Edited by Country Sinker, 03 November 2005 - 02:24 PM.
Yo! You're not logged in. Why am I seeing this ad?
John Henry on WEEI - 5p EST
#1
Posted 03 November 2005 - 02:22 PM
#2
Posted 03 November 2005 - 02:27 PM
John Henry will be on WEEI's The Big Show at 5p EST today - 11/3/05
So I have 2.5 hours to develop a way of throwing raw, rotten fruit through my radio. Thanks.
#3
Posted 03 November 2005 - 02:34 PM
Edited by BrooklynDog45, 03 November 2005 - 02:34 PM.
#4
Posted 03 November 2005 - 02:35 PM
#5
Posted 03 November 2005 - 02:41 PM
#6
Posted 03 November 2005 - 02:43 PM
#7
Posted 03 November 2005 - 02:47 PM
Tell everybody you will have a GM in a week to 10 days. Say and mean you will make every effort to keep Manny and try to make him happier. Say you have some free agents scheduled for visits and that you plan to be active participants in the meetings next week.
Quit your F'ing crying, whiny baby BS and get a glove on and get in the game. Do something!
#8
Posted 03 November 2005 - 02:49 PM
#9
Posted 03 November 2005 - 02:50 PM
Tony Mazzarotti who accused the FO in print of a 'smear campaign' and Larry Johnson, who might just about say anything are both on the show today.
IMHO, JWH needs to do this to attempt to start to repair the image of the organization with the public. I really don't know of anyone who thinks the current state of affairs is anything else than a disaster of epic proportions.
Quite honestly, if we could all understand better what exactly happened, withough assigning blame, that would be a start at putting the pieces back together.
I wonder if he takes calls?
#10
Posted 03 November 2005 - 02:51 PM
He's already said he is sorry and he let everybody down and all that BS. I don't want to hear it again. What I do want to hear is what he is going to do to try to fix things. I know he is not going to push payroll to 200 million or start handing out free game tickets or something but, some kind of meaningful plan would be nice. I am tired of all the vagueness.
Tell everybody you will have a GM in a week to 10 days. Say and mean you will make every effort to keep Manny and try to make him happier. Say you have some free agents scheduled for visits and that you plan to be active participants in the meetings next week.
Quit your F'ing crying, whiny baby BS and get a glove on and get in the game. Do something!
I would like to hear that he is going to be more of a hands on owner, and he'll look in the trenches more.
#11
Posted 03 November 2005 - 02:55 PM
Not going to happen. This will be all spin and damage control, and he'll say the same stuff he said yesterday.I would like to hear that he is going to be more of a hands on owner, and he'll look in the trenches more.
LL is the hands-on guy. He will be more than ever now that Theo's gone.
#12
Posted 03 November 2005 - 02:56 PM
I would like to hear that he is going to be more of a hands on owner, and he'll look in the trenches more.
After some searching within himself, he finds he can no longer give 100% to being the owner of the Boston RedSox.... he has sold his share to Larry Lucchino.....
Edited by SoxsFans, 03 November 2005 - 03:05 PM.
#13
Posted 03 November 2005 - 03:05 PM
Guts Tony, guts.
Now, this sounds like it's going to be a pretty tame segment.
#14
Posted 03 November 2005 - 03:08 PM
#15
Posted 03 November 2005 - 03:12 PM
Harsh, but it still made made me laugh. I wonder if the Dentist has the hutzpah to approach John Henry with media advice. Hey, at least he knows how to handle the CHB.This looks like some PR spin control. They only problem is Oh Henry's game is numbers and not words. Hopefully LL and Charles have schooled him well.
On to today's Big Show. Bad timing gives us Larry Johnson, perhaps the dullest knife in the Boston Mediot drawer. He'll be sure to ask some inane totally-unrelated question. With better luck Sean McAdam would have been scheduled on today.
Oh well, at least Massarotti might be interesting, given his recent carping on Red Sox management. Come on Tony, show us what ya got. Just don't threaten to ignore the Red Sox Foundation.
#16
Posted 03 November 2005 - 03:15 PM
I'd like somebody to ask him how he could possibly have decided it was better to lose Theo and keep Lucky, rather than the other way around.
I dont think Henry looked at it remotely as you are suggesting. I dont think he chose Lucchino over Theo, as Theo is the one who left, Henry didnt force him out.
As for reasons to have Lucchino there, actually there are a few. This is still a business, something many fans do not grasp that idea, they just think owners will pour every dollar back into the team in an all out quest to win the world series, profitability be damned.
#17
Posted 03 November 2005 - 03:18 PM
Lucchino, I think, is going nowhere.
#18
Posted 03 November 2005 - 03:20 PM
Being patient and "I'm dumping salaries left and right to profit by selling the team in a couple of years" do not necessarily go hand in hand. I believe that being patient may mean that they won't trade Manny this afternoon, but rather later if a good deal presents itself and that free agent signings may come closer to Spring Training than Thanksgiving. It may also mean that the current plan is to promote some of our youth and only make minor moves in the offseason with the promise of something larger happening at the trade deadline (unlike this season) should those moves need to be made, as they probably will.
I liked Theo as much as the next guy, but some of the people on this board have sounded an awful lot like Tim McCarver fawning over Derek Jeter and his calm eyes as you discuss the loss of Theo. Yes, he did grab Ortiz off the scrap heap, traded for The Guy Who Stole Second, and he had a pretty eventful Thanksgiving dinner a couple of years ago, but he also signed Matt Clement, Matt Mantei, Wade Miller, Edgar Renteria, etc.
In short, let's hear Mr. Henry out before we attack him. If it's a salary dump that he has been planning for awhile and he doesn't field a competitive team over the next few years, I'll join in with the angry words against him. Until then, seeing that I'm not privy to what has actually transpired behind the doors of the FO, I'll sit back and watch and try to check my emotions.
Anyhow, that's my .02.
#19
Posted 03 November 2005 - 03:20 PM
Of course Lucky is staying; he signed an extension on his contract through 2011.It actually wouldn't surprise me if JWH tosses out the Dentist at some point in the near future. I don't think it'll happen today, or even this month. But it wouldnt' surprise me at all if he's gone by opening day.
Lucchino, I think, is going nowhere.
#20
Posted 03 November 2005 - 03:22 PM
#21
Posted 03 November 2005 - 03:31 PM
As Dale said yesterday, "Well that clears everything up." He'll be in strict spin mode, and we'll be hanging on every word hoping he slips up.
#22
Posted 03 November 2005 - 03:33 PM
#23
Posted 03 November 2005 - 03:36 PM
Lucchino is an owner. It's pretty tough (though not impossible) to "lose" a fellow owner.I'd like somebody to ask him how he could possibly have decided it was better to lose Theo and keep Lucky, rather than the other way around.
#24
Posted 03 November 2005 - 03:41 PM
Of course Lucky is staying; he signed an extension on his contract through 2011.
Not that big a deal, though, in the big picture, if they really want to get rid of him...it's a fair amount of money, but there's an upside to making that move anyway. They can also demote him if they choose to. So I don't think the extension really is the issue.
I don't think either will happen, mind you, because I think they are happy with LL, and overall have good reason to be. I know people right now don't think that's the case, but so be it.
#25
Posted 03 November 2005 - 03:43 PM
I'd like somebody to ask him how he could possibly have decided it was better to lose Theo and keep Lucky, rather than the other way around.
There are a thousand reasons.
LL is signed through 2010 and Theo was "off the books" Tuesday.
LL has done a great job with the park.
LL have increased revenues.
LL will get another GM who will bring in his own set of "minions."
And the other 996 reason don't matter.
Edited by SoxFanSince57, 03 November 2005 - 03:44 PM.
#26
Posted 03 November 2005 - 03:44 PM
The extension is through 2011 at around $2 million a year, plus he's likely got a piece of the team (1-2%), which would be worth $10-20 million. That's a TON of coin to buy him out of his contract and stake in the ownership.Not that big a deal, though, in the big picture, if they really want to get rid of him...it's a fair amount of money, but there's an upside to making that move anyway. They can also demote him if they choose to. So I don't think the extension really is the issue.
I don't think either will happen, mind you, because I think they are happy with LL, and overall have good reason to be. I know people right now don't think that's the case, but so be it.
Not gonna happen. LL's here through 2011 or when JWH sells, whichever comes first.
#27
Posted 03 November 2005 - 03:45 PM
Lucchino is an owner. It's pretty tough (though not impossible) to "lose" a fellow owner.
the only way to lose Lucky is to either have their buddies in MLB beg Lucky to take a critically important job with MLB, because they need someone with his character and experience. So Lucky can say how much he hates to leave the Sox, but he loves the game so he couldn't turn this position down.
Or else have their buddies in MLB arrange for Lucky to join a different ownership group, where they need an experienced baseball person, adn someone who can handle stadium issues, etc. Is the Washington owneship situation handled yet? that would have been the perfect way out
#28
Posted 03 November 2005 - 03:45 PM
Actually, I'm not sure he is. He's president and CEO, named to those positions immediately following the purchase of the team early in 2002. He is certainly considered part of "the ownership group," but I do not believe he is an owner--unless his most recent extension included shares in the team.
#29
Posted 03 November 2005 - 03:47 PM
I think he is considered an owner, that's why he may or may not have been used as the "out" in the Colorado trade -- he was the Ownership's perogative to overrule the deal."Lucchino is an owner."
Actually, I'm not sure he is. He's president and CEO, named to those positions immediately following the purchase of the team early in 2002. He is certainly considered part of "the ownership group," but I do not believe he is an owner--unless his most recent extension included shares in the team.
#30
Posted 03 November 2005 - 03:50 PM
Not gonna happen. LL's here through 2011 or when JWH sells, whichever comes first.
As I already said, I don't think it happens. But that's because they want him here, not because he's owed a few million dollars.
There's zero chance in my view that he is left in his current position just because of the money. Measured against the overall business enterprise and the PR value, it's just not nearly enough money to drive the decision.
He's staying because JWH likes the job he's done and wants him to keep on doing it.
Lose, it was reported that Lucchino communicated ownership's decision to veto that deal...that doesn't require that he actually be an owner himself. He may have been the decisionmaker or not, but he was definitely the messenger of the decision.
Edited by PedroKsBambino, 03 November 2005 - 03:51 PM.
#31
Posted 03 November 2005 - 04:41 PM
He said his say yesterday, and even that was too much. Why go through it again, unless he has something different to say? because poor Lucky Lucchino needs more defending? Let Larry defend himself. He'd do a better job anyway.
Unless he has something new of value to say, he should shut up and get on with hiring the best GM who will work for this organization.
#32
Posted 03 November 2005 - 04:43 PM
I believe Lucchino gets a minority share in the team as part of his compensation, as he did with San Diego."Lucchino is an owner."
Actually, I'm not sure he is. He's president and CEO, named to those positions immediately following the purchase of the team early in 2002. He is certainly considered part of "the ownership group," but I do not believe he is an owner--unless his most recent extension included shares in the team.
#33
Posted 03 November 2005 - 04:51 PM
Edited by AcroBrat, 03 November 2005 - 04:56 PM.
#34
Posted 03 November 2005 - 04:52 PM
We will see in 10 mins...
Edited by bornintoit, 03 November 2005 - 04:53 PM.
#35
Posted 03 November 2005 - 05:00 PM
Or is it streaming?
#36
Posted 03 November 2005 - 05:03 PM
It is online...Play by play would be awesome if someone doesn't mind.
Or is it streaming?
mms://wmc1.liquidviewer.net/WEEI
#37
Posted 03 November 2005 - 05:03 PM
WEEI.com
#38
Posted 03 November 2005 - 05:05 PM
#39
Posted 03 November 2005 - 05:06 PM
#41
Posted 03 November 2005 - 05:08 PM
Help.
#42
Posted 03 November 2005 - 05:09 PM
#43
Posted 03 November 2005 - 05:09 PM
Is it in a commercial?
"We had a lot of contention at the end"
"He left for a reason to be named later"
#44
Posted 03 November 2005 - 05:10 PM
Edited by Marbleheader, 03 November 2005 - 05:11 PM.
#45
Posted 03 November 2005 - 05:11 PM
#46
Posted 03 November 2005 - 05:12 PM
Agreed, seems more poised today...and he's cutting off Larry Johnson...good move.He doesn't sound close to tears today. He's trying to sound logical without being defensive.
Henry believes he knows why Theo left...though he doesn't agree with all his reasons.
Edited by Marbleheader, 03 November 2005 - 05:14 PM.
#47
Posted 03 November 2005 - 05:14 PM
BO- How is it that in a negotiation when everyone wants the same outcome it can fail...
JH- There will always be contention, lots at the end. That's one answer. "Left for a reason to be named later"
BO- Couldn't read much into PC. Trust was something that jumped out. Is there a trust problem
JH- Anytime you have unamed sources in the media, it's difficult to have negotiation. HAs been problem. Creates trust issue. Who is leaking this? Unnamed sources part of a free society/press.
BO- Do you have leaks in your organization?
JH- Every organization has them. "There's no secrets in baseball"
BO- How do you stop them? They've done damage
JH- Yes, they have done damage. It's an issue. It certainly was at the end. Many inaccurate. Early leaks inaccurate, near the end, they were. Makes people wonder what went on.
LJ- Do you undertand why he left?
JH- Yes. I didn't agree with them, but I understand why.
LJ- Why?
JH- "Reasons to be named Later"
#48
Posted 03 November 2005 - 05:14 PM
Edited by jacklamabe65, 03 November 2005 - 05:15 PM.
#49
Posted 03 November 2005 - 05:15 PM
#50
Posted 03 November 2005 - 05:16 PM
He's staying because JWH likes the job he's done and wants him to keep on doing it
While I can only read between the lines, IMO LL may have been almost soley responsible for losing a pretty f'ing valuable team asset. JWH is pretty astute with asset valuations, and he can't be too happy with someone pissing away his assets, particularly at this point in time. While he defended the survivor yesterday, he may reassess LL strengths and weaknesses, and decide a shorter leash or greater oversite might be required.
Edited by bankshot1, 03 November 2005 - 05:18 PM.










