NFC Championship Game Thread

ObstructedView

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 1, 2001
3,256
Maine
Silverdude2167 said:
Game is on NFL Network right now. Green Bay has shown no balls twice already.
Yeah, watching it now. I didn't see any of it live. Two biggest impressions through 2.5 quarters (just before the fake FG):
 
1) Holy shit did Seattle look horrible. I mean, I obviously knew they'd dug themselves a hole - but actually watching it, it's incredible how awful Wilson was.
 
2) GB planted the seeds for the loss with those 3 kicks on 4th and 1. But there was also Rodgers' huge overthrow on a wide-open Cobb before one of their FGs.
 
I cannot imagine being a Packer fan right now.
 

Dollar

Member
SoSH Member
May 5, 2006
11,089
DanoooME said:
 Right in front of the official no less.
Are you implying that the refs maybe could have or should have thrown a flag for Gilliam doing the same exact celebration that Rodgers has done countless times, just because it could be seen as "showing him up"?

And if so, are you by any chance Shawne Merriman?
 

DanoooME

above replacement level
SoSH Member
Mar 16, 2008
19,877
Henderson, NV
Dollar said:
Are you implying that the refs maybe could have or should have thrown a flag for Gilliam doing the same exact celebration that Rodgers has done countless times, just because it could be seen as "showing him up"?

And if so, are you by any chance Shawne Merriman?
 
No, I just thought it was a funny coincidence that he did it in front of the official.  No conspiracy theories necessary.
 

normstalls

Member
SoSH Member
Mar 15, 2004
4,499
Kyed says the rule states at least 4 on each side (which Seattle had).  Confirmation on who is actually correct here?
 
edit - Just saw Blandino's tweet.  Assuming the formation was legal.
 

JerBear

Member
SoSH Member
Nov 11, 2006
1,584
Leeds, ME
Burt Reynoldz said:
Wait, what am I missing here?
 
From the NFL rules, Rule 6, Article 3(c): "At least four players of the kicking team must be on each side of the kicker."
 
 
normstalls said:
Kyed says the rule states at least 4 on each side (which Seattle had).  Confirmation on who is actually correct here?
 
edit - Just saw Blandino's tweet.  Assuming the formation was legal.
 
Burt is correct at least according to the 2013 rules.  There is nothing illegal here, someone got excited and though they had a scoop on twitter.
 

Ed Hillel

Wants to be startin somethin
SoSH Member
Dec 12, 2007
43,894
Here
Burt Reynoldz said:
Wait, what am I missing here?
 
From the NFL rules, Rule 6, Article 3(c): "At least four players of the kicking team must be on each side of the kicker."
 
You're missing nothing, there's no issue. Not all Twitterers can be Bob Kravitz.
 

johnmd20

mad dog
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Dec 30, 2003
62,068
New York City
Mystic Merlin said:
I enjoyed this faux controversy for the 5 minutes it lasted.
 
I didn't. I want Seattle removed from the Super Bowl (and the league) and Pete Carroll suspended for at least 10 seasons.
 

singaporesoxfan

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Jul 21, 2004
11,882
Washington, DC
bowiac said:
That said, in the moment, even knowing the game situation and clock, I mostly liked the decision to go down. Fumbles happen a lot off interceptions (I can't find good numbers, but 10% wouldn't surprise me).
 
In retrospect, seeing the all 22, I think the ideal answer would have been to make a beeline towards the sideline at around the Seattle 47-45, but that's obviously unrealistic.
 
I decided to do some research into Burnett's slide decision and turned it into a SoSH Central article (while also working in the Patriots' tendency to lateral the ball after turnovers). There were 450 interceptions last year; 326 of those were returned for yards (including zero and negative yards). Of the 326, 8 (2.4%) resulted in fumbles, 4 (1.2%) of which were recovered by the team that got intercepted. That's a really, really low rate. It suggests an extreme risk aversion, or a bad estimation of the likelihood of potential negative events.
 

crystalline

Member
SoSH Member
Oct 12, 2009
5,771
JP
Cool. The Troy Brown strip and the fumble in the Dallas game both stick in my mind - so I would have guessed the turnover rate was much higher. Especially because you can justify it by saying that defensive players don't practice protecting the football.

And this explains why Belichick coaches his guys to run the ball back.

Is the rate much higher after fumble recoveries? That might be harder to test because there's a lot of judgement call as to when the recovery stops and the runback begins.
 

bowiac

Caveat: I know nothing about what I speak
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Dec 18, 2003
12,945
New York, NY
singaporesoxfan said:
I decided to do some research into Burnett's slide decision and turned it into a SoSH Central article (while also working in the Patriots' tendency to lateral the ball after turnovers). There were 450 interceptions last year; 326 of those were returned for yards (including zero and negative yards). Of the 326, 8 (2.4%) resulted in fumbles, 4 (1.2%) of which were recovered by the team that got intercepted. That's a really, really low rate. It suggests an extreme risk aversion, or a bad estimation of the likelihood of potential negative events.
The question I've got is how many of those interceptions resulted in slides (i.e, those aren't super helpful for this analysis), but either way, the rate appears to be much lower than I expected. Good stuff.
 

singaporesoxfan

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Jul 21, 2004
11,882
Washington, DC
bowiac said:
The question I've got is how many of those interceptions resulted in slides (i.e, those aren't super helpful for this analysis), but either way, the rate appears to be much lower than I expected. Good stuff.
 
That's true - I did think about going deeper but the play-by-play data isn't at the level where they tell you how exactly the person advanced the ball, unfortunately.
 

singaporesoxfan

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Jul 21, 2004
11,882
Washington, DC
crystalline said:
Cool. The Troy Brown strip and the fumble in the Dallas game both stick in my mind - so I would have guessed the turnover rate was much higher. Especially because you can justify it by saying that defensive players don't practice protecting the football.

And this explains why Belichick coaches his guys to run the ball back.

Is the rate much higher after fumble recoveries? That might be harder to test because there's a lot of judgement call as to when the recovery stops and the runback begins.
 
There were 262 plays that ended in fumbles in 2014. Exclude the 8 that were interceptions that resulted in fumbles by the returning team, that meant that there were 254 fumbles by the team on offense. I don't know how to break those down into fumble recoveries by the defense vs the offense, so I can't tell you how many times the defense didn't choose to advance the ball, and in any case that figure probably wouldn't be of much use since a recovering defender at the bottom of the pile on top of the ball is not going to advance the ball. 
 
However, what I can say is that of the 254, 70 resulted in returns, which by definition is only done by the defense. Of those returns, only 3 resulted in a fumble by the returning defender. (None of the non-returned fumbles were followed by a second fumble, in case you were wondering.) It's such a low rate I can list all 3 occurrences here:
 
  • CIN @ NE: Andy Dalton pass complete deep middle to A.J. Green for 19 yards (tackle by Darrelle Revis). A.J. Green fumbles (forced by Darrelle Revis), recovered by Jamie Collins at CIN-28 and returned for 3 yards (tackle by Giovani Bernard). Jamie Collins fumbles (forced by Giovani Bernard), recovered by Alfonzo Dennard at CIN-25 and returned for 3 yards (tackle by Giovani Bernard)
  • NO @ DAL: Drew Brees pass complete short middle to Jimmy Graham for 16 yards (tackle by Rolando McClain). Jimmy Graham fumbles (forced by Rolando McClain), recovered by J.J. Wilcox at DAL-10 and returned for 11 yards (tackle by Jimmy Graham). J.J. Wilcox fumbles (forced by Jimmy Graham), recovered by Brandon Carr at DAL-23 and returned for 11 yards (tackle by Jimmy Graham)
  • TAM @ ATL: Matt Ryan pass complete short right to Levine Toilolo for 13 yards (tackle by Alterraun Verner). Levine Toilolo fumbles (forced by Alterraun Verner), recovered by Mark Barron at TAM-21 and returned for 8 yards (tackle by Devin Hester). Mark Barron fumbles (forced by Devin Hester), recovered by Devin Hester at TAM-37 and returned for 8 yards (tackle by Devin Hester)
I argue in the article that the first of these 3 fumbles, if you saw it, was really a Collins mid-tackle lateral that was ruled a fumble (and thus Dennard's return was negated because you can't advance a fumble with less than 2 minutes left). But even counting that one, that's 3 out of 70 fumble returns that resulted in second fumbles, or 4.2%.