Dismiss Notice
Guest, I have a big favor to ask you. We've been working very hard to establish ourselves on social media. If you like/follow our pages it would be a HUGE help to us. SoSH on Facebook and Inside the Pylon Thanks! Nip

Kraft Charged with Soliciting

Discussion in 'Blinded by the Lombardis: Patriots Forum' started by Hoya81, Feb 22, 2019.

  1. Brohamer of the Gods

    Brohamer of the Gods Well-Known Member Silver Supporter SoSH Member

    Messages:
    1,607
    Actually they do.

     
  2. geoduck no quahog

    geoduck no quahog Well-Known Member Lifetime Member SoSH Member

    Messages:
    10,579
    So what's with the traffic stops?

    They go around breaking tail lights to justify yanking them over?
     
  3. Myt1

    Myt1 the FRESH maker Lifetime Member SoSH Member

    Messages:
    26,216
    Everyone speeds. Everyone fails to signal. Literally everyone.
     
  4. maufman

    maufman Anderson Cooper x Mr. Rogers Staff Member Dope Gold Supporter

    Messages:
    24,070
    Would they even need a pretext? They stopped the car for the purpose of investigating a crime. Even if they lied about the reason for the stop, they’re entitled to do that so long as the actual reason is legitimate, right?
     
  5. Rovin Romine

    Rovin Romine Johnny Rico Lifetime Member SoSH Member

    Messages:
    9,003
    This is a subtle point.

    From the Kraft-ian defendant's point of view, we should work the whole issue backwards. Specifically, the first question is, "Does the warrant hold up absent those stops?"

    If yes, their potential exclusion is meaningless in practical terms. Here, if I recall the other facts correctly from the affidavit, the answer is likely, yes, the warrant would stand on other grounds.

    If no, then it triggers another series of inquiries, which goes into factual issues such as what the police said and did (was it a custodial stop, etc.) and procedural issues such as who has the standing to assert the illegality of those stops. There's a potential fruit of the poisonous tree issue as well, somewhere down the line.

    ***
    But in general no, the police are not allowed to detain potential witnesses to a crime. There's nothing (in FL) that prevents them from asking one to stop and cooperate, and anyone can willingly help out the fuzz. But there's nothing (in FL) that generally requires one to stay in an area and provide information to the police.*

    *Absent some duties imposed via employment/child endangerment issues and operating a motor vehicle. There are a few other exceptions as well, including declared states of emergency, and following officer directions via safety and crime scene issues, but in general, no, one does not have to be an informant and one never has to self-incriminate.)
     
  6. LoweTek

    LoweTek Well-Known Member Lifetime Member SoSH Member

    Messages:
    1,373
    So my point was, they seem to have obtained the warrant based on suspicion of trafficking which turns out to be unlikely or thin at best.

    Instead they have a bunch of guys on solicitation charges and one person on a weak trafficking charge.

    I guess I'm questioning whether a warrant based on trafficking can freely be used for solicitation charges instead?

    I'd never heard of a video surveillance warrant granted for solicitation at a massage place.

    As for the Jimmy Fund bet, I'm in but please make it clear what I'm betting on, Kraft dismissal vs not? Or something else?
     
  7. LoweTek

    LoweTek Well-Known Member Lifetime Member SoSH Member

    Messages:
    1,373
    Hey thanks! I claimed no knowledge of procedure. I was asking the lawyers that's all.
     
  8. Myt1

    Myt1 the FRESH maker Lifetime Member SoSH Member

    Messages:
    26,216
    Generally, yes. Once you’ve got a legal search, you’re not required to ignore evidence of other crimes. Think a pile of coke on a table while the police execute a warrant based on an illegal weapons possession and it turns out that there are no guns there.

    Dismissal based on the warrant being for a different crime, I thought. But sure, to make it more sporting, how about a ruling that the video evidence against Kraft has to be excluded?
     
  9. LoweTek

    LoweTek Well-Known Member Lifetime Member SoSH Member

    Messages:
    1,373
    Ok, excluded or any complete dismissal of Kraft charges regardless?

    Do video surveillance warrants generally get granted for second degree misdemeanors?

    I guess your pile of cocaine example makes sense but here we are going from a first degree felony warrant justification down to basically a traffic ticket for a first offense. There would seem to be a difference. Maybe not.
     
  10. InstaFace

    InstaFace MDLzera

    Messages:
    6,713
    No worries, just kidding around about the offer of a wager. I think most of us non-lawyers are lucky if our knowledge about procedure reaches "regular Law & Order watcher" status.

    If the charges are dismissed, btw, all the "Kraft gets off - again!" puns will be hilarious from the Post/Daily News, and then get gradually more obnoxious as they pile up from all corners.
     
  11. The Mort Report

    The Mort Report Member SoSH Member

    Messages:
    1,230
    I have a very basic understanding of law, but its starting to feel like the way Kraft is going to fight this is try to find errors in the police work and get the case thrown out on a technicality. I worry that if this works, depending on the error, all men charged will be able to use the same reason and their cases get thrown out. Wouldn't that destroy the sex trafficking case since there are suddenly no sex related offenders? Yes its still human trafficking but I'd imagine there is a much higher charge when it includes sex crimes as well.

    Even if he gets the charges dropped, I don't think anyone is suddenly going to believe he is innocent short of a guy coming forward that looks exactly like Kraft and admits to impersonating him. I for one think its crazy what he did, and he should be punished but I don't really think it effects his legacy in my eyes. However, if spends thousands of dollars to find a fault that gets him out of a misdemeanor and community service at the expense of weakening a case against truly bad individuals? I'm not so sure
     
  12. Myt1

    Myt1 the FRESH maker Lifetime Member SoSH Member

    Messages:
    26,216
    Exclusion’s fine. That’s the real point.

    I dunno. I’d doubt they’re applied for.
     
  13. djbayko

    djbayko Member SoSH Member

    Messages:
    7,996
    It’s not at all clear this place was trafficking humans, so I wouldn’t get too worried just yet. If you think he needs to be punished for the crazy act of getting a hand job, well, we’ll just have to disagree there. He will most likely be punished though, so you’ll get your wish.
     
  14. nighthob

    nighthob Member SoSH Member

    Messages:
    7,104
    Or “Kraft Gets Another Happy Ending”.
     
  15. Rovin Romine

    Rovin Romine Johnny Rico Lifetime Member SoSH Member

    Messages:
    9,003
    Be sure.

    Individual attorneys making sure the police followed the law on a case-by-case basis is the basic way our country provides oversight for it's various criminal justice systems. This is important because criminal justice systems are always ripe for abuse and mismanagement, which produces injustice - the very thing they're in place to fight.

    Kraft has an attorney. Pretty much everyone arrested in connection to this will have an attorney, either hired or appointed. All of those attorneys will be looking to make sure the police followed the law.
     
  16. bakahump

    bakahump Well-Known Member Lifetime Member SoSH Member

    Messages:
    6,054
    RR, Its a Action movie Trope, But Lets use the Coke example above.

    In your opionion (not professional but morally) if a cop broke into a home and found a pile of coke then arrested a guy, is that guy any less guilty? He had coke when he shouldnt have had coke.
    (I would love to hear SOSHs opinion in general)

    I am certainly not arguing against our system.....its about as good as can be expected, and the the flexibility and its intent to protect the innocent as much as possible is its main strength.

    But "Defense" is a fascinating subject.

    Instead of coke, what if a cop broke in (because he had a "Bad feeling") and found 3 kidnapped children.

    Its a weird dichotomy.

    But we have to do this to protect 1 truly innocent person even if 100 guilty get off.

    I think Kraft is guilty. I think the crime is minor. I think he is getting a raw PR deal from the press. But hes guilty. The fact that I am rooting for him to find a loop hole just to shut all the naysayers up is strange.
     
  17. reggiecleveland

    reggiecleveland sublime Lifetime Member SoSH Member

    Messages:
    20,034
    I agree

    Here I don't agree. He was, at best, colossally stupid and carless, and all public shame he gets is earned.
     
    #1017 reggiecleveland, Mar 5, 2019
    Last edited: Mar 5, 2019
  18. InstaFace

    InstaFace MDLzera

    Messages:
    6,713
    that's such a good typo you should leave it.
     
  19. BornToRun

    BornToRun Member SoSH Member

    Messages:
    10,718
    I think we’re way past caressing at this point.
     
  20. Rovin Romine

    Rovin Romine Johnny Rico Lifetime Member SoSH Member

    Messages:
    9,003
    The legal/moral distinction is an important one. But I think you're blurring right away with your questions. Shouldn't it be something like, "found a pile of coke, so is he any less morally culpable, regardless of whether he can be charged with a crime?"

    Moral culpability is pretty fact dependent for me. I tend to be pretty libertarian about most things in isolation. That said, some things are hard to isolate, and I'm not really pro-drug-cartel. It's all on a spectrum though.
     
  21. JohnnyTheBone

    JohnnyTheBone Member SoSH Member

    Messages:
    13,954
    That's why he had a driver wait outside.
     
  22. reggiecleveland

    reggiecleveland sublime Lifetime Member SoSH Member

    Messages:
    20,034
    I suppose
     
  23. simplyeric

    simplyeric aggressively nonsensical SoSH Member

    Messages:
    11,507
    ‘Kraft well serviced by attorneys, beats off rap’
     
  24. InstaFace

    InstaFace MDLzera

    Messages:
    6,713
    don't be so premature, guys, let's keep it in our pants.
     
  25. BornToRun

    BornToRun Member SoSH Member

    Messages:
    10,718
    “Robert Kraft got his penis pulled on by a woman in a massage parlor.”

    Too literal?
     
  26. simplyeric

    simplyeric aggressively nonsensical SoSH Member

    Messages:
    11,507
    ‘Breaking: Billionaire Has Sexual Relations’
     
  27. Lose Remerswaal

    Lose Remerswaal Leaves after the 8th inning Lifetime Member SoSH Member

    Messages:
    33,134
    So when the car got pulled over for speeding or not signalling, how was Kraft involved?

    And didn't this happen twice? Or was he only pulled over once?
     
  28. nighthob

    nighthob Member SoSH Member

    Messages:
    7,104
    Go on, pull the other one why don’t ya.
     
  29. MuppetAsteriskTalk

    MuppetAsteriskTalk lurker

    Messages:
    2,289
    I think he was pulled twice, and stopped once.
     
  30. Lose Remerswaal

    Lose Remerswaal Leaves after the 8th inning Lifetime Member SoSH Member

    Messages:
    33,134
    Yeah, yeah, but there are two charges against him. If he got stopped once by cops, WHY GO BACK the next day???

    And how does his driver getting pulled over involve Kraft?
     
  31. edoug

    edoug Member SoSH Member

    Messages:
    1,845
    You know that happens when we get too excited.
     
  32. Marciano490

    Marciano490 Urological Expert SoSH Member

    Messages:
    33,108
    If anyone wondered what week 2 of dick jokes looks like...
     
  33. Rovin Romine

    Rovin Romine Johnny Rico Lifetime Member SoSH Member

    Messages:
    9,003
    I'm still waiting on the video for week one.
     
  34. SemperFidelisSox

    SemperFidelisSox suzyn SoSH Member

    Messages:
    16,620
  35. Marciano490

    Marciano490 Urological Expert SoSH Member

    Messages:
    33,108
  36. geoduck no quahog

    geoduck no quahog Well-Known Member Lifetime Member SoSH Member

    Messages:
    10,579
    Human Trafficking is a completely different crime from prostitution or soliciting prostitution. They can overlap venn-like.

    The guys were popped for soliciting. The gals, I presume, would be charged with prostitution.

    What is the illegal act? Getting nude? Someone touching your peepee? Ejaculation? Penetration?

    Cops doesn't address that issue, so I don't know.

    Wasn't erotic massage legal in RI?

    We were so much better with the Puritans.
     
  37. edoug

    edoug Member SoSH Member

    Messages:
    1,845
    Prostitution was decriminalized in RI from 1980 to 2009. The results were a bit startling on one hand but make sense in the other.
    https://whyy.org/articles/prostitution-decriminalized-rhode-islands-experiment/
     
  38. Papelbon's Poutine

    Papelbon's Poutine Homeland Security SoSH Member

    Messages:
    17,371
    I’d imagine the answer is as simple as ‘the transfer of money’.
     
  39. uncannymanny

    uncannymanny Well-Known Member Gold Supporter SoSH Member

    Messages:
    5,730
    Well not just a transfer of money :)

    This seems to cover it all:

    [/i][/i]
     
  40. simplyeric

    simplyeric aggressively nonsensical SoSH Member

    Messages:
    11,507
    Or a really good zipper manufacturer.
     
  41. Marciano490

    Marciano490 Urological Expert SoSH Member

    Messages:
    33,108
    I usually wear sweats to get a massage, and I’m not even getting jerked off.
     
  42. YTF

    YTF Well-Known Member Silver Supporter SoSH Member

    Messages:
    9,321
    How about Orchids of Asia Stadium? I mean they could probably pay for it with luxury suite "amenities".
     
  43. soxhop411

    soxhop411 Member SoSH Member

    Messages:
    33,573
    Kraft is being ordered to appear at the hearing at the end of the month
    https://boston.cbslocal.com/2019/03/07/robert-kraft-prostitution-arraignment/

     
  44. simplyeric

    simplyeric aggressively nonsensical SoSH Member

    Messages:
    11,507
    Kraft might have some sans-a-belt slacks, but he's not wearing sweats. Think of your market demographics, man!
    They should have moved the stadium to Rhode Island back during those "it's all ok if you're indoors" years...
     
  45. Rovin Romine

    Rovin Romine Johnny Rico Lifetime Member SoSH Member

    Messages:
    9,003
  46. Van Everyman

    Van Everyman Member SoSH Member

    Messages:
    17,000
    What? That makes no sense.
     
  47. Myt1

    Myt1 the FRESH maker Lifetime Member SoSH Member

    Messages:
    26,216
    All you. IMHO, the main problem with using English instead of Latin is that people can read our bullshit now.
     
    #1047 Myt1, Mar 7, 2019
    Last edited: Mar 7, 2019
  48. CoolPapaLaSchelle

    CoolPapaLaSchelle lurker

    Messages:
    70
  49. Van Everyman

    Van Everyman Member SoSH Member

    Messages:
    17,000
     
  50. Marciano490

    Marciano490 Urological Expert SoSH Member

    Messages:
    33,108
    Are you speaking as a lawyer or a Catholic?
     

Share This Page