US and Japan are going into extra innings. Japan was just a hit away from winning in the bottom of the 7th and 8th.
Edited by dderemer, 20 August 2008 - 08:39 AM.
Yo! You're not logged in. Why am I seeing this ad?
Posted 19 August 2008 - 10:29 PM
Edited by dderemer, 20 August 2008 - 08:39 AM.
Posted 19 August 2008 - 11:01 PM
Posted 20 August 2008 - 03:18 AM
Posted 20 August 2008 - 04:48 AM
Posted 20 August 2008 - 06:51 AM
It's not uncommon in softball for one pitcher to pitch all the games. And Ueno is one of the top four pitchers in the sport. Of course, the other three are the three American pitchers.....So, Ueno throws 147 pitches against the US in Japan's extra innings loss, and she then starts vs. the Aussies about 5 hours later. WTF.
Japan is down 1-0 heading to the bottom of the 3rd. Ueno hit an Aussie chick in the head with a pitch, as she's taking her base Ueno just keeps continuously bowing to her. Aussie girl clearly had no idea what to make of the situation. Since she's fine, it was all pretty amusing. Still have no idea why Ueno is pitching again though.
Posted 20 August 2008 - 08:28 AM
I'm pretty sure this system is unique to softball. I don't know anyone else who has it. It's somewhat misleading to label the games as semifinals.Question: so, 4 teams advanced from the prelims: USA, Japan, Australia, Canada. In "semi-final match 1", the Aussies beat Canada, so Canada is out. In "semi-final match 2", US beat Japan, so Japan...goes on to play the Aussies to see who gets to go to the gold medal game? This isn't how it works for anything else is it? Why don't Japan & Canada play for the bronze, with USA vs Oz for the gold? Does it have something to with records coming in?
Edited by dderemer, 20 August 2008 - 08:29 AM.
Posted 20 August 2008 - 08:40 AM
Posted 21 August 2008 - 12:41 AM
Posted 21 August 2008 - 12:51 AM
Posted 21 August 2008 - 12:54 AM
Posted 21 August 2008 - 07:11 AM
Posted 21 August 2008 - 07:20 AM
Posted 21 August 2008 - 07:23 AM
Posted 21 August 2008 - 07:24 AM
Posted 21 August 2008 - 07:29 AM
Posted 21 August 2008 - 07:32 AM
Why are you bunting with a 2-0 count on your #3 hitter?
Posted 21 August 2008 - 07:40 AM
Posted 21 August 2008 - 07:46 AM
Posted 21 August 2008 - 07:50 AM
Posted 21 August 2008 - 07:54 AM
Posted 21 August 2008 - 08:17 AM
Posted 21 August 2008 - 08:20 AM
That Japanese pitcher threw somewhere around 450 pitches the last two days
I would suspect she won't be able to move her arm for a month.
Posted 21 August 2008 - 08:28 AM
No doubt the USA is the best team in the world, but when it all comes down to one game you never know.....While it was surprising that the Americans did not win the gold, it was not surprising to softball fans that Japan beat them in an all-or-nothing game. Ueno helped beat the United States four times in international tournaments the past four years, the biggest reason why the Americans were a modest 14-6 against Japan since 2004. She held the Americans scoreless through eight innings in the semifinals before allowing four runs in the pivotal ninth inning.
Posted 21 August 2008 - 08:29 AM
Posted 21 August 2008 - 08:59 AM
This reminds me of...That Japanese pitcher threw somewhere around 450 pitches the last two days
I would suspect she won't be able to move her arm for a month.
Posted 21 August 2008 - 12:06 PM
It's OK, She won't need it until 2016 at the earliest.That Japanese pitcher threw somewhere around 450 pitches the last two days
I would suspect she won't be able to move her arm for a month.
Posted 21 August 2008 - 12:09 PM
Posted 21 August 2008 - 12:32 PM
Softball does have World Championships, and they also started an event they called the World Cup with fewer teams so better games all around (none of this US vs. Netherlands crap). So these events already exist. I'd imagine they would increase in importance over the next 8+ years. Hopefully someone like ESPN will televise them, as I imagine they would.At least baseball has the WBC. Maybe MLB/IBF/Whoever the softball IF is ought to help out the ladies here and create World Softball Classic to run a little before, a little after or somehow else affiliated with the WBC. Alternatively, maybe someone could answer the question, "Why do we even have softball? Can't women just play baseball?".
It's an interesting question as to why women's softball vs. men's baseball evolved this way, yet ringette never displaced women's hockey. Part of it is probably that ringette never got out of Canada I guess, while softball and baseball were both invented in America? Some women's hockey players for Canada definitely started playing ringette in the past, then switch to ice hockey, though that's probably less common now that women's ice hockey is an established Olympic and NCAA sport (and NCAA relies heavily on Canadian players).In my opinion, softball is like ringette - an adapted version of a men's game developed in a day when it was believed that women couldn't/shouldn't play the men's version. Ringette, by the way, is a mainly Canadian game played on ice - with a donut style ring instead of a puck, and a straight stick with which you control the ring, basically watered down hockey invented for girls back before women just started playing ice hockey. It sounds pretty lame, and in fact it is - especially now that any girl or woman who is at all athletic is playing ice hockey.
Posted 21 August 2008 - 12:43 PM
I presume it's a timing issue - baseball, and its "ladies version", are just older - and softball had time to really get established before the day came when people realized, "waitaminute, women CAN do the same stuff as men". Ringette, on the other hand, was just newer, and easier to replace. If ringette was slightly more established when NCAA had to create women's hockey teams, I wonder if NCAA would have used that sport instead of ice hockey to satisfy Title IX requirements?It's an interesting question as to why women's softball vs. men's baseball evolved this way, yet ringette never displaced women's hockey. Part of it is probably that ringette never got out of Canada I guess, while softball and baseball were both invented in America? Some women's hockey players for Canada definitely started playing ringette in the past, then switch to ice hockey, though that's probably less common now that women's ice hockey is an established Olympic and NCAA sport (and NCAA relies heavily on Canadian players).
But there's too much infrastructure in place for softball now at the youth, high school, and college levels in the US (and probably worldwide, I don't know what it's like in Aussie/Japan) that I see no way that women's baseball is going to displace women's softball.
Edited by Fred not Lynn, 21 August 2008 - 12:46 PM.
Posted 21 August 2008 - 07:42 PM
You do know there's Men's Fastpitch Softball?In my opinion, softball is like ringette - an adapted version of a men's game developed in a day when it was believed that women couldn't/shouldn't play the men's version.
Edited by FelixMantilla, 21 August 2008 - 07:43 PM.
Posted 24 August 2008 - 12:21 PM
Posted 24 August 2008 - 12:26 PM
Posted 24 August 2008 - 12:30 PM
I liked how one of the reasons softball was removed from the games was because it was bad for one country to win all the medals.
So that means diving is next to go, right? Then long distance running I suppose. And the Russians seem to win synchro swimming every year, should probably look at that too.
The second best thing was baseball being removed because of steroids in MLB. Good thing we took all those swimming events out in the 70s. And the cycling better go too, those damn tour de francers are always getting busted. Should probably take out track and field as well just to be sure.