Yo! You're not logged in. Why am I seeing this ad?
The Big Show
#3
Posted 03 July 2008 - 05:43 PM
-- Big O uneven. Good with most guests, but exercises almost no control over the football guys, which hurts the performance of those guys.
-- A lot of football knowledge resides in Smerlas and DeOssie but is overshawdowed by their big timing callers and general thug behavior (servicing their demographic?).
-- Blatant Patriots' fanboyism so widely known, it's harmless cause few take them seriously. But it's goddamn irritating when they then turn their attention to other franchises in town and nitpick those teams to death. As they consistently did with the RS, for example, before October of last year.
-- Need to clean the stable of some weak guests.
#4
Posted 03 July 2008 - 06:10 PM
-- Need to clean the stable of some weak guests.
"The Big Show" sinks or swims depending on who the co-hosts are.
Too often, Burt, LJ, and Burton are in the co-host chair, bringing the quality of the show waaaaaaaaaay down.
The addition of Merloni has seemed to lessen Bill Burt's, and Steve Burton's role, however. Too bad that LJ still sees his weekly action.
Edited by Phenom, 03 July 2008 - 06:11 PM.
#5
Posted 03 July 2008 - 06:51 PM
For example, Shepperd or Burton could say something like, "You know Paul Pierce is quite a scorer. I haven't seen a stroke like that since Dino Radja." Ordway will take that and twist it, turn and completely make it unrecognizable into something like "Dino Radja is the greatest Celtic I've ever seen." This happens with knobs like Smerlas, Johnson, Burton, Stearns and occasionally Burt. Then those guys get confused, flustered and all fucked up over what they said and Ordway has wasted an hour beating a topic to death that no one really said. Then the callers get riled up and start screaming and there's another two hours wasted. Next thing you know, it's the Whiner Line and you've lost countless brain cells.
Most of the time, the baseball guys and DeOssie don't get tripped up by that sort of shit or they're articulate enough to tell Ordway to calm down and explain what was meant. And Ordway is too much of a jock sniffer to try it on Maxwell, Merloni or Daubach.
The bottom line is when Ordway isn't trying to mind fuck his buddies, the show isn't too bad. But when the Big O is bored or is in over his head, watch out.
Edited by John Marzano Olympic Hero, 03 July 2008 - 06:53 PM.
#6
Posted 03 July 2008 - 10:34 PM
Glen Ordway is usually a very good host, however he has one fatal flaw that (depending on his guest) can completely send his show flying off the tracks. Over the course of four hours, one of the guest hosts will say something that they don't mean as either a throw away line or just a brain fart. Ordway will jump all over this and ride it into the ground.
For example, Shepperd or Burton could say something like, "You know Paul Pierce is quite a scorer. I haven't seen a stroke like that since Dino Radja." Ordway will take that and twist it, turn and completely make it unrecognizable into something like "Dino Radja is the greatest Celtic I've ever seen." This happens with knobs like Smerlas, Johnson, Burton, Stearns and occasionally Burt. Then those guys get confused, flustered and all fucked up over what they said and Ordway has wasted an hour beating a topic to death that no one really said. Then the callers get riled up and start screaming and there's another two hours wasted. Next thing you know, it's the Whiner Line and you've lost countless brain cells.
Most of the time, the baseball guys and DeOssie don't get tripped up by that sort of shit or they're articulate enough to tell Ordway to calm down and explain what was meant. And Ordway is too much of a jock sniffer to try it on Maxwell, Merloni or Daubach.
The bottom line is when Ordway isn't trying to mind fuck his buddies, the show isn't too bad. But when the Big O is bored or is in over his head, watch out.
Great post and its the biggest reason I can't listen to EEI. I used to be a big fan of the station. But then someone turned me on to Mike and the Mad Dog, and realized how awful this shit is. Your damn right Ordway is talented.......but for some reason I cannot comprehend, he won't do a straight up show. Maybe its because he's insecure, and thinks he needs shit like you described to make it interesting, but whatever the reason, he almost always goes away from his "legit" ways to schitick. Someone is giving him bad advice. Or maybe not, because the ratings are high. Either way, if some day this city is ever graced with a couple of talents like M&MD they would own this town. Dale and Holly try, but they are so vanilla, and are so afraid of being "controversial" I can't figure out for the life of me what they really feel about anything. Sports radio in this town fucking sucks and its a shame because the only reason it sucks is because the ratings are good for poor talent, which in a sports starved town is understandable. If there was a radio station with balls they would simulcast M&MD because there is a smart enough audience that would flock to them.
#7
Posted 04 July 2008 - 09:42 AM
Glen Ordway is usually a very good host, however he has one fatal flaw that (depending on his guest) can completely send his show flying off the tracks. Over the course of four hours, one of the guest hosts will say something that they don't mean as either a throw away line or just a brain fart. Ordway will jump all over this and ride it into the ground.
that's exactly right. last week they were attempting to talk about possible celtics off-season moves. sounds like a great topic for a show, except that someone (i think it was max?) mentioned ron artest. they then spent the entire show (and even a subsequent show, i think) discussing a player who is a) already under contract with another team b) would never fit in the celtics cap anyway and c) is certifably insane. so, a potentially great show was scuttled by a ridiculous sidebar. plus,they never even got around to analyzing the draft or discussing other possible moves. it's a show that can be really frustrating. it just reminds me why i grew up listening to M&MD instead of EEI....on the plus side, when the gang isn't being total fanboy suck-ups, they can work up some really good analysis. and merloni is fantastic.
#8
Posted 04 July 2008 - 12:55 PM
Generally speaking, I like all of the co-hosts except LJ and Smerlas. Sheppard is OK until he starts acting like he has more knowledge than the average fan. Then he becomes boorish.
The return of the man on the way up has added nothing.
#9
Posted 04 July 2008 - 10:47 PM
Do you ever listen to Felger on 890 AM? I see problems here and there but there's at least a sincere attempt to have a conversation like an adult.Great post and its the biggest reason I can't listen to EEI. I used to be a big fan of the station. But then someone turned me on to Mike and the Mad Dog, and realized how awful this shit is. Your damn right Ordway is talented.......but for some reason I cannot comprehend, he won't do a straight up show. Maybe its because he's insecure, and thinks he needs shit like you described to make it interesting, but whatever the reason, he almost always goes away from his "legit" ways to schitick. Someone is giving him bad advice. Or maybe not, because the ratings are high. Either way, if some day this city is ever graced with a couple of talents like M&MD they would own this town. Dale and Holly try, but they are so vanilla, and are so afraid of being "controversial" I can't figure out for the life of me what they really feel about anything. Sports radio in this town fucking sucks and its a shame because the only reason it sucks is because the ratings are good for poor talent, which in a sports starved town is understandable. If there was a radio station with balls they would simulcast M&MD because there is a smart enough audience that would flock to them.
#10
Posted 05 July 2008 - 01:00 AM
There is more money in it for the station not to do "straight up" drive time shows. Mornings bring asides of beating up Entwistle in the joint, afternoons dwell on Pete's verbal miscues and other foils for Ordway. It's all planned, and it gets numbers.he won't do a straight up show
I'd like to see a first-rate FM station with a decent signal go against them. But they have worked at tying up their markets which will discourage competition.
#12
Posted 05 July 2008 - 09:46 AM
That Dino Radja thing is a nice example. Sounds like the typical trap Gen would spring in an area where his cred is beyond reproach.Glen Ordway is usually a very good host, however he has one fatal flaw that (depending on his guest) can completely send his show flying off the tracks. Over the course of four hours, one of the guest hosts will say something that they don't mean as either a throw away line or just a brain fart. Ordway will jump all over this and ride it into the ground.
...
Most of the time, the baseball guys and DeOssie don't get tripped up by that sort of shit or they're articulate enough to tell Ordway to calm down and explain what was meant. And Ordway is too much of a jock sniffer to try it on Maxwell, Merloni or Daubach.
The bottom line is when Ordway isn't trying to mind fuck his buddies, the show isn't too bad. But when the Big O is bored or is in over his head, watch out.
Glen and the producers must have addressed this these "ride into the ground" shows appear less common now. Turn, comeback hour or so later.." wha..they're still on this!". Good luck understanding what the original point was through the noise. Glen's need to prove guest or co-host "wr...wr...wrong" last usually a segment now instead of 3 hours plus.
And whatever dumb retort Ordway's target made is archived for future bumps and opens. Perhaps the point of those long painful pissing matches in the past.
Build a clip library of media folks losing it while Glen chuckles in the background. It is "The Big Show with the Big O" so you know folks need to be reminded of that. Besides few get the better of him in a back and forth. His rep as slippery in confrontations is a "bit" itself. Tom Caron, though, appears to quite capable in taking on Glen.
It's better now I think. When Glen comes on with the "We gonna get right to it today..." comments after the cross over usually means we are despensing with the BS today and some timely news is in the making.
Smerlas is good at the football, love to listen his defensive breakdowns. But his value beyond comedy ends there.
DeOssie continues being the better of the two discussing different topics and mixing it up with Glen.
Buckley is a total victim of Big Show Mind F*ck.
Every show practically every show, has " Mr. I Love Stories" being defensive from his first comment on. It's always the same tone.
"Glen, you love to do this, no really you take something and twist it all around..." Blah, blah in a whiny tone.Everytime.
Jeesh, note to Steve Buckley you been on these shows for at least a decade you are either in on the act
or the dumbest sumbitch going. Argue better. Past week he spent 10 minutes defending himself for being late to Shepperd.
This during a period of mid-season meltdown by the Red Sox.
His act has grown stale. In this house he went from loving the "Quality Hang" to hoping, praying a sink hole opens up in Cambridge and swallows the Old Time Baseball Game whole. Leaving behind the donations raised and Lou Merloni. Utility Lou is good. Can't replace Mr ILS fast enough.
Max's comments on KG being better the Larry brought responses from Ordway, callers and folks on the street(according to Max). As they should, it's a classic sports argument opening a whole can of worms. Minimum jock sniffing going on in that case.
That station would need to have a better concept than being WEEI-Lite, It would have to draw stonger and fresher personalities to it than AM85. Probably from AM85. Radio Mogul Plan offer Glen an ownership stake to come into the new station and deal with the Boston Globe and NESN for talent. Money and the need to resuscitate/expand markets makes strange bedfellows.There is more money in it for the station not to do "straight up" drive time shows. Mornings bring asides of beating up Entwistle in the joint, afternoons dwell on Pete's verbal miscues and other foils for Ordway. It's all planned, and it gets numbers.
I'd like to see a first-rate FM station with a decent signal go against them. But they have worked at tying up their markets which will discourage competition.
One of the annoying things is the Herald slanted line up. Particularly during the Tomase Incident.
Edited by WalletTrack, 05 July 2008 - 09:47 AM.
#13
Posted 05 July 2008 - 09:46 AM
Glen plays to the level of his co-hosts; when he's working with Curran & Bradford (for example) he pushes the discussion along, keeps to the schedule and handles the wingnut callers. When he has no one to provide content, and he has to provide the discussion fodder, AND LJ, Burt, Burton, Buckley, Smerlas, or Stearns is involved, it quickly becomes irritating.
The reason that M&MD are so much more satisfying to listen to is that both can carry discussions in multiple sports AND can "manage" a show (schedule, callers, etc.) Ordway can do that, but he needs at least one and preferably two sport-specific "experts" to carry the discussion.
#14
Posted 08 July 2008 - 08:23 AM
#15
Posted 08 July 2008 - 08:37 AM
To their credit, these guys (Ordway, Tony Massarotti, Brian Daubach) were more sensible than I ever would have thought when discussing the Barry Bonds "news". They were all in favor of the possibility of bringing him aboard, and were fending of the army of tard callers who were using words like "disgrace" and what not.
The sensible standpoint is to disregard character for a few wins?
Good to know.
#16
Posted 08 July 2008 - 11:25 AM
I should have been more clear...when I say "sensible" I mean from the point of view of a fan of the Boston Red Sox, i.e. someone who wants to see them win games. Yes, adding someone who you think would win you more games would be sensible in that scenario.The sensible standpoint is to disregard character for a few wins?
#19
Posted 10 July 2008 - 09:24 PM
I really wanted Felger to succeed. But his show has gotten progressively worse. The last thing Felger is, is an adult. The scatalogical humor and egocentric fixation on "Mike" has become so grating I move on within seconds. Even back to the Big Show, even when LJ and Bill Burt are the co-hosts. And, Rocco, don't kid yourself. A sober show like Mike and the Mad Dog would never succeed against Ordway. He knows his audience.
What bothers me most about Ordway is the fact that his ratings have permitted him to become incredibly lazy. They rarely have interesting guest interviews other than Ainge and Belichick, just hours of the Gong Show with Pete and the co-host du jour. Any drive-time show that employs the likes of Burt is too fat and contented to produce anything of value.
Edited by Dalton Jones, 10 July 2008 - 09:24 PM.
#20
Posted 10 July 2008 - 10:14 PM
Oh yah? Well, just wait until you here the line up tomorrow.
This is what I don't understand. What's a guy like Mike Mutnansky doing tomorrow afternoon? I'm sure two of McAdam, Bradford, Buckley (better than Burt), Tom Caron, etc are available, considering they're at Fenway tomorrow night anyway.
The only viable conclusion is that Ordway insists to have LJ and Burt fill-in for him, so that he doesn't get shown up. Which is really immature, because Glenn can be quite good, when he's surrounded by good co-hosts.
Edited by Phenom, 10 July 2008 - 10:15 PM.
#21
Posted 11 July 2008 - 01:24 AM
This is what I don't understand. What's a guy like Mike Mutnansky doing tomorrow afternoon? I'm sure two of McAdam, Bradford, Buckley (better than Burt), Tom Caron, etc are available, considering they're at Fenway tomorrow night anyway.
The problem for Caron I think, though I'm not sure, is he has to do show prep for his NESN gig on game days and that inhibits his ability to be on the Big Show. Too bad, too.
Tomorrow's show will suck severely. I won't listen to a word of it.
#22
Posted 11 July 2008 - 01:39 AM
#29
Posted 17 July 2008 - 02:19 PM
He's not really mentioning how they had a lights out bullpen, 3 or 4 good starters, a HoF SS in his prime, excellent CF, C, ect...
#30
Posted 18 July 2008 - 02:57 PM
Are you kiddin me Brian Daubach? Is the stupidity of the Big O and Pete the Meat rubbing off on you?
Edit: sorry, it is Brian Daubach
Edited by RedOctober3829, 18 July 2008 - 03:02 PM.
#32
Posted 24 July 2008 - 05:45 PM
After the Mike Adams lock-in stunt, I don't believe anything from them anymore, but if they are giving me the false hope that I won't hear Fred anymore, damn them all to hell.
Edit: Forgot a couple words. Smerlas sucks.
Edited by The Four Peters, 24 July 2008 - 08:04 PM.
#35
Posted 25 July 2008 - 04:11 PM
Are you basing this on today's show? If so, I'm really curious to hear why you think that? What's his agenda today? Intelligent baseball discussion? Don't get me wrong, he has plenty of faults, but none of them have been evident during this show.I really hate Tony Mazz. He sounds like he has an agenda every single time he's on the show. One of the worst personalities in the Boston Media IMO.
I am really enjoying today's Big Show. Pete is sitting back and letting Mazz and Lou basically shoot down a lot of the moron callers. Everyone is levelheaded, making reasonable points, and Merloni is bringing up points from his experience. Hell, he even dissected the Labor Day game from 2003 when Grady didn't pitch hit for him with Manny. I've enjoyed today way more than I would have if it was the Big O and two crappy guests.
One last point, Mazz is noticeably better when Ordway is not on because they don't get into the pissing contest of whose agenda is bigger. He sticks more to the discussion and not the self-righteous media self-analyzation.
Edited by The Four Peters, 25 July 2008 - 04:11 PM.
#36
Posted 25 July 2008 - 04:21 PM
#37
Posted 25 July 2008 - 04:30 PM
No, I'm basing it on the fact that I sift through a lot of crap on WEEI, and other than D&C's political crusade he's really the only person that can get me to just turn it off. It's not a one time thing, it's for the past few years.Are you basing this on today's show? If so, I'm really curious to hear why you think that? What's his agenda today? Intelligent baseball discussion? Don't get me wrong, he has plenty of faults, but none of them have been evident during this show.
Today, it's the whole Manny issue. How would anyone aside from Merloni have absolutely any idea to the legitimacy of this injury? What is the point of speculating about something you can't possibly have any idea about? He comes off as a very biased host, and unlike the other idiots that are on some of the shows, has a bit of credibility being that he's a writer for BBWAA. He is literally saying that Manny faked it in 06, is faking it now, and that he doesn't care. I'm not a Manny fan boy, but this type of journalism where you take conjecture and spit it out as fact is crap. The Tomase issue was completely different, I can at least understand Mazz defending him, but Mazz has no reason to spit out what he thinks and say it as the no doubt truth repeatedly.
He's also talked about his Hall of Fame vote, and who he sees as Hall of Famers on the Ballot in the recent past and near future. I forget the exact topic right now, but I know I was thinking at the time "this guy is a complete lunatic".
His columns are different, but when I hear him on EEI, he comes off as an arrogant schmuck.
#38
Posted 25 July 2008 - 04:39 PM
Today's 'Big Show' has been very good. I loved Merloni's perspective on the Labor Day 2003 game. Merloni, to me, brings something that was sorely missed on the EEI airwaves, and that's the perspective of not only an ex-athlete, but an ex-athlete who's played, and been teammates with many of the guys that are still in the game today.
Hopefully they surround Pete with capable co-hosts these next few weeks. With the Red Sox at home this week, hopefully we'll hear some Sean McAdam, and Rob Bradford.
#39
Posted 25 July 2008 - 05:17 PM
http://www.myfoxbost...mp;pageId=6.1.1
#40
Posted 25 July 2008 - 05:25 PM
if you were curious, here is the link to the Butch Stearns mayor video...
http://www.myfoxbost...mp;pageId=6.1.1
I'm not sure if I've ever seen a bigger tool on television in my life. It's A) not funny and B) about 4 minutes longer than the skit should be
#46
Posted 28 July 2008 - 03:24 PM
Have you not heard of Eddie Andleman? Fred Smerlas? LARRY FREAKING JOHNSON? DAN SHAUGHNESSY?I really hate Tony Mazz. He sounds like he has an agenda every single time he's on the show. One of the worst personalities in the Boston Media IMO.
I hated Mazz for defending the Herald in that Tomase fiasco, but he's not even in driving distance of the "worst personalities in the Boston Media."
#49
Posted 29 July 2008 - 03:26 PM
Reply to this topic
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users










