Edited by Corsi Combover, 23 December 2008 - 03:37 PM.
Yo! You're not logged in. Why am I seeing this ad?
Yankees sign Teixeira; I just lost my lunch!
#1
Guest_Corsi Combover_*
Posted 23 December 2008 - 03:22 PM
#2
Posted 23 December 2008 - 03:25 PM
#3
Posted 23 December 2008 - 03:26 PM
#4
Posted 23 December 2008 - 03:26 PM
#5
Posted 23 December 2008 - 03:26 PM
#6
Guest_Corsi Combover_*
Posted 23 December 2008 - 03:26 PM
#7
Guest_Corsi Combover_*
Posted 23 December 2008 - 03:27 PM
Source: http://sportsillustr...ixeira/?cnn=yesTeixeira, who hit .308 with 33 home runs and 121 RBIs in 2008, will receive an eight-year, $180 million deal from the Yankees with a full no-trade provision.
#8
Posted 23 December 2008 - 03:28 PM
#9
Posted 23 December 2008 - 03:28 PM
#10
Posted 23 December 2008 - 03:28 PM
#11
Posted 23 December 2008 - 03:30 PM
#12
Posted 23 December 2008 - 03:30 PM
#13
Posted 23 December 2008 - 03:30 PM
#14
Posted 23 December 2008 - 03:31 PM
#15
Posted 23 December 2008 - 03:32 PM
#16
Posted 23 December 2008 - 03:33 PM
They are going to be incredibly formidable next year.
#17
Posted 23 December 2008 - 03:33 PM
ESPN just said 8/170
OTL Weekly or whatever it's called said 8 years and over 170,000,000
#18
Posted 23 December 2008 - 03:33 PM
I'm shocked that the Sox wouldn't top that.ESPN just said 8/170
#19
Posted 23 December 2008 - 03:33 PM
If that's the case it's completely mindboggling to me that the Sox wouldn't match/top that offer.ESPN just said 8/170
#20
Posted 23 December 2008 - 03:34 PM
I'm shocked that the Sox wouldn't top that.
Why? Has this organization made any deals for anywhere near that long for anywhere near that much? I mean, Teixeira is a nice player but come on.
#21
Posted 23 December 2008 - 03:34 PM
I'm shocked that the Sox wouldn't top that.
Why? Has this organization made any deals for anywhere near that long for anywhere near that much? I mean, Teixeira is a nice player but come on.
#22
Posted 23 December 2008 - 03:35 PM
How do you know they didn't?If that's the case it's completely mindboggling to me that the Sox wouldn't match/top that offer.
#23
Posted 23 December 2008 - 03:35 PM
Bummer.
#24
Posted 23 December 2008 - 03:35 PM
$25M for Teix
$23M for CC
$22M for Jeter
$18M for Burnett
$118M for 5 players (before you even count in the luxury taxes on top of that?).
Who cares that the economy is teetering on the edge of oblivion?
#25
Posted 23 December 2008 - 03:35 PM
Well, the Yankees have had a hell of an offseason here. If there's no opt-out clause, then the Sox should've matched this. Not just so he didn't go to the Yanks, but because they need a middle of the order bat for the next few years.
They are going to be incredibly formidable next year.
Hard as it is for us to believe, maybe Teixeira simply chose the Yanks over the Sox with comparable offers on the table.
#26
Posted 23 December 2008 - 03:35 PM
Furthermore, the reports that seem to indicate that talent will be available by trade as other teams move to shed payroll make a lot of sense. The Sox may yet make some moves that help them keep pace. The downside however, is that Teixeira only would have cost money and now they will have to move cost-controlled bodies to upgrade.
#27
Posted 23 December 2008 - 03:36 PM
So do the Yanks still get to ask NYC for money for their stadium?
Of course. And they'll get it. And no one in NYC will think twice.
But then they'll charge people 25% taxes on music downloads.
But that's another issue for another thread.
#28
Posted 23 December 2008 - 03:37 PM
If that's the case it's completely mindboggling to me that the Sox wouldn't match/top that offer.
There has to be an opt-out clause in this, otherwise it makes no sense at all that the Sox didn't match that offer.
Can't say I'm surprised--Yankees in full on stealth mode for a position of need--shades of Damon, although not a direct parallel.
It is infuriating, though.
Edited by Hildy, 23 December 2008 - 03:38 PM.
#29
Posted 23 December 2008 - 03:37 PM
Hey, all you can do is laugh. I think the Onion wrote a parody article a few years back that resembled this scenario.
It's reminiscent of the winter of 2003.
#30
Posted 23 December 2008 - 03:37 PM
If that's the case it's completely mindboggling to me that the Sox wouldn't match/top that offer.
It was the no trade clause.
#31
Posted 23 December 2008 - 03:38 PM
Of course. And they'll get it. And no one in NYC will think twice.
But then they'll charge people 25% taxes on music downloads.
But that's another issue for another thread.
No there is absolutely no way they are getting the money Bloomsberg almost cried laughing when they asked.
#32
Posted 23 December 2008 - 03:39 PM
#33
Guest_Corsi Combover_*
Posted 23 December 2008 - 03:41 PM
Source: http://www.nj.com/ya..._with_teix.htmlA person close to the negotiations, who declined to be identified because the deal was "still in a sensitive negotiating stage," said the Yankees were nearing agreement with free-agent first baseman Mark Teixeira.
The person said the deal was for eight or nine years at an average annual salary of about $22 million per year.
The deal would be a major coup for the Yankees, who were looking for a big bat to put in the middle of their lineup with Alex Rodriguez, mainly because the division rival Boston Red Sox had been considered the favorites to sign Teixeira.
But according to this person, the Yankees beat out Boston, Anaheim, Baltimore and Washington when they intensified their pursuit this morning and this afternoon.
#34
Posted 23 December 2008 - 03:41 PM
Absolutely. If the Sox matched that they would completely contradict their personnel policy of the past 5 years.It was the no trade clause.
#35
Posted 23 December 2008 - 03:42 PM
$30M for ARod
$25M for Teix
$23M for CC
$22M for Jeter
$18M for Burnett
$118M for 5 players (before you even count in the luxury taxes on top of that?).
Who cares that the economy is teetering on the edge of oblivion?
That's right. Who cares. It is not your or my money, let them spend. If fiscal responsibility is what determines who we are fans of, then we should grab a KC hat.
I never understood why people get worked up over payroll.
#36
Guest_Corsi Combover_*
Posted 23 December 2008 - 03:42 PM
Source: http://news.bostonhe...position=recentA high-ranking baseball source this afternoon said Mark Teixeira will not be coming to the Red Sox, and while his eventual destination is still officially unknown, the same source believes that the free agent first baseman will soon sign with the New York Yankees.
The Yankees became a factor only in the last day, but have apparently stepped into the void created when the Los Angeles Angels of Anaheim withdrew from the talks over the weekend, days after the Red Sox expressed their own doubt about their ability to match offers Teixeira had from other teams.
#37
Posted 23 December 2008 - 03:42 PM
How many times have we heard this over the last five years?Well, the Yankees have had a hell of an offseason here.
They are going to be incredibly formidable next year.
#38
Posted 23 December 2008 - 03:42 PM
#39
Posted 23 December 2008 - 03:43 PM
It'll be interesting to see what kind of market Boras stirs up for Manny now... or will the Yanks sign him, too for 3/70 or so?
#40
Guest_Corsi Combover_*
Posted 23 December 2008 - 03:44 PM
Source: http://www.nydailyne...r_deal_wit.htmlIt was then learned that Teixeira had favored the Yankees all along and according to sources he conveyed that to them this week.
#41
Posted 23 December 2008 - 03:44 PM
I have to assume they gave him the opt-out. In which case, whatever... that's not a good deal.
You keep telling yourself that. Opt out, no opt out, it's irrelevant. If he performs well and opts out, he gets a new deal. What does that have to do with him being in the middle of the order on Opening Day?
$30M for ARod
$25M for Teix
$23M for CC
$22M for Jeter
$18M for Burnett
$118M for 5 players (before you even count in the luxury taxes on top of that?).
Who cares that the economy is teetering on the edge of oblivion?
Yes, because the economy is down, people with money shouldn't buy things they can afford. Don't they know that regular folks need more jobs? Luckily the Red Sox are paying their players minimum wage and throwing in stock options.
Edited by Caspir, 23 December 2008 - 03:47 PM.
#42
Posted 23 December 2008 - 03:44 PM
I would not want to be Cashman right now, particularly since he'll only be remembered in baseball history as a GM who knew how to write checks.
#43
Posted 23 December 2008 - 03:45 PM
I get the feeling it comes down to this guy just not really wanting to be a Red Sox, unless the money was phenomenal, relative to the other offers on the table.
Distance from Severna Park, MD
NY - 178 miles
Boston - 366
I guess being closer to home was the deciding factor.
#44
Posted 23 December 2008 - 03:45 PM
Oh well... c'est la guerre...
It'll be interesting to see what kind of market Boras stirs up for Manny now... or will the Yanks sign him, too for 3/70 or so?
Who else has the money to do it unless the Mets step up?
Heyman is reporting that the deal is 8 years for 180 million. That's more than the Sox offered from all reports.
Edited by Remagellan, 23 December 2008 - 03:46 PM.
#45
Posted 23 December 2008 - 03:45 PM
#46
Posted 23 December 2008 - 03:46 PM
Who else has the money to do it unless the Mets step up?
Manny will be the Nats' consolation prize
#47
Posted 23 December 2008 - 03:46 PM
How many times have we heard this over the last five years?
This is going to be the prevailing argument, but signing CC, Burnett, and Teixeira easily makes the Yankees the favorites in the division. IMO, it really is not all that close. The Yankees knew their offense needed a jolt with aging and ineffective players mixed in with A Rod, and they went the extra mile. Sox will likely compete for a playoff spot, but the Yankees just catapulted from mediocre to formidable.
Sox will likely overpay for Holliday, who is really the only true impact FA on the horizon next year.
#48
Posted 23 December 2008 - 03:47 PM
#49
Posted 23 December 2008 - 03:48 PM
There will be calls for salary caps now. They will be ignored.This is getting ridiculous. By now everyone is used to the huge advantage they have, but to sign the three biggest FAs in one offseason is insane. There needs to be at least some semblance of balance.
#50
Posted 23 December 2008 - 03:48 PM
How many times have we heard this over the last five years?
The difference this time is that the Yanks have just signed three impact players in their primes. In previous extravagant deals and trades they picked up aging or over the hill stars with big names and uncertain futures.
The same cannot be said for this offseason. Cashman absolutely took Theo to town.
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users




This topic is locked






