Dismiss Notice
Guest, I have a big favor to ask you. We've been working very hard to establish ourselves on social media. If you like/follow our pages it would be a HUGE help to us. SoSH on Facebook and Inside the Pylon Thanks! Nip

Markelle Fultz

Discussion in 'Mark Blount's Port Cellar: Celtics Forum' started by PedroKsBambino, Sep 1, 2017.

  1. PedroKsBambino

    PedroKsBambino Well-Known Member Lifetime Member SoSH Member

    Messages:
    19,293
    Right, though I think Ainge's actions suggest pretty clearly he did not have much of a gap between Tatum and Fultz (whoever was first) which is really the point for the exchange I was having with DeJesus.

    I am pretty much the SoSH champion of 'don't automatically believe what is reported' commentary, but when actions and words match it does increase the confidence some.
     
  2. Koufax

    Koufax Well-Known Member Lifetime Member SoSH Member

    Messages:
    3,769
    Yes, and this whole train of though assumes dramatic events that are no more likely to occur than dramatic events going the other way. What if Fulz blows out both knees in the pre-season and is never the same again? What if he dies of a cocaine overdose? What if Tatum grows another 2 inches and develops a killer three point shot? By making outlier assumptions you can develop any result you'd like from Ainge is a wizard to Ainge is a doofus. How does that advance the ball regarding what we can surmise now based upon the facts as they exist?
     
  3. maufman

    maufman Dope Staff Member Dope Gold Supporter

    Messages:
    21,647
    I went through this in another thread, but the median assumption for a player of Fultz's caliber (consensus #1 pick in a draft that isn't weak at the top) is that barring injury, he'll be at least as good a baller as Blake Griffin, if not better (obviously apples and oranges, as BG is a completely different player, but you get my point). That's not "assum[ing] dramatic events"; it's a sober assessment of how good guys with that pedigree who don't get seriously hurt end up being.

    Tatum has the highest floor by far of any of this year's first four picks (barring injury, an athletic 6-8 guy who was a star in college and can shoot the rock won't fail to be a useful NBA player), but the conventional wisdom says his median projection isn't on par with a consensus #1 pick like Fultz. So while anything could happen, Danny is making a big bet against the conventional wisdom.
     
  4. Rough Carrigan

    Rough Carrigan reasons within Reason Lifetime Member SoSH Member

    Messages:
    18,539
    Wasn't there a degree of worry about Fultz that he seemed to be too comfortable with his team sucking and getting their asses kicked game after game?
     
  5. maufman

    maufman Dope Staff Member Dope Gold Supporter

    Messages:
    21,647
    Building on this, Ainge's willingness to travel to California at the 11th hour to see Josh Jackson work out at least suggests that Danny's public statements of Tatum-love since the draft might be overstated.
     
  6. maufman

    maufman Dope Staff Member Dope Gold Supporter

    Messages:
    21,647
    Maybe that's too harsh a way to put it, but I think you're spot-on.

    Ball and Tatum were the best players on top-15 teams. Fultz had an inferior supporting cast, but it's fair to question why a point guard who is supposedly even better than those two couldn't coax better than a 9-22 record out of his team. I think Danny weighed this much more heavily than his fellow GMs.

    The reason I keep belaboring this point about Fultz in a discussion of the Kyrie/IT trade is because I think that trade reveals that Danny didn't pass on Fultz because he thought IT was the team's point guard of the future.
     
  7. Sam Ray Not

    Sam Ray Not Member SoSH Member

    Messages:
    2,362
    I'm sure it's been much pondered here, but what's the absolute upside of Fultz? In NBA history, the upside of true, normal-sized PGs is at least somewhat limited. The best ever who fit that description are probably Curry, Nash, Stockton and Paul; and it seems highly unlikely Fultz will be the greatest shooter ever like Curry, or have the handles/vision/passing/doggedness/IQ of the other three. And even if he does reach that level: Curry's the only guy of those four who's been good enough to be the best player on an NBA champion.

    Yeah, Fultz is a bit bigger than all those guys, but he's not Jordan-big or even James Harden big. I'm not sure he has the physical profile it would take to be the type of versatile, tough wing defender you need to be to break past the "generic PG" ceiling — let alone the mentality it takes to be a great defender. Indeed, lack of defensive effort and tools seems to be the biggest knock on him.

    Seems to me like the realistic upside is a poor man's James Harden, which doesn't seem like anything to get all hot and bothered about.
     
  8. #classicsquander

    #classicsquander lurker

    Messages:
    46
    I don't believe that was the case. Reports about Jackson cancelling came out around the time of the draft, but I believe the actual cancellation took place weeks before the draft, here's a link suggesting that (http://www.masslive.com/celtics/index.ssf/2017/06/josh_jacksons_camp_canceled_bo.html). I believe it's been reported elsewhere as well.
     
  9. nighthob

    nighthob lurker

    Messages:
    5,289
    He's very Hardenesque, and I'd put his floor as a poor man's James Harden rather than his ceiling. But he's just a normal first pick level player, so a lot of what he turns into is going to be environmental. Just as landing on the TSJ Era Wizards delayed John Wall's growth there's a real risk that being in Philly could do the same for Fultz (I'm assuming that this is why they've finally started signing vet players there). But there are still a lot of kids there more worried about their second contracts than winning.

    I think it would have been less of an issue on a strong veteran team like Boston, just as I suspect that Tatum's going to get a lot closer to his ceiling (which I see as being a longer Paul Pierce) in this environment than he would have in Philly, or Phoenix, or Sacramento or wherever he dropped to without the trade.
     
  10. PedroKsBambino

    PedroKsBambino Well-Known Member Lifetime Member SoSH Member

    Messages:
    19,293
    You're confusing 'expected projection for first overall pick' and 'expected projection for Fultz' though. The question you are speaking to is "should I keep first overall pick or trade it without knowing the players involved". The actual question Ainge faced was "should I pick Fultz, Ball, Tatum or make a trade"

    It is true that historically you should (in a generic sense) expect more from consensus number one pick than any other pick. And I imagine you're thinking "well, that is true of this year too in a projection sense" which is also true...if you get a large enough sample to work from. The trick with a draft is you only get one number one pick, and so you don't know whether you're getting the 'average' number one guy or not.

    Certainly, historical performance of consensus number one picks (and some are overstating the degree to which that is true of Fultz, but he was one to some degree) matters, but it is not the case that it is always better to pick the consensus pick than the guy you have rated highest. And it seems clear Ainge either didn't have Fultz rated highest, or had him so close to others that the gap was less than what he could get in trade.
     
  11. maufman

    maufman Dope Staff Member Dope Gold Supporter

    Messages:
    21,647
    A shorter James Harden who is defensively competent would be an absolutely transcendent player. I'm not saying Fultz will get there, but that's the tantalizing potential that made him the consensus #1 pick. Ball and Tatum are widely seen as not having that high a ceiling.
     
  12. Grin&MartyBarret

    Grin&MartyBarret Member SoSH Member

    Messages:
    5,047
    Fultz is a 6'4, 200lbs point guard at age 18 with a 6'10 wingspan. That's not really a "normal size" point guard, is it?

    The average NBA point guard in 2016 was 6'2 and his wingspan is well above the average for NBA point guards.

    It also seems that some here are vastly underrating Fultz's athleticism. He's an elite NBA level athlete. Given that, his size and wingspan, I'm not sure where the idea that he lacks the "physical profile" to be a good defender comes from.
     
  13. Sam Ray Not

    Sam Ray Not Member SoSH Member

    Messages:
    2,362
    I think it's more that he lacks the physical profile to be an elite defender in the Jordan/Pippen/Kawhi mold — the type of guy who can lock down 1-2-3 and even smallball 4s. To me, that's the defensive versatility that can take you out of the mold of "generic, offensively elite PG who puts up numbers" (something the league is pretty well glutted with right now) and into the realm of "centerpiece of a championship contender."

    Also: at least based on the Nate Duncan / Danny Leroux breakdown I heard, Fultz, despite good length, seems to lack the lateral quickness and effort/motor of a great (or even decent) defender. At this point, I don't think it should be a given that he'll be better on that end than Harden, though I guess if we're talking about upside we can safely put him, at age 19, above the Beard.
     
  14. wade boggs chicken dinner

    wade boggs chicken dinner Member SoSH Member

    Messages:
    12,257
    a
    You mentioned this before and I think you might want to rethink this. Here's the list of #1 overall picks who are guards since 1979 (complete list in the spoiler; I picked 1979 arbitrarily since that's when Magic was drafted).

    Fultz
    Wiggins
    Irving
    Wall
    Rose
    Iverson
    Magic

    If you agree that Fultz isn't Magic, the median level of achievement for Fultz is a multiple-time All-Star, which ironically is what we just traded for (as someone else pointed out when you first brought this up). Now you may say that Rose could have been more than that if he hadn't gotten injured but I would respond that Fultz isn't nearly the athlete that peak Rose was.

    Fultz is going to be a really good NBA player. He can score from 3 levels, he has great handles, and he can hit amazing over the head shots. But unlike the most transcendent guards, it does not appear yet that Fultz can get wherever he wants to get no matter who is guarding him.

    More to the point, there aren't a lot of drafts since 1979 where Fultz would have been the #1 pick.

    Sure there's a chance that Fultz turns out to be Stephen Curry. But there's also a chance that Tatum turns out to be Paul Pierce. I don't think the fact that Fultz was (more or less) the consensus #1 pick means that Fultz is destined for greatness.

    Markelle Fultz
    Ben Simmons
    Karl-Anthony Towns
    Andrew Wiggins
    Anthony Bennett
    Anthony Davis
    Kyrie Irving
    John Wall
    Blake Griffin
    Derrick Rose
    Greg Oden
    Andrea Bargnani
    Andrew Bogut
    Dwight Howard
    LeBron James
    Yao Ming
    Kwame Brown
    Kenyon Martin
    Elton Brand
    Michael Olowokandi
    Tim Duncan
    Allen Iverson
    Joe Smith
    Glenn Robinson
    Chris Webber
    Shaquille O'Neal
    Larry Johnson
    Derrick Coleman
    Pervis Ellison
    Danny Manning
    David Robinson
    Brad Daugherty
    Patrick Ewing
    Hakeem Olajuwon
    Ralph Sampson
    James Worthy
    Mark Aguirre
    Joe Barry Carroll
    Magic Johnson
     
  15. PedroKsBambino

    PedroKsBambino Well-Known Member Lifetime Member SoSH Member

    Messages:
    19,293
    6-4 with Fultz' wingspan is enough size to be a terrific defender at three spots....Marcus Smart is a good example of that. Jordan and Pippen at best defended three spots as well (Jordan wasn't truly an elite PG defender, imo).

    Fultz' game doesn't suggest that will happen, as you note, which I think is the more important part of the analysis.
     
  16. DavidTai

    DavidTai Member SoSH Member

    Messages:
    551
    Could also be just a coaching fit... Maybe they think Tatum, coached by Stevens, has a better shot at reaching his potential than Fultz under Stevens.
     
  17. wade boggs chicken dinner

    wade boggs chicken dinner Member SoSH Member

    Messages:
    12,257
    If you are saying that Fultz has NBA level athleticism, I'd agree with that.

    If you are saying that Fultz's athleticism is elite even when compared to the NBA level athletes who play in the association, I would disagree with that. He was widely seen as not having the athleticism of a DSJ or Fox, not to mention standouts like Wall and Westbrook etc.

    BTW, while it remains to be seen how athletic Tatum is, people should remember that he had the third highest Max Touch - 11'7.5" - in this year's draft, behind uber-athlete Jarrett Allen (12'1") and Zach Collins (11'8").
     
  18. Grin&MartyBarret

    Grin&MartyBarret Member SoSH Member

    Messages:
    5,047
    I didn't mention Tatum. Not comparing the two.

    But I think people are underselling Fultz's athleticism. He may not be elite relative to the entire NBA, but I think his athleticism will slide comfortably into the top 10% of point guards. Almost all of his scouting reports mention his elite athleticism. Whether that's relative to his draft class, position, or the entire NBA can be hard to decipher, but regardless I think it's safe to say he has the athleticism to be a really strong defender if he puts in the work.
     
  19. Grin&MartyBarret

    Grin&MartyBarret Member SoSH Member

    Messages:
    5,047
    I'm not sure I follow. You think you need to be an elite wing defender on par with Jordan/Pippen/Kawhi to be more than a generic point guard? Chris Paul doesn't have that sort of athleticism -- or anything close to it -- and he's an elite defender at his position. In fact, I'm not sure I can think of a single point guard that does.
     
  20. nighthob

    nighthob lurker

    Messages:
    5,289
    I think people sleep on it because he plays like Harden, where he relies on a combination strength and shiftiness to get by people. But watch his chase down blocks and you realise just how athletic he is.
     
  21. maufman

    maufman Dope Staff Member Dope Gold Supporter

    Messages:
    21,647
    When all is said and done, Wiggins will probably be the only non-HOFer on that list. (Maybe D-Rose too, but if so he'll be the first MVP in a really long time who wasn't enshrined. Wall will get there if he stays healthy; so will Kyrie if he wins a title in Boston.)
     
  22. bosox79

    bosox79 Member SoSH Member

    Messages:
    5,983
    Wiggins could still get in himself. Barring injury, he's going to score a shitload of points even if they are all empty.
     
  23. CreedBratton

    CreedBratton Member SoSH Member

    Messages:
    1,559
    If Derrick Rose makes the hall of fame they better just shut it down for good.
     
  24. maufman

    maufman Dope Staff Member Dope Gold Supporter

    Messages:
    21,647
    Breaking out the Fultz digression from the Kyrie/IT discussion -- I'm sure I didn't do it perfectly, but I think the patient will survive the operation.
     
  25. wade boggs chicken dinner

    wade boggs chicken dinner Member SoSH Member

    Messages:
    12,257
    Well one thing is for sure. DA sure gave us a lot to talk about - for the rest of our lives.
     
  26. DrewDawg

    DrewDawg Dorito Dink SoSH Member

    Messages:
    24,472
    I don't know. Word is he may not pass the physical...
     
  27. maufman

    maufman Dope Staff Member Dope Gold Supporter

    Messages:
    21,647
    Well played, good sir.
     
  28. LondonSox

    LondonSox Robert the Deuce SoSH Member

    Messages:
    8,115
    He's actually potentially a lot like Kyrie, not ridiculously fast but shifty and hard to stay in front of especially with his pull up/ step back ability.
    The scouts who loved him compared him to kyrie, except with better size and better tools defensively. More questions sure, but similar. He also can play off play off ball supposedly. We shall see.
    He's as good a prospect (PROSPECT) as Kyrie or Wall.

    He's not an elite athlete in fairness, he's a a solid NBA athlete though, not some plodder.

    All the questions about record ignore a terrible coach and bad team, and his defense was poor, but it's unclear how much of that was due to the team plus carrying all the load on the other end.
    We shall see.

    The whole he wouldn't be number one in a other drafts is pretty dubious. It was a widely regarded good draft, at the top especially. He was an almost consensus number 1, in a deep draft. Now the consensus might be wrong but it was nearly universal, he would be in the running for most years, ex brow and the like.
    This he's not a clear number one, he's not that great is hindsight supporting Ainge rationalization. He was a clear consensus number one in a good draft, this is not as common as you make it out, and there aren't a ton of misses (eg Bennett was not a clear consensus number one and not a good draft).
     
  29. Papelbon's Poutine

    Papelbon's Poutine Homeland Security SoSH Member

    Messages:
    13,727
    He's as good a prospect as Wall, but he's not an elite athlete? Isn't that exactly what Wall is? I'm just a bit confused on how you're comparing them.
     
  30. HomeRunBaker

    HomeRunBaker bet squelcher SoSH Member

    Messages:
    14,459
    As someone who was bullish on both Kyrie and Wall coming out of college I don't have Fultz in that same space. The main difference is that he isn't nearly as explosive or quick athletic as they are which is an enormous factor in evaluating today's scoring PG's.



    Agreed that these guys never miss and I don't think Fultz will "miss" per se.......but he can still not miss and also not be in the Kyrie/Wall league. If I had to guess he lands in the tier below them with the Kemba grouping. That isn't a miss.....but not Kyrie/Wall either.
     
  31. Eddie Jurak

    Eddie Jurak Go Leafs Go Lifetime Member Gold Supporter SoSH Member

    Messages:
    14,222
    My brother, a track coach who views everything through the lens of athleticism, was higher on Fox than anyone in this draft.
     
  32. wade boggs chicken dinner

    wade boggs chicken dinner Member SoSH Member

    Messages:
    12,257
    Shouldn't he have been highest on DSJ?
     
  33. wade boggs chicken dinner

    wade boggs chicken dinner Member SoSH Member

    Messages:
    12,257
    I think the majority of us are in agreement. Fultz, barring injury, is going to be a multiple time All-Star but likely will not be a generational talent (i.e., a guy who could be the best player on a championship team; e.g., LBJ, KD, Davis, etc.). That's not a knock against Fultz.

    I was responding to a post by Maufman that said that DA was bucking CW by trading a consensus No. 1 pick because of "how good guys with that pedigree who don't get seriously hurt end up being" (Maufman compared him to Blake Griffin, who I think has underperformed his expectations but in part due to injury).

    My point is that Fultz was the consensus (more or less) No. 1 of a deep draft, not a generational one, so I think DA's move for Tatum isn't as, well, contrarian as Maufman seems to make it. Particularly since a lot of Fultz's strengths are also shared by Tatum (great footwork and an ability to score at 3 levels).
     
  34. pjheff

    pjheff Member SoSH Member

    Messages:
    378
  35. Eddie Jurak

    Eddie Jurak Go Leafs Go Lifetime Member Gold Supporter SoSH Member

    Messages:
    14,222
    He liked DSJ, too. I just went back and checked old text messages from before the draft (mostly from after Ainge tradied the #1 and before the draft). Summary here:
    • Fultz: really good, really skilled. Not as explosive as DSJ, not as light on his feet as Fox, but really really good.I like ainge's move though. Hard to draft a guard #1 unless he's an off-the-charts athlete. Surprised he's viewed as a definitive 1 actually
    • Ball: very good but not high elite athlete. Whips the ball around effortlessly in several different ways - reminds me a little of bird like that. Ball's a wildcard to me. Hard to support him over what are clearly better athletes, but his ball skills - no pun intended - are elite/unique. A better basketball guy could evaluate him better. Ball might have otherworldly passing ability; I'm just not as good at evaluating that.
    • Tatum: Okay, I'd stop short of calling Tatum a high elite athlete; we're not talking about Garnett here. But he's a very good athlete, functionally very strong, and is comfortable scoring in a whole slew of ways. Reminds me of Carmelo Anthony when he was at Syracuse. If Pierce/Carmelo is your thing, he's perfect. I think Tatum might be the safest pick in the draft.
    • Jackson: Okay I might not be quite as high on Josh Jackson as the consensus. Really good athlete - though not quite the athlete Wiggins was - and if he gets space in either a half court spread or the open floor, he can be lethal. Don't love his shot compared to some of these other guys. Moves with more fluidity than Jaylen Brown. Might put him in 5-10. I def don't like him over Tatum, and I think I might prefer Isaac. Man I'd have a hard time taking Josh Jackson over De'arron Fox - couldn't do it actually. Fox is the far more rare player. Might like DSJ better than Jackson too. He's young so he could keep getting better, but in general I didn't care for [Jackson]. Be interesting to see who has the better career, Josh Jackson or Jonathan Isaac
    • Fox: not exactly sure how to put it, but his feet interact with the ground more effortlessly than any player I've ever seen, including Jordan/Payton. Def doesn't have the freakish strength/exlosiveness of MJ/Westbrook, but his feet just look miles ahead of what he'll see in the NBA. Worth watching his YouTube highlights to see what I mean. Defensive potential must be off the charts. Plenty of ball skill & ability to change direction ability is elite. He can drive so well defenders will have to concede some space, so whether he can stick that shot consistently will determine a lot of his success. I cannot overstate the quality of Fox's feet. We're talking Deion Sanders here.
    • Isaac: How tall is Isaac? His highlights are really good - superb coordination in both sides. Form on outside shot could be a little better, though he prob has the coordination to fix it (most guys don't). I could see a team liking him. He's 6'11"? Holy shit...hes not projected top 5?
    • Ntilikina: really good movements on the court and a nice looking shot imo. I don't see the explosive first step that Fox or Smith has, and that's why I prob have him at the bottom of the guy's I've seen so far. Light, long and athletic though, so plenty to like.
    • DSJ: Okay, Smith is really good, though prob the worst current Celtics fit. Stronger, more mature offensive game than Fox. Still prefer Fox bc I think at worst you've got a game changing defender, and this kid def isn't that. Offense comes really easily to him though. Tough to bet on an NC State kid; that program is a hell hole. Very good player though. Can certainly see him as a top 10 type.
    • Monk: a little more difficult to evaluate a shooter bc when you only see highlights, you don't see him moving w/o the ball. Awesome shooter, and can score in a bunch of other ways too. Had no idea he had that many dunk finishes. Would have liked to have seen more examples of him setting his shot up off the dribble. Inconclusive there. Doesn't look like a great defender, but also not the type of shooter who's a complete liability in that regard either.
     
  36. Papelbon's Poutine

    Papelbon's Poutine Homeland Security SoSH Member

    Messages:
    13,727
    Your brother sends really long text messages.
     
  37. LondonSox

    LondonSox Robert the Deuce SoSH Member

    Messages:
    8,115
    My thoughts from a LOT of tape watching and reading ahead of the draft.
    But again I do think such a high consensus on a good draft is more significant than you guys think. We shall see. We are splitting a small difference anyway so not really a big deal

    I mean there was as much debate on Simmons Vs Ingram as fultz Vs field. And Simmons Vs Ingram isn't remotely close. People get paid to write what about stories on the draft and really no one had anything but fultz 1 until ainge shook it up.

    I do get the point though that no one in this draft was a no warts no flaws almost guaranteed super duper star. Many drafts don't have one, esp at 19/20
     
  38. Eddie Jurak

    Eddie Jurak Go Leafs Go Lifetime Member Gold Supporter SoSH Member

    Messages:
    14,222
    That was the useful stuff out of several long conversations via text. :)
    LOL, no scouting claims were made. :)
     
  39. Papelbon's Poutine

    Papelbon's Poutine Homeland Security SoSH Member

    Messages:
    13,727
    I realize Ingram didn't exactly knock people's socks off, but given that Simmons has yet to, ya know, actually play a game in the NBA because of a pretty significant injury, I continue to find your homerisms comical, especially when combined with your stones caste at Celtics fans out of he other side of your mouth. #trusttheprocess

    Edit: @LondonSox for clarity
     
    #39 Papelbon's Poutine, Sep 3, 2017
    Last edited: Sep 3, 2017
  40. LondonSox

    LondonSox Robert the Deuce SoSH Member

    Messages:
    8,115
    Simmons is a different level prospect. His combination of size, strength, speed, handle and passing is pretty unique. Said it before the draft, Ingram has been worse than expected including in the areas like shooting which weren't meant to be a question. I don't see an obvious reason to change Simmons view because he landed on someone's foot. Esp as everything supposedly went fine.
    The only thing worse than being hurt a d not playing is being healthy and absolute trash.
    And as for fultz I expressed these views before any trades and was openly saying the Celtics were getting a great player and I was jealous.

    I want to be clear that I was as high on fultz when I thought the Celtics were getting him. So yes what homerism.

    I'm happy to have homerism pointed out. But I wasn't high on a player when my team was likely to draft him and down when not.
    My only change to analysis from team to team is fit.
     
  41. maufman

    maufman Dope Staff Member Dope Gold Supporter

    Messages:
    21,647
    @LondonSox is a Sixers fan, but I think his opinions are in line with the conventional wisdom on this issue -- Simmons would go #1 in a redraft; Ingram would probably drop behind Brown and Murray.
     
  42. sezwho

    sezwho Member SoSH Member

    Messages:
    281
    Really enjoyed reading this. I'll definitely make room in my inbox for any of his athleticism focused perspective texts on the upcoming draft if you want to CC me :)
     
  43. wade boggs chicken dinner

    wade boggs chicken dinner Member SoSH Member

    Messages:
    12,257
  44. Big John

    Big John lurker

    Messages:
    482
    Let's wait to see how well Simmons and Fultz can defend a competent NBA backcourt, say Irving and Hayward, Lowry and DeRozan or Wall and Beal. Even Schroeder and Bazemore will present a challenge to them, since Schroeder is way quicker than either one and they will have to bring in someone like T.J. McConnell to keep him in check.

    I expect Simmons to run the offense from the sf position, but that cuts into Covington's minutes.
     
  45. LondonSox

    LondonSox Robert the Deuce SoSH Member

    Messages:
    8,115
    He hopefully mainly plays the 4 defensively to maximize his plus rebounding and ability to grab and go and up the pace and get more transition opportunities

    I think the starting sixers lineup (defensively)
    Fultz, redick, Covington, Simmons, embiid
    Bench
    TJ, bayless, saric, sauce, Anderson, Holmes, Johnson and korkmaz (though he might be in g league a fair bit) oh and okafor lol I try to forget him
     
  46. Big John

    Big John lurker

    Messages:
    482
    Well, Fultz/Redick will not be an outstanding defensive backcourt either. I guess Saric and Covington will fight for minutes, depending on which forward position Simmons plays.
     
  47. lovegtm

    lovegtm Member SoSH Member

    Messages:
    453
    I'd assume Saric comes off the bench, since his scoring ability seems to project well in a 6th man/super-sub role?

    Covington seems like a guy who would match up better in the starting lineup, since he doesn't really create his own shot, but is a strong defender.
     
  48. LondonSox

    LondonSox Robert the Deuce SoSH Member

    Messages:
    8,115
    Yup I think saric is sixth man, tough matchup for backups potentially.
    And yeah fultz redick back court is bad defensively most likely (longer term I see optimism for fultz to be ok and redick isn't awful but likely this year fultz will be schooled), but Covington and embiid help a lot and TJ is fine defensively and TLC has lots of promise there. So
     
  49. HomeRunBaker

    HomeRunBaker bet squelcher SoSH Member

    Messages:
    14,459
    You passed the homerism test by recognizing that a Redick/Fultz starting backcourt will be awful. :)
    Coming from an unbiased source I'm guessing "awful" is the best case this year for them.
     
  50. jmm57

    jmm57 Member SoSH Member

    Messages:
    1,032
    NBA.com NBA gm poll
    Which rookie will be the best player in 5 years?
    Josh Jackson 24%
    Markelle Fultz 21%
    Jayson Tatum 21%
    Lonzo Ball 14%
    Ben Simmons 14%
    Others receiving votes: Jonathan Isaac, Dennis Smith Jr

    Maybe Fultz wasn't as consensus #1 as mock draft sites would have us believe?

    http://www.nba.com/gmsurvey/2017#/
    Edit to add link
     

Share This Page