The Rocks beat the Phils and the D'Backs. The D'Backs beat the Cubs.
true, my bad. My point stands.
Yo! You're not logged in. Why am I seeing this ad?
Posted 24 October 2007 - 07:35 PM
The Rocks beat the Phils and the D'Backs. The D'Backs beat the Cubs.
Posted 24 October 2007 - 07:35 PM
Posted 24 October 2007 - 07:36 PM
Posted 24 October 2007 - 07:36 PM
Posted 24 October 2007 - 07:36 PM
Posted 24 October 2007 - 07:36 PM
Posted 24 October 2007 - 07:36 PM
I don't mean to keep being argumentative with you, but why is the 21 of 22 that much more relevant than the fact that they were 76-72 over the first 90% of the season? I can understand giving some degree of increased weight to recent results, but barring some wholesale personnel changes, it seems better to evalute the team over their entire season performance.
Posted 24 October 2007 - 07:36 PM
Posted 24 October 2007 - 07:37 PM
Watch for the bunt single by Taveras. I don't have stats but I think he does that more than anyone else in MLB.
Posted 24 October 2007 - 07:37 PM
Posted 24 October 2007 - 07:37 PM
Posted 24 October 2007 - 07:37 PM
A buddy and I set a nightly over/under on the moment of Tim McCarver's first incredibly stupid statement. Tonight's line has been set at one minute before the upcoming top of the hour. Place your bets accordingly.
Posted 24 October 2007 - 07:37 PM
Posted 24 October 2007 - 07:37 PM
Posted 24 October 2007 - 07:37 PM
How do they not show Yaz throwing out the first pitch?
Posted 24 October 2007 - 07:37 PM
Under.A buddy and I set a nightly over/under on the moment of Tim McCarver's first incredibly stupid statement. Tonight's line has been set at one minute before the upcoming top of the hour. Place your bets accordingly.
Posted 24 October 2007 - 07:38 PM
I dunno about the exact moment of his first stupid statement, but I'm setting the line at +7 as to the number of stupid things he says during the broadcastA buddy and I set a nightly over/under on the moment of Tim McCarver's first incredibly stupid statement. Tonight's line has been set at one minute before the upcoming top of the hour. Place your bets accordingly.
Posted 24 October 2007 - 07:38 PM
Posted 24 October 2007 - 07:38 PM
Posted 24 October 2007 - 07:38 PM
Posted 24 October 2007 - 07:38 PM
Posted 24 October 2007 - 07:38 PM
Posted 24 October 2007 - 07:38 PM
Posted 24 October 2007 - 07:38 PM
Posted 24 October 2007 - 07:38 PM
Edited by JohnnyTheBone, 24 October 2007 - 07:40 PM.
Posted 24 October 2007 - 07:39 PM
Posted 24 October 2007 - 07:39 PM
Posted 24 October 2007 - 07:39 PM
I dunno about the exact moment of his first stupid statement, but I'm setting the line at +7 as to the number of stupid things he says during the broadcast
Posted 24 October 2007 - 07:39 PM
Posted 24 October 2007 - 07:39 PM
For what it's worth, the Baseball Prospectus simulations have the Sox winning the series nearly 60 percent of the time.
*ducks for cover*
Posted 24 October 2007 - 07:40 PM
Posted 24 October 2007 - 07:40 PM
Has anybody noticed that Beckett has now officially joined the ranks of elite pitchers who get the trapezoidal strike zone? (i.e., it widens from the waist down).
Posted 24 October 2007 - 07:40 PM
Posted 24 October 2007 - 07:41 PM
Posted 24 October 2007 - 07:41 PM
Posted 24 October 2007 - 07:41 PM
That seems a little low.
Posted 24 October 2007 - 07:41 PM
Posted 24 October 2007 - 07:41 PM
yeah, apparently Vegas agrees with you and have moved the over/under to 25... I'm looking forward to that first comment that leads to an awkward pause and Buck trying to quickly change the topicThat seems a little low.
Posted 24 October 2007 - 07:41 PM
Posted 24 October 2007 - 07:41 PM
Posted 24 October 2007 - 07:41 PM
Posted 24 October 2007 - 07:41 PM
Posted 24 October 2007 - 07:41 PM
Posted 24 October 2007 - 07:42 PM
Posted 24 October 2007 - 07:42 PM
Posted 24 October 2007 - 07:42 PM
Posted 24 October 2007 - 07:42 PM
Posted 24 October 2007 - 07:42 PM
Posted 24 October 2007 - 07:42 PM
Not necessarily. I don't know how old you are, but the 1973 Mets were in last place on 8/30 and took the powerhouse A's to the bottom of the 9th in game 7 of the WS. It doesn't matter how cold you were 3 months ago as long as you are hot when it counts. I remind you once again of the Cardinals from last year. They barely made the playoffs and then won it all over the heavily favored Tigers.
The MFYs were 8 or 9 games under .500 and 14 games back of the Sox earlier this year, and they ended up only finishing a handful of games behind the Sox and making the playoffs after scores of people had written them off.
Posted 24 October 2007 - 07:42 PM