Red Sox Spring training thread

Sandy Leon Trotsky

Member
SoSH Member
Mar 11, 2007
6,426
It is amazing how quiet it's been about X this spring.  All the attention has been on Mookie, Castillo, Vic and the pitching staff.  How has he been looking defensively at SS?  He reportedly spent a lot of time working on his defense this offseason.
 

Byrdbrain

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 18, 2005
8,588
I've heard he looks smoother and a bit quicker to the ball but his throws have been a little erratic.
Sorry no links it was stuff I heard on the radio, I think Merloni talking to Bradford.
 

Drek717

Member
SoSH Member
Dec 23, 2003
2,542
Trotsky said:
It is amazing how quiet it's been about X this spring.  All the attention has been on Mookie, Castillo, Vic and the pitching staff.  How has he been looking defensively at SS?  He reportedly spent a lot of time working on his defense this offseason.
In the Effectively Wild season preview series Britton from the Providence Journal said he looks a little smoother and a little more under control.  Hopefully that leads to more easily reaching those intermediate difficulty grounders and as a result making better throws.
 

soxhop411

news aggravator
SoSH Member
Dec 4, 2009
46,469
Alex Speier @alexspeier · 14m 14 minutes ago
Barnes: 16 Ks in 12 IP this spring.
 

soxhop411

news aggravator
SoSH Member
Dec 4, 2009
46,469
Alex Speier @alexspeier · 17m 17 minutes ago
Matt Barnes has had a couple of punchouts of RHH with curveballs today. He sees that pitch as a potential weapon.
 

soxhop411

news aggravator
SoSH Member
Dec 4, 2009
46,469

E5 Yaz

polka king
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Apr 25, 2002
90,486
Oregon
soxhop411 said:
 
Which is why the speculation is growing louder that Craig will be dealt before the end of camp. At this point, it remains a rumor, but there is no question that clubs have had at least preliminary discussions with the Sox about the 30-year-old Craig.
 


 
And with a week left before the team breaks camp, there was talk here that the Sox were close to trading Craig, though that could not be confirmed Saturday afternoon.
 

Hee Sox Choi

Member
SoSH Member
Mar 27, 2006
6,134
I wonder if Andrew Susac could be the target.  Susac could catch this year and learn 1B for the future.  Lots of power, good eye and could make a nice back-up C and starting 1B in 2016+.  Posey has said he wants to remain at C and they have Belt at 1B so Susac seems to be expendable.  With Sabean's tendency to heavily value veterans, a Susac for Craig trade makes a lot of sense.  
 
Hector Sanchez doesn't seem like much of a return for Craig IMO.  
 

Lars The Wanderer

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
3,833
San Francisco
The Sox won't be getting Susac for Craig unless Boston is picking up most of that contract. My guess is Susac breaks camp as the backup C. Hector Sanchez isn't good offensively or defensively and has issues with concussions. I think his time as a C (or even a major leaguer at any position) is just about over.
 

soxhop411

news aggravator
SoSH Member
Dec 4, 2009
46,469
Brian MacPherson ‏@brianmacp 40s40 seconds ago
John Farrell said on two different occasions today that Robbie Ross has pitched his way back into contention for a roster spot.
 

jimbobim

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 14, 2012
1,558
This is just mighty uncomfortable ....offense better beat the Phillies over the head I'd add Barnes to the mix... 
 
Alex Speier ‏@alexspeier  3m3 minutes ago
Farrell: Koji Uehara 'unlikely' to be ready for start of year. Mujica the primary closer, but Sox open to match ups w/Tazawa, Layne, Ogando
3 retweets0 favorites

Reply
 Retweeted3
 Favorite
 
 

geoduck no quahog

not particularly consistent
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Nov 8, 2002
13,024
Seattle, WA
I'm equally concerned about a possible unwritten edict to the umpires that the strike zone needs to be shrunk at the bottom to increase offense and partly overcome the shifts. The Rays announcers (I know) alluded to this yesterday and even though they're jerks, it seemed that the zone was higher than I recall. Or, am I just being paranoid, because if it's true that edict would probably impact the Sox more than any other team.
 
Anyone else have an opinion on this?
 

Green Monster

Member
SoSH Member
Sep 29, 2000
2,277
CT
Lars The Wanderer said:
The Sox won't be getting Susac for Craig unless Boston is picking up most of that contract. My guess is Susac breaks camp as the backup C. Hector Sanchez isn't good offensively or defensively and has issues with concussions. I think his time as a C (or even a major leaguer at any position) is just about over.
 
The Giants optioned catcher Andrew Susac, to Triple-A Sacramento Sunday.  Susac was the favorite to open the season as the team's No. 2 but Hector Sanchez won the competition.  Susac will be the team's starter in Triple-A................................
 
Does this make a trade more or less likely?
 

Rasputin

Will outlive SeanBerry
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Oct 4, 2001
29,494
Not here
Rudy Pemberton said:
Why acquire a young catcher though, when he wouldn't fit into the teams long term plans?
 
Because you should always have a backup plan.
 
I mean, if we assume that Swihart is Plan A for catcher of the future, and Vazquez is Plan B, our Plan B is probably going to have people cutting into his throwing arm soon, and the fact that we're discussing a trade for a catcher, whatever Plan C is, it probably sucks. Having a better Plan C just won a Super Bowl.
 
And really, if we have too many good young catchers, we'll be able to trade one for something useful.
 

Al Zarilla

Member
SoSH Member
Dec 8, 2005
59,268
San Andreas Fault
Green Monster said:
 
 
The Giants optioned catcher Andrew Susac, to Triple-A Sacramento Sunday.  Susac was the favorite to open the season as the team's No. 2 but Hector Sanchez won the competition.  Susac will be the team's starter in Triple-A................................
 
Does this make a trade more or less likely?
 
That's a bit puzzling, although I haven't followed the Giants ST at all. Susac is highly regarded but maybe they feel he needs more seasoning. Also, the Giants give players a lot of rope and maybe they're giving Hector one last chance. And, seeing Rudy's post, when Vazquez gets back, and you have Swihart, what are you going to do with Susac. 
 

Lars The Wanderer

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
3,833
San Francisco
Al Zarilla said:
That's a bit puzzling, although I haven't followed the Giants ST at all. Susac is highly regarded but maybe they feel he needs more seasoning. Also, the Giants give players a lot of rope and maybe they're giving Hector one last chance. And, seeing Rudy's post, when Vazquez gets back, and you have Swihart, what are you going to do with Susac. 
 
Susac had a late start due to some wrist soreness. I think they want him in minor league camp to get regular ABs.
 

Al Zarilla

Member
SoSH Member
Dec 8, 2005
59,268
San Andreas Fault
Lars The Wanderer said:
 
Susac had a late start due to some wrist soreness. I think they want him in minor league camp to get regular ABs.
Thanks, Lars. Guess I'll have to start following the Giants as well as the Sox. Actually, I'm still on super bowl high. Life is good. 
 
My favorite announcers, Kruk and Kuip on right now as a matter of fact. Cain vs. the Dodgers. 
 

sean1562

Member
SoSH Member
Sep 17, 2011
3,651
Rudy Pemberton said:
Why acquire a young catcher though, when he wouldn't fit into the teams long term plans?
 
Isnt Vazquez's offense highly questionable? even if he didnt get injured, a JBJ type rookie year was still a possibility no? Now that he is losing a year of development due to major arm surgery, dont you think it might be time to start hedging our bets on the vazquez front? he has never been a sure thing
 

Red(s)HawksFan

Member
SoSH Member
Jan 23, 2009
20,873
Maine
sean1562 said:
 
Isnt Vazquez's offense highly questionable? even if he didnt get injured, a JBJ type rookie year was still a possibility no? Now that he is losing a year of development due to major arm surgery, dont you think it might be time to start hedging our bets on the vazquez front? he has never been a sure thing
A few things are different in terms of Vazquez vs JBJ: 1) JBJ's lack of offense was a surprise...they had higher expectations for him than they ever have had for Vazquez's bat. 2) The offense overall is greatly improved so lack of offense out of Vazquez would be much less impactful than JBJ's floundering last year. 3) Vazquez's value is and always was tied to his defense, where he is more than capable of having a huge impact that makes up for his bat a lot more than JBJ's considerable defensive prowess ever could.

Also given the details we have, which is to say a lack of details, it's a giant leap at this point to assume "major arm surgery" and that he's lost for the year. We should really wait to jump off the bridge until we're actually on the bridge.
 

reggiecleveland

sublime
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Mar 5, 2004
28,000
Saskatoon Canada
Rudy Pemberton said:
Why acquire a young catcher though, when he wouldn't fit into the teams long term plans?
 
Thank you Rudy. You were freaking me out with all the declarative statements in that other thread.
 
I would expect the catcher fits into their short term plans.
 

mabrowndog

Ask me about total zone...or paint
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Dec 23, 2003
39,676
Falmouth, MA
richgedman'sghost said:
You really think that a case of food poisoning is "DL worthy"?  Might be stretching the term.
 
My use of "I'm sure it's nothing serious" was intended to convey that the rest of that sentence was tongue-in-cheek, especially with several players either already headed for the DL (Vazquez) or flirting with that fate (Uehara, Kelly). But, as Ferm points out, food poisoning -- if severe enough -- can indeed be debilitating for an extended period. Dehydration, muscle soreness (from shivering, heaving & vomiting) and weight loss are all factors. Since Barnes was tweeting about it instead of laying weakened and completely motionless in a hospital bed, I suspect he'll be OK by the time rosters are set.
 
But... at the very least, it's something to watch.
 

Rasputin

Will outlive SeanBerry
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Oct 4, 2001
29,494
Not here
NJ_Sox_Fan said:
Napoli is hitting 30 plus this year. Book it.
I think he's going to be a beast. I've got sleep apnea and the difference between having my machine and not is huge. If the machine want enough for him, I don't get how he could even function.
 

C4CRVT

Member
SoSH Member
Feb 29, 2008
3,076
Heart of the Green Mountains
Craig has too much long term upside to trade for next-to-nothing. If I were king, he'd go to Pawtucket and let things sort themselves out. I think that the odds of that happening are slim because he's a veteran. But there's a more than trivial chance he'll be back to putting up lineup-anchoring numbers and doing so for a discount.
 
I guess I could be swayed by what comes back in whatever theoretical trade but seems like selling now would be selling pretty low.
 

bosockboy

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
19,983
St. Louis, MO
So unless Craig or Victorino gets moved in the next 48 hrs or so, I guess it's Castillo to AAA?  When should the 25 man be announced?
 

Red(s)HawksFan

Member
SoSH Member
Jan 23, 2009
20,873
Maine
bosockboy said:
So unless Craig or Victorino gets moved in the next 48 hrs or so, I guess it's Castillo to AAA?  When should the 25 man be announced?
 
I don't think it needs to be finalized until Opening Day, but I'd imagine once there are no more exhibitions to be played, they'll send down everyone who is going to be sent down and cut whoever is going to be cut.  Assuming of course there isn't a trade in the works or an injury being monitored (like Victorino last year).
 

E5 Yaz

polka king
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Apr 25, 2002
90,486
Oregon
Castillo is expected to join Bradley in Pawtucket, though it appears pretty clear the Sox have kept Castillo well informed of that possibility, because he has consistently said it would not bother him to begin in Triple-A. The justification for starting Castillo there is because he has played only a handful of games the past two years and he could use some more at-bats, although there has been little to suggest in his play here that he is not ready for prime time. Castillo’s stay in Pawtucket is expected to be short -- he’s too good, at 27 he’s in the prime of his career, and the Sox are paying him too much ($72.5 million) to keep him there.
 
http://espn.go.com/blog/boston/red-sox/post/_/id/42594/bradley-among-sox-facing-cutdown-day
 

luckysox

Indiana Jones
SoSH Member
Apr 21, 2009
8,084
S.E. Pennsylvania
I understand WHY he needs to go to AAA with Craig, Vic and Naver all on the big team, but I hate it. I'd take him as the best of those four every day and twice all weekend. It's one of the only specific situations the Sox could be in that would result in a guy as talented and primed to go as Castillo is beginning his first full season in the system in freaking Pawtucket.
 

Snoop Soxy Dogg

Well-Known Member
Silver Supporter
May 30, 2014
407
E5 Yaz said:
Castillo is expected to join Bradley in Pawtucket,   though it appears pretty clear the Sox have kept Castillo well informed of that possibility, because he has consistently said it would not bother him to begin in Triple-A  . The justification for starting Castillo there is because he has played only a handful of games the past two years and he could use some more at-bats, although there has been little to suggest in his play here that he is not ready for prime time. Castillo’s stay in Pawtucket is expected to be short -- he’s too good, at 27 he’s in the prime of his career, and the Sox are paying him too much ($72.5 million) to keep him there.
 
http://espn.go.com/blog/boston/red-sox/post/_/id/42594/bradley-among-sox-facing-cutdown-day
 
That "justification" is perhaps best defined as a "rationalization" for public consumption, which is ok I suppose. Everybody understands what's going on. This is like sending Kris Bryant to AAA so he can "work on defense".
 
I must say I hate sending Castillo down, but I get it.
 

Al Zarilla

Member
SoSH Member
Dec 8, 2005
59,268
San Andreas Fault
luckysox said:
I understand WHY he needs to go to AAA with Craig, Vic and Naver all on the big team, but I hate it. I'd take him as the best of those four every day and twice all weekend. It's one of the only specific situations the Sox could be in that would result in a guy as talented and primed to go as Castillo is beginning his first full season in the system in freaking Pawtucket.
It is frustrating. One thing is that we never know when Cuban guys may become available. You just have to grab ones you think can fit in, when you can, and then work them in.  Another one, Jose Abreu , also never got a chance until he was 27, last year. He was ROY and #4 in MVP voting with the White Sox. Hmm, that example might make it more frustrating.  :huh:
 

Papelbon's Poutine

Homeland Security
SoSH Member
Dec 4, 2005
19,615
Portsmouth, NH
Al Zarilla said:
It is frustrating. One thing is that we never know when Cuban guys may become available. You just have to grab ones you think can fit in, when you can, and then work them in.  Another one, Jose Abreu , also never got a chance until he was 27, last year. He was ROY and #4 in MVP voting with the White Sox. Hmm, that example might make it more frustrating.  :huh:
I don't believe Abreu ever played a game in the minors.
 

Plympton91

bubble burster
SoSH Member
Oct 19, 2008
12,408
Snoop Soxy Dogg said:
 
That "justification" is perhaps best defined as a "rationalization" for public consumption, which is ok I suppose. Everybody understands what's going on. This is like sending Kris Bryant to AAA so he can "work on defense".
 
I must say I hate sending Castillo down, but I get it.
It would really only be comparable to Bryant if the Cubs had keep last year's starting 3B around and had recently traded for an ex-all-star 3B on a multiyear contract who was coming off a bad season. The Red Sox are using the options on a player who has options to maintain organizational depth and can make a plausible case that they're still filling the position with an above average major leaguer. The Cubs can't.
 

InsideTheParker

persists in error
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
40,466
Pioneer Valley
I am really hoping at this point that the Sox don't regret signing Hanley Ramirez. Without him, I think Castillo stays with the team. I guess I understand why the Sox couldn't say no, but Hanley's OPS has apparently been dropping steadily the last couple of years. (Lost the source of that info, sorry.)
 

foulkehampshire

hillbilly suburbanite
SoSH Member
Feb 25, 2007
5,100
Wesport, MA
InsideTheParker said:
I am really hoping at this point that the Sox don't regret signing Hanley Ramirez. Without him, I think Castillo stays with the team. I guess I understand why the Sox couldn't say no, but Hanley's OPS has apparently been dropping steadily the last couple of years. (Lost the source of that info, sorry.)
 
That has more to do with injuries than anything. He's not the force he was in Florida during his early years, but he still has the power. His 2013 was incredible (.345/.402/.638) in only 86 games. If he can stay healthy he's going to hit, especially in this ballpark/division. 
 

Red(s)HawksFan

Member
SoSH Member
Jan 23, 2009
20,873
Maine
InsideTheParker said:
I am really hoping at this point that the Sox don't regret signing Hanley Ramirez. Without him, I think Castillo stays with the team. I guess I understand why the Sox couldn't say no, but Hanley's OPS has apparently been dropping steadily the last couple of years. (Lost the source of that info, sorry.)
 
2010 .853 in 142 games
2011 .712 in 92 games
2012 .759 in 157 games split between MIA and LAD
2013 1.040 in 86 games
2014 .817 in 128 games
 
He's been up and down, but he's also been injured off and on a lot.
 

Mighty Joe Young

The North remembers
SoSH Member
Sep 14, 2002
8,454
Halifax, Nova Scotia , Canada
Given that one of this Organizations defining attributes is the hoarding of assets I suppose I can understand sending Castillo to Pawtucket. The partyline is he will be back up soon enough. But .. if the FO is waiting for some team's LF or RF to get injured it could be a long wait (unless it's Our teams OF).
 
It IS extremely frustrating to have the best player out of Victorino, Nava, Craig and Castillo to be the odd man out. 
 
Some folks have claimed that a healthy Victorino is better - well the 2013 Victorino was better - but I don't think anyone is suggesting that's his true talent level. 
 

yecul

appreciates irony very much
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Jul 8, 2001
18,482
This is likely to be a short term solution to mitigate a roster crunch and figure out best course. Long term the best talent will play the most innings. Until that starts to get compromised as we get beyond a couple weeks or a month I am not going to stress the opening day roster. Besides, a short term period of additional seasoning in games that "matter" down in AAA might not be awful for Castillo.