Yo! You're not logged in. Why am I seeing this ad?
9/4 Red Sox vs Pale Hose
#1
Posted 03 September 2006 - 09:02 PM
#2
Posted 03 September 2006 - 09:27 PM
In honor of Labor Day, several Red Sox employees are returning to work. Finally, some good news. Get out the bats boys, and WIN!
What do you guys think. Can we even come close to the Wild Card? I've been keeping hope, but every day that hope gets less and less.
#3
Posted 03 September 2006 - 09:53 PM
#4
Posted 03 September 2006 - 10:29 PM
5.5 back, and a series and chicago here. If we sweep, we're back in the hunt. Anything less is just getting our hopes up.
I'm pretty sure we're actually 6.5 back. Still, with a sweep, we're at least in the conversation again. And with Tavarez, Gabbard, and Snyder pitching....well, what the hell, it would be cool to have monkeys fly out of my butt.
#5
Posted 03 September 2006 - 11:01 PM
Josh Bard got the winning RBI too
San Diego IP H R ER BB SO HR ERA
Wells 6.0 5 1 1 1 2 0 4.58
Meredith (W, 3-1) 2.0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0.84
Hoffman (S, 36) 1.0 1 0 0 0 1 0 1.94
#6
Posted 04 September 2006 - 01:37 AM
Oh, and George Kottaras is 0-8 with two walks since the trade. He's not even safe from the Disease 3000 miles away.
#7
Posted 04 September 2006 - 02:09 AM
Let's make it interesting boys, and show these young guys that we don't quit when we're down.
#8
Posted 04 September 2006 - 02:21 AM
Edited by PlantiersSquat, 04 September 2006 - 12:55 PM.
#9
Posted 04 September 2006 - 04:38 AM
with a sweep the Red Sox will be back in it, you never know, the White Sox just lost 2 out of 3 TO THE ROYALS their rotation looks terrible right now for some strange reason. but tomorrow's starter Jon Garland is an exception...
Though to be honest, the whole team has a given up feeling to it, so i don't think the chances are that good...
match ups.
Garland vs Tavarez
....even the most optimistic fans can't like the look of this matchup... Garland has won 4 strait start (though he didn't look sharp in the last one) and Tavarez is....... Tavarez...
Vazquez vs Gabbard
... this also doesn't look good, although Vazquez is far more hittable than Garland lately... this is probably going to be a wild one.
Contreras vs Snyder
This might actually be the most favorable matchup, Contreras seem to be going the same rout as he did with the Yankees... dominating in his first year then starts to suck again... since his win streak died at the hands of the Yankees he's been all too hittable... while Snyder finally look like he's putting it all together lately.
#10
Posted 04 September 2006 - 04:53 AM
#11
Posted 04 September 2006 - 05:48 AM
Damnit, win!
#12
Posted 04 September 2006 - 06:37 AM
#13
Posted 04 September 2006 - 07:48 AM
Edit: grammar
Edited by paulftodd, 04 September 2006 - 07:49 AM.
#14
Posted 04 September 2006 - 07:52 AM

Time to light 'em up, boys
#15
Posted 04 September 2006 - 08:04 AM
Win it for the Crocodile Hunter! What a terrible story...at least he died doing what he loved.
Oh man!! We loved the Croc Hunter in this house. This is terrible news. The kids will be crushed.
Win one for Steve-o.
#16
Posted 04 September 2006 - 08:40 AM
If Tito does not give up as he has done with a number of games this year where we fell behind early, and as Theo and the FO did by trading Wells and not going after Abreu so as to at least make the Yankees give up more than they did, then I think we have a chance.
I think this statement is a bit much to just throw out there...
1. It is Francona's job to put the team in the best position to win over the course of the entire season. If the team is down six runs and the starter goes 4 innings, then he has to go to the bullpen scrubs. If he wastes Papelbon or Delcarmen when the team is down several runs then they are not available to preserve leads. It's frustrating, but it is the way a team has to be managed when there are finite bullpen resources available. You can blame Theo for that if you wish, but it's not Tito's fault.
2. According to Gordon Edes, (linked below) the Red Sox WERE in on Abreu but could not afford to make the trade the Yankees did. You can argue that Henry should have sucked it up and ponied up the cash, but 1) $20 million is not pocket change, even for the Red Sox and 2) adding Abreu for 2006 and 2007 when the team already has Trot Nixon (who was not onthe DL at the time) and Wily Mo Pena would have been foolish. Hindsight tells us the Sox could have used Abreu and acquiring him would have weakened the Yankees. However, it would be a terrible game plan for the FO to spend tens of millions of dollars on redundant position players simply because that player could make a huge impact elswhere.
Edes Story
#17
Posted 04 September 2006 - 09:23 AM
Mirabelli, Tek will be a welcome addition. Here's hoping Manny and Papi make it into the lineups.
I echo the sentiments of some of my fellow lurkers...win it for Steve.."Croiky!"
Edited by Oil Can's Liver, 04 September 2006 - 09:27 AM.
#18
Posted 04 September 2006 - 10:23 AM
I agree that the manager is the least of our problems. The problem really isn't all Theo, either, although he has made some mistakes that were fatal to the 2006 hopes. The biggest part of the problem is the 49% debt load that the team has, with rising interest rates and 18 partners that are looking for an R.O.I.. They were not the best choice financially for ownership, but as been stated many times before were brought together and handpicked by Selig. Theo was handcuffed at the deadline, as he couldn't take on substantial salary and go over the luxury tax threshold. For the same reason, he couldn't deal the young arms that were near major league ready...He needs to use cheap young players to fill out the roster and keep the payroll down, still giving him the flexibility to acquire some high priced pitching in 2007 and beyond. So the two chips that allow teams to get better at the deadline, the ability to take on bloated salary and give up good, near major league ready prospects, were simply not in Theo's pile. Part of this is his own fault, as he made big mistake$ on guys like Renteria and Clement, thus limiting his payroll flexibility.I think this statement is a bit much to just throw out there...
1. It is Francona's job to put the team in the best position to win over the course of the entire season. If the team is down six runs and the starter goes 4 innings, then he has to go to the bullpen scrubs. If he wastes Papelbon or Delcarmen when the team is down several runs then they are not available to preserve leads. It's frustrating, but it is the way a team has to be managed when there are finite bullpen resources available. You can blame Theo for that if you wish, but it's not Tito's fault.
2. According to Gordon Edes, (linked below) the Red Sox WERE in on Abreu but could not afford to make the trade the Yankees did. You can argue that Henry should have sucked it up and ponied up the cash, but 1) $20 million is not pocket change, even for the Red Sox and 2) adding Abreu for 2006 and 2007 when the team already has Trot Nixon (who was not onthe DL at the time) and Wily Mo Pena would have been foolish. Hindsight tells us the Sox could have used Abreu and acquiring him would have weakened the Yankees. However, it would be a terrible game plan for the FO to spend tens of millions of dollars on redundant position players simply because that player could make a huge impact elswhere.
Edes Story
The Sox obviously need to get younger in the rotation for both financial and reliability reasons, as they came into the season with 3 of 5 starters around or over 40. The Beckett deal was a solid attempt to remedy this(It was still a good risk IMHO). We were told that 2006 was a transitional year, but what we weren't told is that 2007, and possibly 2008, also fall under this label. Despite the trend bucking performances of young aces like Verlander, Johnson, Papelbon etc. this season, young pitchers, especially starters, generally take until their third big league season to show their true colors, so even before the Lester setback, it was unrealistic to think that the Sox could count on the young guys next season. The Sox will have to fill in the gaps with short term pitchers via trades and free agency until the likes of Hansen and Delcarmen sink or swim. A mid level free agent like Ted Lilly comes to mind as someone who might fill in the gap in the rotation for reasonable dough. Papelbon should also be moved into the rotation, with a stopgap closer signed. Pap has been Riveraesque in the pen, but you just aren't going to find a potential #1/#2 rotation arm like Papelbon's on the market. This could repair the rotation quickly.
#19
Posted 04 September 2006 - 10:31 AM
At least the returns of Tek, Nixon, Pena, Gonzalez and possibly Ramirez make me want to actually use my tickets for tonight.
#20
Posted 04 September 2006 - 10:31 AM
They were not the best choice financially for ownership, but as been stated many times before were brought together and handpicked by Selig.
You can feel free to disagree, but Seth Mnookin points out in his book that what you said above was a creation of the Boston media. Henry and his group got the team because they were able to put together the strongest financial case. The mudslinging against the current ownership group reached a crescendo during the sale of the Red Sox because of Boston's xenophobia towards those who are not "local."
Also, faulting anyone for not being able to put up $700 million in cash to buy the team outright just isn't fair
#21
Posted 04 September 2006 - 11:09 AM
Win it for the Crocodile Hunter! What a terrible story...at least he died doing what he loved.
He loved getting stabbed in the heart by stingrays?
#22
Posted 04 September 2006 - 12:19 PM
#23
Posted 04 September 2006 - 12:32 PM
#24
Posted 04 September 2006 - 12:56 PM
#25
Posted 04 September 2006 - 01:10 PM
Still plenty of baseball left.
#26
Posted 04 September 2006 - 01:30 PM
A sweep and the Red Sox are four back in the loss column. I worry what would happen if this took place, though. Would Jonathan Papelbon be rushed back? Jason Varitek, too? Would Dustin Pedroia be stashed on the bench in favor of Alex Cora and the heavy-hitting Mark Loretta?
Oh, and George Kottaras is 0-8 with two walks since the trade. He's not even safe from the Disease 3000 miles away.
After 2004 the RS fan should never give up hope but this year a late push could cause serious long term injury to many key players for future seasons.
#27
Posted 04 September 2006 - 01:38 PM
Win.
#28
Posted 04 September 2006 - 01:40 PM
Ortiz tomorrow? Is this his first start after the heart monitoring for the weekend plus a day and hopefully no problems?I have NOT given up on this season...with Tek, Nixon, and Manny back tonight, and Ortiz tomorrow...we have a completely different team on the field.....Let's win this series and get back in it.
Still plenty of baseball left.
#29
Posted 04 September 2006 - 01:56 PM
#30
Posted 04 September 2006 - 02:00 PM
#31
Posted 04 September 2006 - 02:07 PM
I am still pissed at the completely RIDICULOUS trades that Boy Wonder has consumated in the past two years. I laughed at his press conference after the trading deadline passed where he commented that he was not going to mortgage the future just to make some short sighted deals. DUHHHHHHH. That is what you have done the past two years!!!! The list of trades is well documented on this site. All I see is a a bunch of our young players starring around the league, while we are paying for Renteria in Atlanta, Clement is a basket case, and our CF plain out sucks. Nice job Theo. You sure are lucky that Posada's throw was not 6 inches to the right and that Tony Clark's ground rule double took a lucky bounce.
Hindsight... always... 20/20...
#32
Posted 04 September 2006 - 02:10 PM
The Nats announcers suck.
#33
Posted 04 September 2006 - 02:15 PM
You sure are lucky that Posada's throw was not 6 inches to the right and that Tony Clark's ground rule double took a lucky bounce.
How many times must you repeat the same tired phrase? You sure are lucky that the GT were open to Lurkers so you have an opportunity to spew your venom in the direction of the GM.
#34
Posted 04 September 2006 - 02:27 PM
#35
Posted 04 September 2006 - 02:29 PM
Hindsight... always... 20/20...
not getting the job done. that is what he is paid $$$$ for. Give me, you, or most on this board $125 mill and we could do just as well.
#36
Posted 04 September 2006 - 02:30 PM
How many times must you repeat the same tired phrase? You sure are lucky that the GT were open to Lurkers so you have an opportunity to spew your venom in the direction of the GM.
sometimes the truth kinda hurts. keep on waving the pom poms and all will be well.
#37
Posted 04 September 2006 - 02:35 PM
not getting the job done. that is what he is paid $$$$ for. Give me, you, or most on this board $125 mill and we could do just as well.
Okay, then I'll put you to the test. What moves would you do with this team that you supposedly think would be better than what Theo's done?
#38
Posted 04 September 2006 - 02:47 PM
sometimes the truth kinda hurts. keep on waving the pom poms and all will be well.
No pom-poms here, bud. What did you think of Theo in 2004, before he got "lucky?"
not getting the job done. that is what he is paid $$$$ for. Give me, you, or most on this board $125 mill and we could do just as well.
Thanks for clearing up that Theo is paid to "get the job done." His job looks pretty easy to someone like you who sits in front of the TV swilling beer and watching sports. I love the arrogance of people who think they could handle someone else's job so easily.
#39
Posted 04 September 2006 - 02:51 PM
I mean, barring the entire New York Yankee team dying in a plane crash.. it's OVER. (and even then, the Blue Jays might still overtake us)
#40
Posted 04 September 2006 - 02:53 PM
I mean, he was safe by like a foot.You sure are lucky that Posada's throw was not 6 inches to the right.
#41
Posted 04 September 2006 - 02:57 PM
Thanks for clearing up that Theo is paid to "get the job done." His job looks pretty easy to someone like you who sits in front of the TV swilling beer and watching sports. I love the arrogance of people who think they could handle someone else's job so easily.
I have to agree -- I understand (and concur wholeheartedly from time to time) regarding specific instances or commenting on general trend, but ideas like "we can do a better job" smacks me of nothing but frustration (but yes, I know there's no rule against venting.)
There's real expertise involved in anything we do for a living -- how ridiculous would it be for someone else to say "hey I can do your job better if I just had xxxx and yyyy."?
Theo operates out of a philosophy and he's sticking to his guns. Kevin Towers does, Beane does, and so does a lot of the better if not the best GMs. And he also shoots for riskier signings with bigger upsides which can make him look foolish in hindsight.
He's got younger guys coming in, signed the first 13 players in the draft in a weak draft, have room to get some free agent help (I know that's an oxymoron to some) and no one can say this team won't compete next year.
Theo doesn't deserve anymore slack for the Garciaparra trade, but I don't think there'd be very few, if any, of us can do a better job than he does given the same dollars and cents.
Edited by SeoulSoxFan, 04 September 2006 - 02:58 PM.
#42
Posted 04 September 2006 - 02:59 PM
#43
Posted 04 September 2006 - 03:05 PM
1. Kevin Youkilis, 1B
2. Mark Loretta, 2B
3. Eric Hinske, DH
4. Manny Ramirez, LF
5. Trot Nixon, RF
6. Mike Lowell, 3B
7. Jason Varitek, C
8. Gabe Kapler, CF
9. Alex Gonzalez, SS
#44
Posted 04 September 2006 - 03:06 PM
Okay, then I'll put you to the test. What moves would you do with this team that you supposedly think would be better than what Theo's done?
Where do I start???
This is WAY too easy.
Coco Crisp?? One AMAZING catch in CF and nothing else, probably one of the worst CF in baseball. PATHETIC SIGNING. Hmmm. Damon or Crisp?? They could have easily paid Damon with all the $$$ they blew.
Renteria, he would not give him a chance to get his feet wet in Boston so we are paying his fat salary in Atlanta. AWFUL SIGNING.
Julian Tavrez. Another whack job, another bad signing.
Seanez?? Gone. Enough said.
Yankees come to town and we have one stiff lefty in the bullpen, Lopez. Meanwhile Yanks have Myers. Brutal.
No trading deadline deals. Say what you want. yanks made moves, we did not, they got better, we did not.
starting pitching?? Schilling will be 40. He should have done research on Clement who may be the nicest guy in the clubhouse, but is no tiger on the mound. Wells is gone, Wakefield is 40.
Hanley Ramirez, Marte, Bard, Meredith, Sanchez. We would be better off right now with them playing then the stiffs Theo has brought in.
Don't for a second blame the injuries for this years collapse. This team was relatively healthy when they lost 3 out of 4 to TB and 3 straight to KC.
Hey, I give him credit for the Nomar deal and getting Ortiz. Of course he wasn't smart enough to keep Cabrerra) However, in no way, shape or form has Theo been a great or even a good GM. This team is not going in the right direction. It is old and the crop of youngsters in the minors are not good enough to step in and make a big impact.
He simply can not put a bullpen together. it is basically throw it against the wall and see what sticks. Anyone on this board can wheel in retread after retread and hope one eventually catches fire.
HE HAS GOT THE SECOND HIGHEST PAYROLL IN BASEBALL AND THIS IS WHAT WE HAVE FOR A TEAM??? Good freeking luck next year.
Edited by Soxanalyzer, 04 September 2006 - 03:07 PM.
#45
Posted 04 September 2006 - 03:12 PM
Renteria, he would not give him a chance to get his feet wet in Boston so we are paying his fat salary in Atlanta. AWFUL SIGNING.
so you're saying that theo is to be blamed for not alloying renteria to adjust to boston, for paying his salary in atland, and for signing him in the first place
waiter ... check please
#46
Posted 04 September 2006 - 03:12 PM
I have to agree -- I understand (and concur wholeheartedly from time to time) regarding specific instances or commenting on general trend, but ideas like "we can do a better job" smacks me of nothing but frustration (but yes, I know there's no rule against venting.)
There's real expertise involved in anything we do for a living -- how ridiculous would it be for someone else to say "hey I can do your job better if I just had xxxx and yyyy."?
Theo operates out of a philosophy and he's sticking to his guns. Kevin Towers does, Beane does, and so does a lot of the better if not the best GMs. And he also shoots for riskier signings with bigger upsides which can make him look foolish in hindsight.
He's got younger guys coming in, signed the first 13 players in the draft in a weak draft, have room to get some free agent help (I know that's an oxymoron to some) and no one can say this team won't compete next year.
Theo doesn't deserve anymore slack for the Garciaparra trade, but I don't think there'd be very few, if any, of us can do a better job than he does given the same dollars and cents.
<<theo operates out of a philosophy and he is sticking to his guns???>>HUH?? his philosphy according to his post trading deadline press conference was that he was not going to trade his young players to mortgage the future. WELL, that is EXACTLY what he has doen the past two years. A ton of young talent gone for a bunch of stiffs. the REAL reason he did not make any trading deadline deals is because after TWO years of trading potential stars he finally got cold feet and decided to stay pat.
#47
Posted 04 September 2006 - 03:14 PM
Where do I start???
This is WAY too easy.
Coco Crisp?? One AMAZING catch in CF and nothing else, probably one of the worst CF in baseball. PATHETIC SIGNING. Hmmm. Damon or Crisp?? They could have easily paid Damon with all the $$$ they blew.
Renteria, he would not give him a chance to get his feet wet in Boston so we are paying his fat salary in Atlanta. AWFUL SIGNING.
Julian Tavrez. Another whack job, another bad signing.
Seanez?? Gone. Enough said.
Yankees come to town and we have one stiff lefty in the bullpen, Lopez. Meanwhile Yanks have Myers. Brutal.
No trading deadline deals. Say what you want. yanks made moves, we did not, they got better, we did not.
starting pitching?? Schilling will be 40. He should have done research on Clement who may be the nicest guy in the clubhouse, but is no tiger on the mound. Wells is gone, Wakefield is 40.
Hanley Ramirez, Marte, Bard, Meredith, Sanchez. We would be better off right now with them playing then the stiffs Theo has brought in.
Don't for a second blame the injuries for this years collapse. This team was relatively healthy when they lost 3 out of 4 to TB and 3 straight to KC.
Hey, I give him credit for the Nomar deal and getting Ortiz. Of course he wasn't smart enough to keep Cabrerra) However, in no way, shape or form has Theo been a great or even a good GM. This team is not going in the right direction. It is old and the crop of youngsters in the minors are not good enough to step in and make a big impact.
He simply can not put a bullpen together. it is basically throw it against the wall and see what sticks. Anyone on this board can wheel in retread after retread and hope one eventually catches fire.
HE HAS GOT THE SECOND HIGHEST PAYROLL IN BASEBALL AND THIS IS WHAT WE HAVE FOR A TEAM??? Good freeking luck next year.
If the team was so bad from the start - then Tito must have been near godlike to attain and maintain 1st place for so much of the season. By the way, how about the vaunted BJs - a team who made all the moves during the offseason it seems you would like to have made - how are they doing? You have a lot of judgments, but no facts AND its not about today's game. Isn't that what a game thread is?
As long as these guys seem like they are hanging in trying - I'm on board as far as it takes us.
GO SOX - WIN TODAY!
#48
Posted 04 September 2006 - 03:19 PM
while that whole post undoubtedly belongs in the analytical game thread, i'm struck by this bit of revisionism:
so you're saying that theo is to be blamed for not alloying renteria to adjust to boston, for paying his salary in atland, and for signing him in the first place
waiter ... check please
If you can spin the Renteria signing into a positive than you are a better man than me. All I remember is watching Rent in the playoffs and the WS and never once did i say to myself, "Boy, he would look great playing short for us."
LaRussa gets ripped because he says that Boston is not a good fit for Rent. Of course, LaRussa was right. Rent was even quoted saying that he never felt comfy in Boston. So, Wonder boy signs him and can not WAIT to dump him as soon as the season is over. Most teams would be stuck with him, but because Theo has the 2nd highest payroll in baseball he can afford to sweep the bad signing under the rug. Forget giving him a second chance. Gone, see ya. Crisp is Renteria with a smaller salary. he will be gone by November.
#49
Posted 04 September 2006 - 03:29 PM
No pom-poms here, bud. What did you think of Theo in 2004, before he got "lucky?"
Thanks for clearing up that Theo is paid to "get the job done." His job looks pretty easy to someone like you who sits in front of the TV swilling beer and watching sports. I love the arrogance of people who think they could handle someone else's job so easily.
As I said, the Nomar trade was solid. However, he was one lucky ground rule double bounce or one stolen base from being swept 4 straight. I know I know I know that Roberts did steal the base and yes Clarks ball did bounce into the stands and the rest is history. It was a great year. Well, that was '04 and the fact is this squad is heading in the wrong direction.
One more thing, Tito gets ripped on this board all the time for his bullpen mismanaging. In reality, Tito deserves a freeking big fat raise for trying to win games with the stiff relievers that Theo has wheeled in here.
#50
Posted 04 September 2006 - 03:31 PM
Where do I start???
This is WAY too easy.
Coco Crisp?? One AMAZING catch in CF and nothing else, probably one of the worst CF in baseball. PATHETIC SIGNING. Hmmm. Damon or Crisp?? They could have easily paid Damon with all the $$$ they blew.
Renteria, he would not give him a chance to get his feet wet in Boston so we are paying his fat salary in Atlanta. AWFUL SIGNING.
Julian Tavrez. Another whack job, another bad signing.
Seanez?? Gone. Enough said.
Yankees come to town and we have one stiff lefty in the bullpen, Lopez. Meanwhile Yanks have Myers. Brutal.
No trading deadline deals. Say what you want. yanks made moves, we did not, they got better, we did not.
starting pitching?? Schilling will be 40. He should have done research on Clement who may be the nicest guy in the clubhouse, but is no tiger on the mound. Wells is gone, Wakefield is 40.
Hanley Ramirez, Marte, Bard, Meredith, Sanchez. We would be better off right now with them playing then the stiffs Theo has brought in.
Don't for a second blame the injuries for this years collapse. This team was relatively healthy when they lost 3 out of 4 to TB and 3 straight to KC.
Hey, I give him credit for the Nomar deal and getting Ortiz. Of course he wasn't smart enough to keep Cabrerra) However, in no way, shape or form has Theo been a great or even a good GM. This team is not going in the right direction. It is old and the crop of youngsters in the minors are not good enough to step in and make a big impact.
He simply can not put a bullpen together. it is basically throw it against the wall and see what sticks. Anyone on this board can wheel in retread after retread and hope one eventually catches fire.
HE HAS GOT THE SECOND HIGHEST PAYROLL IN BASEBALL AND THIS IS WHAT WE HAVE FOR A TEAM??? Good freeking luck next year.
Again hindsight is always 20/20. I don't think Theo is immune to criticism but you seem to have an agenda against him.










