This is the best Red Sox team...ever.

InstaFace

The Ultimate One
SoSH Member
Sep 27, 2016
22,132
Pittsburgh, PA
and I mean, weakest relative to what? What's the interleague record? The AL has won interleague play every year since 2004, often by large margins. MLB keeps setting higher standards in the extent to which they evangelize the game abroad and identify the best talent (not too many Arubans prior to Xander, were there? Just Ponson and dreck.) The training, preparation, conditioning and injury-prevention of baseball teams have never been better, and games lost to injury keeps going down, so we're keeping talent around. At some point, claims about supposed "weakness" of a current generation of play or players become a tautology - something that can't be disproven, advanced via circular reasoning, that old cranks can throw around to claim things were better in the good ol' days.

They weren't.
 

Cesar Crespo

79
SoSH Member
Dec 22, 2002
21,588
and I mean, weakest relative to what? What's the interleague record? The AL has won interleague play every year since 2004, often by large margins. MLB keeps setting higher standards in the extent to which they evangelize the game abroad and identify the best talent (not too many Arubans prior to Xander, were there? Just Ponson and dreck.) The training, preparation, conditioning and injury-prevention of baseball teams have never been better, and games lost to injury keeps going down, so we're keeping talent around. At some point, claims about supposed "weakness" of a current generation of play or players become a tautology - something that can't be disproven, advanced via circular reasoning, that old cranks can throw around to claim things were better in the good ol' days.

They weren't.
NL leads 119-102 with a +41 Run margin.
 

Adrian's Dome

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 6, 2010
4,424
Bingo. Or to put it another way, how would one go about proving that this is the "weakest AL in 40 years"?
Negative nellies who just can't fathom the idea that the Sox are really this fucking good. That's all that talk is.

See, also:

"The lineup can't produce sans Mookie/JDM who will get pitched around"

"The bullpen isn't good enough and we didn't make any moves to bolster it"

"Why is Swihart on this team"/"OMG Swihart is hurt what are we gonna do"

"We can't possibly weather Devers' inconsistency/defense all year"

"Projection systems say we're only the 3rd best team in the AL"

"We can't rely on starters like Price/Porcello/ERod in the playoffs"

Or any other amount of stupid shit on this board to attempt to justify the opinion that this team is somehow heavily flawed or flukish as the sample size of dominance keeps getting bigger and bigger, even in the face of slumps and injuries.
 

Bergs

funky and cold
SoSH Member
Jul 22, 2005
21,695
Negative nellies who just can't fathom the idea that the Sox are really this fucking good. That's all that talk is.

See, also:

"The lineup can't produce sans Mookie/JDM who will get pitched around"

"The bullpen isn't good enough and we didn't make any moves to bolster it"

"Why is Swihart on this team"/"OMG Swihart is hurt what are we gonna do"

"We can't possibly weather Devers' inconsistency/defense all year"

"Projection systems say we're only the 3rd best team in the AL"

"We can't rely on starters like Price/Porcello/ERod in the playoffs"

Or any other amount of stupid shit on this board to attempt to justify the opinion that this team is somehow heavily flawed or flukish as the sample size of dominance keeps getting bigger and bigger, even in the face of slumps and injuries.
Maybe I'd buy it if we'd played any good teams.
 

Oppo

Member
SoSH Member
Apr 5, 2009
1,576
31-17 against AL teams and 6-2 against NL teams that are currently at .500 or above
 

Savin Hillbilly

loves the secret sauce
SoSH Member
Jul 10, 2007
18,783
The wrong side of the bridge....
Here's another meaningless-but-fun data slice for you all: The 2018 Yankees are on a pace for 102 wins, which would tie them with the 1936 and 1937 teams (Gehrig, DiMaggio, Dickey, etc.) for the 12th most wins in the history of the franchise.

And we're 9.5 games ahead of them.
 

uncannymanny

Member
SoSH Member
Jan 12, 2007
9,097
Here's another meaningless-but-fun data slice for you all: The 2018 Yankees are on a pace for 102 wins, which would tie them with the 1936 and 1937 teams (Gehrig, DiMaggio, Dickey, etc.) for the 12th most wins in the history of the franchise.

And we're 9.5 games ahead of them.
The Yankees have the second best record in baseball and are twice as far back as the West’s 3rd place team. It’s remarkable.
 

Curtis Pride

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 25, 2005
1,388
Watertown, MA
So far the Red Sox have won 27 series (including the current one in Baltimore), lost 7, and split 4. If you count the 5-0 makeup game toward its originally scheduled series, their record becomes 28-7-3.

Losses:
2 to Oakland
2 to the MFY @ Stade Fasciste
1 at Tampa Bay
1 at Minnesota
1 vs Chicago White Sox

Splits:
2-2 at Houston
2-2 at Seattle
1-1 at Baltimore (rain-shortened)
1-1 vs Philadelphia

They have swept 11 series, 12 if they win today.
 

AlNipper49

Huge Member
Dope
SoSH Member
Apr 3, 2001
44,902
Mtigawi
If we lost the rest of our games and the Orioles win their remaining games we’d still finish ahead of them.
 

bigq

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
11,155
Chris Sale has allowed a grand total of one earned run since June 24.
 

uncannymanny

Member
SoSH Member
Jan 12, 2007
9,097
They need to go 21-21 to break the franchise win record. Yes, .500 over the last >25% of the season is all it will take.
 

Hank Scorpio

Member
SoSH Member
Apr 1, 2013
6,989
Salem, NH
You know what sucks about this team?

Think how miserable we’re going to be from now on when the Sox field a typical 92-95 win team.
 

Rasputin

Will outlive SeanBerry
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Oct 4, 2001
29,494
Not here
You know what sucks about this team?

Think how miserable we’re going to be from now on when the Sox field a typical 92-95 win team.
If we win 117, I think we're going to be okay with only winning 95 next year, so long as the Yankees win 94.
 

Adrian's Dome

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 6, 2010
4,424
You know what sucks about this team?

Think how miserable we’re going to be from now on when the Sox field a typical 92-95 win team.
You ever hook up with a 10, then get upset about bagging a 7 the next year?

Me neither.

Let's just enjoy the ride before we fully realize just how crazy it is.
 

Red(s)HawksFan

Member
SoSH Member
Jan 23, 2009
20,872
Maine
You know what sucks about this team?

Think how miserable we’re going to be from now on when the Sox field a typical 92-95 win team.
Forget that, imagine the misery if this GFIN, push the chips to the middle of the table magical season brings on the inevitable comedown of a rebuild and the team struggles to win 80-85 games in 2-3 years.

I'm thinking it will be worth it.
 

BaseballJones

ivanvamp
SoSH Member
Oct 1, 2015
24,662
You know what sucks about this team?

Think how miserable we’re going to be from now on when the Sox field a typical 92-95 win team.
What's actually going to suck is if the Sox don't win the World Series after winning 112+ regular season games. We'll hear from douchebags like CHB and others, and probably many people here, about what a choke job the Sox put up. This is an historically great season for them, and of course it would be glorious to cap it off with a WS title. But we all know just how incredibly hard it is to win a championship in any sport, baseball included. The Sox will likely have to go through two 100+ win teams in their own league just to make the World Series. That alone would be very very difficult and improbable, and quite a feat in it of itself.

After the 2007 Pats' season ended the way it did, it taught me to enjoy the journey so much more than having all my chips in on the final destination. This has been one of the most incredible Red Sox seasons in all my 48 years. Winning it all would just be icing on the cake. But it wouldn't "ruin" the season at all for me if they didn't win it all. It would suck, yes, but mainly because of all the complaints we'd hear.
 

sheamonu

Member
SoSH Member
Nov 11, 2004
1,342
Dublin, Ireland
With 85 wins this team is now assured of a record that would have won a division and secured a postseason berth on several occasions in the past.


On the 12th of August...
 

teddywingman

Looks like Zach Galifianakis
SoSH Member
Jul 31, 2009
11,211
a basement on the hill
Someone in the gamethread said that this team is a wagon. That's a good word for this team. It's like they can lose a wheel-- Mookie for two weeks, Bogaerts for near a month, Devers, Eddie R, Vazquez, Sale for starts-- I'm leaving plenty out. But there's an extra wheel hanging around somewhere that will get us to the next town. And on the way to that town we'll keep having fun. This team is a wagon.
 
Last edited:

jon abbey

Shanghai Warrior
Moderator
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
71,135
What's actually going to suck is if the Sox don't win the World Series after winning 112+ regular season games. We'll hear from douchebags like CHB and others, and probably many people here, about what a choke job the Sox put up. This is an historically great season for them, and of course it would be glorious to cap it off with a WS title. But we all know just how incredibly hard it is to win a championship in any sport, baseball included. The Sox will likely have to go through two 100+ win teams in their own league just to make the World Series. That alone would be very very difficult and improbable, and quite a feat in it of itself.

After the 2007 Pats' season ended the way it did, it taught me to enjoy the journey so much more than having all my chips in on the final destination. This has been one of the most incredible Red Sox seasons in all my 48 years. Winning it all would just be icing on the cake. But it wouldn't "ruin" the season at all for me if they didn't win it all. It would suck, yes, but mainly because of all the complaints we'd hear.
This is exactly why I remember the 2001 Yankee team more fondly than the 1999 and 2000 teams that won it all, no one has ever faced three teams that good in the postseason and NY were just an inning away from beating all three. Oakland had the best post-ASB record ever, Seattle won 116 games, and Arizona had probably the best 1/2 SP postseason combo ever in Schilling/Johnson, 5 starts between them plus Johnson in relief on zero days rest in game 7 after 104 pitches in game 6.
 

teddywingman

Looks like Zach Galifianakis
SoSH Member
Jul 31, 2009
11,211
a basement on the hill
This is exactly why I remember the 2001 Yankee team more fondly than the 1999 and 2000 teams that won it all, no one has ever faced three teams that good in the postseason and NY were just an inning away from beating all three. Oakland had the best post-ASB record ever, Seattle won 116 games, and Arizona had probably the best 1/2 SP postseason combo ever in Schilling/Johnson, 5 starts between them plus Johnson in relief on zero days rest in game 7 after 104 pitches in game 6.
I've heard this opinion before, but this is the first time I really thought about it.