Yo! You're not logged in. Why am I seeing this ad?
Yankees give deadline to Twins on Johan Deal
#1
Posted 02 December 2007 - 01:55 PM
http://sports.espn.g...tory?id=3138088
I say the Yankees are bluffing. There is no way they pull their offer off the table so that the Red Sox will be in prime position to get Santana. They've bluffed before, and they've shown that they won't keep up with what they are saying, example: A-Rod.
You think the Twins will actually buy this?
#2
Posted 02 December 2007 - 02:00 PM
But at the same time they do also need to move on. I would expect them to start publicly negotiating with Oakland, and maybe Baltimore in the next few hours.
#3
Posted 02 December 2007 - 02:06 PM
The battle of wits between Billy Beane & Hank Steinbrenner would be fun to watch.I would expect them to start publicly negotiating with Oakland
#4
Posted 02 December 2007 - 02:16 PM
Of course they are bluffing.
But at the same time they do also need to move on. I would expect them to start publicly negotiating with Oakland, and maybe Baltimore in the next few hours.
The might be bluffing, but they also might be toying with the Red Sox now. If the Twins don't agree to the Hughes, Melky, lesser prospect deal by the imposed "deadline" and the Red Sox don't up their offer to include Ellsbury or Buchholz (to see how committed they are to acquiring Santana) than possibly they pull Hughes off the table again and see if they can work out a lesser package.
And you are absolutely right, they need to move on, especially with the Winter Meetings starting tomorrow. They can't let the Twins destroy their chances of improving their team in other ways this week.
#5
Posted 02 December 2007 - 02:31 PM
#6
Posted 02 December 2007 - 02:43 PM
I certainly expect the Twins to make it sound like they prefer that Sox deal, but I'd be shocked if that were the case.
#7
Posted 02 December 2007 - 02:51 PM
#8
Posted 02 December 2007 - 03:01 PM
#9
Posted 02 December 2007 - 03:17 PM
More agents and general mangers should go over Cashman's head and talk directly to Hank Steinbrenner, seeing as how he just can't seem to help himself in any negotiations.
#10
Posted 02 December 2007 - 03:25 PM
The might be bluffing, but they also might be toying with the Red Sox now. If the Twins don't agree to the Hughes, Melky, lesser prospect deal by the imposed "deadline" and the Red Sox don't up their offer to include Ellsbury or Buchholz (to see how committed they are to acquiring Santana) than possibly they pull Hughes off the table again and see if they can work out a lesser package.
Ellsbury has been offered already, but the real issue for me is the bolded part. The Twins have said that they prefer Crisp, Lester, Lowrie, and Bowden/Masterson to the Kennedy, Melky, Jackson/Tabata offer. If the Yankees pull Hughes, why do you not think that the Sox would jump at the chance to make the previous deal?
It seems like very wishfull thinking that the Sox are only in this to keep Santana from the Yankees. In the minds of a lot of Yankee fans they were only in on Matsuzaka to block the Yankees, which clearly wasn't the case. They might pull back if the Yankees offer more talent they are willing to, but so far NY doesn't seem inclined to blow anyone out of the water.
#11
Posted 02 December 2007 - 03:30 PM
for about 1 day
then they offer Hughes, Kennedy and Melky.
#12
Posted 02 December 2007 - 03:33 PM
It wasn't so very long ago that Hank Steinbrenner mentioned that he wouldn't deal any of the untouchables...for a position player. That was before ARod came back and there was speculation about Miggy Cabrera. Early in the Santana negotiations the word was that the Yankees didn't want to include Hughes. I don't ever remember seeing anything from them that Hughes was untouchable with regards to Santana. Maybe I missed it though. I'd love to see a link.
To be sure, there is always some maneuvering with regards to negotiations, both at the table in the press. But I don't see how the Yankees bargaining with the Twins is any different that what the Sox are doing. Other than being at a disadvantage because of need. Wasn't Ellsbury untouchable at some point too?
#13
Posted 02 December 2007 - 03:34 PM
then they offer Hughes, Kennedy and Melky.
No way, how dumb would they have to be to make a trade FOR starting pitching and end up with fewer MLB-ready starters than they began with?
#14
Posted 02 December 2007 - 03:35 PM
when did he ever say that hughes was untouchable in a trade for santana? when did anyone ever say that? (other than the nimrods over at nyyfans)It's been nothing but empty threats from the New York FO this offseason, with the exception of not going four years with Rivera. No team or agent should take these deadlines seriously. They've already included one of their "untouchable" prospects in the deal and it's only a matter of time before the include one of the other prospects from the infamous list of Horne, Jackson, Tabata, Kennedy.
More agents and general mangers should go over Cashman's head and talk directly to Hank Steinbrenner, seeing as how he just can't seem to help himself in any negotiations.
#15
Posted 02 December 2007 - 03:49 PM
Wasn't Ellsbury untouchable at some point too?
Boston Herald about a week ago:
" There are no untouchables," Epstein said. "If there's an opportunity to get better, we'll do it. We believe in those guys. Their value to us is legitimate. We're not eager to get rid of them."
As opposed to Hank S., Epstein hardly ever ( actually probably " never"!) engages in public ultimatums. He's insanely cryptic in his public posturing.
Edited by stephensjh, 02 December 2007 - 03:50 PM.
#16
Posted 02 December 2007 - 03:58 PM
Ellsbury has been offered already, but the real issue for me is the bolded part. The Twins have said that they prefer Crisp, Lester, Lowrie, and Bowden/Masterson to the Kennedy, Melky, Jackson/Tabata offer. If the Yankees pull Hughes, why do you not think that the Sox would jump at the chance to make the previous deal?
It seems like very wishfull thinking that the Sox are only in this to keep Santana from the Yankees. In the minds of a lot of Yankee fans they were only in on Matsuzaka to block the Yankees, which clearly wasn't the case. They might pull back if the Yankees offer more talent they are willing to, but so far NY doesn't seem inclined to blow anyone out of the water.
I admit, I am still a little skeptical about the Sox pursuit of Santana, I have nothing to base this on of course, but it's just a feeling. I can easily be proven wrong in 72 hours or so, and I will probably end up eating some humble pie.
I also, don't think the Twins would accept an offer with our Lester or Buchholz in it. They are losing Santana, Garza and Silva this offseason. They need an arm that can step in to the rotation right away (Lester, Buchholz, Hughes, Kennedy). It would be foolish for them to make such a trade.
#17
Posted 02 December 2007 - 05:04 PM
#18
Posted 02 December 2007 - 05:11 PM
#19
Posted 02 December 2007 - 08:30 PM
even as a Yankee fan, I can see how it's good for baseball that this blowhard Hank is running the team, because if you combined premium decision-making (and I'm a big fan of Cashman, when they let him actually make the decisions) with their seemingly unlimited wallets, other teams wouldn't have much of a chance.
#20
Posted 02 December 2007 - 08:36 PM
#21
Posted 02 December 2007 - 09:24 PM
even as a Yankee fan, I can see how it's good for baseball that this blowhard Hank is running the team, because if you combined premium decision-making (and I'm a big fan of Cashman, when they let him actually make the decisions) with their seemingly unlimited wallets, other teams wouldn't have much of a chance.
Give me a break. The Yankees have put a premium product on the field, they've targeted the players they wanted and almost always got the players and the coaches they wanted. They have simply failed. Don't exclusively blame blowhard owners for it. There is plenty of blame to go around, including Cashman and, gee I dunno, the players. But oh no, blame George and Hank. Whatever. For the last couple of years it is pretty clear that Cashman has been running the operation, so it's been a failure all around, not simply a result of intrusive owners.
#22
Posted 02 December 2007 - 09:29 PM
The Twins are really lacking in the leverage department, considering both teams would love to just take a shot at him in FA and not give anything up
Edited by PooNani, 02 December 2007 - 09:32 PM.
#23
Posted 02 December 2007 - 09:42 PM
After seeing the reports of all these bids, is Beane going to not bother to talk to them? Are the Orioles not going to bother to call them? Nothing's happening on those other deals till something happens on this one because those other sellers will try to fleece the team that loses out on Santana.
#24
Posted 02 December 2007 - 09:58 PM
Give me a break. The Yankees have put a premium product on the field, they've targeted the players they wanted and almost always got the players and the coaches they wanted. They have simply failed. Don't exclusively blame blowhard owners for it. There is plenty of blame to go around, including Cashman and, gee I dunno, the players. But oh no, blame George and Hank. Whatever. For the last couple of years it is pretty clear that Cashman has been running the operation, so it's been a failure all around, not simply a result of intrusive owners.
wow, I usually agree with you, maybe I wasn't being clear. I'm not exclusively blaming the owners, everyone makes their share of bad decisions, Cashman, Theo, whoever. I just feel a lot more comfortable when Cashman makes the decisions and not 1) the Tampa crew a few years back or 2) Hank now. you're right that since the 2005 offseason, Cashman has had sole responsibility for player moves, and I think he's done a very nice job. my issue is that his influence seems to be dwindling again now.
#25
Posted 02 December 2007 - 10:02 PM
========================================================
"I'm not going to be played against the Red Sox. That's not something I'll do. That's not something the Yankees should ever do, and that's I think what they're trying to do now," Yankees senior vice president Hank Steinbrenner said Sunday. "So if they want the best offer that has been offered to them, then they need to make up their minds."
The Yankees have proposed swapping pitcher Phil Hughes, center fielder Melky Cabrera and a midlevel prospect for the two-time Cy Young Award winner, who can become a free agent after next season.
Boston also is competing to land Santana. The Red Sox are thought to have offered a package that would include pitcher Jon Lester or center fielder Jacoby Ellsbury but not both. Center fielder Coco Crisp also could be part of a trade.
Steinbrenner wouldn't set a specific time Monday for pulling out.
"We'll see how it goes, but this is not an act. It's not a bluff. It's just reality," he said. "Because as much as I want Santana, and you can make that clear -- for his sake, to know that I do want him -- but the fact is that I'm not going to play the game. We've made them the best offer. And at this point, it's not going to get any better. So they can decide. At this point, it's up to them. I don't think they want to lose us in this thing, obviously. Nobody wants to lose the Yankees in a negotiation."
A trade likely would have to be made on a conditional basis, giving the Yankees or Red Sox 72 hours to work out a new long-term contract for Santana, who is owed $13.25 million next season. Steinbrenner said the Yankees didn't want to wait too long, miss out on Santana and then find out it was too late to get involved in talks for other pitchers, such as Oakland's Dan Haren.
"We need to get things straightened out, and not wait around for them to run back to Boston and back to us, and then back to Boston," he said. "I'm not going to do that.""
http://sports.espn.g...tory?id=3138748
#26
Posted 02 December 2007 - 10:16 PM
Advantage: Red Sox.
#27
Posted 02 December 2007 - 10:37 PM
#28
Posted 02 December 2007 - 10:39 PM
Edited by jarules1185, 02 December 2007 - 10:40 PM.
#29
Posted 02 December 2007 - 10:41 PM
wow, I usually agree with you, maybe I wasn't being clear. I'm not exclusively blaming the owners, everyone makes their share of bad decisions, Cashman, Theo, whoever. I just feel a lot more comfortable when Cashman makes the decisions and not 1) the Tampa crew a few years back or 2) Hank now. you're right that since the 2005 offseason, Cashman has had sole responsibility for player moves, and I think he's done a very nice job. my issue is that his influence seems to be dwindling again now.
Hahah, thanks, I'm flattered! I guess it sounded to me like you were suggesting that the only thing preventing Yankee hegemony was a muzzle on ownership.
I'm not yet sure what to make of Hank. These next several weeks will reveal what we should expect for the next several years.
#30
Posted 02 December 2007 - 10:44 PM
#31
Posted 02 December 2007 - 10:50 PM
Today, making sure Santana knows how much they want him, etc.
The odds favor Santana going to New York, but if the Red Sox make the trade, I wonder if Hank would have the ability to keep his mouth shut during the 72-hour negotiating period.
Edited to make it more like actual English.
Edited by snowmanny, 02 December 2007 - 10:51 PM.
#32
Posted 02 December 2007 - 10:52 PM
That said, I'm sure this is as irritating for the Sox and Twins as it is for some of us. The more Stein Jr. talks to the media about what he will or won't do, the harder it will be for him to back down. Even though he got paid in the end, ARod first had to genuflect and kiss the ring. Hank seems to have too big an ego to lose that much face. And since he's part of the ownership team, he won't have to. He really can follow through and walk away. Its not like he is a GM trying to keep his job or something. Hell, if he did, there would probably be a ton of Yankee fans extolling his tough stance and talking about how glad they were to keep Hughes. Mostly New Yorkers, I'm sure. Its not like there is an asshole shortage in that city or anything.
I wouldn't take it for granted that he is bluffing. He could be, but somehow I don't think the subtlety required is really his strong suit.
#33
Posted 02 December 2007 - 11:10 PM
The more Stein Jr. talks to the media about what he will or won't do, the harder it will be for him to back down. Even though he got paid in the end, ARod first had to genuflect and kiss the ring. Hank seems to have too big an ego to lose that much face. And since he's part of the ownership team, he won't have to. He really can follow through and walk away.
Hey, I'd genuflect and kiss his ring for 300 million dollars too. Doesn't mean that Hank is a man of his word when he hands out his threats. He did use the words "No chance" when describing the possiblity of the Yanks re-signing A-Rod after the opt-out.
"No chance" includes every future development, including A-Rod "crawling back" for 300 million.
#34
Posted 02 December 2007 - 11:33 PM
Hey, I'd genuflect and kiss his ring for 300 million dollars too. Doesn't mean that Hank is a man of his word when he hands out his threats. He did use the words "No chance" when describing the possiblity of the Yanks re-signing A-Rod after the opt-out.
"No chance" includes every future development, including A-Rod "crawling back" for 300 million.
Well, we're talking about perceptions -- the percpetion most prevalent in the media is that ARod came crawling back. Hank didn't lose any face in that regard. Whether he is a man of his word or not, and what circumstances he really meant with the "no chance" bit is really immaterial to me. I didn't claim he was a man of his word, only that his ego seems big enough to do what he's saying. This guy seems to love the spotlight. I have a hard time seeing him back down in such a public way. Rightly or wrongly, the ARod saga didn't play that way.
Again, its all about perceptions with him, I think.
Edit: Oh and for the record, if my feelings on the matter aren't coming through clearly enough, I do not think this is a good thing. H.S. constantly running his mouth sucks.
Edited by EvilEmpire, 02 December 2007 - 11:42 PM.
#35
Posted 02 December 2007 - 11:33 PM
Hey, I'd genuflect and kiss his ring for 300 million dollars too. Doesn't mean that Hank is a man of his word when he hands out his threats. He did use the words "No chance" when describing the possiblity of the Yanks re-signing A-Rod after the opt-out.
"No chance" includes every future development, including A-Rod "crawling back" for 300 million.
Didn't Hank just say a day or two ago, the Yanks were going into stealth mode and will thus not be discussing the Santana L'Affaire thru the media. Now this latest episode!
Just for fun :
"We’re not going to back down. It’s goodbye….. It’s clear he didn’t want to be a Yankee. He doesn’t understand the privilege of being a Yankee on a team where the owners are willing to pay $200 million to put a winning product on the field…. If you don’t want to be a Yankee and paid what you’re being paid, we don’t want you, that’s the bottom line. You’d be hard-pressed to argue that point. If you don’t understand the magnitude of being a Yankee and understand what that means, and being the highest-paid player in baseball, I think it’s pretty obvious."
#36
Posted 02 December 2007 - 11:54 PM
#37
Posted 02 December 2007 - 11:57 PM
What other opportunities are going to dry up?
After seeing the reports of all these bids, is Beane going to not bother to talk to them? Are the Orioles not going to bother to call them? Nothing's happening on those other deals till something happens on this one because those other sellers will try to fleece the team that loses out on Santana.
Who are the Orioles going to trade? Any teams who were going to offer the packages equal or similar to the Yankees or Red Sox right now would have been in the running. The Twins sure as hell don't want to make the two wealthiest teams any better, but they are the ones who have stepped up to this level.
Steinbrenner and company are playing it perfectly. They made an offer that they believe (and I believe) is very fair. If the Twins are only going to accept the Yankees offer if they add Kennedy, then fuck them. The second the Yankees take their offer off the table and look to other trade opportunities, what do the Twins have? The Sox sure as hell aren't keeping Ellsbury on the table.
Best case scenario at that point is the lesser trade offers will start to come in again, and they'll get a weaker package than whats being offered right now by the Sox and Yankees. Worst case scenario is they have to choose between Lester/Crisp/Masterson and two draft picks...and FA benefits the Yankees and all the other teams anyway.
It's easy to pick on this guy right now, but hes not some 20 year old with zero knowledge of the business. He's in his 50s, and has overseen the baseball operations for nearly a decade IIRC. The guy is full of hot air, but again....he's merely restating what's been written in the press via rumors, and what goes along with Cashman's stated plans. Nothing that has happened so far has gone against what Cashman has talked about before. No, A-Rod did not come at a discount, but as Cashman had stated, the Yankees we're not going to pursue A-Rod and as far as he was concerned, his future with the Yankees was over. A-Rod was the one who extended his hand, and sure he ended up making a shit-ton of money, but IMO that does nothing to destroy the Yankees' bargaining power. He is the best player in baseball after all.
Considering that Cashman has always kept quiet and didn't like the media attention, I'm glad to be hearing from Steinbrenner about what's going on with the team, provided it doesnt interfere with the team's bargaining skills. So far, it hasn't.
#38
Posted 03 December 2007 - 12:03 AM
#39
Posted 03 December 2007 - 12:04 AM
it's true that it's worked out OK so far, it's just kind of an obnoxious way to do business, and very unnecessarily public. I do think that if Hank keeps laying his cards on the table so publicly, one of these is going to blow up in his face and hurt the Yankees, but we'll see.
Edited by jon abbey, 03 December 2007 - 12:05 AM.
#40
Posted 03 December 2007 - 12:16 AM
“How can I go any higher?” Steinbrenner said. “What do they want — Hughes, Kennedy and Cabrera? I can’t do that kind of thing. It’s crazy. It’s suicidal. In the past 20 or 30 years, teams have always asked more from the Yankees than they have of anybody else, and that’s going to stop. I’ve made the best offer Minnesota is going to get, and the fact is, it’s an offer we can go away happy and they can go away happy.”
http://www.nytimes.c...gtIgvh/Imrf/Btw
#41
Posted 03 December 2007 - 12:16 AM
#42
Posted 03 December 2007 - 12:19 AM
In the past 20 or 30 years, teams have always asked more from the Yankees than they have of anybody else
Really? Care for some cheese with that whine?
Edited by NYCSox, 03 December 2007 - 12:29 AM.
#43
Posted 03 December 2007 - 12:32 AM
So does Cashman just get coffee for everybody at this point or what?
http://www.nytimes.c...gtIgvh/Imrf/Btw
Hankenstein almost deserves his own "quotes" thread at this point.
#44
Posted 03 December 2007 - 12:43 AM
Updates:
Heyman was just on Mike'd up from Nashville and ranked Yankee's #1 and Red Sox #2 in the Santana Sweepstakes. Hey claimed he ran into a Red Sox Executive in the hallway who stated: 'we won in October and they (the MFYs) can have November/December.' Which indicated to Heyman that the Red Sox were conceding it...
A second baseball official, from a team involved with Santana talks, said the Twins continue to pester the Red Sox to up their offer for Santana, even as the Sox insist they will also stand firm.
So the Twins are either holding out for more -- a tactic limited by Santana's reported stance -- or playing the rivals off each other to see if either one ups the ante before choosing one of the offers.
The first official, who spoke on the condition of anonymity due to tampering rules, said the Yankees insist they have made the Twins the offer they sought for their ace, so it should be good enough.
The second official, who asked not to be named because of the sensitive nature of trade discussions, denied an ESPN.com report that Boston relented and is willing to include outfielder Jacoby Ellsbury in a trade for Santana. The official reiterated what was reported last week: The Red Sox would put Ellsbury in the deal only if the Twins included a significant "extra piece" in addition to Santana.QUOTEThe Twins "know exactly where (the Red Sox) stand and they keep coming back," the official said.
One reason, the official believed, was that the Twins want the Yankees to include a top-level prospect -- "substance" -- along with Hughes and Cabrera.
Minnesota's thinking, in that case, is that Cabrera is not an exceptional player, so Hughes would need to pan out as well as many expect for the Twins to get value for Santana. A top prospect in addition to Hughes and Cabrera would increase the chances the Twins benefit from dealing a two-time Cy Young Award winner.
http://www.nj.com/sp...?...&thispage=1
New York wins.
It appears as though Minnesota has been content with a Hughes/Cabrera deal this whole time but are attempting get Boston to increase the Ellsbury offer to try and squeeze out one more prospect out of New York before they accept Hughes/ Cabrera. Boston will not offer Ellsbury and Lester/Buchholz and are ready to concede, so New York has no reason to throw in a third top prospect. Now that New York has set the deadline and Santana has made it clear that he will veto all other deals outside of Boston and New York, Minnesota has no choice but to accept the best offer, which is Hughes. If not, they will be left to deal with only Boston, who would have all the leverage. The Twins are now backed into a corner, with Boston unwilling to increase their offer and Santana willing to veto all trades during the season and outside of Boston/New York. They really have no choice but to accept New York's offer, right here and right now.
Edited by Rockin Robbin, 03 December 2007 - 01:26 AM.
#45
Posted 03 December 2007 - 02:41 AM
I'll give some kudos to Theo for at least making sure the Yankees gave up wonderboy Philip Hughes, and perhaps forcing Damon to play CF again, but I'm a bit suprised Theo doesn't seem to want Johan for the apparent asking price.
I hope this is more a case of the Sox FO just not wanting to give one player 25 mil a year for the next 6 years instead of the alternative, which is that the Sox FO thinks giving up Lester/Ellsbury/Lowrie + is too much for a 1-2 punch of Santana and Beckett for at least the next 3 years.
#46
Posted 03 December 2007 - 03:34 AM
#47
Posted 03 December 2007 - 04:37 AM
The Yankees have needs and need to know where their team stands. If they have holes to fill, they can't wait around to see if this trade fills them because it seems like there's a very good chance they'll end up empty handed.
Edited by jtn46, 03 December 2007 - 04:37 AM.
#48
Posted 03 December 2007 - 07:27 AM
There is a good chance Hank will be talking in the third person by the All Star Break.
Updates:
http://www.nj.com/sp...?...&thispage=1
New York wins.
It appears as though Minnesota has been content with a Hughes/Cabrera deal this whole time but are attempting get Boston to increase the Ellsbury offer to try and squeeze out one more prospect out of New York before they accept Hughes/ Cabrera. Boston will not offer Ellsbury and Lester/Buchholz and are ready to concede, so New York has no reason to throw in a third top prospect. Now that New York has set the deadline and Santana has made it clear that he will veto all other deals outside of Boston and New York, Minnesota has no choice but to accept the best offer, which is Hughes. If not, they will be left to deal with only Boston, who would have all the leverage. The Twins are now backed into a corner, with Boston unwilling to increase their offer and Santana willing to veto all trades during the season and outside of Boston/New York. They really have no choice but to accept New York's offer, right here and right now.
1. There's no reason to believe that the Yankees "deadline" is chiseled in stone. Neither NY nor Boston will start pulling players back after midnight tonight, because doing so may give the other team an edge.
2. In Minnesota's view, the "best offer" may or may not include the "best player". The excerpts you clipped above make it clear enough that the Twins are concerned about putting all their eggs in one basket with Hughes. It's not at all inconceivable that they may decide to view a Boston offer of Lester/Crisp/Lowrie and an AA arm as superior because it spreads the risk over more players with decent upsides.
#49
Posted 03 December 2007 - 08:15 AM
obnoxious or not, at least its entertaining.well, if nothing else, Hank pissed off Mariano for no reason.
it's true that it's worked out OK so far, it's just kind of an obnoxious way to do business, and very unnecessarily public. I do think that if Hank keeps laying his cards on the table so publicly, one of these is going to blow up in his face and hurt the Yankees, but we'll see.
alright sylvia browne if you say so. the twins are clearly going to be fine without the yankees offer on the table1. There's no reason to believe that the Yankees "deadline" is chiseled in stone. Neither NY nor Boston will start pulling players back after midnight tonight, because doing so may give the other team an edge.
http://www.projo.com...14.29961f1.html
Santana, who has a full-no trade clause and intends to wield it to land a six-year contract extension from any team striking a deal for him, told the Twins that he would veto a trade to any team except the Yankees or Red Sox. He also warned them that he would not accept a deal in-season, forcing the Twins to move him this week or lose him to free agency after the 2008 season, when his current contract expires.
it's getting done today
#50
Posted 03 December 2007 - 08:24 AM
1. There's no reason to believe that the Yankees "deadline" is chiseled in stone. Neither NY nor Boston will start pulling players back after midnight tonight, because doing so may give the other team an edge.
If Boston doesn't improve their offer, why wouldn't Minnesota just make a decision one way of the other? If Boston doesn't improve their offer there is no reason for the Yankees to. The Yanks might be perfectly happy for Minnesota to just keep Santana and then have a shot at him as a FA without giving any prospects up next year.
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users




This topic is locked








