Jump to content


Yo! You're not logged in. Why am I seeing this ad?

Photo
* * * * - 9 votes

Joe Posnanski: your new Senior Writer for SI (Not No More, He Ain't)


1234 replies to this topic

#1201 weeba

  • 1761 posts

Posted 07 January 2015 - 12:43 PM

Thanks - just didn't know which article it was referenced in.



#1202 PC Drunken Friar

  • 4337 posts

Posted 08 January 2015 - 07:02 AM

As usual, Pos nails it:
 

haha, he sure did...

 

Curt Schilling (40-45%): 39.2%
— I don’t see this ballot evolving.

 



#1203 LogansDad


  • SoSH Member


  • 8134 posts

Posted 08 January 2015 - 05:48 PM

haha, he sure did...

 

:rotflmao:

 

Also from that blog:

 

"Takeaway: The people who do the most interesting Hall of Fame ballots never write stories about them; I wish they would. I wish the voters would explain how, on this ballot, they found room to vote for Aaron Boone and Tom Gordon. Maybe it would be a great story. Maybe Boone or Gordon saved their lives. Maybe Boone or Gordon taught their children how to read. I want the story, I really do."


Edited by LogansDad, 08 January 2015 - 05:50 PM.


#1204 JimD


  • SoSH Member


  • 5084 posts

Posted 17 January 2015 - 09:22 AM

Pos has another Belichick piece up, this time about the ineligible players scheme:

 

http://sportsworld.n...com/dark-magic/



#1205 Lose Remerswaal


  • Leaves after the 8th inning


  • 24106 posts

Posted 17 January 2015 - 09:48 AM

Good stuff. Too bad he has to mention Spygate, but I guess that sticks to BB the rest of his career

#1206 nocode51

  • 240 posts

Posted 17 January 2015 - 09:58 AM

I was reading an older Pos piece on his blog and it was one of those list columns but it had this gem. 

"28. If the 16-0 Patriots could have traveled back in time, they would have beaten the 1972 Dolphins by 50."

 

http://joeposnanski....ears/#more-2505



#1207 DrewDawg


  • Dorito Dink


  • 12789 posts

Posted 20 February 2015 - 02:00 PM

Things I learned from Strat-O-Matic: http://joeposnanski....-strat-o-matic/

 

Lesson 1: You really need a defensive shortstop with range.

Lesson 2: On-base percentage! On-base percentage! On-base percentage!

Lesson 3: Ballparks matter.

Lesson 4: Clutch hitting is baloney.

Lesson 5: Don’t use outfielders with no range and low error numbers.

Lesson 6: Matchups matter but …

Lesson 7: Twenties happen.

 



#1208 johnmd20


  • voice of soccer


  • 19875 posts

Posted 21 February 2015 - 11:48 AM

That Strat o Matic column was fantastic!



#1209 SirMixaLittle

  • 1 posts

Posted 30 March 2015 - 12:40 PM

In case anyone missed it, Joe's most recent post is a great one: http://joeposnanski....baseball-story/



#1210 Danny_Darwin

  • 844 posts

Posted 27 April 2015 - 08:01 PM

Bump - Joe has updated his Top 100 again.

http://joeposnanski.com/no-36-yaz/



#1211 drleather2001


  • given himself a skunk spot


  • 18035 posts

Posted 30 April 2015 - 04:12 PM

Oh no, Joe.

 

Then there is Joe Paterno. He was head coach at Penn State for 45 years, and assistant another 16 years before that. There is no way to catalogue the almost universal praise he received for his coaching — his teams won 409 games, the most for any Division I coach – and his integrity. His teams consistently graduated a high percentage of players. The NCAA never sanctioned them. His former players consistently call him one of their greatest teachers. The hard-hitting “60 Minutes” once did a segment on Paterno so glowing, that even he was embarrassed. On the November 2011 day of thegrand jury presentment that indicted Sandusky, Pennsylvania politicians were in the process of nominating him for the Presidential Medal of Freedom.

 

Joe Paterno was mentioned only in passing in that grand jury presentment. He was never charged with a crime. To the contrary, he was praised by the attorney general’s office for being forthright in his testimony.

 

Still, Paterno has taken much of the brunt for Sandusky’s crimes.

 

 

 

Ugh. 


Edited by drleather2001, 30 April 2015 - 04:14 PM.


#1212 riboflav

  • 4440 posts

Posted 30 April 2015 - 04:31 PM

I haven't read it yet but I assume he goes to talk about the actual victims and how they're the ones who have suffered the most. Right?



#1213 nattysez

  • 2369 posts

Posted 30 April 2015 - 04:43 PM

I haven't read it yet but I assume he goes to talk about the actual victims and how they're the ones who have suffered the most. Right?

 

The crimes of Jerry Sandusky against children are terrible and well-known. Sandusky was convicted of 45 counts of child sex abuse. He will spend the rest of his life in prison for them. Three Penn State officials – Spanier, former Penn State Vice President Gary Schultz and former athletic director Tim Curley – were charged with perjury, obstruction of justice and child endangerment. They have all insisted repeatedly and voraciously on their innocence; the charges against them are still pending after more than three years. Court observers say there is almost no chance their cases will go to trial in 2015. They are in what seems a permanent limbo.

 

Then there is Joe Paterno. He was head coach at Penn State for 45 years, and assistant another 16 years before that. There is no way to catalogue the almost universal praise he received for his coaching — his teams won 409 games, the most for any Division I coach – and his integrity. His teams consistently graduated a high percentage of players. The NCAA never sanctioned them. His former players consistently call him one of their greatest teachers. The hard-hitting “60 Minutes” once did a segment on Paterno so glowing, that even he was embarrassed. On the November 2011 day of thegrand jury presentment that indicted Sandusky, Pennsylvania politicians were in the process of nominating him for the Presidential Medal of Freedom.

 

Joe Paterno was mentioned only in passing in that grand jury presentment. He was never charged with a crime. To the contrary, he was praised by the attorney general’s office for being forthright in his testimony.

 

Still, Paterno has taken much of the brunt for Sandusky’s crimes. He said to his death that he did not know Sandusky was a pedophile and did not understand what he was dealing with. Freeh and others said he had to know and understand. Paterno said that with the benefit of hindsight, he wished he had done more. Those words of regret have been misquoted and twisted into a tortured admission of guilt.

 

 

Of all the hills to die on, I'm a bit surprised this is the one Joe's chosen.


Edited by nattysez, 30 April 2015 - 04:43 PM.


#1214 timlinin8th

  • 522 posts

Posted 30 April 2015 - 04:51 PM

 
 
Of all the hills to die on, I'm a bit surprised this is the one Joe's chosen.


Everyone has their Achilles' heel; it would seem that Paterno is Pos's

#1215 drleather2001


  • given himself a skunk spot


  • 18035 posts

Posted 30 April 2015 - 08:44 PM

I used to think his ability to emotionally connect with a subject was his greatest asset as a writer. It turns out his inability to keep an emotional distance, even when circumstances require, may be his tragic flaw.

I mean, 4 years ago it really appeared like this guy was the future of sports journalism. He had it all; old school bona fides as a beat reporter, an understanding of modern statistics, a grasp of how to use blogs and yet still write well in a column form. He was writing good books worthy subjects like the 1975 Reds and Buck O'Neil. He was a fan as much as a reporter, and seemed to be a rare personality that could walk seamlessly between those worlds.

Im afraid he's blown it. He's still only middle aged, but it just seems like he squandered so much on something that was just totally unworthy. Now it appears he's letting the Paternos use him to rehab their image.

What a shame.

Edited by drleather2001, 30 April 2015 - 08:52 PM.


#1216 PC Drunken Friar

  • 4337 posts

Posted 30 April 2015 - 09:22 PM

There's a mental block that Pos has with Paterno. My mental block is Pos' attitude towards Paterno

#1217 touchstone033

  • 243 posts

Posted 01 May 2015 - 03:01 PM

I used to think his ability to emotionally connect with a subject was his greatest asset as a writer. It turns out his inability to keep an emotional distance, even when circumstances require, may be his tragic flaw.

 

I never saw Pos as connecting with or really understanding his subjects. His insight isn't very penetrating. He builds people up. He's an idealist and a romantic. He's great at creating myths and heroes, at connecting people to ideals. And that's great, especially now in these cynical times, where we reject most of our heroes, we learn too much about them, when we're both obsessed and repelled by celebrities. That's why I love his columns. 

But -- and I've said it before in this thread -- he's absolutely the wrong guy to do a hard investigative piece. Pos was the perfect choice to write the literary hagiography Paterno deserved before the Sandusky affair. But as soon the story broke, Pos had a hard, complex story on his hands that demanded he put aside his respect and admiration for Paterno and really worm his way into the story. Which, as far as I can tell, he's completely incapable of doing. Did he actually do any real reporting on Paterno and Sandusky?

 

A shame. He got caught with the wrong story at the wrong time. 



#1218 Remagellan


  • SoSH Member


  • 5118 posts

Posted 07 May 2015 - 10:33 AM

Pos is spot-on about all things Deflategate



#1219 WenZink

  • 815 posts

Posted 07 May 2015 - 10:51 AM

Pos is spot-on about all things Deflategate

Good observation by Joe.  I especially like his comparison of Brady, in his press conference, to Martin Short's SNL "Nathan Thurm" character.  If Brady had handled the issue more forthright, and even acted with some indignity, he probably would have fared better in the court of public opinion, just as we now all side with George Brett 34 years later.  "Give me a bleepin' break!"



#1220 epraz


  • SoSH Member


  • 5611 posts

Posted 07 May 2015 - 01:46 PM

Good observation by Joe.  I especially like his comparison of Brady, in his press conference, to Martin Short's SNL "Nathan Thurm" character.  If Brady had handled the issue more forthright, and even acted with some indignity, he probably would have fared better in the court of public opinion, just as we now all side with George Brett 34 years later.  "Give me a bleepin' break!"

 

Brady did say in his press conference "This Isn't ISIS, No One Is Dying."  But do you really think that being indignant would've been helpful?  He would be skewered.  "Arrogant Patriots Cheat Again"



#1221 WenZink

  • 815 posts

Posted 07 May 2015 - 02:27 PM

 

Brady did say in his press conference "This Isn't ISIS, No One Is Dying."  But do you really think that being indignant would've been helpful?  He would be skewered.  "Arrogant Patriots Cheat Again"

A bit OT for this thread, but, yeah, if his attitude had been, "What's the big deal?  Every starting QB wants their footballs prepared for them.  Everyone."  Then today, he could make the case that the two Pats equipment guys were just too zealous in  meeting his demands.  It's not a big deal, really, but Brady's evasiveness, and his inability (I assume) to come clean with Belichick and Kraft will probably lead to his undoing, instead of the NFL fining the Patriots 2 x $25,000 for having two nitwits going to extremes to keep Brady off their backs.  Hell, if Nixon had come clean in June of 1972, and just said, "I told them to take care of things, and my staff hired those 'effin nitwits who decided to become burglars!" he'd have survived easily.

 

Point is, Pos makes the point that Brett had pine tar on his bat above the allowed area.  But everyone had done it.  No big deal. 



#1222 drleather2001


  • given himself a skunk spot


  • 18035 posts

Posted 07 May 2015 - 02:41 PM

A bit OT for this thread, but, yeah, if his attitude had been, "What's the big deal?  Every starting QB wants their footballs prepared for them.  Everyone."  Then today, he could make the case that the two Pats equipment guys were just too zealous in  meeting his demands.  It's not a big deal, really, but Brady's evasiveness, and his inability (I assume) to come clean with Belichick and Kraft will probably lead to his undoing, instead of the NFL fining the Patriots 2 x $25,000 for having two nitwits going to extremes to keep Brady off their backs.  Hell, if Nixon had come clean in June of 1972, and just said, "I told them to take care of things, and my staff hired those 'effin nitwits who decided to become burglars!" he'd have survived easily.

 

Point is, Pos makes the point that Brett had pine tar on his bat above the allowed area.  But everyone had done it.  No big deal. 

 

Come clean with what, exactly?  That he likes his "balls soft"?  Did you miss the press conference that was mocked by the entire nation where he said exactly that?



#1223 WenZink

  • 815 posts

Posted 07 May 2015 - 02:49 PM

 

Come clean with what, exactly?  That he likes his "balls soft"?  Did you miss the press conference that was mocked by the entire nation where he said exactly that?

 

Pos compared Brady's demeanor in the Press Conference to Nathan Thurm.  I agree with that assessment 100%.  IMO, if he'd come clean with Belichick and Kraft, he would have help in defusing the situation back then.  Instead, 433 pages later, he's lost the case in the court of public opinion and he'll probably get a suspension for a stupid, minor infraction.



#1224 drleather2001


  • given himself a skunk spot


  • 18035 posts

Posted 07 May 2015 - 03:04 PM

Again: come clean with what?



#1225 WenZink

  • 815 posts

Posted 07 May 2015 - 03:15 PM

Again: come clean with what?

Come clean with Bill and Bob with whatever instructions/texts/correspondence he'd had with the two clowns that worked on the footballs. Tell them what the NFL might discover. This is not so much a rules-violation matter as it is a PR nightmare.  Most of this was preventable if a PR team knew what they had to deal with at the time.  



#1226 drleather2001


  • given himself a skunk spot


  • 18035 posts

Posted 07 May 2015 - 03:17 PM

And you think that he didn't tell them all this?

 

Why is that, exactly?



#1227 WenZink

  • 815 posts

Posted 07 May 2015 - 03:45 PM

And you think that he didn't tell them all this?

 

Why is that, exactly?

 

Because of the statements of Kraft and Belichick at the time.

 

Look, it's fine if you disagree with Pos and with me.  I thought Brady's presser in January was a disaster, even at the time.  So does Pos.  You think Brady was, at least, adequate.  Good.  We disagree.



#1228 Red(s)HawksFan


  • SoSH Member


  • 6369 posts

Posted 07 May 2015 - 04:25 PM

 

Because of the statements of Kraft and Belichick at the time.

 

Look, it's fine if you disagree with Pos and with me.  I thought Brady's presser in January was a disaster, even at the time.  So does Pos.  You think Brady was, at least, adequate.  Good.  We disagree.

 

Brady at the time said he prefers his balls soft.  Based on the texts between the equipment guys, the implication is only that he told them he wants the balls soft.  There's still no smoking gun that he ordered them to deflate the balls below specs or in violation of the rules (i.e. during games/after inspection).  I only read that he asked for the equipment guys to make sure the refs didn't overinflate the balls during inspections as they apparently did at least once (the mentions of 16 p.s.i. and "rugby balls").

 

Brady could have easily told Belichick and Kraft all of that (and we have zero evidence that he didn't) and it wouldn't have changed their answers or responses one iota.

 

I agree with Pos's overall conclusion about this saga.  It's insanely overwrought.  MLB realized how fucking assinine the pine tar rule was and the fact that no one paid any attention to it until that one moment in time, so they overturned the ruling by the umpires and essentially gave Brett a pass.  The NFL should have done the same thing with this...admitted no one gave two shits about monitoring air pressure in game balls and moved on.  Instead, they've turned it into a circus and a witch hunt.

 

If they're going to follow through with fines and suspensions, they had better go the full nine and lock down air pressure procedures for every single game from here on out.  You know, if it's a matter of the integrity of the game, let's make sure that this is the last time these shenanigans happen.



#1229 doldmoose34


  • impregnated Melissa Theuriau


  • 3011 posts

Posted 08 May 2015 - 05:39 AM

I think Pos gets it right, and one thought keeps coming back about the report, in the words of Gov. William J. Lopettome "we've got to protect our phoney baloney jobs"

#1230 JimBoSox9


  • will you be my friend?


  • 14160 posts

Posted 08 May 2015 - 05:59 AM

HARUMPH



#1231 VBSoxFan

  • 107 posts

Posted 12 May 2015 - 02:06 PM

quick take from Joe on the Dgate penalties handed down. He takes the league to task for their heavy-handedness, and holds the opinion that argument for GOAT now excludes Brady because of "a little bit of air in footballs".



#1232 WenZink

  • 815 posts

Posted 12 May 2015 - 02:23 PM

quick take from Joe on the Dgate penalties handed down. He takes the league to task for their heavy-handedness, and holds the opinion that argument for GOAT now excludes Brady because of "a little bit of air in footballs".

 

It's a great point.  Arriving at GOAT is always a subjective process.  I still cling to Johnny Unitas because of his high-tops.  Advocates of Brady for GOAT in barroom arguments will get shouted down forever by the memory of Deflate-gate.  And Joe raises the most important issue of all by questioning the wisdom of the NFL in devaluing the greatest star of his era.  The Pats should have been warned before the AFC title game.  Goodell will claim he didn't know beforehand, but I think it's more likely he was willing to sacrifice Brady's rep in order revive his own position, after the Ray Rice debacle.

 

Roger Goodell is trying to be a modern-day Judge Kenesaw Mountain Landis.  Of course Landis was a fraud, who helped keep black athletes out of MLB until after his death.  So, "Congratulations Roger!"


Edited by WenZink, 12 May 2015 - 02:24 PM.


#1233 drleather2001


  • given himself a skunk spot


  • 18035 posts

Posted 13 May 2015 - 11:12 AM

I don't put stock in moronic opinions, and neither should you.

 

If the basis of an opinion is stupid, then the opinion is probably stupid as well.   This is like arguing that Peyton Manning isn't in consideration of being GOAT because he lied about how bad his injury was this past season.



#1234 There is no Rev


  • SoSH Member


  • 25951 posts

Posted 14 May 2015 - 01:32 AM

quick take from Joe on the Dgate penalties handed down. He takes the league to task for their heavy-handedness, and holds the opinion that argument for GOAT now excludes Brady because of "a little bit of air in footballs".

 

This is a very, very poorly expressed characterization of JoePos's position presented in that piece. Yes, he says that the argument excludes Brady. But you left out the part where he implies that that is a bad thing.

 

Also, in general (this not in response to the quoted posted), we understand that this issue is making people crazy, but if your post demonstrates that you were commenting on a linked to piece and didn't actually read it, well... don't? Please?



#1235 VBSoxFan

  • 107 posts

Posted 14 May 2015 - 05:46 AM

I felt that including the quote of "a little bit of air" from Joe demonstrated that he thought that reasoning was specious. I certainly do, but I will be clearer with any future posts.





Reply to this topic



  


4 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 2 guests, 0 anonymous users


    Bing (2)