Spygate 2: Red Sox Stealing Signs and Relaying Electronically

Ed Hillel

Wants to be startin somethin
SoSH Member
Dec 12, 2007
43,976
Here
@PeteAbe
Rob Manfred made it clear no wins will be vacated over this issue. Said two investigations are ongoing. Chalked it up to the rivalry.
Sounds like this won't be getting Goodell'd, which is good news for all. It's such a stark contrast to watch Goodell compared to all his modern counterparts.
 

soxhop411

news aggravator
SoSH Member
Dec 4, 2009
46,472
Sounds like this won't be getting Goodell'd, which is good news for all. It's such a stark contrast to watch Goodell compared to all his modern counterparts.
Even David Stern. (Unless your a laker fan)
 

j44thor

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 1, 2006
11,015

Buzzkill Pauley

Member
SoSH Member
Jun 30, 2006
10,569
Why release Holt and Young, but suspend Pedroia? Just curious what the distinction is. Is it because they are not doing well and he's very important to the team?
I disagree on the recommended punishment action, but you could make a logical case that, since the Red Sox are bound to a guaranteed contract for Pedroia in future years, but do not have that obligation to Young or Holt, such a punishment would be fair.

You'd just need to suspend Pedroia for the remainder of the season as well as the postseason, if the Sox make it there. And add in rules like not being in uniform or in the dugout, if those aren't already standard for suspensions.

As for me, I suspect this goes on throughout MLB.
 

MikeM

Member
SoSH Member
May 27, 2010
3,114
Florida
So ironically enough now we get to spend the winter hearing "see what happened when they couldn't cheat" when our offense gets shuts down in playoffs. Which was probably already going to happen anyway.

This really is morphing into the most depressing 1st place season I can recall.
 

BaseballJones

ivanvamp
SoSH Member
Oct 1, 2015
24,671
Oh yes, the Yankees are saints that would never cheat. I am sure they would also never sucker punch a player from another team during a brawl.
Well, when you get just three games for multiple sucker punches, and none of them actually have to be served in games against your archrival, while Detroit's players get suspended more for doing less, why WOULDN'T you sucker punch the other guy?
 

JohntheBaptist

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 13, 2005
11,404
Yoknapatawpha County
So it is possible I'm missing some obvious incidents, but if communicating GM-to-GM is protocol, it doesn't seem totally like Cashman to go to measures these drastic, especially since they ended up basically dominating us all weekend. I find that part of this weird, will be interesting to see if any more details come out.

It seems like a bad look to me but I know nothing about professional baseball culture so if the commissioner is cool more or less dropping it, hopefully this can just get tossed aside. Like JMOH, my grasp on caring about sports is tenuous these days at best and some protracted obsession with it would likely have been a death blow.
 

Comfortably Lomb

Koko the Monkey
SoSH Member
Feb 22, 2004
13,031
The Paris of the 80s
Lol @ cheating. This sport has a long storied history of cheating. It's part of the fabric of the game. The problem here is the Sox look like desperate idiots... because they are.
 

Maximus

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 18, 2005
5,774
Yanks trying to rattle the Sox. Just another nail in Manager John's coffin. Henry must be beside himself.
 

ehaz

Member
SoSH Member
Sep 30, 2007
4,954
Manfred's on WEEI right now. Said they've had plenty of allegations before and some substantiated. He seemed to be downplaying it for the most part.

Sigh. What the NFL could have been with a halfway competent commissioner.
 

Tony C

Moderator
Moderator
SoSH Member
Apr 13, 2000
13,708
Even though this is, if true, much worse than Spygate or, God forbid, "Deflategate", I find that this entire episode bothers me FAR less than what the Pats have gone through. Not sure why.
because the Pats accusations were BS, where this one seems like something the Sox did, in fact, stupidly bring on themselves?
 

Doctor G

Member
SoSH Member
Jan 24, 2007
2,331
every team has a videoscreen justa few steps from the dugout. They are not required to be tunedexclusively to media feedfor replays. Players check called strike calls all the time.
The umps must love this story. They hate repayin any form.


I hope the Sox win the division by one game over the MFYs.
 

Doctor G

Member
SoSH Member
Jan 24, 2007
2,331
The cheating culture inMLB is only exceededf by NASCAR.

Bring on the vibrating Skoal tin.
 
Last edited:

natpastime162

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
2,958
Pennsylvania

DeJesus Built My Hotrod

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Dec 24, 2002
48,565
Let's face it. Boston has a long, inescapable history of cheating at just about every contest.

This goes far beyond the conniving Red Sox, the Cheatriots, or even Red Auerbach. Boston's fate as a town that celebrates cheaters dates all the way back to a fateful evening when a guy, made famous by Henry Wadsworth Longfellow, took his famous Midnight Ride.
 
Last edited:

mauf

Anderson Cooper × Mr. Rogers
Moderator
SoSH Member
Manfred's on WEEI right now. Said they've had plenty of allegations before and some substantiated. He seemed to be downplaying it for the most part.

Sigh. What the NFL could have been with a halfway competent commissioner.
If MLB had sent a memo to all teams a month ago reminding them about the rules for use of electronics in the dugout, the Sox would be facing stiff penalties for their shenanigans.

The correct parallel is if Mangini made an issue of BB filming signals two years earlier -- Goodell likely would've downplayed the issue, not wanting to encourage gamesmanship or bring the game into disrepute by suggesting something serious had happened. Seems like that's the tack Manfred is taking. Maybe I'm too sanguine, but I'm expecting a slap on the wrist.
 

OurF'ingCity

Member
SoSH Member
Apr 22, 2016
8,469
New York City
Count me among those largely unfazed by this story - I don't fall into the camp of people who expect their teams to be total saints and like many others here am more astounded at the apparent stupidity of both (a) the actual scheme and (b) getting caught than anything else. And after having been through Spygate/Deflategate I couldn't care less about the "Boston cheats!" memes/troll jobs anymore.

My only worry is that players (Pedroia and/or others) could be suspended for their roles as that could affect actual wins/losses. Anything else I don't really care about (unless high draft picks are taken away but even that is less important in baseball than other sports).
 

Hawk68

New Member
Feb 29, 2008
172
Massachusetts
This is a failure of leadership.

All concerned know better, but the manager is responsible for the team. And the team broke the rules seeking competitive advantage.

There is only one way for ownership to correct this.
 

staz

Intangible
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Dec 2, 2004
20,760
The cradle of the game.
Number One: You can't tell me this kind of thing isn't absolutely RAMPANT in MLB. Pedroia's so gullible to think this wouldn't get around the clubhouse in no time? And then, when players are bought and sold, around the league? Of course not, and he's not going to knowingly tarnish his brand to get involved with something way off the reservation. He's a goddamned veteran and veterans pull this shit ALL THE TIME.

Number Two: Fucking. Good. I don't like them getting caught, but I LOVE the Moxie of a club that's always looking for an angle. Whatever. Now they know the limits. But I have zero problem with a little stubble on the whole "America's Most Beloved Ballpark" brand. YUCK.

Number Three: My, what little bitches the New York Yankees have become. If Cashman really thought the act were providing a great deal more advantage than the countless schemes his players are surely involved in, he's calling DD to say "knock it off", not crying a river to the NYT. He's pissed that his catcher doesn't have a clue behind the plate and he's jealous his players didn't come up with the ruse first.

Number Four: Ain't cheatin' = ain't tryin'. Haters gonna hate. Haters also gonna kiss my motherfucking ass. I make passionate love to your hate. Welcome to Massachusetts, BITCH. By the way, get over it: it's fucking baseball, not the shit your local skinheads are teaching to their children.

Number Five: The chicken littles in here already boohooing potential lost draft picks THREE HOURS INTO IT make me ill.
 

Bongorific

Thinks he’s clever
SoSH Member
Jul 16, 2005
8,448
Balboa Towers
From the article: "During games, the tablets cannot be connected to the Internet or stream live video, MLB says. Any data to be used must be loaded from network connections installed during the offseason in all home and visiting clubhouses."
Weren't the Yankees caught streaming live video on their tablets before?
 

snowmanny

Member
SoSH Member
Dec 8, 2005
15,747
This is a failure of leadership.

All concerned know better, but the manager is responsible for the team. And the team broke the rules seeking competitive advantage.

There is only one way for ownership to correct this.
Fire Farrell unless they make the World Series?
 

soxeast

New Member
Aug 12, 2017
206
I'm sick of the "unlikeable team" mantra. They were damn likable two weeks ago when they were continually coming from behind and playing awesome defense and Devers was transcendent.

You can't tell me Mookie, JBJ, Devers, Sale, Kimbrel, Pedroia, Benintendi and Vazquez are unlikeable. Bogaerts is in a painful slump, but there's no reason to think he's not giving his all, and isn't a pleasant guy. Hanley may be stubborn, but he was sure likable when he had Papi as protection.

The only thing that's unlikeable is losing. I hate Matt Barnes the ballplayer with the heat of a thousand suns, but there's no reason to accuse him of being a bad guy.

Except David Price. That guy's a douche.
I'm sorry but you don't understand why some of us don't like the team though we certainly root for them. On another site many spoke last year and this year that they didn't want a particular "wife-beater" reliever. Are you actually getting upset at people who has a certain moral level of liking a player/liking a team vs someone such as yourself that only cares about wins and losses with possibly little-to-no moral compass?

I am not bashing your opinion. I'm sue you have a fine moral compass. Just don't try to admonish anyone that also likes to like "the person." You'd be fine with Ty Cobb and a bunch of wife beaters etc "as long as they win?"

Bottomline is - I don't share your point in bold. That might be your personal take on what is likeable but it certainly isn't mine.
 

DeJesus Built My Hotrod

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Dec 24, 2002
48,565
This is a failure of leadership.

All concerned know better, but the manager is responsible for the team. And the team broke the rules seeking competitive advantage.

There is only one way for ownership to correct this.
Overreact and fire Farrell for something (stealing signs) that just about everyone in organized baseball (from U10 travel teams up through the pros) does and has always done if their club is worth a damn?

This complaint by the Yankees carries about as much weight as CC getting salty about Nunez's bunt. If teams aren't using iPhone watches they are using cameras, baserunners watching the catchers signals or base coaches watching lazy catchers dropping their hands below their thighs.

As has been said before many times in this thread, stealing signs is part of baseball. This isn't ISIS...
 

turnthe2

New Member
Jan 13, 2007
82
Las Vegas, NV
I'm sure it was just mere coincidence that 1-9 (well excluding Judge) were on virtually every Sale pitch Sunday including something like 29 fouls with 2 strikes. Nothing to see here, we are just the hard working yankees.
This. I mentioned to my buddy when I believe it was Alex Speier noted the foul ball frequency that either Sale was tipping his pitches (which was mentioned recently being a possibility), the Yankees were stealing signs or they just had their always lucky rabbit foot with them. Too convenient IMO....
 

lexrageorge

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 31, 2007
18,188
The calls in this thread for firing Farrell over this minutia are almost as hilarious as the allegations themselves. Then again, if anyone involved thought this scheme as reported by the NYT (making a big assumption that the scheme is being correctly reported) would actually have any benefit, then baseball folks are even dumber than we thought.
 

HangingW/ScottCooper

Member
SoSH Member
Nov 10, 2006
2,502
Scituate, MA
Fire Farrell and hire Tek so he can push his glove into Girardi's face and we can win the World Series again.
I wanted him gone after last year. Anything short of winning the World Series and he should be gone. He's not part of the solution.

Unrelated, but I wouldn't be surprised to see some gut punch trades this offseason too. I could see JBJ, Xander and Pedroia all on the trading block.
 

MedfieldFan

New Member
Aug 26, 2006
61
Someone needs to explain to me why they didn't set this scheme up so that they used the Apple Watch's haptic feedback so that the trainer didn't have to look at the watch. Buzz once for fastball, twice for curve, three for slider....

The damning evidence against seems to be completely "guy looking at watch".