I already said. You don't have to look like Bonds to be suspected of steroid abuse. Jesus.The best run of Clemens career was when he was 27-29 (184 ERA+). The worst was when he was 38-40 (114 ERA+). Certainly, the one great year in Houston looks very suspicious; but it's one year. I fully admit I wanted to believe he was clean; but once he went back to MFY I could give a fuck. The back end of his career was far worse than his peak, though.
Bonds four best years were when he was 36-39. His OPS+ in those years was 255, which was 50% higher than the 4 year prior. His SLG went from 625 to 806. It was pretty unprecedented for a player that age to be so much better than he had previously been, which was my argument. Hey, I guess some of us want to believe that guys we looked up to at one point were clean, I think most of that is gone now.
I wouldn't have brought it up, but then you had no business getting on BigMike.
#261
Posted 07 May 2009 - 11:39 AM
Because "my doctor messed up" isn't a valid reason to get the suspsension overturned. The burden is on the player to pass tests, not the MLB to judge excuse validity.I don't understand why he would do this if he could put up a prescription and have a doctor's "testimony." Wouldn't all of this be good stuff with a reasonable chance of getting the suspension flipped?
It could be 100% true that this is what happened (doctor error), and the suspension would still stand. It only matters in the court of public opinion.
#263
Posted 07 May 2009 - 11:39 AM
Well if that ain't karma I don't know what is.
I'm not saying the Sox are clean here by any means, but I think we all know that guy hitting lasers in LA wasn't the guy that left here. The guy who consistently couldn't deal with plus fastballs and we were cringing at coming up in key situations. His batspeed was down significantly. He could also have just been tanking it, but there's enough smoke to think he left Boston and pulled a "I'll show those fuckers."
ala Clemens. Edit- several pages back- hadn't finished reading yet.
Edited by C4CRVT, 07 May 2009 - 11:40 AM.
#264
Posted 07 May 2009 - 11:39 AM
If he was given Ritalin or something by a doc for ADD I think that's a bit different than a pure Roid, no?
Since he was suspended for 50 games, we know that the substance was on the "Performance Enhancing Substance" list. Ritalin (methylphenidate) is on the Stimulant list, which carries lesser penalties for a first time offense.
#267
Posted 07 May 2009 - 11:40 AM
They are going to have to back it up by showing the prescription.
If they do and Manny is being treated for legitimate medical reasons, and that has caused the drug test then mlb is in a bit of a bad situation.
If they refuse to show the prescription for privacy reasons no one will believe them
If they show the prescription and it was for non medical reason's then clearly Manny looks awful
We all guessed ADD at some point.
This will create an interesting issue for the 104 names list. If he's on it, reporters will try and get info. To this point it seems Selena Roberts was only able to get a source to corroborate her info on a particular name. Does the source now do the same for Manny? Is the source worried about the attention and their possible liability, and refuse to do so?
Also, if Manny truly is not on steroids, it would be in his interest to release the list. Boras as a union guy would resist allowing even just Manny to ask for the release of his name not being on the list.
#270
Posted 07 May 2009 - 11:41 AM
I'd say Ritalin or the like is the obvious candidate here. If nothing else, that would explain his improved fielding in LA.
The other question is weather this was prescribed by an actual doctor or an internet dentist in Florida.
#271
Posted 07 May 2009 - 11:41 AM
Manny's statement (via ESPN) follows the Boras "Doctor's prescription" mantra.
He's also waived his right to challenge the suspension.
I find the waiver of his rights very interesting. No challenge to the suspension means, if he wants, he could keep a fairly tight lid on the whole deal, maintain control over the information released (more than if there were going to be subsequent proceeedings), and cross his fingers and hope it all blows over as quickly as possible. MLB can't talk, the doc can't talk, the team can't talk. That leaves Manny and Boras as the mouth pieces. Not a bad strategy.
#272
Posted 07 May 2009 - 11:41 AM
Amfepramone (Diethylproprion)
Amphetaminil
Chlorphentermine
Clortermine
Ephedrine
Methylphenidate
Phenpentermine
Phentermine
I have no idea what any of those are, but if it turns out one or more of them can be prescribed in a non-PED way, I won't be surprised.
#275
Posted 07 May 2009 - 11:42 AM
What about Manny Ramirez? someone asks.
Canseco laughs and offers his theory. A-Rod was exposed only when his name was leaked from a list of 104 major leaguers who in a 2003 test showed up positive for steroids. Because the test was anonymous, those names were not supposed to be made public. But in Canseco's mind, baseball's power brokers know who is on it: players he is sure will be seen as toxic if the truth comes out.
He says this, despite the fact that A-Rod isn't being treated as toxic, nor are other players who were caught up in the steroid scandal but publicly apologized, including Miguel Tejada, starting shortstop for the Houston Astros, and Andy Pettitte, a starting pitcher with the New York Yankees.
Why didn't Ramirez get a long-term deal? Canseco asks. Why were owners gun-shy about signing arguably the game's best hitter?
Never mind that Ramirez was asking for a mega-deal at age 36. Or that he was negotiating in a sickly economy, while weighed down by the heavy baggage of a surly reputation. Canseco will have none of it. To Canseco, the drawn-out negotiation, the lack of a long-term deal, the lack of interest all raise red flags, and so he tells the Bovard crowd that Ramirez's "name is most likely, 90%," on the list.
Canseco admits later that he has no way of knowing. But it makes sense to him, so he threw it out there -- kaboom! -- swinging for the fences, still.
Late Saturday, I tracked down Ramirez to tell him what Canseco had said. The immediate response is pure Ramirez: He laughs. Sitting at his locker, he says, "I got no comment, nothing to say about that. What can I say? I don't even know the guy."
#276
Posted 07 May 2009 - 11:42 AM
Really?
The guy tried to torpedo our season, several times and put on an act last year that was intolerable enough to force management's hand, then went to LA and played lights out for the rest of the season.
He is now unmasked (unless you feel obligated to accept the "it was a mistake" defense they all like to use.)
His sudden superhuman abilities after the trade last year are at least curious, with some reason to believe, particularly given his age, the product of "enhancement."
He bleeped us, and he has now been exposed. To the life long Red Sox fan, this is as great as hearing about that pitcher who made a previous GM look foolish for letting him go, just as Manny* made Theo look a bit dopey.
With all due respect, this is insane.
Can anyone rationally say Manny did not use PEDs in 2004 and 2007? He didn't all of a sudden get the jones in LA.
#279
Posted 07 May 2009 - 11:43 AM
Really, the ship has to be righted and if it takes zeroing out somebody like manny, I'm all for it.
Since he isn't challenging the ban, I'd say they have him dead to f=right. If manny is right and it wasn't steroids, I'd say the next best candidate is hGH.
#280
Posted 07 May 2009 - 11:43 AM
I don't understand why he would do this if he could put up a prescription and have a doctor's "testimony." Wouldn't all of this be good stuff with a reasonable chance of getting the suspension flipped?
No. Because then every single positive test will result in a doctor "testifying" that it was their fault. There's a list of banned substances, and it's the player's responsibilty to be 100% sure about what he takes or is injected with.
#281
Posted 07 May 2009 - 11:43 AM
The best run of Clemens career was when he was 27-29 (184 ERA+). The worst was when he was 38-40 (114 ERA+). Certainly, the one great year in Houston looks very suspicious; but it's one year. I fully admit I wanted to believe he was clean; but once he went back to MFY I could give a fuck. The back end of his career was far worse than his peak, though.
This is off-topic, but this is a bizarre argument. What about his ages 41-43, when his ERA+ was 180? If you put his best ERA+ seasons in order from best to worst, they go like this:
Age: 42, 34, 27, 43, 31, 29, 35.
So, 2 of his 4 "best" seasons were at age 42+. 4 of his best 7 seasons were at age 34+.
#282
Posted 07 May 2009 - 11:43 AM
Hard to take anything you say or think about Manny seriously since you despise the guy.
Laddie, to be fair, it's hard to take anything you say or think about Manny seriously since you're veritably infatuated with the guy.
The fact is this case could mirror J.C. Romero's suspension. When both Gammons AND Verducci are reporting it's not a steroid, then I think Manny's answer garners a bit more credibility.
#289
Posted 07 May 2009 - 11:44 AM
We all guessed ADD at some point.
It isn't ADD meds and it isn't Ritalin. If that were the case, even if he hadn't asked for permission from MLB, he wouldn't be getting 50 games. Can we please stop saying this crap?I'd say Ritalin or the like is the obvious candidate here. If nothing else, that would explain his improved fielding in LA.
#290
Posted 07 May 2009 - 11:45 AM
Please don't make me list the 58 drugs (which Ritalin is not on the list) that result in a 50 game suspension on the first offense again.I'd say Ritalin or the like is the obvious candidate here. If nothing else, that would explain his improved fielding in LA.
#291
Posted 07 May 2009 - 11:45 AM
Yeah, and ARod has passed every test since 1994. Clemens never tested positive. Ect ect ect ect ect ect ect ect ect
ARod tested positive for two anabolic steroids so no, he didn't pass every test since 1994. I'm going to wait until I find out what Manny's tested for before dumping him into the hole that ARod, Clemens and Bonds are in. If it's a performance-enhancing drug, then he'll be lumped in, but there's no harm to waiting for more information before judging Manny.
#293
Posted 07 May 2009 - 11:45 AM
The reason I say it rings true is that who would be stupid enough these days with mandatory testing to knowingly take a banned substance? I guess if there were someone that dumb, it might be he, though.
#294
Posted 07 May 2009 - 11:45 AM
Are you kidding? I like Manny but I'm certainly not infatuated with him. That's just stupid; don't put words into my mouth, just shut up. Rocco hates Manny; he will fully admit to this.Laddie, to be fair, it's hard to take anything you say or think about Manny seriously since you're veritably infatuated with the guy.
The fact is this case could mirror J.C. Romero's suspension. When both Gammons AND Verducci are reporting it's not a steroid, then I think Manny's answer garners a bit more credibility.
Edited by CaptainLaddie, 07 May 2009 - 11:47 AM.
#295
Posted 07 May 2009 - 11:45 AM
The MLB banned substabces list includes steroids, drugs of abuse (pot/coke/heroin), and stimulants, listed as:
Amfepramone (Diethylproprion)
Amphetaminil
Chlorphentermine
Clortermine
Ephedrine
Methylphenidate
Phenpentermine
Phentermine
I have no idea what any of those are, but if it turns out one or more of them can be prescribed in a non-PED way, I won't be surprised.
Metyhlphenidate is Ritalin, since that seems to be the working hypothesis at this point.
#298
Posted 07 May 2009 - 11:46 AM
Is that in the Selena Roberts book, that ARod has failed other tests besides the 2003 one? I'm confused. I remember the stories that Gene Orza told him and other guys when their tests would be so that they could do everything they could to pass them but I hadn't heard that.Didn't it just come out that ARod didn't pass every test?
#299
Posted 07 May 2009 - 11:46 AM
Stimulants and Drugs of Abuse dont result in 50 game suspensions on the first offense. Please return to the beginning of the thread.The MLB banned substabces list includes steroids, drugs of abuse (pot/coke/heroin), and stimulants, listed as:
Amfepramone (Diethylproprion)
Amphetaminil
Chlorphentermine
Clortermine
Ephedrine
Methylphenidate
Phenpentermine
Phentermine
I have no idea what any of those are, but if it turns out one or more of them can be prescribed in a non-PED way, I won't be surprised.
Reply to this topic
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users










