Patriots Sign Stephon Gilmore

4 6 3 DP

Member
SoSH Member
Oct 24, 2001
2,377
I know they are different positions, but when in silly season guys like Britt and Stills get 8-8.5 a year, even if it's not the Patriot Way it seems a much better use of dollars is going up to 14 for a premier talent.
 

Jeff Van GULLY

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 13, 2005
4,031
Why would Malcolm Butler report to camp if he doesn't get an extension after Gilmore's payday?

They either pay up or he's gone I think.
 

H78

Fists of Millennial Fury!
SoSH Member
Jul 22, 2009
4,613
I mean, if they do land a 1st for Butler, and then trade Jimmy, this could be a team with three first-round picks in this year's draft. Maybe more if Cleveland lost their collective minds to acquire Jimmy.

Discuss for another thread, but there has to be another shoe to drop here, no? Gilmore, plus a 1st for Butler, re-sign Hightower, and roll into next season with a younger corner at #2 (whether that's Jones - which I understand is doubtful - or a rookie).
 

Toe Nash

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 28, 2005
5,628
02130
I don't think it's that complicated. They have Butler this year regardless, so if anything it is ensuring they have two good corners for '17, and then they have this year to develop Jones or find someone else in the draft.
 

Stitch01

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
18,155
Boston
Gilmore is a true shutdown corner. The idea of rolling into next season with Butler and Gilmore maning the two outside corner positions is really exciting.
Yeah, expected them to make a big defensive signing and this was on the list of possibilities. Also gives them some insurance if they cant reup Butler.
 

Leather

given himself a skunk spot
SoSH Member
Jul 18, 2005
28,451
I'll always remember him better for torpedoing the locker room.
Well...that and the sack where he spun Jets-Favre around like a drunken square dancing partner before driving him to the turf.
 

Jimbodandy

Member
SoSH Member
Jan 31, 2006
11,497
around the way
I don't think it's that complicated. They have Butler this year regardless, so if anything it is ensuring they have two good corners for '17, and then they have this year to develop Jones or find someone else in the draft.
That's not at all true. Granted, the Pats aren't in salary cap hell and facing the "poison pill" contract scenario. And yes, Butler comes with a first round pick tax. But it's not out of the question that someone offers something for him that Bill won't match. It's entirely possible.
 

Van Everyman

Member
SoSH Member
Apr 30, 2009
27,091
Newton
Well...that and the sack where he spun Jets-Favre around like a drunken square dancing partner before driving him to the turf.
Yup. My memory was that ADT was much better in 08 than 07 until he got hurt.

As for Ryan replacement and Cyrus, is there anyone else currently on the roster who could be a dark horse? Am I misremembering or did Jonathan Jones start getting CB snaps in the last few games of the year?
 

boca

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 31, 2006
516
I don't think it's that complicated. They have Butler this year regardless, so if anything it is ensuring they have two good corners for '17, and then they have this year to develop Jones or find someone else in the draft.
If Butler doesn't get an offer from another team he plays for the 1st round tender money next season right?
 

Eck'sSneakyCheese

Member
SoSH Member
May 11, 2011
10,399
NH
Or maybe butler is going to NO for Cooks.
I like the Butler for Cooks idea in a vacuum . Seems like a nice swap. Both 2 years of control i believe.
Hmmm. I could be on board with this.

I can't believe that after all the worrying about if they can keep Jones, Collins, Hightower and/or Butler we may be at the point where none of them are back and it's quite possible they'd still be Super Bowl contenders.
 

shoosh77

Member
SoSH Member
Oct 19, 2009
4,382
New Canaan, CT
Yup. My memory was that ADT was much better in 08 than 07 until he got hurt.

As for Ryan replacement and Cyrus, is there anyone else currently on the roster who could be a dark horse? Am I misremembering or did Jonathan Jones start getting CB snaps in the last few games of the year?
Bankshot called it, Rowe. I was impressed by him last year.
 

jimbobim

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 14, 2012
1,558
That's not at all true. Granted, the Pats aren't in salary cap hell and facing the "poison pill" contract scenario. And yes, Butler comes with a first round pick tax. But it's not out of the question that someone offers something for him that Bill won't match. It's entirely possible.
So let's just say BB heard whispers a team was planning this.. Would you rather have Gilmore as insurance not to be backed into a corner and to be able to take the first rounder or no Gilmore all the FA's are gobbled up( very likely) and only the pick no butler and no one of comparable talent to spend the $ on ?
 

Mooch

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
4,535
That's not at all true. Granted, the Pats aren't in salary cap hell and facing the "poison pill" contract scenario. And yes, Butler comes with a first round pick tax. But it's not out of the question that someone offers something for him that Bill won't match. It's entirely possible.
The thing is, the teams that would have the necessary cap space to sign Butler are picking near the top of the draft. Would you trade a top 15 pick and shell out a big contract for Butler? I wouldn't in a million years.
 

Rusty13

Member
SoSH Member
Nov 3, 2007
5,368
That's not at all true. Granted, the Pats aren't in salary cap hell and facing the "poison pill" contract scenario. And yes, Butler comes with a first round pick tax. But it's not out of the question that someone offers something for him that Bill won't match. It's entirely possible.
To go from an undrafted guy, to Super Bowl hero, to pro bowler and then to a guy a team gives "max" money PLUS a 1st rounder would be an incredible story. Either way, he's in a hell of a spot.
 

Jed Zeppelin

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 23, 2008
51,502
I thought Rowe did a pretty decent job coming in mid-season. A big CB who played tight coverage.
I have no idea how to verify this beyond using our collective memories but it seemed like there were a bunch of plays where Rowe was right on someone and they made a great catch and/or he was flagged for a weak DPI.

For a midseason acquisition I agree he did a fine job.
 

DJnVa

Dorito Dawg
SoSH Member
Dec 16, 2010
54,053
It's early here in Denver, so I may not be thinking clearly - but wouldn't this indicate that they're going to let Butler walk? I cannot imagine the Patriots paying $14m+ per year to two corners, and if Gilmore demands $14m per, what is Butler worth? $16m? $18m?
I look at it like this--the fact that Brady is a $14m hit instead of $23m gives then room to play. Because of this, it *may* be possible to pay Gilmore and Butler. But likely not Gilmore, Butler, and Hightower.
 

Dr. Gonzo

Member
SoSH Member
Jan 8, 2010
5,221
I think it's more likely that Hightower is gone than Butler. They'd rather spend the money on a CB than a linebacker.
What makes you believe that? The Pats signed Mayo to an extension in recent memory. If Ed Werder is to be believed, Hightower is looking for 10-13M a year. That seems reasonable to me.
 

Ed Hillel

Wants to be startin somethin
SoSH Member
Dec 12, 2007
43,978
Here
The Patriots could now do Butler and #32 to the Saints for Cooks and #11.
I'd love for New Orleans to give up the younger, better player under an extra year of control and let the Pats move up 21 spots in the first round, but I don't think that happens...

I do think there's room for a mega trade with New Orleans, though.
 

Stitch01

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
18,155
Boston
I thought Rowe did a pretty decent job coming in mid-season. A big CB who played tight coverage.
I agree. I was saying "no, I dont think its too optimistic because he contributed last year". He played pretty well in favorable matchups.
 

Ed Hillel

Wants to be startin somethin
SoSH Member
Dec 12, 2007
43,978
Here
You really think Cooks is the better player than Malcolm Butler? I don't at all.
Given the age difference, I would probably take Cooks, though Butler is arguably at a more valuable position. I would say they are pretty evenly matched.
 

jimbobim

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 14, 2012
1,558
BB seemingly adores Cooks. Him Edelman Hogan Gronk White/Lewis it is enticing ill say that. Good luck pass defenses
 

Infield Infidel

teaching korea american
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
11,463
Meeting Place, Canada
If Butler waits a year and signs a deal similar to Gilmore, say 4/56, he'd make 5/60 including this year's 1st rd tender. So a team would have to offer 5/60 or maybe 4/48 for him to sign this year, plus lose a 1st. Would the Pats match $12m per year? They would probably match something lower, but Not sure if Butler would sign for lower than that, even with the risk of getting injured or havign a down season
 

Hatcher Steals Home

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
216
Dianna Russini‏Verified account @diannaESPN 7s8 seconds ago
The New England Patriots are considering trading Malcolm Butler to the New Orleans Saints for Brandin Cooks per sources
In this scenario, would NO and NE be able to collude to some extent where NO makes an offer to Butler, NE matches it and then they trade. I am
not sure why they (i.e, NO) would not just sign Butler and lose the pick, then on a separate but parallel track, flip Cooks for #32?
 

shoosh77

Member
SoSH Member
Oct 19, 2009
4,382
New Canaan, CT
If Butler plays under the first round tender, then gets franchised next year, in essence the Pats are paying him around $19M for two seasons. Then they could let him walk in 2019 when he turns 29. Not totally out of the question.
The Jimmy G Franchise/Trade scenario after the season could mess this up.
 

Jed Zeppelin

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 23, 2008
51,502
In this scenario, would NO and NE be able to collude to some extent where NO makes an offer to Butler, NE matches it and then they trade. I am
Not sure why they would not just sign him and lose the pick, then on a separate but parallel track, flip Cooks for #32?
Because New Orleans doesn't want to lose the pick.
 

lexrageorge

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 31, 2007
18,188
In this scenario, would NO and NE be able to collude to some extent where NO makes an offer to Butler, NE matches it and then they trade. I am
Not sure why they would not just sign him and lose the pick, then on a separate but parallel track, flip Cooks for #32?
Both teams would be subject to the Wrath of Roger it they attempted any sort of funny business.

About the only thing that can happen is that NO can talk to Butler's agent about his willingness to sign an extension with the Saints, as Butler is an RFA.

From the CBA:

There may be no consideration of any kind given by one Club to another Club in exchange for a Club’s decision to exercise or not to exercise its Right of First Refusal, or in exchange for a Club’s decision to submit or not to submit an Offer Sheet to a Restricted Free Agent or to make or not to make an offer to enter into a Player Contract with a Restricted Free Agent.
 
Last edited:

jablo1312

New Member
Sep 20, 2005
975
Imagine saying 12 months ago that the Pats would end up with none of Jones, Collins, Hightower, and Butler?
 

Mystic Merlin

Member
SoSH Member
Sep 21, 2007
46,896
Hartford, CT
If NO intends to keep Cooks absent a big offer that may or may not come, I have no idea why Payton is allowing reporters to attribute his name to these comments.
 

JokersWildJIMED

Blinded by Borges
SoSH Member
Oct 7, 2004
2,752
Not that BB cares, but trading Butler will bring some wrath from a portion of both the media and fans...not quite getting rid of Kosar, but close.