SOSH Real Fantasy Draft 2014: Draft Order, Rules, and Draft Thread

SoxFan58

Donald Driver
Aug 16, 2005
1,486
Might be a bit of a gamble but ill roll the dice on a guy I really think took a huge step forward last year and will continue to do so.

Yu Darvish, SP

Please bold the selection for me, on mobile, thanks!
 

MakMan44

stole corsi's dream
SoSH Member
Aug 22, 2009
19,363
SoxFan58 said:
Might be a bit of a gamble but ill roll the dice on a guy I really think took a huge step forward last year and will continue to do so.

Yu Darvish, SP

Please bold the selection for me, on mobile, thanks!

 
EDIT: I also PM'd the next guy for you JIC.
 

MakMan44

stole corsi's dream
SoSH Member
Aug 22, 2009
19,363
I also don't think it's a reach at all. He's proven to be a first round pick already, especially with guys like Jose Fernandez and Puig leaving the board. 
 

Frank Fenway

Member
SoSH Member
Apr 23, 2009
5,339
San Jose, CA
I'm going with a guy who is one of the top players at his position. He's also due to regress next season and is an injury risk. Regardless of that, he's got pop and obp at a position that has very little of both. 
 
I've never been good at first round picks. 
 
Hanley Ramirez, SS.  
 
 

czar

fanboy
SoSH Member
Jul 16, 2005
4,317
Ann Arbor
I like this exercise. Congrats to whoever has my spot, make good picks.

----

Taking a pitcher in the top half of the first round would terrify me. Pitcher value is generally A) slightly less than elite hitter value and B) much more variable on a year-to-year basis.

I know people don't like the CarGo pick (I don't either), but the Jose Fernandez pick strikes me as a reach for a young pitcher who lived on BABIP suppression last year. I like him, but I don't think I would have taken him over A) four or five other pitchers (one of which was taken after him) or B) about 10-15 hitters.

Puig is a ballsy pick at 11. Not saying it's a bad gamble, just the range of outcomes is very wide.

Color me shocked that Bryce Harper fell so far. I would probably have had him right behind Trout although Cutch isn't too far behind. I'd have let Cabrera slide top the bottom of the top 10, but also a defensible pick I suppose.
 

terrisus

formerly: imgran
SoSH Member
Fishercat said:
Heh, Yu and Hanley went back to back in the last draft too, almost exactly one round later.
 
Indeed. I had planned to pick Yu last year with that pick, and when he was picked one spot before me, it really threw me off. I ended up setting on Hanley, but regretted it immediately after. Not that he was a horrible pick, but if I had taken more time to think about it, I definitely would have gone in a different path with that pick. Still, had really wanted Yu with that pick (and I wanted Yu with my first pick this year). I guess I should just stop thinking about Darvish entirely.
 

The Best Catch in 100 Years

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 31, 2006
791
Kyrgyzstan
czar said:
the Jose Fernandez pick strikes me as a reach for a young pitcher who lived on BABIP suppression last year.
I'm not totally sure what you mean by this--yes, he had an exceptionally low BABIP, and some regression there is to be expected, but his strikeout, walk and HR numbers (the home park helped, but his away HR/9 is nice too) were all good-to-terrific.
 

DanoooME

above replacement level
SoSH Member
Mar 16, 2008
19,895
Henderson, NV
soxfan121 said:
To defend (sort of) Galway's selection of Gonzalez - there's no more scarce resource than power. It commands a premium in the real market and it's going to command a premium in this fake one. Gonzalez, for all his other faults, is a legit middle of the order bat. Sure, his value is reduced because he plays in Coors but it's not like he's Vinny Castilla or something. He would have value playing in Petco or Oakland. 
 
So, while it was probably a little too high to take him seventh overall, I can see why Galway went there at that time and as long as the pick ends up fitting his overall team building strategy, I think y'all are being a little too harsh. 
 
Oh, and since this thing wasn't even supposed to START until this morning, I think y'all might be a little hasty on the time limit thingy. Chill out - this is gonna take all winter and most of the spring.
 
Signed, 
Guy-Not-Actually-Playing
 
 
MakMan44 said:
Then he whiffed, hard. 
 
There's a guy left on the table that has a higher ISO away from home than CarGo (and his home ISO is nearly the same as CarGo's ISO at Coors). Sure, he was injured last season but it's not like Gonzalez is the picture of health. Any way you slice it, it was a bad pick. 
 
EDIT: Of course, Curll just picked him.
 
I was just reading Jayson Stark's new Strange But True column and the NL leader in Road OPS last year was: Carlos Gonzalez (930 Home, 987 Away).  Of course, his road numbers were fueled by a .407 BABIP, but pay no attention to that.  And his home BABIP was .331, so go figure.
 
I'll also add my name to the wait list in case someone drops out.  I liked doing it last year, but it was a big time hog for me (and that's my fault for getting over-involved in it).
 
 
edit: added linky goodness
 

czar

fanboy
SoSH Member
Jul 16, 2005
4,317
Ann Arbor
The Best Catch in 100 Years said:
I'm not totally sure what you mean by this--yes, he had an exceptionally low BABIP, and some regression there is to be expected, but his strikeout, walk and HR numbers (the home park helped, but his away HR/9 is nice too) were all good-to-terrific.
That wasn't meant to make it sound like he's an average pitcher who got lucky with BABIP.

It was meant to say that he had the 2nd best ERA in the bigs last year (3rd if you count Clay), but the 12th best SIERA. He was still a 1A pitcher, just probably closer to the 15th best pitcher than the 1st.

His peripherals weren't too far from some other young pitchers who also debuted last year but they probably won't go in Round 1 (or maybe even Round 2). If we assume people look past ERA/league effects, I would propose that the reason for this was the fact that Fernandez threw ~50-100 more innings than them, since they were equivalently ranked before last season. Which either implies that A) Fernandez was overdrafted or B) there is an extreme arbitrage for people to capitalize on.
 

ForceAtHome

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 23, 2008
4,011
Maine
  • I don't like the Hanley pick. Awesome bat when he's healthy, of course, but he just turned 30. How long will he stick at SS and how healthy will he stay?
  • I wouldn't have had the balls to go with Fernandez 12th overall, either. High upside, for sure, but I'd rather take a sure thing bat there. His youth may give him higher upside, but also a higher chance that he blows out his arm.
  • I think Harper was a steal at 5th.
  • I agree wholeheartedly with something Fishercat said in an earlier post.
 

Jaylach

Gamergate shitlord
Sep 26, 2007
1,636
Vernon, CT
So I see a lot of people don't like my pick.
 
I went into the draft knowing I'd pick Fernandez with my pick. I had a good suspicion he wouldn't go in the top 30.. when I saw I was pick 12, I knew he was going to be on the table. I knew this because I know he wasn't the smartest or best pick in my spot. It didn't matter to me.
 
My Fernandez pick was far more about heart-shaped eyes than it was about baseball prowess. 
 
Not the best way to do business but, as I stated before all this started, I'm terrible at these things. This is why :)
 
EDIT: 
 
I feel I should explain "smartest or best pick" a bit. I'm not trying to say I made a pick I knew was bad. In fact, I believe it's a good pick, but by most people's standards I knew it wasn't going to be the smartest pick. That didn't matter to me because, as I've said below, with Kershaw and Harper off the table this is the dude I build a team around.
 

terrisus

formerly: imgran
SoSH Member
Jaylach said:
I went into the draft knowing I'd pick Fernandez with my pick. I had a good suspicion he wouldn't go in the top 30.. when I saw I was pick 12, I knew he was going to be on the table. I knew this because I know he wasn't the smartest or best pick in my spot. It didn't matter to me.
 
Too bad we can't trade draft picks. Could have traded down and still gotten your guy in that case.
 

Jaylach

Gamergate shitlord
Sep 26, 2007
1,636
Vernon, CT
The Best Catch in 100 Years said:
Are the rest of your picks also going to be whimsical?
 
No. And it wasn't completely whimsical. I really do believe he's going to be a stud for years to come, including next year. I'm not as afraid of his BABIP as some are, even though it is slightly concerning. With Kershaw and Harper off the table, he's the guy I'd build my team around. 
 
I knew he'd be available because the dude only has 177 MLB innings under his belt. That doesn't usually warrant a top-20 pick in a draft like this. 
 

MakMan44

stole corsi's dream
SoSH Member
Aug 22, 2009
19,363
I mean, if he wants the guy as his number 1, can you blame him? I have very little doubt that Fernandez was not going to make it back to him on the turn. 
 

Scoops Bolling

Member
SoSH Member
Jun 19, 2007
5,898
Looks like Bosox4416 hasn't been on since the 22nd. Anyone have an opinion on how long we should give him to make a pick before making a move to replace or fill in for him?
 

MakMan44

stole corsi's dream
SoSH Member
Aug 22, 2009
19,363
The same treatment as last time, we move on at 11:35 AM today and he gets skipped on the turn if he doesn't make a pick before then. I would suggest actually replacing him on the turn if he's not here though, a team losing its first two picks is very likely to suck.
 

The Best Catch in 100 Years

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 31, 2006
791
Kyrgyzstan
MakMan44 said:
The same treatment as last time, we move on at 11:35 AM today and he gets skipped on the turn if he doesn't make a pick before then. I would suggest actually replacing him on the turn if he's not here though, a team losing its first two picks is very likely to suck.
Maybe he or the new owner can just make the first-round pick at any time after he's been skipped, if it gets to that point?
 

MakMan44

stole corsi's dream
SoSH Member
Aug 22, 2009
19,363
They can and that's what will happen if 4416 gets back in time but a new owner is still losing a chance at much better players if he gets skipped twice and gets the team when it gets back to him the third time. 
 

The Tax Man

really digs the Beatles
SoSH Member
Jun 8, 2009
735
Mansfield, MA
I'm with terrisus.  We should pause the draft and have the first taxi squad manager make the first round pick.  If the original manager doesn't show up by his 2nd round pick, then we go ahead and give his team to the taxi squad manager.  
 
We've just started this draft and skipping managers and picks is going to change everyone's draft substantially.  Let's get this right at the beginning.  
 

Jaylach

Gamergate shitlord
Sep 26, 2007
1,636
Vernon, CT
I'm with terrisus.  We should pause the draft and have the first taxi squad manager make the first round pick.  If the original manager doesn't show up by his 2nd round pick, then we go ahead and give his team to the taxi squad manager.  
 
We've just started this draft and skipping managers and picks is going to change everyone's draft substantially.  Let's get this right at the beginning.  


Came here to say the same thing.
 

Scoops Bolling

Member
SoSH Member
Jun 19, 2007
5,898
Keninten has been PMed to make a pick. If Bosox4416 does not post in this thread by the time his second pick comes up, Keninten will officially take over.
 
ForceAtHome, should I add you to the taxi list?
 

ForceAtHome

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 23, 2008
4,011
Maine
Scoops Bolling said:
Keninten has been PMed to make a pick. If Bosox4416 does not post in this thread by the time his second pick comes up, Keninten will officially take over.
 
ForceAtHome, should I add you to the taxi list?
 
I do not intend to participate in managing a team. I was just offering to help make an unbiased selection so that a team doesn't lose their first round pick, something that will likely be an insurmountable hill to climb.
 

keninten

New Member
Nov 24, 2005
588
Tennessee
If I wait how would I make up for the pick I would be missing in this round?
 
I may make a few picks like jaylach did with Fernandez. The player I`d take now wouldn`t make it back to me for my next pick but I`d definitely take him now. I checked out who I wanted before SoxFan58 made it back.
 
If anyone can give me some websites to help me with checking out players I`d appreciate it. I used Fangraphs and B-Ref but when it gets to later rounds is where I might get in trouble. You guys were picking some guys I had never heard of.
 
I`ll be watching(lurking) to see what happens.
 

SumnerH

Malt Liquor Picker
Dope
SoSH Member
Jul 18, 2005
32,019
Alexandria, VA
Right, pick now.

If Bosox4416 show up before his next pick, he keeps the team. If not, you take it over. Either way it has your pick as its first-round player.
 

terrisus

formerly: imgran
SoSH Member
ForceAtHome said:
So, at this point I gather that whoever is picking 19th is drooling.
 
Well, knucklecup was PMed at noon today and told he could pick, so, must be a pretty big pile of drool by now.
 
And then after that it's me. So I just sit waiting, knowing whoever I think about will end up getting drafted by one of the two slots before me.
But, ah, I'm going to sleep soon anyway. And while I could PM in a contingency pick, we've had to wait nearly 36 hours already, so I'll see what's up once I wake up in the morning. Probably still won't be to me anyway.
 

keninten

New Member
Nov 24, 2005
588
Tennessee
To stop the excessive drooling I`ll pick Manny Machado 3B
 
Let the crucifying begin. I`d rather here a big "fuck you".
 
I PMed knucklecup
 

ForceAtHome

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 23, 2008
4,011
Maine
When the Fernandez comp was thrown out there, it was obvious that Machado was the pick. Are you not going to consider playing him at SS?