- 09/13/1972 @ NYA 5th Doug Griffin (RBI), Lynn McGlothen off Rob Gardner
- 04/14/1973 @ NYA 7th Tommy Harper , Luis Aparicio off Fritz Peterson
- 09/14/1975 v MIL 7th Cecil Cooper , Denny Doyle off Rick Austin
- 10/01/1976 v BAL 7th Butch Hobson , Denny Doyle off Fred Holdsworth
- 10/03/1985 @ BAL 7th Mike Greenwell , Rick Miller off Brad Havens
- 07/16/1994 @ OAK 1st Otis Nixon (lead-off), Tim Naehring off Ron Darling
- 04/21/2007 v NYA 2nd Coco Crisp , Alex Cora off Jeff Karstens
Page 1 of 1
Back-to-back bunts for hits
#1
Posted 22 April 2007 - 05:40 AM
Going back though the 1967 season using Retrosheet data, I only found six instances of Red Sox batters having back-to-back bunt hits before last night's occurrence.
_____________________________________________________________________
Not everything that counts is counted; not everything that is counted is worth counting.
---Albert Einstein
Not everything that counts is counted; not everything that is counted is worth counting.
---Albert Einstein
#2
Posted 22 April 2007 - 10:11 AM
Have two players ever bunted for consecutive hits against two different pitchers?
I was wrong, spectacularly wrong about Lugo.
Eric Vann
No shit Sherlock.
Ma Browndog
Eric Vann
No shit Sherlock.
Ma Browndog
#3
Posted 22 April 2007 - 10:24 AM
reggiecleveland, on Apr 22 2007, 11:11 AM, said:
Have two players ever bunted for consecutive hits against two different pitchers?
_____________________________________________________________________
Not everything that counts is counted; not everything that is counted is worth counting.
---Albert Einstein
Not everything that counts is counted; not everything that is counted is worth counting.
---Albert Einstein
#4
Posted 22 April 2007 - 10:58 AM
OttoC, on Apr 22 2007, 09:24 AM, said:
I don't know, but I'd be surprised if it had not happened.
Did you manually go throught the score sheets to find the Red Sox bunt hits or is there a way to search.
I was wrong, spectacularly wrong about Lugo.
Eric Vann
No shit Sherlock.
Ma Browndog
Eric Vann
No shit Sherlock.
Ma Browndog
#5
Posted 22 April 2007 - 11:06 AM
I don't know how Otto did it, but if you download play-by-play data into a spreadsheet, it's pretty easy to write an Excel macro that will scroll down the list of plays until it finds two consecutive bunt singles.
RADIATION WILL TASTE LIKE VANILLA ICE CREAM
I think you have me confused with Corsi which makes you a &*#@ing idiot. - SeanBerry
I think you have me confused with Corsi which makes you a &*#@ing idiot. - SeanBerry
#6
Posted 22 April 2007 - 11:35 AM
Reggie: He probably wrote a program that did it (fortran?).
edit: or not
edit: or not
This post has been edited by BenRS: 22 April 2007 - 02:07 PM
#7
Posted 22 April 2007 - 02:04 PM
I have Retrosheet event files (play-by-play) in an Access database and I simply did a query for Boston batting at home and on the road for HitValue>0 and BuntFlag="T". Then, I copied the result of that query to Excel, sorted it by date, game, inning and event number. That allowed me use a formula like if a2=a1 then t else "". Since there were so few instances, I visually inspected each t and the record immediately preceding to see if the inning was the same and the event numbers were approximately proximate. There were a few more bells and whistles, but that is the gist of what I did.
Note: I currenty only have Red Sox games going back through 1967 and all teams from 2000 through 2006. I haven't gotten around to building a database with all Retrosheet's data because of the sheer amount of data. For example, the database for all teams from 2000 through 2006 has 1,355,268 records, each with 97 fields.
Note: I currenty only have Red Sox games going back through 1967 and all teams from 2000 through 2006. I haven't gotten around to building a database with all Retrosheet's data because of the sheer amount of data. For example, the database for all teams from 2000 through 2006 has 1,355,268 records, each with 97 fields.
_____________________________________________________________________
Not everything that counts is counted; not everything that is counted is worth counting.
---Albert Einstein
Not everything that counts is counted; not everything that is counted is worth counting.
---Albert Einstein
Share this topic:
Page 1 of 1

Sign In »
Register Now!
Help



This topic is locked











