Yo! You're not logged in. Why am I seeing this ad?
February General NHL thread
#301
Posted 23 February 2009 - 12:54 PM
Hopefully the interim guy doesn't right the ship over there. But then, I lean towards doubting anyone could right a ship captained by Scott Gomez, Chris Drury and Wade Redden.
It's a fantastic year to hate the Rangers.
#302
Posted 23 February 2009 - 01:36 PM
And yet Glen Sather... still employed. Doesn't really seem fair to ol' Tom.
Shhh ... keeping Sather around is the best thing that could happen. And after he gives Zherdev a ridiculous contract he'll have only enough money left to put SOSHers on the last two lines and on defense.
Edited by NYCSox, 23 February 2009 - 01:39 PM.
#303
Posted 23 February 2009 - 01:45 PM
#304
Posted 23 February 2009 - 01:48 PM
#305
Posted 23 February 2009 - 07:02 PM
Torts would be great just because he'd probably strangle a Post reporter at some point.Laviolette would be a good choice for them.
#306
Posted 23 February 2009 - 07:13 PM
bTT-7Su7iaY
Torts or Laviolette would be fine choices though, probably better fits than Schoeny...
#307
Posted 23 February 2009 - 07:19 PM
http://www.nypost.co...ella_156591.htm
Edited by Nuf Ced, 23 February 2009 - 08:38 PM.
#308
Posted 24 February 2009 - 09:17 PM
#309
Posted 25 February 2009 - 12:43 PM
Clemmensen got shipped back to Lowell. Apparently he had been on emergency recall for the past 4 months. Who knew you were allowed to do that?
#310
Posted 25 February 2009 - 01:29 PM
#311
Posted 25 February 2009 - 02:28 PM
Pretty remarkable that he got sent back, even though he'll be back after the deadline. Probably the best performance in a while from a player up for that long to eventually get sent back to the A.Brodeur is back in net tomorrow against the Avalanche.
Clemmensen got shipped back to Lowell. Apparently he had been on emergency recall for the past 4 months. Who knew you were allowed to do that?
#312
Posted 25 February 2009 - 05:27 PM
=C'est certain que le Canadien n'est pas allé me chercher et me donner un contrat pour me faire jouer dans les gradins à chaque trois ou quatre matchs. Si je ne suis pas important pour l'organisation, je pourrais l'être pour une autre équipe. Je ne sais pas quelles étaient les intentions du Canadien en venant me chercher, mais j'ai été laissé de côté seulement en finale. Je croyais que l'organisation voulait apporter un élément de robustesse à chaque match. Quand tu ne joues pas, tu t'attends à ce que l'équipe veuille faire des changements. », a affirmé Laraque à la suite de la séance d'entraînement, mercredi matin.
Georges Laraque affirme que son utilisation n'est pas celle qui avait été discutée au cours de l'été dernier : « Si les conversations avaient parlé d'une utilisation comme on fait de moi aujourd'hui, je ne serais pas ici. C'est frustrant. Je vois que c'est le genre d'entraîneur qui ne veut pas de mon type de joueur dans son alignement à tous les matchs. Avec mon salaire et l'utilisation qu'on fait de moi, je ne serais pas surpris de bouger. »
« Si tu ne joues pas en saison régulière quand il y a des blessés, ton utilité va être quoi en séries? Zéro.
"It's obvious that the Canadiens didn't sign me to only play me once every three or four games. If I'm not in the organization's plans, I could be for another team. I don't know what the Canadiens had in mind when they signed me, but they've left me on the sidelines. I thought the organization wanted to bring an element of physicality to each game. WHen you don't play, you wait for the changes a team wants to make." Laraque confirmed after practice Wednesday morning.
Georges Laraque admits that his current utilization by the Canadiens isn't what had been discussed over the course of last summer: "If the [contract] talks had mentioned using me the way I'm used today, I would not be here. It's frustrating. I can see that it's the type of coaching that doesn't want players with my type of game in his lineup in every game. With my salary and the way they use me, I wouldn't be surprised to be traded."
"If you don't play in the regular season when there are injuries, what will your use be in the playoffs? None.
#313
Posted 25 February 2009 - 05:52 PM
#314
Posted 25 February 2009 - 06:08 PM
Can Laraque still play? He always struck me as a guy who could actually play a regular shift on the checking line along with the extracurriculars, but I haven't seen enough of him with the Habs to say if that's still the case. I suppose another possibility is that he got comfortable once he got the deal from Montreal...
From what I've seen, the answer is no. He's a fighter and doesn't bring any other attributes to the ice. He skates along asking guys politely if they'd like to fight. I wouldn't really even call him an enforcer. He's not overly physical and doesn't grind it out like, say, Shawn Thornton with a tough forecheck and good cycling in the offensive end. He won't jump a guy to defend a teammate (ex. Chara v. Valabik or entire Bruins team v. Ott and Avery). If you say "no thanks, Georges" then he skates away and is completely useless on the ice. Watch the 3rd Bruins/Canadiens game- Laraque shadowed Lucic the entire game, Lucic declined, and Laraque cruised along the ice with nothing to do.
Edited by cshea, 25 February 2009 - 07:44 PM.
#315
Posted 25 February 2009 - 07:25 PM
#316
Posted 25 February 2009 - 07:52 PM
Oh yeah, and Markus Nasland decided to get in a fight, with punches and everything. The Tortorella era has begun!
Edited by The Four Peters, 25 February 2009 - 08:13 PM.
#317
Posted 25 February 2009 - 07:58 PM
I could see this being a great, great coaching change for NYR.
Edited by PedroSpecialK, 25 February 2009 - 07:58 PM.
#318
Posted 25 February 2009 - 08:18 PM
Domenick Moore, a left-handed shot, was taking a faceoff in his own zone to the right of Toskala. So, the normal draw would put his right hand on top, his left on the bottom, and the blade of the stick towards the middle of the ice, curve facing out. This is how everyone in the history of ever takes the face-off. Yet at the last second, he flips his stick around as if he's a right-handed shot taking the faceoff with a lefty stick. Left hand on top, blade towards the boards, curve facing back into the corner. This makes it infinitely easier to draw the puck back to the corner (the preferred spot), if you've practiced enough to become comfortable. Apparently he has, because he's won 2 out of 3 times doing it.
I found it fascinating, mainly because I can't believe no one's thought to do that regularly. Or if they have, I've never noticed.
#319
Posted 25 February 2009 - 08:47 PM
#320
Posted 25 February 2009 - 09:42 PM
Good God Wade Redden scored a goal.Rozsival doesn't look totally useless thus far, and Zherdev's really busting his ass.
I could see this being a great, great coaching change for NYR.
#321
Posted 25 February 2009 - 11:18 PM
Good God Wade Redden scored a goal.
And yet the Rags lose again. They may back in, but only because of Ryan Miller's injury and the Canes' horrific remaining schedule.
#322
Posted 26 February 2009 - 12:15 PM
Ryan Whitney dealt to Anaheim for Chris Kunitz and Eric Tangradi.
Wonder if Pronger's on the move now? I like this on the Ducks side, a good buy low on Whitney.
#323
Posted 26 February 2009 - 12:21 PM
#324
Posted 26 February 2009 - 12:24 PM
#325
Posted 26 February 2009 - 12:28 PM
#326
Posted 26 February 2009 - 12:30 PM
I sold Tangradi short, my friend's a big Belleville fan and has an SJH on Thomas-level man-hate for him. Looking at his numbers, they're extremely impressive, but he also has Cameron and Subban on his squad. Anyhow, he's a good prospect, definitely better than the 7.5C given to him by HF right now - I'd probably put him at a higher boom/bust number, more like 8.5C or something like that. It helps even it out for Pittsburgh, but this to me reeks of a Pitkanen for Cole-type move from Edmonton's side.well I love the deal for Pittsburgh. Talking about hitting a ceiling, Whitney is lost in his own zone and spent 3/4 of the playoffs last year at Forward. Kunitz gives them a guy to put with Sid and Tangradi is 2 points behind Tavares in for the OHL scoring lead.
#327
Posted 26 February 2009 - 12:37 PM
The Penguins also have Alex Goligoski in the AHL now, but he had around 20 points with the big club this year and seemed to be better than Whitney in both zones already.
#328
Posted 26 February 2009 - 12:37 PM
Kunitz - Crosby - Fedotenko
Satan - Malkin - Sykora
Dupuis - Staal - Kennedy
Cooke - Talbot - Godard
Orpik - Gonchar
Eaton - Letang
Scuderi - Gill
?
Whitney had his foot totally rebuilt in the offseason surgery he had; I don't know that he'll ever get back to what he was his first 2.5 seasons. He was already on a downward trend last year (like I mentioned, they moved him to forward against Detrot). It was embarrassing to watch him this year, like the game against washington, he just gave them the puck for their 4th goal.
The Penguins also have Alex Goligoski in the AHL now, but he had around 20 points with the big club this year and seemed to be better than Whitney in both zones already.
For the life of me I will never understand why they've been playing guys even like Eaton or Scuderi over Goligoski, who I thought brought a whole lot more to that blue line than either of them. If they were stalwarts in their own end, fine, but they're not so markedly better that they render Gogo's offensive output moot. He definitely deserves a look with Whitney gone.
Edited by PedroSpecialK, 26 February 2009 - 12:38 PM.
#329
Posted 26 February 2009 - 12:42 PM
So what does Pittsburgh's lineup look like now?
Kunitz - Crosby - Fedotenko
Satan - Malkin - Sykora
Dupuis - Staal - Kennedy
Cooke - Talbot - Godard
Orpik - Gonchar
Eaton - Letang
Scuderi - Gill
?
That's likely pretty close, other than Cooke usually plays with Staal and Kennedy.
#330
Posted 26 February 2009 - 01:29 PM
Wow, just saw something I've never seen before in all my time playing hockey (that's not to say it's never happened).
Domenick Moore, a left-handed shot, was taking a faceoff in his own zone to the right of Toskala. So, the normal draw would put his right hand on top, his left on the bottom, and the blade of the stick towards the middle of the ice, curve facing out. This is how everyone in the history of ever takes the face-off. Yet at the last second, he flips his stick around as if he's a right-handed shot taking the faceoff with a lefty stick. Left hand on top, blade towards the boards, curve facing back into the corner. This makes it infinitely easier to draw the puck back to the corner (the preferred spot), if you've practiced enough to become comfortable. Apparently he has, because he's won 2 out of 3 times doing it.
I found it fascinating, mainly because I can't believe no one's thought to do that regularly. Or if they have, I've never noticed.
Believe it or not I used to take d-zone draws that way, albeit at club/rec league level. We had 2 goalies, and when the other guy played I took shifts all over. I played a bit of center, and as a right shot/left glove I'm pretty comfortable shooting left, so I'd take draws on the left side lefty which made it simpler to draw it back & away from my net. Probably explains why you see a lot of centers with less curve, or funny curves (Gilmour, Messier spring to mind)
I don't remember seeing Moore do that in the minors, though I didn't see him a ton.
#331
Posted 26 February 2009 - 02:48 PM
#332
Posted 26 February 2009 - 03:27 PM
Flyers made a couple of moves today. They waived old friend Glen Metropolit. Who cares. The more intriguing move is that Ossi Vaananen was waived. I highly doubt he clears all the way to Boston, but Krejci damn would I love it if Chia brought him in for the Hnidy/Hunwick/Stuart spot
Wonder how this scene will play out in the movie re: Metro's life.
Ossi is a cheap depth pick up for anyone ahead of the B's in priority, only $1m this season before UFA this summer. We can pray to Krejci he'll slip down.
#333
Posted 26 February 2009 - 03:47 PM
#334
Posted 26 February 2009 - 06:15 PM
per tsn.ca
Steve Begin headed from Montreal to Dallas for Doug Janik. Begin replace Avery as Ott's sidekick. I think Begin had asked out of Montreal, otherwise not sure what the Habs see in Janik. I suppose it clears a few dollars of he Habs cap, though.
Edited by cshea, 26 February 2009 - 06:20 PM.
#335
Posted 26 February 2009 - 06:19 PM
#336
Posted 26 February 2009 - 06:33 PM
I'm guessing the Metro waive is clearing a spot for Danny Briere. I'm curious how the lines will shake out, but either way a guy who can actually play hockey will slide to the third line, always a good thing.
#337
Posted 26 February 2009 - 06:46 PM
#339
Posted 26 February 2009 - 08:54 PM
#340
Posted 26 February 2009 - 09:25 PM
In fairness, Milhouse tied to the net could've pitched that shutout, the Divealanche stink and were absolutely terrible tonight.
#341
Posted 26 February 2009 - 09:25 PM
#342
Posted 27 February 2009 - 12:16 AM
#343
Posted 27 February 2009 - 12:26 AM
#344
Posted 27 February 2009 - 01:33 AM
And he shutouts the Avalanche 4-0. He picks up where he left off. Thank god we are in the position we are in right now. I wouldn't want to face the Devils early in a playoff series.
Let the Devils and Caps go at it in the second round. At least we know someone will be eliminated.
#345
Posted 27 February 2009 - 01:36 AM
I can't wait to see Janik on the Habs' blue line. I've been calling him the worst regular defenseman in the NHL for a while now - so glad to see he's going up to MTL.
you gotta figure the habs waive him down to the AHL. Begin deserves a chance to play a regular shift in the NHL - if the habs lose Janik on waivers, so what, otherwise he's good enough to help out the Bulldogs. Janik seems to have a 2-way contract, so he'd be cheap to play in the AHL and the Habs make a pretty decent cap savings for the deal
#346
Posted 27 February 2009 - 08:40 AM
#347
Posted 27 February 2009 - 09:47 AM
This is a great point, I assumed Janik was on a one way deal. My dream is shattered.
just checked the Canadiens press release (http://canadiens.nhl...rticleid=411216):
The 28-year-old defenseman signed with the Dallas Stars as a free agent on July 6, 2006. Janik will join the Canadiens’ farm team in Hamilton (AHL) provided he clears waivers by Saturday at noon.
#348
Posted 27 February 2009 - 09:51 AM
I think this situation stinks, quite honestly. Clemmensen may well have saved their season by playing so credibly when The Franchise was out, and now he's shipped back to the A not because he can't play in the NHL, but for waiver and salary cap reasons.Pretty remarkable that he got sent back, even though he'll be back after the deadline. Probably the best performance in a while from a player up for that long to eventually get sent back to the A.
It sucks.
#349
Posted 27 February 2009 - 10:15 AM
#350
Posted 27 February 2009 - 10:19 AM
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users











