Yo! You're not logged in. Why am I seeing this ad?
The 2007 49ers Thread (or the Pats '08 draft pick watch)
#1
Posted 10 September 2007 - 04:30 PM
The defense should improve with the addition of Clements and Willis, but there are still a lot of questions about a D that gave up more points than anyone last season (412 - more than double the Ravens' #1 scoring defense). Obviously this has to improve if they want to go anywhere.
It starts tonight at home against the Cardinals, another young team with questions on defense. It should be fun to watch this 2nd game of the MNF doubleheader.
I think they'll go 8-8 (3-3 vs NFC West, 1-3 vs AFC North, 4-2 rest of NFC). In 2006, teams 13-20 finished 8-8. In the NFC, this could be good enough for a playoff spot. The Patriots extra 2008 1st rounder from SF could realistically be as high as 10 or as low as 20. In all likelihood it will be a better pick than the one the Pats traded away to get it. I hate to root against an exciting young team like SF, but at least this year Pats fans are obligated to hope they lose.
#2
Posted 10 September 2007 - 05:02 PM
#3
Posted 11 September 2007 - 08:38 AM
If the league takes away a #1 for the filming issue, I'd expect it to be the Pat's own #1, not one received in a trade.
And I'd expect the punishment to be a #3 or #4 at worst, unless there were prior warnings.
#4
Posted 11 September 2007 - 08:46 AM
#5
Posted 11 September 2007 - 08:48 AM
#6
Posted 11 September 2007 - 08:49 AM
#7
Posted 11 September 2007 - 09:13 AM
There's really only one thing to say about it:
SAME OLD CARDINALS! *clap clap clap-clap-clap* SAME OLD CARDINALS! *clap clap clap-clap-clap*
The difference, of course, is that Dennis Green isn't here to claim that the 49ers are who they thought they were. And I don't think anybody's ready to crown their ass.
#8
Posted 11 September 2007 - 10:33 AM
I am sure the Pats are perfectly happy with the pick falling in the 15 - 20 range. They are on record as saying that this is where the most value is vs having to pay an unproven top 12 pick a load of gauranteed money...
See Jamarcus Russell's fat contract earned because of a big arm and one good year of college football. I would, however, like the pick to be closer to 10-15 which is definitely possible after watching that team last night and looking at their schedule. The 10-15 range is good because there is always a player available that is the best at his position (and I don't mean a guard or punt returner). Patrick Willis, every Pats fan's dream scenario last year and a guy who figures to have a humongous impact in his rookie season, was the 11th pick by the Niners (7-9). If they could repeat that draft position I would be happy.
BB hasn't picked up any LBs in the draft because the top ones have always been taken and the value wasn't there to reach for the next tier (could've been Beason this year had they not traded the pick). If they're anywhere within a few spots of 15 they could be in really good shape for finally taking a LB. Of course BB would take a stud at another position just as quickly if he didn't like who was available.
The Niners will be 'dogs in their next four games so we should be able to start enjoying these results more than last night.
#9
Posted 11 September 2007 - 10:44 AM
I am sure the Pats are perfectly happy with the pick falling in the 15 - 20 range. They are on record as saying that this is where the most value is vs having to pay an unproven top 12 pick a load of gauranteed money...
I bet they'd be perfectly happier with a top ten pick that they could trade for 2 later 1st round picks.
#10
Posted 16 September 2007 - 03:02 PM
#11
Posted 16 September 2007 - 05:41 PM
San Fran gets lucky again. They suck. They'll lose some games this year, especially when they play the real conference.
They'll lose some game, no doubt, but unless they get absolutely crushed by injuries it won't be a top 10 pick, and they proabably have already won to many to be in contention for #1 (not like that was ever a real possibility)
#12
Posted 16 September 2007 - 05:54 PM
Sep 16 at St. Louis W 17-16
Sep 23 at Pittsburgh
Sep 30 Seattle
Oct 7 Baltimore
BYE WEEK
Oct 21 at NY Giants
Oct 28 New Orleans
Nov 4 at Atlanta
Nov 12 at Seattle
Nov 18 St. Louis
Nov 25 at Arizona
Dec 2 at Carolina
Dec 9 Minnesota
Dec 15 Cincinnati
Dec 23 Tampa Bay
Dec 30 at Cleveland
The losses are coming (especially the next couple of weeks), but that is hardly a tough schedule. Let's hope Pace gets healthy, Cincy is in the playoff hunt, and right versions of the schizo teams (NYG, TB, etc) show up.
#13
Posted 20 September 2007 - 02:00 PM
http://sports.espn.g...tory?id=3029152The San Francisco 49ers suffered their first major injury blow of the season Thursday when they learned linebacker Manny Lawson was lost for the season because of a torn ACL.
(Maybe not 'wooo', hate to see a good young player hurt... but you know what I mean.)
#14
Posted 25 September 2007 - 12:02 AM
Niners' Davis likely out two weeks
2-3 going into the bye is looking highly plausible.Just when Vernon Davis finally became a key part of the San Francisco 49ers' offense, the tight end is headed back to the sideline.
Davis probably will miss the 49ers' next two games with a sprained ligament in his right knee after getting hurt during San Francisco's 37-16 loss at Pittsburgh. Last year's No. 6 overall draft pick caught four passes for 56 yards against the Steelers just a few days after asking coach Mike Nolan how he could be more involved in the Niners' struggling offense.
#15
Posted 30 September 2007 - 10:36 PM
http://www.sportslin.../story/10381806Though a miracle could happen, it is looking like Smith will be out at least several weeks (and that's conservative). In fact, don't be surprised if the 49ers reach out to their rivals just down road and over a bridge or two, as Oakland has one of the few realistically tradable and viable backups in Andrew Walter.
"I've had maybe 10 separated shoulders," said Trent Dilfer, who came on to play quarterback Sunday after Smith's injury. "And I think with all but one, I've played the next week. But of course, I don't know how bad this one was."
It was bad. Very bad. Smith's throwing mechanism wasn't so much separated as it was squashed and disintegrated when the 308 pounds of Seattle's Rocky Bernard landed on top of Smith and jammed his right shoulder directly into the ground.
"I told him, 'I need to see you throw the ball,' " Dilfer said. "And when he picked one up and threw one really weak pass, I knew. I put on my helmet and started warming up.
http://origin.mercur...news/ci_7046936Coach Mike Nolan said he would not know how long Smith is out until the MRI exams and other medical reports are completed Monday morning. But when asked if Smith will start next week against Baltimore, Nolan conceded: "Probably not."
Edited by SoxScout, 30 September 2007 - 10:39 PM.
#16
Posted 30 September 2007 - 10:43 PM
#17
Posted 30 September 2007 - 10:46 PM
I apologize for that. He gets a little exuberant sometimes.Jackpot? Fuck you. That's bullshit and bush league. I don't think you'd take too kindly to someone cheering a multi-week Tom Brady injury.
#18
Posted 30 September 2007 - 10:47 PM
It's all in good fun.
He's just a marginal QB at best,
so give it a rest.
Not to be rude,
but even with Alex Smith, SF 49ers are no good.
Regards,
The Rhyming Sexist
#19
Posted 30 September 2007 - 10:54 PM
All offseason it was "if Gore or Smith get hurt, jackpot." I'm not shedding a tear for Smith or 49er fans. Brady has played the last two years with a bum shoulder! [/Belichick]
Edited by SoxScout, 30 September 2007 - 10:58 PM.
#20
Posted 30 September 2007 - 11:05 PM
#21
Posted 30 September 2007 - 11:19 PM
He is going to miss one game, and now I'd say the 9ers go from a slight favorite to a slight underdog. I'll be happy if they lose no matter who is at QB.
#22
Posted 02 October 2007 - 11:22 PM
A team source has told ESPN's Ed Werder that San Francisco 49ers starting quarterback Alex Smith is seeking a second opinion from Dr. James Andrews after preliminary MRI results indicated he appears to have suffered a serious injury to tendons in his right shoulder in Sunday's game.
If the diagnosis performed at Stanford is confirmed by Andrews, the source said that it is expected Smith would opt to have corrective surgery immediately even though he would likely miss the rest of the season.
#23
Posted 02 October 2007 - 11:31 PM
If they didn't send him to Andrews that would have been shocking. Ed Werder sucks, I say the odds of him having a real scoop are... remote.
Edited by SoxScout, 02 October 2007 - 11:32 PM.
#24
Posted 03 October 2007 - 07:43 AM
But from a draft pick perspective, this bodes well for us.
#25
Posted 03 October 2007 - 08:13 AM
Shoulder subluxations produce labral tears and they are so hard to reliably find on MRI that it is standard practice to have readings by 5 docs a mix of radiologists and orthopods and majority rules.Well that is not good. Interesting how stories has the preliminary MRI results as only being a shoulder subluxation (aka nothing significant any more) and now these "preliminary" results are somehow different.
If they didn't send him to Andrews that would have been shocking. Ed Werder sucks, I say the odds of him having a real scoop are... remote.
#26
Posted 03 October 2007 - 11:07 AM
That's bad for Smith, a promising young player who just took a major hit to his career prospects.
That's bad for the Patriots, because the Niners are going to begin doing things to win games with Dilfer at the helm. At this stage of their careers, I take Dilfer over Smith, especially since the former means more Frank Gore on the ground.
#27
Posted 03 October 2007 - 12:22 PM
Gore finally started to be a little productive last week, but he started putting the ball on the ground again. God knows where his head is at after his Mom died.
Good luck, Mike Nolan.
#28
Posted 03 October 2007 - 01:14 PM
Their O-line has been terrible too, well at least the veterans, I think Joe Staley has been decent.
Living out here in the Bay Area and having to watch and listen about the 49ers regularly, a lot of their issues on offense has been on the offensive line. They gave up 6 sacks and had 4 false start and 3 holding penalties this past Sunday against the Seahawks.
Mike Nolan in a radio interview earlier this week recognized the weakness of the line and said they were considering giving other players (i.e. David Baas, etc.) an opportunity to play (more). We'll see if that makes a difference or not...
#29
Posted 03 October 2007 - 02:47 PM
That is exactly right, O line is the major weakness. Which is why Alex Smith is actually a better quarterback for them than Trent Dilfer, because he can move around.Living out here in the Bay Area and having to watch and listen about the 49ers regularly, a lot of their issues on offense has been on the offensive line. They gave up 6 sacks and had 4 false start and 3 holding penalties this past Sunday against the Seahawks.
Mike Nolan in a radio interview earlier this week recognized the weakness of the line and said they were considering giving other players (i.e. David Baas, etc.) an opportunity to play (more). We'll see if that makes a difference or not...
There are rumors out here of trying to talk Jake Plummer out of retirement, who would be an upgrade.
#30
Posted 03 October 2007 - 03:30 PM
#31
Posted 03 October 2007 - 03:43 PM
Take kindly? No. Expect it? Hell yes.Jackpot? Fuck you. That's bullshit and bush league. I don't think you'd take too kindly to someone cheering a multi-week Tom Brady injury.
I gave a minor fist pump when I heard the news today while driving around; the fact the Pats might get a top 10 pick in a year where they've been "punished" (and I seem to recall a good deal of bullshit and bush league taunting over that) is absolutely wonderful.
The fact is, based on my 30 minutes of watching the 49ers this season, trent Dilfer gives them a better chance to win. Alex Smith has sucked this season, even when healthy.
#32
Posted 03 October 2007 - 04:38 PM
Belicheat. Cheatriots. TMQ in general.I gave a minor fist pump when I heard the news today while driving around; the fact the Pats might get a top 10 pick in a year where they've been "punished" (and I seem to recall a good deal of bullshit and bush league taunting over that) is absolutely wonderful.
If you think Patriots fans aren't going to be happy to hear that Smith is injured, you are being just plain naive. How many non-Pats fans in the country wouldn't be ecstatic if Brady got injured?
#33
Posted 03 October 2007 - 05:03 PM
#35
Posted 04 October 2007 - 01:26 AM
Edited by Jim Lonborg, 04 October 2007 - 01:27 AM.
#36
Posted 04 October 2007 - 08:34 AM
Something that I've noticed as a 49er fan is that the new offensive coordinator is a huge drop off from Norv Turner last year. The reason that Gore has sucked is that every team has put 8 in the box daring them to pass and they haven't. The play calling has been totally predictable. Gore run on first down, Gore run on second down, then pass when it is third and 8. The reason that there were so many sacks last week was that the coaching staff was extremely slow to adjust to the different blitz packages the Seattle defensive coaches were sending. The players are somewhat to blame with their underperformance as well, but Jim Hostler hasn't helped things.
Norv's departure messed up two teams. Superb OC, bad HC.
#37
Posted 04 October 2007 - 03:54 PM
1. Alex Smith has made some improvements but he still does not seem to have it, like a #1 overall pick is expected to.
2. I always considered Dilfer a decet QB, but with that O line he could get killed one of these games.
3. Ironic if Jake Plummer is indeed pulled out or retirement, as many Niner fans think that they drafted the wrong QB when they had a chance to draft Plummer (anyone know whatever became of Kim Dreckenmiller?)
4. Totally agree that Norv Turner's leaving totally screwed up the Niners O. But it's more than that. They've had like 4 OCs in 4 years and Nolan is a primarily defensive coach, so each new coach will bring his own scheme and changes. When the "coaching carroussell" ended last offseason I was happy that Turner didn't go anywhere as I thought it would give Smith and Co. one more year to learn and grow into the new offense, and then San Diego came along, no one here would expect Turner to refuse a HC job.
5. They took the time to get 2 good WRs yet cannot manage to throw ell to them with 8 men in the box? Sheesh!
#38
Posted 07 October 2007 - 04:36 PM
#39
Posted 07 October 2007 - 06:22 PM
Maybe he's a hand model. Note to NFL GMs: It's never a good sign when the only positive thing anyone can say about your supposed 'quarterback of the future' is that he has gigantic mitts. Of course, that's better than drafting one with little girl hands who can barely hold onto the ball.(anyone know whatever became of Kim Dreckenmiller?)
As a lifelong Niners & Pats fan, this is a very strange year for me.
#40
Posted 07 October 2007 - 06:25 PM
#41
Posted 07 October 2007 - 11:26 PM
#42
Posted 08 October 2007 - 12:21 AM
#43
Posted 08 October 2007 - 10:41 AM
The draft pick is now up to #11, #10 if Buffalo upsets Dallas tomorrow. That might get you a guy like Zackary Bowman of Nebraska.
The draft pick is going a lot higher than #11 by the time this season ends. I could definitely see no more than 2 more wins from the 49ers, and maybe only 1. 3-13 or 4-12 at best is my guess.
Look at the teams who are currently tied or below them:
NY Jets: They have not looked good, but I have to think they can win 4 games or more.
Buffalo: Will certainly win more than 4 games. They have still yet to play Miami.
Miami: Definitely finishing at the bottom of the league below SF.
Cincinatti: No question will win a lot more games than SF
Cleveland: This team will be close to .500, maybe 7-9.
Denver: The Broncos win pick themselves up and will not be in contention with SF here.
KC: Big variable, the team has been pretty bad, and they play a pretty tough schedule. They are good at home though, so I give them 2-3 more wins on the season.
San Diego: No question, much better.
Philly: At 1-3 they are underperforming, but Westbrook will be back and they will finish well ahead of SF.
Chicago: Big win last night at GB, they will finish well above SF as well.
Minnesota: Unless they get QB help they are in trouble as Peterson can not do it all. They are definitely a threat to finish near SF at the bottom.
Atlanta: No question, they are a threat to SF, but they have hung in every game beyond the season opener. Something tells me they finish with 4 wins on the season.
New Orleans: My god they can be this horrendous can they? As much as I want to say no, I cant...they are brutal.
St Louis: The whole offense has been hurt this season leading to the Rams' struggles. Nothing is changing very soon on those injuries though, so it will be ugly.
Projecting right now:
1. Miami 1-15
2. St Louis 2-14
3. New Orleans 3-13
4. San Franicisco 3-13
5. Atlanta 4-12
The funny thing is when Dallas traded for Cleveland's number #1 next year everyone pretty much assumed it would end up being much higher than SF's #1 pick. Doesnt look even all that close right now. I think the Pats will end up with a top 5 draft pick in 2008.
#44
Posted 08 October 2007 - 10:47 AM
#45
Posted 08 October 2007 - 10:48 AM
This may have been covered, but do we have any info as to which pick the Pats will lose? Can the NFL take away the Niners pick, or will they be taking away the 32nd pick?
Its already been stated it will be the Patriots own selection.
#46
Posted 08 October 2007 - 11:12 AM
#47
Posted 08 October 2007 - 12:34 PM
#48
Posted 08 October 2007 - 01:08 PM
I haven't followed college football much this year, but if there is a stud CB or LB I could see the Patriots keeping it. Otherwise, I agree they'd probably move it.Also, given the quotes by Pioli, Kraft and Belichick around the idea that the top 15 picks in the draft are often not worth it given the contract size, I could definately imagine trading down, giving them something in the bottom half of the 2008 draft and a likely 2009 first rounder or two 2008 picks (1st and an early second). I'm almost convinced that if they are picking anywhere above 10, they will trade down. Especially when you look at a top 10 pick costing approximately as much as the Ty Warren extension. The value is just not there.
#49
Posted 08 October 2007 - 01:15 PM
I'm almost convinced that if they are picking anywhere above 10, they will trade down. Especially when you look at a top 10 pick costing approximately as much as the Ty Warren extension. The value is just not there.
Agreed. I see them trading this pick down unless it falls into the bottom half of the 'teens, which I doubt, and I maybe even then. There is going to be someone lusting after a QB, WR or DE that will give up a late 1st and a 2nd/3rd for that pick.
As an aside, I mentioned this thread to a buddy who is a big BC fan, and he is now worried that it will be something like the Falcons trading up from the 2nd round to try to get Matt Ryan, and he will have to watch his favorite son run around in a Falcon's #7 jersey in the near future. I found his terror amusing.
#50
Posted 08 October 2007 - 02:00 PM
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users










