The Game Ball Thread: Week 13 vs Vikings

SeoulSoxFan

I Want to Hit the World with Rocket Punch
Moderator
SoSH Member
Jun 27, 2006
22,102
A Scud Away from Hell
Who saw the NE defense pretty much shutting down Vikings offense? Not me.

It's December. The Pats are very close to being the machine that it always is this time of the year.

Also, Game Ball Time!
  • Offense: the OL gets it again, with Devlin close behind
  • Defense: Jackson? JACKSON??? Looks like we got a bigger, faster, Butler
Honorary Game Balls to Burkhead for getting back healthy & Allen for the newly-found directional punts. Flowers got some key pressures too.

Phins up next then the MNF at the Steelers.

P.S. LOLZ @ Thielen for yapping at BB then getting a mouthful back.
 

SeoulSoxFan

I Want to Hit the World with Rocket Punch
Moderator
SoSH Member
Jun 27, 2006
22,102
A Scud Away from Hell
Is it me or McD purposely stashes plays until the 4th quarter? I read somewhere they like to throw away (my words) some drives by showing different formations, setting the opposition up for the kill.
 

eddiew112

Member
SoSH Member
Sep 7, 2005
4,732
Boston
The O line was great, as was Brady. Outside of the INT he was fantastic, especially moving in the pocket.

Everyone on the defense played well. JC Jackson and Flowers obviously stood out though
 

m0ckduck

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 20, 2005
1,748
First 25 min: pass rush, McDaniels
Last 25 min: Gordon
Whole game: Defensive secondary
Honorary mention: the handoff-to-Develin play that worked three times in key moments
 

Rook05

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Jul 18, 2005
3,116
Boulder, CO
Flores or Belichick. Defensive game plan was great. They’ve been far less predictable the last two games, bringing pressure more frequently.

Also, I’d love JC Jackson to be Malcom Butler 2.0.
 

lars10

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 31, 2007
11,749
Is it me or McD purposely stashes plays until the 4th quarter? I read somewhere they like to throw away (my words) some drives by showing different formations, setting the opposition up for the kill.
At the very least it looks as though they seem to have a series of plays for a player at time...especially the RBs. White didn't really get involved until the second quarter I believe.. so I do wonder if there is a bit of a change of pace going on as well. (well obviously there is, but I wonder if it's related to what you're saying..different formations, different paces etc.)
 

j44thor

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 1, 2006
11,015
Flowers, dual threat Brady, Burkhead, Patterson with some huge plays including the catch of the game.
Tough to find anyone to fault, Ghost is probably the LVP for NE this week followed closely by Gronk.
 

j44thor

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 1, 2006
11,015
Is it me or McD purposely stashes plays until the 4th quarter? I read somewhere they like to throw away (my words) some drives by showing different formations, setting the opposition up for the kill.
I really, really, really, really hope that isn't the case. This defense isn't near good enough nor is the offense elite enough to experiment with plays on D.

If we had the BAL D I could perhaps understand that but no one is confusing the NE and BAL D.
 

j44thor

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 1, 2006
11,015
The defense as a whole gets mine. Thielen 5-28-1 and Diggs 5-49 speaks to the kind of effort the secondary put in. Rudolph only 3 catches too after the TEs that had burned this defense this year.
I don't recall another game where NE gave up so much to the RB, clearly the game plan was to take away Thielen then Diggs. Just odd to see Cook gash the D so often but clearly it was the right play.
 

Mystic Merlin

Member
SoSH Member
Sep 21, 2007
46,896
Hartford, CT
They took away the big plays from Cousins. 32 completions but only just over 200 yards.
He has a big tendency to dump the ball to the short read on every single pressure. The pass to Treadwell on fourth and 11 was glaring in that respect.

It helped that the Pats devoured YAC opportunities; great tackling today.
 

StupendousMan

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 20, 2005
1,925
I don't recall another game where NE gave up so much to the RB, clearly the game plan was to take away Thielen then Diggs. Just odd to see Cook gash the D so often but clearly it was the right play.
How about this game against the Broncos, when the defense kept daring Manning to check into running plays ... and he kept doing it. Lots of yards on the ground, but not many points in the second half.

https://www.patspulpit.com/2013/11/25/5142502/patriots-vs-broncos-final-score-what-a-comeback-pats-win-34-31
 

j44thor

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 1, 2006
11,015
He has a big tendency to dump the ball to the short read on every single pressure. The pass to Treadwell on fourth and 11 was glaring in that respect.

It helped that the Pats devoured YAC opportunities; great tackling today.
I don't think that is the case at all. He has one of the highest passer ratings against the blitz and before this week really didn't involve the RBs in the passing game. Thielen is his to go under pressure and on 3rd down. NE did a great job taking him out.
 

leftfieldlegacy

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 31, 2005
1,009
North Jersey
Jackson for the game ball but the entire D came up big. Having almost all of the DL/LB and a safety standing and moving around from one position to another so Cousins couldn't get a consistent pre-snap read was very effective. If Flores was the architect of that game plan then a game ball to him too.
 

Jed Zeppelin

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 23, 2008
51,502
I really, really, really, really hope that isn't the case. This defense isn't near good enough nor is the offense elite enough to experiment with plays on D.

If we had the BAL D I could perhaps understand that but no one is confusing the NE and BAL D.
I don’t believe this is the case, but would be pretty peeved if it were. Not just for defensive reasons but for the fact that it opens you up to flukes/penalties/one bad run of play costing the game.

At the end of the day the other team is trying too so not everything will work perfectly. I certainly don’t love the cutesy plays when the offense is pretty much having its way straight up against a D, but whatever.
 

j44thor

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 1, 2006
11,015
Jackson for the game ball but the entire D came up big. Having almost all of the DL/LB and a safety standing and moving around from one position to another so Cousins couldn't get a consistent pre-snap read was very effective. If Flores was the architect of that game plan then a game ball to him too.
Yes, reminded me of the old Ted Washington amoeba defense with one down lineman. Loved that they were running that most of the 4th Q with MN in catchup mode.
 

Mugsy's Jock

Eli apologist
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Dec 28, 2000
15,106
UWS, NYC
Is it me or McD purposely stashes plays until the 4th quarter? I read somewhere they like to throw away (my words) some drives by showing different formations, setting the opposition up for the kill.
This is a reasonable explanation for why Gordon wa in Witness Protection in the first half.
 

Bowhemian

Member
SoSH Member
Nov 10, 2015
5,773
Bow, NH
The defense as a whole gets mine. Thielen 5-28-1 and Diggs 5-49 speaks to the kind of effort the secondary put in. Rudolph only 3 catches too after the TEs that had burned this defense this year.
100% agree. The defense today was awesome. Coached up perfectly, and executed almost as perfectly.
 

Mugsy's Jock

Eli apologist
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Dec 28, 2000
15,106
UWS, NYC
Love Belichick channeling his inner Ryan Brasier.

Like Merlin above, I thought the tackling was excellent...both McCourtys, Chung and Van Noy in particular. And pleased to see Hightower looking so spry.
 

bigq

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
11,157
I have difficulty singling out individuals. A team win through and through. What a great win.
 

CoffeeNerdness

Member
SoSH Member
Jun 6, 2012
8,851
This was a worse day for Thielen than a couple weeks back when NBC created a graphic where it looked like his face got splattered on.

 

Deathofthebambino

Drive Carefully
SoSH Member
Apr 12, 2005
42,058
I don't recall another game where NE gave up so much to the RB, clearly the game plan was to take away Thielen then Diggs. Just odd to see Cook gash the D so often but clearly it was the right play.
This is what I wrote in the game thread, during Minnesota's 2nd offensive series:

Pats are daring them to run the ball, which the Vikes haven't done all year. Aren't going to let Thielen or Diggs beat them.

The Pats have basically done the same thing this year to the Packers, Chiefs and Dolphins. When they face a team with a good, and particularly fast (that's why the Dolphins are in the group) set of receivers, Belichick generally takes away the big plays and says to the other team "if you have the patience, we'll let you run all day." It worked especially well today, because the Vikings have proven all year that they have absolutely no patience when it comes to the running game. They only ran the ball 13 times today, and they averaged 7.3ypc. Even worse, Cook was averaging 9.3ypc and only got 9 carries (he got 8 receptions though, for only 22 yards). Coming into today, Minnesota was 3rd in the NFL in pass attempts, and 28th in rush attempts. Zimmer just can't stick with the run, no matter how well it's doing, and BB/Pats exploited the shit out of it today.

My game balls go to Brady, Michel, White and CPat on offense, and the entire defense. That was, plain and simple, a complete team effort today. But this game was really won in the trenches. Both lines dominated.
 

DeJesus Built My Hotrod

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Dec 24, 2002
48,576
James "Patriots 2018 non-TB12 MVP" White gets no love? The guy led the team in targets and had 118 yards from scrimmage. With Gronk not doing Gronk things, I know folks think Gordon is the heir apparent but White has been Brady's everything all season long. The guy is about as "Patriot" as any current offensive player not named Brady.

Also, add my vote for the defense. Great to see them starting to round into form. The Vikings are a top 10 passing team but not today.
 

Jimbodandy

Member
SoSH Member
Jan 31, 2006
11,497
around the way
JC Jackson, Flores, Brady. White.

Whole offense and defense and their coaches were stellar. Punt and punt return units were fine. Placekicking units were meh.
 

j44thor

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 1, 2006
11,015
This is what I wrote in the game thread, during Minnesota's 2nd offensive series:

Pats are daring them to run the ball, which the Vikes haven't done all year. Aren't going to let Thielen or Diggs beat them.

The Pats have basically done the same thing this year to the Packers, Chiefs and Dolphins. When they face a team with a good, and particularly fast (that's why the Dolphins are in the group) set of receivers, Belichick generally takes away the big plays and says to the other team "if you have the patience, we'll let you run all day." It worked especially well today, because the Vikings have proven all year that they have absolutely no patience when it comes to the running game. They only ran the ball 13 times today, and they averaged 7.3ypc. Even worse, Cook was averaging 9.3ypc and only got 9 carries (he got 8 receptions though, for only 22 yards). Coming into today, Minnesota was 3rd in the NFL in pass attempts, and 28th in rush attempts. Zimmer just can't stick with the run, no matter how well it's doing, and BB/Pats exploited the shit out of it today.

My game balls go to Brady, Michel, White and CPat on offense, and the entire defense. That was, plain and simple, a complete team effort today. But this game was really won in the trenches. Both lines dominated.
Yep great call though I have to give GBs to all the RBs including Burkhead and Develin. Burkhead really gives them the perfect in between of White, receiver first who can run a little and Michel run first who can catch a little. Burkhead can do both equally well but you don't want him touching the ball more than 10X per game.
 

mauf

Anderson Cooper × Mr. Rogers
Moderator
SoSH Member
Everyone still think this year “feels different”? Same as it ever was folks.
In terms of point differential, the Pats are in the same general neighborhood as the Steelers, Ravens, Texans, and Chargers, and they’re well behind the Chiefs.

I’m not saying PD is the be-all and end-all, but this year definitely “feels different” than the Pats’ recent Super Bowl campaigns.
 

Ale Xander

Hamilton
SoSH Member
Oct 31, 2013
73,120
Entire defense, with the exception of that prevent fiasco in the 1st half.

If I had to chose 1 player, JC Jackson
 

Super Nomario

Member
SoSH Member
Nov 5, 2000
14,015
Mansfield MA
Is it me or McD purposely stashes plays until the 4th quarter? I read somewhere they like to throw away (my words) some drives by showing different formations, setting the opposition up for the kill.
I don't think they save stuff, but I do think they try different combinations and see how the defense will react. Sometimes they hit on something that works early and sometimes it takes a little longer.

They passed a lot on the first drive with great success - five straight passes to get down to the 16, then an end around and a couple handoffs to punch it - but then they seemed to want to establish the run after that and had a hard time building a lot of offensive consistency. Then after MIN tied it up, they went back to the pass - 108 of the 125 yards in the final two TD drives were on passes. I think they were worried about Minnesota's pass rush so they ran a lot of short stuff, screens, and run plays, and then either they felt like they had worn them down or they had to do something different after the Vikings tied it up. They were super conservative on O from about the late second quarter to last third and that was the stretch they did nothing.

Entire defense, with the exception of that prevent fiasco in the 1st half.
"Prevent fiasco?" I saw a bunch of blitzing, it's just that Minnesota picked it up on that drive.
 

tims4wins

PN23's replacement
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
37,332
Hingham, MA
In terms of point differential, the Pats are in the same general neighborhood as the Steelers, Ravens, Texans, and Chargers, and they’re well behind the Chiefs.

I’m not saying PD is the be-all and end-all, but this year definitely “feels different” than the Pats’ recent Super Bowl campaigns.
Probably because the 3 losses are all by multiple scores. 6 of the 9 wins have been by multiple scores and in 2 of the others the Pats had late 4th quarter 14 point leads. In other words aside from the KC team they have put away every game they have won. Oh and the Pats did have a 15 point lead against KC. The Pats have had a 14+ point lead in all nine of their wins. Can any other team say that?
 

mauf

Anderson Cooper × Mr. Rogers
Moderator
SoSH Member
Probably because the 3 losses are all by multiple scores. 6 of the 9 wins have been by multiple scores and in 2 of the others the Pats had late 4th quarter 14 point leads. In other words aside from the KC team they have put away every game they have won. Oh and the Pats did have a 15 point lead against KC. The Pats have had a 14+ point lead in all nine of their wins. Can any other team say that?
Another way of saying this is they’re an elite team that beats themselves.

I’m not sure how to think about this. On one hand, it shows they’re a terrific team when they’re at their best. On the other, how often does a team that sometimes beats itself raise the Lombardi Trophy?
 

Kenny F'ing Powers

posts way less than 18% useful shit
SoSH Member
Nov 17, 2010
14,476
Is it me or McD purposely stashes plays until the 4th quarter? I read somewhere they like to throw away (my words) some drives by showing different formations, setting the opposition up for the kill.
I really, really, really, really hope that isn't the case. This defense isn't near good enough nor is the offense elite enough to experiment with plays on D.

If we had the BAL D I could perhaps understand that but no one is confusing the NE and BAL D.
I don’t believe this is the case, but would be pretty peeved if it were. Not just for defensive reasons but for the fact that it opens you up to flukes/penalties/one bad run of play costing the game.

At the end of the day the other team is trying too so not everything will work perfectly. I certainly don’t love the cutesy plays when the offense is pretty much having its way straight up against a D, but whatever.
This is a reasonable explanation for why Gordon wa in Witness Protection in the first half.
Yikes.

No. This was gameplan specific. The entire first half saw check downs, short out routes, and screens. The Patriots were challenging the flats, and the Vikings had no answer. That the Patriots didnt score 20+ before half was a minor blessing for the Vikings.

Second half rolled around, the Pat's tried more of the same, saw that the Vikings made adjustments, so the Patriots pivoted and started taking advantage of the soft spots that opened up with the Vikings playing more aggressive in the flats. The seam route to Gronk, for example, probably would not have been there in the first half. I didnt watch, but I wouldnt be shocked if the Vikings switched to more of a consistent cover-2, which left the seams and sidelines - whatsup big 4th quarter by Gordon - much softer.

This wasnt about holding plays back. It was a great chess game by McD.
 

tims4wins

PN23's replacement
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
37,332
Hingham, MA
Another way of saying this is they’re an elite team that beats themselves.

I’m not sure how to think about this. On one hand, it shows they’re a terrific team when they’re at their best. On the other, how often does a team that sometimes beats itself raise the Lombardi Trophy?
They haven’t really blown any leads though aside from KC. The Bears comeback was pretty shitty luck on the Develin pick play. Ditto the Colts semi comeback. As for not putting away the Jets earlier in the game - I mean, the Pats were down 14-0 in the Meadowlands 2 years ago to a 5-11 Jets team. The Pats are 2-0 road division with wins by 19 and 14.
 

j44thor

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 1, 2006
11,015
Another way of saying this is they’re an elite team that beats themselves.

I’m not sure how to think about this. On one hand, it shows they’re a terrific team when they’re at their best. On the other, how often does a team that sometimes beats itself raise the Lombardi Trophy?
I don't think any NE SB team has won the SB without losing a game or two by beating themselves. You can make the case that last years PHI didn't beat themselves but beyond that I think you are looking at the 2000 Ravens for another similar team.
 

mauf

Anderson Cooper × Mr. Rogers
Moderator
SoSH Member
They haven’t really blown any leads though aside from KC. The Bears comeback was pretty shitty luck on the Develin pick play. Ditto the Colts semi comeback. As for not putting away the Jets earlier in the game - I mean, the Pats were down 14-0 in the Meadowlands 2 years ago to a 5-11 Jets team. The Pats are 2-0 road division with wins by 19 and 14.
I’m not talking about blowing leads. I’m talking about getting whipped by three teams, two of which are likely to finish with losing records. That’s why this year feels different. Which isn’t to say they aren’t going to make a deep playoff run — it’s just weird tuning in to the game on Sunday and wondering which team is going to show up.
 

tims4wins

PN23's replacement
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
37,332
Hingham, MA
I’m not talking about blowing leads. I’m talking about getting whipped by three teams, two of which are likely to finish with losing records. That’s why this year feels different. Which isn’t to say they aren’t going to make a deep playoff run — it’s just weird tuning in to the game on Sunday and wondering which team is going to show up.
Maybe. Guess we’ll see. They were playing without some key guys in weeks 2-3. The Titans game was a mess, no doubt, although I do wonder about the flu bug.
 

Super Nomario

Member
SoSH Member
Nov 5, 2000
14,015
Mansfield MA
Another way of saying this is they’re an elite team that beats themselves.

I’m not sure how to think about this. On one hand, it shows they’re a terrific team when they’re at their best. On the other, how often does a team that sometimes beats itself raise the Lombardi Trophy?
I don't think it's about beating themselves, to be honest. When I think "beating themselves," I think games like the 2015 loss to Philly (when they gave up two ST TDs) or the 2010 loss to the Browns (when they turned the ball over three times). When they've lost this year, it hasn't been fluky players or turnovers (they are +1 in three losses this year); they've just gotten their asses kicked.

The obvious takeaway is that they've been inconsistent. That probably doesn't bode well for the playoffs, but when they've looked good they've basically looked as good as they always have, and get a bye and you only need to win three games in a row.