Yo! You're not logged in. Why am I seeing this ad?
Week - Pats at Colts: Rivalry Renewed
#1
Posted 30 October 2008 - 11:08 AM
#2
Posted 30 October 2008 - 12:49 PM
First, they are by far the more desperate of the two teams. Second, they have a significant HFA. Combine those two, and that's usually decisive in this League.
In addition:
Colts are getting their OL together again, with Saturday and Ugoh back. They ran the ball effectively against the Titans for much of Monday night's game -- surprisingly effectively IMO. Manning seemed to be just missing with his receivers -- straight back foul ball missing.
Their run D certainly contained the Titan's running game for most part, albeit with everybody and his brother in the box. If you add Sanders, who is coming back, the noise in that place, and this being Cassell's first time there, it's a recipe for trouble -- oh yeah, and the Pats are thin at RB.
It will very interesting to see how our younger defensive players and Cassell cope. I can accept easily a close loss in which they play well and the Pats put some points on the board. But if they soil themselves a la San Diego, then we'll likely know who they are, at least for now -- a middle-of-the-pack team that can get into the postseaon but probably do very little once there.
Edited by dcmissle, 30 October 2008 - 12:49 PM.
#3
Posted 30 October 2008 - 02:00 PM
Their run D certainly contained the Titan's running game for most part, albeit with everybody and his brother in the box. If you add Sanders, who is coming back, the noise in that place, and this being Cassell's first time there, it's a recipe for trouble -- oh yeah, and the Pats are thin at RB.
Why does Fragile Bob always seem to get healthy just in time for the Patriots game every season?
http://www.nfl.com/p...amp;season=2006
In 2006 he misses from week 3 through week 8, plays against the Pats in week 9, and then only plays again once between weeks 10-17.
That bastard.
Not sure about the HFA at "The Lube" yet, they've only won once there this season.
Edited by Nator, 30 October 2008 - 02:01 PM.
#4
Posted 30 October 2008 - 02:40 PM
Edited by bsartist618, 30 October 2008 - 02:41 PM.
#5
Posted 30 October 2008 - 06:16 PM
I understand the Pats have had a relatively easy schedule thus far and have not played at an elite level. I also understand that there has been a backlash against BB, what with 3-4 years of unmitigated ball-washing - I get it and it's to be expected, given his persona and level of success. Both of those things granted, his team is 5-2 with Matt Cassel at quarterback - the past few weeks they've looked a lot more energetic than I'm used to. The first month or so the team looked to be in some sort of malaise (Super Bowl hangover or?), but they've looked like a different team.
Does this mean they are good enough to advance deep into the playoffs or contend for the Super Bowl? No. But, then again, there are no great teams that will preclude that from happening. The NFL is wide open. I'm encouraged.
Edited by Mystic Merlin, 30 October 2008 - 06:27 PM.
#6
Posted 31 October 2008 - 08:19 AM
It is entirely possible that the best QB Sunday Night is Matt Cassel. I love the NFL!
What's the status of the Pats RBs? Any chance Jordan returns?
#7
Posted 31 October 2008 - 09:22 AM
I am very excited to see these two old heavyweights slug it out. Hopefully, Wilfork bites off Peyton's ear.
It is entirely possible that the best QB Sunday Night is Matt Cassel. I love the NFL!
What's the status of the Pats RBs? Any chance Jordan returns?
I heard a radio blurb from John Clayton that LaMont is practicing and should play.
#8
Posted 31 October 2008 - 12:00 PM
Two cents on the game Sunday: I'm deathly afraid of a strip sack or two from Mathis and/or Freeney. Cassel's pocket presence has improved but not enough to keep me from being really nervous. If Cassel turns the ball over one or fewer times then the Patriots have a really good chance of winning this game. I live in Indy and everyone I know that's been to the new stadium has said it isn't nearly as loud as the dome. It's supposed to be a beautiful day/night here on Sunday but I would bet they'll still keep the Luke closed.
#9
Posted 01 November 2008 - 02:51 PM
Also, if the Colts try to stop the run by lining up in a 4-4 like they did on MNF, they are fucked. The Patriots will destroy them.
Things are looking very bad for the horseshoes.
The Patriots will destroy them.
#10
Posted 01 November 2008 - 10:18 PM
I heard a radio blurb from John Clayton that LaMont is practicing and should play.
Channel 7 says Jordan is out.
#11
Posted 01 November 2008 - 11:12 PM
http://www.boston.co...jordan_a_1.htmlThe complete list of downgraded players who will not play is:
# RB LaMont Jordan
# RB Sammy Morris
# CB Lewis Sanders
# S Matthew Slater
# OLB Shawn Crable
#12
Posted 02 November 2008 - 09:47 AM
New stadium is very nice, and huge in comparison to RCA Dome. Lucas Oil has a retractable roof, as well as as a giant bay window above the North end zone that opens and closes. Indy had a couple of "soft openings" in August for the stadium to test out a couple of different configurations. My son was fortunate enough to play his opening HS football game of the year at the stadium for one of the stadium's first public events. Roof and window were closed. Granted, it was August and very hot, but the trend has been for the night games to have a closed roof, irrespective of temperature.
The Colts have been changing the configurations to examine different weather scenarios. Open roof/open window, closed roof/open window, open roof/closed window, and closed roof/closed window all create different air/wind currents. When either the window or roof (or both) are open, the wind swirls through in different ways, so Vinatieri and Smith have been taking notes and making adjustments. As Ghost said in an article earlier in the week, it only takes an hour or so for the visiting kickers to assess the conditions so it shouldn't represent an advantage for the Colts, but it is an interesting idiosyncracy of the new stadium nonetheless.
I also took some clients to the Colts-Ravens game a couple of weeks ago, which was a 1:00 start. Open roof/open window. The sun coming through the roof and South (non-opening) end zone window is a reall problem for the team defending the North side of the field in the first half. As the game progresses, the sun sweeps across the stadium at an angle and by mid-way through the 3rd quarter is no longer a factor. Later in the season, as the sun moves lower in the horizon, any "glare" problems are likely to exist only for the first quarter of the 1:00 games or so. The 4:00 starts I wouldn't imagine would be too much of an issue.
As for noise, the RCA Dome felt small, with the roof sitting right on top of you. Thus the sound seemed like it was capped and "bounced" back down towards the stands, creating a really loud venue. Lucas Oil is so big that the noise tends to go across and up much more than RCA, although my son did say that it was VERY hard to hear coaches and fellow players down at field level due to noise.
Aesthetically, the only drawback for new stadium is that the aisles in the seating areas are very tight (not too dissimilar from old Schaefer/Sullivan) which surprised me given the opportunity to create a bigger venue in comparison to RCA. Rest of the facility is really nice.
Hope those going to the game have a good experience! I haven't read anything in particular, but I would anticipate a closed roof even though its going to be relatively mild here today (temps in low '70's).
#13
Posted 02 November 2008 - 10:12 AM
Win today.
#14
Posted 02 November 2008 - 12:38 PM
Win. <--Period
#15
Posted 02 November 2008 - 01:03 PM
#16
Posted 02 November 2008 - 03:36 PM
#17
Posted 02 November 2008 - 03:54 PM
#18
Posted 02 November 2008 - 04:08 PM
#19
Posted 02 November 2008 - 04:13 PM
#20
Posted 02 November 2008 - 05:37 PM
#21
Posted 02 November 2008 - 05:41 PM
Either way, win it.
#22
Posted 02 November 2008 - 06:56 PM
I say, BRING THE HEAT.
#23
Posted 02 November 2008 - 07:00 PM
Wayne will play.
Hayden, Keiaho (LB) out. Ratliff and Jennings the starting corners.
#24
Posted 02 November 2008 - 07:01 PM
I say, BRING THE HEAT.
I vote for that too, because even if it's not a good strategic plan*, it would make me feel better to see Peyton knocked down about 20 times.
*This is not a criticism -- I don't know enough about football to make that judgment one way or the other.
#25
Posted 02 November 2008 - 07:02 PM
I think th ekey matchup here will be Mathis vs. Kaczur/Levoir.
#26
Posted 02 November 2008 - 07:05 PM
#27
Posted 02 November 2008 - 07:17 PM
# LB Eric Alexander
# OL Wesley Britt
# Matt Gutierrez -- third quarterback
# RB LaMont Jordan
# RB Sammy Morris
# CB Lewis Sanders
# OLB Shawn Crable
# KR/WR/S Matthew Slater
Inactive players for the Colts:
# DB Dante Hughes
# DB Kelvin Hayden
# RB Clifton Dawson
# C Steve Justice
# LB Freddy Keiaho
# WR Roy Hall
# TE Tom Santi
# DT Daniel Muir
The Colts added DB Keiwan Ratliff to their roster.
http://www.boston.co...s/reiss_pieces/
#28
Posted 02 November 2008 - 08:04 PM
Oh well. If they win this, I'll feel like the Pats stole a win. Maybe they'll make my day.
#29
Posted 02 November 2008 - 08:07 PM
#30
Guest_Corsi Combover_*
Posted 02 November 2008 - 08:12 PM
#31
Posted 02 November 2008 - 08:13 PM
#32
Posted 02 November 2008 - 08:14 PM
#33
Posted 02 November 2008 - 08:14 PM
#34
Posted 02 November 2008 - 08:15 PM
I agree with those who feel special teams will play a role in the outcome... we need to continue getting productive punt and kickoff returns.
Has any Pro Bowl player been more invisible The Year After than Vrabel? I don't think his name has been called more than 3-4 times all season. Please feel free to have an impact on the game tonight.
#35
Posted 02 November 2008 - 08:17 PM
#36
Posted 02 November 2008 - 08:17 PM
I don't have a good feeling about this one, but that's partly due to the (non-Brady) health issues. I wish the Pats could have faced the Colts with at least one of Sammy Morris and Lamont Jordan healthy.
Oh well. If they win this, I'll feel like the Pats stole a win. Maybe they'll make my day.
Stole a win? Indy isn't in that great shape. They could certainly win this game (being at home and, yeah, this is the NFL), but the Pats are not overmatched by any means.
#37
Posted 02 November 2008 - 08:17 PM
#38
Posted 02 November 2008 - 08:18 PM
I thought the game was supposed to start at 8:15pm EST. It is 9:30 EST. (Daylight savings doesn't start until tonight, right?) What is the deal?
It started this MORNING. Hope you didn't have any client meetings.
Edited by Ed Hillel, 02 November 2008 - 08:18 PM.
#39
Posted 02 November 2008 - 08:18 PM
#40
Posted 02 November 2008 - 08:19 PM
That's hilarious.
![]()
It started this MORNING. Hope you didn't have any client meetings.
I'm gonna do a Kramer and not change - just show up an hour early everywhere.
#41
Posted 02 November 2008 - 08:21 PM
Actually, it ENDED this morning.
![]()
It started this MORNING. Hope you didn't have any client meetings.
#42
Posted 02 November 2008 - 08:21 PM
#43
Posted 02 November 2008 - 08:22 PM
Also, if the secondary would reconsider its strategy of allowing completions on all throws over 20 yards? Those count, too, guys!
And, yeah, Scout, Adalius needs to kill Peyton.
A win and they're alone in first in the East. How cool would that be, sans Brady?
#44
Posted 02 November 2008 - 08:23 PM
#45
Posted 02 November 2008 - 08:24 PM
#46
Posted 02 November 2008 - 08:25 PM
#47
Posted 02 November 2008 - 08:25 PM
#48
Posted 02 November 2008 - 08:26 PM
Fuck you D.O.
Edited by SoxScout, 02 November 2008 - 08:26 PM.
#49
Posted 02 November 2008 - 08:26 PM
#50
Posted 02 November 2008 - 08:26 PM











