Jump to content


Yo! You're not logged in. Why am I seeing this ad?

Photo
* * * * - 9 votes

Joe Posnanski: your new Senior Writer for SI (Not No More, He Ain't)


1211 replies to this topic

#1201 drleather2001


  • given himself a skunk spot


  • 16294 posts

Posted 06 January 2015 - 09:08 AM

It's a good quote, but I don't think he's saying (half-jokingly) that the Hall of Fame was invented for Pedro, so much as Pedro is exactly the type of player that should be in the HOF.



#1202 touchstone033

  • 222 posts

Posted 06 January 2015 - 11:55 AM

 

Your take may be entirely spot on - maybe it was self-indulgent.  However I read it more as a thank you to all of those people who encouraged him along the way, even if they didn't know who he was or didn't need to make the effort.  Based on what he's written, the guy simply prefers not to see the more cynical or dark side of people and that blind-spot probably is even bigger when it comes to his own career.   Its part of the reason I love his pieces - he wants to believe in the good and I root for him to find it every time.

 

Yes, Joe's especially good at this, and that part of the story was fantastic. I admit it was the third-person, broke-and-confused-boy-on-a-city-bus tone that grated some. Into his writer's broth went a lot of hard work, a dash of boldness, and not a little genius. And luck. He's not some poor schmuck. He's a damn great writer, and his self-depiction at times seems a little too fantastic.

 

Whatever. That's Pos for me! One day, he whips out a brilliant multi-thousand word piece on the HoF, the next he's weeping over the worn spots in the grass at his childhood home.



#1203 JimD

  • 4876 posts

Posted 07 January 2015 - 08:55 AM

As usual, Pos nails it:

— Almost nine percent of the voters saw Pedro Martinez pitch — they saw him just like you and me — and decided not to check his name. It doesn’t matter. But it’s such a loss for them. If you don’t get goosebumps of joy doing your part to elect players like Pedro Martinez into the Hall of Fame, I have no idea why you vote in the first place.



#1204 johnmd20


  • voice of soccer


  • 18455 posts

Posted 07 January 2015 - 09:03 AM

Pedro has the best ERA+ of all time among starters and 9% of the voters thought he wasn't good enough. I mean. . . .



#1205 weeba

  • 1597 posts

Posted 07 January 2015 - 12:22 PM

JimD - link to the article?



#1206 One Leg at a Time

  • 8 posts

Posted 07 January 2015 - 12:25 PM

JimD - link to the article?

It is on his blog - well worth a bookmark:

 

http://joeposnanski....me-percentages/



#1207 weeba

  • 1597 posts

Posted 07 January 2015 - 12:43 PM

Thanks - just didn't know which article it was referenced in.



#1208 PC Drunken Friar

  • 3938 posts

Posted 08 January 2015 - 07:02 AM

As usual, Pos nails it:
 

haha, he sure did...

 

Curt Schilling (40-45%): 39.2%
— I don’t see this ballot evolving.

 



#1209 LogansDad


  • SoSH Member


  • 6314 posts

Posted 08 January 2015 - 05:48 PM

haha, he sure did...

 

:rotflmao:

 

Also from that blog:

 

"Takeaway: The people who do the most interesting Hall of Fame ballots never write stories about them; I wish they would. I wish the voters would explain how, on this ballot, they found room to vote for Aaron Boone and Tom Gordon. Maybe it would be a great story. Maybe Boone or Gordon saved their lives. Maybe Boone or Gordon taught their children how to read. I want the story, I really do."


Edited by LogansDad, 08 January 2015 - 05:50 PM.


#1210 JimD

  • 4876 posts

Posted 17 January 2015 - 09:22 AM

Pos has another Belichick piece up, this time about the ineligible players scheme:

 

http://sportsworld.n...com/dark-magic/



#1211 Lose Remerswaal


  • Leaves after the 8th inning


  • 23008 posts

Posted 17 January 2015 - 09:48 AM

Good stuff. Too bad he has to mention Spygate, but I guess that sticks to BB the rest of his career

#1212 nocode51

  • 184 posts

Posted 17 January 2015 - 09:58 AM

I was reading an older Pos piece on his blog and it was one of those list columns but it had this gem. 

"28. If the 16-0 Patriots could have traveled back in time, they would have beaten the 1972 Dolphins by 50."

 

http://joeposnanski....ears/#more-2505





Reply to this topic



  


2 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 2 guests, 0 anonymous users