EDIT: Now Dale says 3 prospects.
Edited by AlNipper49, 31 July 2008 - 04:48 PM.
title
Yo! You're not logged in. Why am I seeing this ad?
Posted 30 July 2008 - 08:57 PM
Edited by AlNipper49, 31 July 2008 - 04:48 PM.
title
Posted 30 July 2008 - 08:57 PM
WEEI?
Will Carroll of Baseball Prospectus says the Red Sox, Pirates and Marlins have agreed to a three-team Manny Ramirez deal, pending Ramirez waiving his no-trade clause and league approval.Edited by cheekydave, 30 July 2008 - 08:58 PM.
Posted 30 July 2008 - 08:57 PM
Edited by 4-6-3, 30 July 2008 - 08:58 PM.
Posted 30 July 2008 - 08:58 PM
Edited by Deathofthebambino, 30 July 2008 - 08:59 PM.
Posted 30 July 2008 - 08:58 PM
http://www.baseballp...filtered/?p=967We Have A Deal But …
by Will Carroll
The Commissioner’s Office has been informed of a deal involving the Pirates, Red Sox, and Marlins. The Commissioner has to sign off on any deal involving cash considerations of more than a million dollars and there was clearly going to be cash involved in any deal. There’s also some formality about Manny Ramirez waiving his 10-5 rights and no trade clause and I’ll admit not understanding the technicalities.
So here’s what Pee Wee Herman would call the “big but.” The teams, I am told, have not agreed on the specific prospects to be included in the deal. It’s expected that in addition to the principals, the Red Sox would get John Grabow and give up two prospects while the Marlins would get one prospect and give up two. There’s still a lot of haggling but my scribbling notes make it look like the structure of the deal is:
Marlins get Manny Ramirez, one prospect (BOS), and cash (likely Ramirez’s remaining salary)
Pirates get Jeremy Hermida and three prospects (two FLO, one BOS)
Red Sox get Jason Bay and John Grabow
There is still potential for this to fall apart over the prospects, though things appear closer now than ever before.
Edited by SoxScout, 30 July 2008 - 09:08 PM.
Posted 30 July 2008 - 08:58 PM
Posted 30 July 2008 - 09:01 PM
Posted 30 July 2008 - 09:03 PM
Posted 30 July 2008 - 09:04 PM
Posted 30 July 2008 - 09:04 PM
Posted 30 July 2008 - 09:05 PM
Posted 30 July 2008 - 09:05 PM
Edited by Pumpsie, 30 July 2008 - 09:07 PM.
Posted 30 July 2008 - 09:08 PM
So it won't be approved until tomorrow morning correct?
Posted 30 July 2008 - 09:08 PM
Posted 30 July 2008 - 09:08 PM
"Three prospects" scares me unless Julio Lugo is considered a prospect.
Posted 30 July 2008 - 09:09 PM
You forgot this part - Jason Bay had a 93 OPS+ last season.I am not happy if this is the deal. We are going to be in the same spot next year with a 30+ year old slugger looking for a monster contract. Give me Hermida.
Posted 30 July 2008 - 09:10 PM
I am not happy if this is the deal. We are going to be in the same spot next year with a 30+ year old slugger looking for a monster contract.
Posted 30 July 2008 - 09:11 PM
Posted 30 July 2008 - 09:13 PM
You forgot this part - Jason Bay had a 93 OPS+ last season.
Posted 30 July 2008 - 09:13 PM
You forgot this part - Jason Bay had a 93 OPS+ last season.
Posted 30 July 2008 - 09:14 PM
here are Grabow's stats
http://sports.espn.g...e?playerId=5864
seems like a marginal middle reliever. I am not digging this trade. Hermida excites me more than Bay
Posted 30 July 2008 - 09:15 PM
Posted 30 July 2008 - 09:17 PM
I'd much rather have Hermida as well, and I'm guessing that the prospects coming from Florida are more interesting than Grabow.
Posted 30 July 2008 - 09:17 PM
Posted 30 July 2008 - 09:17 PM
The Manny Ramirez trade conversations are expected to continue into Thursday, according to a source. Because it's a very complicated deal, involving a player who has the right to veto the trade and other parts, it is still unlikely to happen. But the negotiations will go on.
Posted 30 July 2008 - 09:17 PM
Posted 30 July 2008 - 09:20 PM
I am not happy if this is the deal. We are going to be in the same spot next year with a 30+ year old slugger looking for a monster contract. Give me Hermida.
Posted 30 July 2008 - 09:21 PM
Posted 30 July 2008 - 09:21 PM
Yeah, I don't get why the Sox would be this desperate to get rid of Manny. Manny and his salary for Bay makes sense, Manny his salary and prosepects (unless they are Single A prospects) boggles my mind.Let me get this straight. The Red Sox are giving up the best player in this trade, a large ton of money, and two/three prospects and they are getting an outfielder in return who has only managed .250/.312/.450/.762 in 267 PAs in interleague play plus a pitcher who has a 9.00 ERA in 30 games of interleague play.
No thanks.
Posted 30 July 2008 - 09:21 PM
Source: http://www.baseballp...filtered/?p=967So here’s what Pee Wee Herman would call the “big but.” The teams, I am told, have not agreed on the specific prospects to be included in the deal. It’s expected that in addition to the principals, the Red Sox would get John Grabow and give up two prospects while the Marlins would get one prospect and give up two.
Posted 30 July 2008 - 09:22 PM
Posted 30 July 2008 - 09:23 PM
So basically we are eating about 7M and giving up two prospects in order to get Grabow and an extra season of Bay at a very affordable 7.5M price.
Posted 30 July 2008 - 09:25 PM
Posted 30 July 2008 - 09:25 PM
Posted 30 July 2008 - 09:25 PM
Why does everyone keep forgetting about the two compensation picks the Sox will be giving up in next year's draft when doing these types of net summaries?
Posted 30 July 2008 - 09:26 PM
Posted 30 July 2008 - 09:27 PM
I think it's a little unfair to judge him over 267 PAs over 5 years. This is a small sample size under strange circumstances.Let me get this straight. The Red Sox are giving up the best player in this trade, a large ton of money, and two/three prospects and they are getting an outfielder in return who has only managed .250/.312/.450/.762 in 267 PAs in interleague play plus a pitcher who has a 9.00 ERA in 30 games of interleague play.
No thanks.
Posted 30 July 2008 - 09:27 PM
Do you get compensation picks after you decline an option?Why does everyone keep forgetting about the two compensation picks the Sox will be giving up in next year's draft when doing these types of net summaries?
Posted 30 July 2008 - 09:28 PM
Posted 30 July 2008 - 09:28 PM
You can decline an option and then offer arbitration.Do you get compensation picks after you decline an option?
Posted 30 July 2008 - 09:28 PM
Posted 30 July 2008 - 09:28 PM
Theo is horrible at midseason trades. Especially when he decides it's time to put the pressure on. Boston loses this one. And I am not opposed to the idea of trading Manny at all. Everyone is available. But this one, as presented, is distasteful.
Posted 30 July 2008 - 09:28 PM
Because they will get the same two picks for Bay a year later.
Posted 30 July 2008 - 09:29 PM
Posted 30 July 2008 - 09:29 PM
Bay is a free agent after next year, good luck getting him to sign "for a few years". He is probably goign to want 5/80 or so for his age 31-36 seasons. That sucks.Bay is better than Hermida today, and may be better than him for the next few years.
Posted 30 July 2008 - 09:29 PM
Yeah, that trade in '04 sure sucked.Theo is horrible at midseason trades. Especially when he decides it's time to put the pressure on. Boston loses this one. And I am not opposed to the idea of trading Manny at all. Everyone is available. But this one, as presented, is distasteful.
Posted 30 July 2008 - 09:29 PM
Posted 30 July 2008 - 09:30 PM
Because they will get the same two picks for Bay a year later.
Posted 30 July 2008 - 09:30 PM
Posted 30 July 2008 - 09:31 PM
When he throws strikes and attacks the hitter, Grabow, can look as good as any left-handed reliever in the game. At other times, he fails to locate his pitches and begins to nibble. Grabow pitched last season with bone chips in his elbow, but was able to gut it out after spending most of April on the DL. He decided against having surgery over the winter so the condition of his elbow will bear watching in spring training.
Edited by Rough Carrigan, 30 July 2008 - 09:36 PM.
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users