Jump to content


Yo! You're not logged in. Why am I seeing this ad?

Photo
* * * * - 6 votes

9/29/07--Twins at Red Sox


This topic has been archived. This means that you cannot reply to this topic.
460 replies to this topic

#101 Southpaw67

  • 1,006 posts

Posted 29 September 2007 - 06:51 PM

Did she actually refer to herself as Youk's "significant other"?

No. Remy did though.

#102 MidnightC

  • 1,662 posts

Posted 29 September 2007 - 06:53 PM

On an 0-2 pitch too. Bleh.

#103 MartyBarrettMVP

  • 873 posts

Posted 29 September 2007 - 06:53 PM

I'm sorry but I actually want to win this game. Call me crazy.

#104 InsideTheParker


  • SoSH Member


  • 7,100 posts

Posted 29 September 2007 - 06:54 PM

I am thinking Wake is not a real plus for a play-off team at this juncture.

#105 MartyBarrettMVP

  • 873 posts

Posted 29 September 2007 - 06:54 PM

I am thinking Wake is not a real plus for a play-off team at this juncture.


Not as a starter but I can't help remember what he did for us in the 2004 ALCS.

#106 4-6-3

  • 1,147 posts

Posted 29 September 2007 - 06:55 PM

Hey, did anyone notice that there were no IPS (?) errors during last night's excitement? How is that possible?

It was a lucky night indeed.

#107 Morgan's Magic Snowplow


  • SoSH Member


  • 6,123 posts

Posted 29 September 2007 - 06:55 PM

Wake has given up 7 HR in his last 21 innings.

#108 5belongstoGeorge


  • Left Coast


  • PipPipPip
  • 8,013 posts

Posted 29 September 2007 - 06:56 PM

Millar up with 2 on against Mr. Ed.

#109 MidnightC

  • 1,662 posts

Posted 29 September 2007 - 06:56 PM

DREW! Leadoff triple!

#110 Comfortably Lomb


  • Koko the Monkey


  • 6,143 posts

Posted 29 September 2007 - 06:57 PM

Did he miss second base?

Edit - Nevermind, looked like the camera angle was just bad.

Edited by Comfortably Lomb, 29 September 2007 - 06:57 PM.


#111 MartyBarrettMVP

  • 873 posts

Posted 29 September 2007 - 06:57 PM

Drew is on fire!!!!

#112 Pearl Wilson

  • 4,684 posts

Posted 29 September 2007 - 06:57 PM

Hunter just had flashbacks of his broken ankle out there.

#113 MidnightC

  • 1,662 posts

Posted 29 September 2007 - 06:58 PM

YOUK! All right. They're starting to hit Silva hard.

#114 MartyBarrettMVP

  • 873 posts

Posted 29 September 2007 - 06:58 PM

This team sobered up right quick!

#115 5belongstoGeorge


  • Left Coast


  • PipPipPip
  • 8,013 posts

Posted 29 September 2007 - 07:00 PM

2 base error puts Millar on second and scores another... even though it is meaningless it is good for Roger's buttboy to get worked.

#116 Obscure Name

  • 4,524 posts

Posted 29 September 2007 - 07:01 PM

wtf are you doing, Youk?

#117 MartyBarrettMVP

  • 873 posts

Posted 29 September 2007 - 07:01 PM

2 base error puts Millar on second and scores another... even though it is meaningless it is good for Roger's buttboy to get worked.

And their #2 starter against the Indians....

#118 MidnightC

  • 1,662 posts

Posted 29 September 2007 - 07:03 PM

Nice having two pitchers in the lineup. Three if you count Cora.

#119 Marbleheader


  • SoSH Member


  • 5,615 posts

Posted 29 September 2007 - 07:04 PM

Hey, did anyone notice that there were no IPS (?) errors during last night's excitement? How is that possible?

Because Nip and Tito have volunteered hours upon hours to do the thankless task of optimizing the server.

#120 RSN Diaspora


  • molests goats for comedy


  • 4,313 posts

Posted 29 September 2007 - 07:04 PM

Well, that ended badly...

#121 fletcherpost


  • sosh's feckin' poet laureate


  • 5,904 posts

Posted 29 September 2007 - 07:04 PM

Hmm - we ought to have scored more there.

#122 Flynn4ever

  • 425 posts

Posted 29 September 2007 - 07:04 PM

Not as a starter but I can't help remember what he did for us in the 2004 ALCS.

Yes, but I also remember what he did to us in the 2003 ALCS (not that I blame him, but still when a knuckler doesn't knuckle that's what you run the risk of.) :(

#123 flymrfreakjar

  • 1,175 posts

Posted 29 September 2007 - 07:05 PM

1 run on 7 hits through 4. Nice.

#124 k-factory

  • 408 posts

Posted 29 September 2007 - 07:05 PM

why is this asshat on the team? what would have been the harm in calling up lowrie?

#125 MartyBarrettMVP

  • 873 posts

Posted 29 September 2007 - 07:05 PM

Yes, but I also remember what he did to us in the 2003 ALCS (not that I blame him, but still when a knuckler doesn't knuckle that's what you run the risk of.) :(


Agreed. Then if I had to choose I would rather have him start a game then come in where one pitch can mean the end of the game.

#126 Pearl Wilson

  • 4,684 posts

Posted 29 September 2007 - 07:06 PM

Yes, but I also remember what he did to us in the 2003 ALCS (not that I blame him, but still when a knuckler doesn't knuckle that's what you run the risk of.) :(

I just don't know what to say to this.

#127 5belongstoGeorge


  • Left Coast


  • PipPipPip
  • 8,013 posts

Posted 29 September 2007 - 07:06 PM

Yes, but I also remember what he did to us in the 2003 ALCS (not that I blame him, but still when a knuckler doesn't knuckle that's what you run the risk of.) :(

If grady had pulled Pedro at the correct time Wakefield would have been the 2003 ALCS MVP. I remember what he did in that series too. He almost singlehandedly won 2 games.

#128 fletcherpost


  • sosh's feckin' poet laureate


  • 5,904 posts

Posted 29 September 2007 - 07:06 PM

Because Nip and Tito have volunteered hours upon hours to do the thankless task of optimizing the server.


Well i for one am grateful. I like those two stalwarts more than i like the butchers choice dry cureed streaky bacon i bought from Sainsburys. Granted i haven't ate the bacon yet.

Good work. Much appreciated.

#129 MidnightC

  • 1,662 posts

Posted 29 September 2007 - 07:07 PM

Because Nip and Tito have volunteered hours upon hours to do the thankless task of optimizing the server.


THANKS, GUYS!

Not thankless now. :(

#130 AhabsLeg

  • 32 posts

Posted 29 September 2007 - 07:08 PM

Because Nip and Tito have volunteered hours upon hours to do the thankless task of optimizing the server.


Nip and Tito; Thank you.

#131 TFisNEXT

  • 4,489 posts

Posted 29 September 2007 - 07:08 PM

Clayton isnt making the most of his start

#132 flymrfreakjar

  • 1,175 posts

Posted 29 September 2007 - 07:09 PM

LeCroy or Clayton?

#133 MartyBarrettMVP

  • 873 posts

Posted 29 September 2007 - 07:09 PM

Please tell me this is the last time we see Royce Clayton in a Sox uni?

#134 fletcherpost


  • sosh's feckin' poet laureate


  • 5,904 posts

Posted 29 September 2007 - 07:09 PM

That wasn't very good.

#135 MidnightC

  • 1,662 posts

Posted 29 September 2007 - 07:10 PM

There's a reason Royce Clayton's played for 11 MLB teams.

#136 Stu Nahan

  • 2,527 posts

Posted 29 September 2007 - 07:11 PM

I think it is fair to say that the Sox don't have a dependable fourth starter for the playoffs. This is fucking awful.

#137 InsideTheParker


  • SoSH Member


  • 7,100 posts

Posted 29 September 2007 - 07:13 PM

Nice DP started by Wake.

#138 MidnightC

  • 1,662 posts

Posted 29 September 2007 - 07:14 PM

Nice play. Needed that.

#139 MartyBarrettMVP

  • 873 posts

Posted 29 September 2007 - 07:14 PM

Now 3-2 in KC.

#140 5belongstoGeorge


  • Left Coast


  • PipPipPip
  • 8,013 posts

Posted 29 September 2007 - 07:14 PM

Pearl, you were right last night about Wakes v. "The Gambler".

#141 TFisNEXT

  • 4,489 posts

Posted 29 September 2007 - 07:14 PM

I think it is fair to say that the Sox don't have a dependable fourth starter for the playoffs. This is fucking awful.



He's hot and cold. Hopefully this is the last of his cold spell. His hot and cold spells tend to last about 4-6 starts and then flip. Hopefully he's good when we need him to be.

#142 MidnightC

  • 1,662 posts

Posted 29 September 2007 - 07:15 PM

Them: 4 hits, 3 runs.
Us: 7 hits, 1 run.

Baseball's funny.

#143 MartyBarrettMVP

  • 873 posts

Posted 29 September 2007 - 07:16 PM

And 6-6 in Baltimore.

Edited by MartyBarrettMVP, 29 September 2007 - 07:17 PM.


#144 fletcherpost


  • sosh's feckin' poet laureate


  • 5,904 posts

Posted 29 September 2007 - 07:16 PM

That could have been worse.

#145 reggiecleveland


  • sublime


  • 11,920 posts

Posted 29 September 2007 - 07:16 PM

He's hot and cold. Hopefully this is the last of his cold spell. His hot and cold spells tend to last about 4-6 starts and then flip. Hopefully he's good when we need him to be.


Has Wake ever had a "hot" spell in October?

#146 5belongstoGeorge


  • Left Coast


  • PipPipPip
  • 8,013 posts

Posted 29 September 2007 - 07:16 PM

Them: 4 hits, 3 runs.
Us: 7 hits, 1 run.

Baseball's funny.

I believe the above situation is called "The Royce Clayton Sucktastic Effect".

#147 AhabsLeg

  • 32 posts

Posted 29 September 2007 - 07:17 PM

I think it is fair to say that the Sox don't have a dependable fourth starter for the playoffs. This is fucking awful.


How dependable are fourth starters really? I would guess Wake's dependability would be at least average, if not better, for a fourth starter.

#148 5belongstoGeorge


  • Left Coast


  • PipPipPip
  • 8,013 posts

Posted 29 September 2007 - 07:18 PM

Has Wake ever had a "hot" spell in October?

More often than they do in Saskatchewan.

#149 Pumpsie


  • The Kilimanjaro of bullshit


  • 10,439 posts

Posted 29 September 2007 - 07:18 PM

Come on and face reality.

There is no way Wakefield should be on the postseason roster. He has no role if he doesn't start and he's been so wretchedly bad since coming back from his injury that shouldn't start anything but the team bus in the postseason. It's too bad because he was going so well before the injury but dems the breaks.

#150 Pearl Wilson

  • 4,684 posts

Posted 29 September 2007 - 07:19 PM

Pearl, you were right last night about Wakes v. "The Gambler".

I am always right :(