I'd like to draw your attention to Masahiro Tanaka

soxhop411

news aggravator
SoSH Member
Dec 4, 2009
46,470
Verducci's take: How will Masahiro Tanaka's workload affect his MLB value? http://t.co/zUYvcItshi via @SINow

Extremely good piece by Verducci. And well worth your time to read.
 

edoug

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
6,007
Remember they said Dice-K never iced his arm? How long did that last?
 

Pete Williams

Banned
Oct 22, 2013
31
soxhop411 said:
Verducci's take: How will Masahiro Tanaka's workload affect his MLB value? http://t.co/zUYvcItshi via @SINow

Extremely good piece by Verducci. And well worth your time to read.
 
 
I generally like Verducci's writing but I think to put things in proper context you need to mention that in Japan pitchers generally get 6 days of rest between starts.  That's significant.
 

Sampo Gida

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 7, 2010
5,044
Yaz4Ever said:
so do I.  Neither of us is getting it, though.
 
That's the beauty of being a free agent that is sought after by multiple teams with deep pockets.  Who would have thought Ellsbury gets 22 million a year. 
 
The only way he makes less than 17 million a year IMO is if some team is smart enough to give him a 10 year deal so as to reduce the AAV, or if MLB scouting reports simply don't project him to be a 4-5 WAR pitcher or his MRI's look like a train wreck.
 

geoduck no quahog

not particularly consistent
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Nov 8, 2002
13,024
Seattle, WA
Pete Williams said:
 
 
I generally like Verducci's writing but I think to put things in proper context you need to mention that in Japan pitchers generally get 6 days of rest between starts.  That's significant.
 
Which he addresses in the article, if you read it.
 

Japanese coaches believe in throwing more than do American pitching experts. However, their pitchers throw with more days of rest (generally every sixth or seventh day rather than the fifth day) in a shorter season against less imposing lineups. Tanaka, for instance, for all of his many innings, never made more than 28 starts in a season for the Eagles.
 
When pitchers leave Japan for the majors, the more rigorous schedule and lineups tend to exact a toll on them after two or three seasons. Eleven pitchers born in Japan have made 25 starts in a major league season. Only two of them were able to do so more than three times: Hideo Nomo and Hiroki Kuroda.
 
If you raise the bar to 30 starts -- and Tanaka will be expected to be that kind of pitcher with the money he will get -- Nomo and Kuroda are the only ones to do so more than twice. And Nomo is a more of a cautionary tale: a two-year wonder followed by 10 years a journeyman.
 
 
 

ForceAtHome

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 23, 2008
4,011
Maine
When pitchers leave Japan for the majors, the more rigorous schedule and lineups tend to exact a toll on them after two or three seasons. Eleven pitchers born in Japan have made 25 starts in a major league season. Only two of them were able to do so more than three times: Hideo Nomo and Hiroki Kuroda.
 
 
How many of those 11 pitchers are really comparable to Tanaka though? Yes, they're all Japanese born -- but which of them dominated the NPB at a young age and came to MLB in their mid-20s?
 
Didn't really come through NPB:
  • Mac Suzuki: came up through MILB
  • Tomo Ohka: came over at age 23, just 57.1 IP in NPB prior to US debut
Came old and found success:
  • Hisashi Iwakuma: came to MLB at age 31
  • Hiroki Kuroda: came to MLB at age 33
Came old and flopped:
  • Masato Yoshii: came to MLB at age 33
  • Kenshin Kawakami: came to MLB at age 34
Came at age 28 with some hype, flopped:
  • Hideki Irabu
  • Kaz Ishii
That leaves three from the list who are really comparable to Tanaka on a very broad level (mainly age and NPB experience). Nomo came at age 26 and found success before turning mediocre. Matsuzaka also came at 26 and everyone here is familiar with him. Darvish came at 25 and has been awesome so far. Tanaka will be 25 all of next season.
 
Koji Uehara and Kei Igawa could probably be added to the list, Koji in the came old/succeeded column and Igawa in the young/flopped category.
 

Sampo Gida

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 7, 2010
5,044
ForceAtHome said:
 

That leaves three from the list who are really comparable to Tanaka on a very broad level (mainly age and NPB experience). Nomo came at age 26 and found success before turning mediocre. Matsuzaka also came at 26 and everyone here is familiar with him. Darvish came at 25 and has been awesome so far. Tanaka will be 25 all of next season.
 
 
Thought it useful to compare those 4 pitchers K/9 in the year before coming over and 1st year in the majors
 
Nomo  -  9.9 Japan/11.1 MLB
Darvish - 10.7/10.4
Matsuzaka -9.7/8.8
Tanaka -7.8/??
 
Not that K/9 tells the whole story but we really are in uncharted territory with someone like Tanaka. 
 
Just for the heck of it, here is Koji
 
Koji -7.2/6.5
 
Koji was then moved to RP'er after 1 year as a starter where he had a 4.05 ERA in 12 starts.  His K/9 then jumped to the double digits.  He was also quite a bit older.
 
Koji might actually be the best comp since Tanaka seems to rely on a not so great FB that he locates and a nasty splitter.  No idea what Koji might have done if he came to the MLB at age of 25, His numbers at age 24 were pretty comparable to Tanaka age 24 season. 
 
Koji 
 W ▴ L W-L% ERA G GS GF CG SHO SV IP        H  R ER HR BB IBB SO HBP BK WP BF   WHIP H/9 HR/9 BB/9 SO/9  
 
 20  4 .833      2.09 25 25 0    12   1      0 197.2 153 49 46 12  24   3  179 4        0    3  769    0.895 7.0    0.5   1.1    8.2  
Tanaka
 24  0 1.000   1.27  28 27 1     8    2      1 212.0 168 35 30 6    32   0   183 3         0    9 822    0.943 7.1    0.3    1.4   7.8  
 

ForceAtHome

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 23, 2008
4,011
Maine
Sampo Gida said:
Thought it useful to compare those 4 pitchers K/9 in the year before coming over and 1st year in the majors
 
Nomo  -  9.9 Japan/11.1 MLB
Darvish - 10.7/10.4
Matsuzaka -9.7/8.8
Tanaka -7.8/??
 
Not that K/9 tells the whole story but we really are in uncharted territory with someone like Tanaka.
 
Not really. Tanaka's K rates in Japan have easily been better than successful MLB pitchers such as Kuroda and Iwakuma. Also, while Tanaka's K/9 was down a bit this year, it's not like he hasn't shown the ability to strike out batters in the past.
 

 
Tanaka also has excellent control. Though Matsuzaka and Darvish took large leaps in their final NPB season, Tanaka has shown consistently better control in Japan. Career rates in Japan:
 
Tanaka: 4.50 SO/BB
Darvish: 3.75 SO/BB
Matsuzaka 2.70 SO/BB
Nomo: 2.05 SO/BB
 

Sampo Gida

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 7, 2010
5,044
ForceAtHome said:
 
Not really. Tanaka's K rates in Japan have easily been better than successful MLB pitchers such as Kuroda and Iwakuma. Also, while Tanaka's K/9 was down a bit this year, it's not like he hasn't shown the ability to strike out batters in the past.
 

 
Tanaka also has excellent control. Though Matsuzaka and Darvish took large leaps in their final NPB season, Tanaka has shown consistently better control in Japan. Career rates in Japan:
 
Tanaka: 4.50 SO/BB
Darvish: 3.75 SO/BB
Matsuzaka 2.70 SO/BB
Nomo: 2.05 SO/BB
 
When your talking about a guy who has over 1300 IP by age 24 and his k/9 rate declines in 2 straight years, you obviously wonder about the wear and tear on his arm.   So yes, Tanaka demonstrated the ability to strike guys out when he was younger, but teams are signing the 25 yo Tanaka.
 
Kuroda and Iwakuma came over in the 30's and their K/9 in their last year was in Japan line with their career averages accounting for some age related decline in Kurodas case.  Neither commanded the kind of payday (salary+posting) that Tanaka, Daisuke or Darvish did.
 
As for control, Darvish had the same Bb/9 has Tanaka in his last year and it jumped from 1.4 to 4.2 BB/9 in his first year in the MLB.  Daisuke went from 1.6 to 3.5 .  I am weighting the final years more heavily than the career numbers.
 

ForceAtHome

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 23, 2008
4,011
Maine
Out of my own curiosity since I hadn't seen it mentioned elsewhere, I wanted to see how Tanaka performed in the World Baseball Classic. With samples so small, pitch restrictions, and such a range in talent, it isn't particularly meaningful. With that said, here's how he performed:

2013 WBC (4 short outings):
7 IP, 2 ER, 10 H, 0 BB, 12 K

The only MLB players he appears to have faced in 2013 by combing box scores were Xander Bogaerts (struck out on three consecutive swings), Che-Hsuan Lin (struck out swinging), and soon-to-be-MLBer Jose Abreu (struck out looking). This, of course, doesn't really tell us anything.
 
In 2009, Tanaka appeared in 4 games as well, all out of relief:
2.1 IP, 1 ER, 3 H, 0 BB, 5 K
 
If nothing else, the 17 K/0 BB in 9.1 IP stands out as a plus. I believe this would have been with WBC balls which conform more to MLB standards, too. However, this doesn't tell us much we didn't already know: Tanaka is capable of dominating non-MLB competition.
 

Mighty Joe Young

The North remembers
SoSH Member
Sep 14, 2002
8,454
Halifax, Nova Scotia , Canada
So how does this work? Does an interested club slap the 20m into some escrow account and in return get Tanaka's cell number? Or does everyone get to talk to his agent and they just pay the posting fee if they manage to sign him?

Let's say this was some marginal guy and the Japanese club sets a Posting fee of 15m .. But Club A only bids 10m .. and Club B bids 11m .. So Club B gets the sole rights to negotiate. This presumes there are two "rounds" or deadlines. A Posting Bid deadline and a window to sign the player. From what I have read the Posting Bid round is now open. But what is the deadline?
 

LeoCarrillo

Do his bits at your peril
SoSH Member
Oct 13, 2008
10,423
I don't believe there is any bid. You just don't call the agent if you aren't prepared to pony up the set posting fee. That's why it seems dicey for marginal guys.
 

Mighty Joe Young

The North remembers
SoSH Member
Sep 14, 2002
8,454
Halifax, Nova Scotia , Canada
LeoCarrillo said:
I don't believe there is any bid. You just don't call the agent if you aren't prepared to pony up the set posting fee. That's why it seems dicey for marginal guys.
Reports on the new posting process have been pretty clear that teams have to make a bid before negotiations with the player can take place. And that bid has to be the highest of submitted bids - or is at the stated posting fee. I just can't see how the negotiations can proceed until the eligible teams are sorted out.
 

LeoCarrillo

Do his bits at your peril
SoSH Member
Oct 13, 2008
10,423
Reports on the new posting process have been pretty clear that teams have to make a bid before negotiations with the player can take place. And that bid has to be the highest of submitted bids - or is at the stated posting fee. I just can't see how the negotiations can proceed until the eligible teams are sorted out.


I don't believe you are correct. Not sure which reports you read.

http://mlb.mlb.com/news/article/mlb/mlb-nippon-professional-baseball-agree-on-revised-posting-system?ymd=20131216&content_id=66016648&vkey=news_mlb
 

geoduck no quahog

not particularly consistent
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Nov 8, 2002
13,024
Seattle, WA
Well, that summary is pretty clear.
 
  • The posting team sets the fee (from $1 - $20,000,000)
  • Any team can bid on the player if they agree to the fee.
  • There is no benefit or ability to exceed the posted fee. A team cannot underbid the posted fee.
  • All clubs that agree to the fee have a 30-day window to negotiate with the player from his date of posting.
 
{edit: Has Tanaka's release fee been formally established yet?}
 

Murderer's Crow

Dragon Wangler 216
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
23,544
Garden City
Is the assumption that if you don't agree to $20m, you can bid under and so long as you are the highest, they can accept?

Just trying to understand why any Japanese team would ever post a player for less than $20m.
 

snowmanny

Member
SoSH Member
Dec 8, 2005
15,747
No. You cannot underbid the posting fee. If a Japanese team posts a player for too high a fee they risk that no MLB team will pay it. There is no "bidding" per se, MLB teams either agree to pay the fee if they sign the player and then negotiate with the player or they don't negotiate.
 

Tokyo Sox

Baka Gaijin
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Feb 16, 2006
6,167
There
This article in Japanese says the Braves are reportedly ready to offer him 20mil/year, but doesn't have info on # of years (though they seem to assume it would be at least 6).
 

soxhop411

news aggravator
SoSH Member
Dec 4, 2009
46,470
Tokyo Sox said:
This article in Japanese says the Braves are reportedly ready to offer him 20mil/year, but doesn't have info on # of years (though they seem to assume it would be at least 6).
this came out of nowhere if true
 

GRPhilipp

Member
SoSH Member
Jan 30, 2007
87
soxhop411 said:
this came out of nowhere if true
Ugh.  This next month is going to be a roller-coaster of emotions with reports like this leaking out from time to time.  They give us momentary hope, but they don't alter the reality that Tanaka is almost certainly going to the Bronx.
 
The consensus upthread was that the best case scenario is the Yankees paying him a ton (though once they commit to living above the CBT threshold, what difference will those extra dollars make to Red Sox fans?) and him sucking.  For reasons I don't fully understand, rooting for a newcomer to suck makes me feel like a bad person.  So for me, the best case scenario is Tanaka signing with anyone other than the Yankees, and then being great.  Go Braves! (or Dodgers, or Mariners...)
 

snowmanny

Member
SoSH Member
Dec 8, 2005
15,747
2.1 billion yen annual salary Braves, to Mr. Marr acquisition
Daily Sports 59 minutes delivery (Sun) 6:00 December 29







Masahiro Tanaka, the Braves are aiming to win under the conditions of special


that are preparing a multi-year contract $ 20 million one-year average (about 2.1 billion yen) towards the acquisition of (25) Tanaka Masahiro pitcher Braves aims Major League Transfers using the new Transfer system from Rakuten (the 28th Japan time) on the 27th, I found. According to the officials, the team is named the key players of the world champion to stay away since 1995 Tanaka. chime in as a dark horse in the large battle that the Yankees are the favorite view.
 

FanSinceBoggs

seantwo
SoSH Member
Jan 12, 2009
937
New York
I never realized that Dice-K walked around 3.6 per nine with the Seibu Lions.  While that isn't an excessive amount, it is too high for Japanese baseball where the hitters aren't that good.  You would think that a 3.6 walk ratio in Japanese baseball would translate to a higher walk ratio in MLB, which is exactly what happened to Dice-K.  In addition, the 3.6 walk ratio in Japanese baseball suggests that Dice-K was not precise or did not have advanced control, something that creates all kinds of problems for a pitcher in MLB.
 
In contrast, Tanaka walked 1.88 per nine.  Tanaka also has a plus-plus pitch with his splitter, which will serve him well in MLB, whereas Dice-K didn't have a plus-plus pitch.
 
In retrospect, the Dice-K disaster didn't come out of nowhere; instead, it was the result of poor front office decision-making.
 
I like the Kuroda comparison as well.  Tanaka is most likely a young version of Kuroda, which is a pretty valuable commodity.  I hope the Yankees don't get him.  I don't want to see the Dodgers end up with him either.  I would like to see him end up with a team that hasn't won much recently--like the Mariners.
 

jimbobim

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 14, 2012
1,558
Agreed the consensus seems young in his prime Kuroda or Haren with the inevitable risk of having a bajillion miles on his arm. I imagine the front office meetings/valuations about this guy around the league were/are highly entertaining and ranging. The problem is the gap of value between paying for a in his prime number 2 or 1 and instead getting a 3 or 4 backend innings eater is pretty significant and somewhat disconcerting of a risk. 
 

Yaz4Ever

MemBer
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Jul 10, 2004
11,289
MA-CA-RI-AZ-NC
Rough Carrigan said:
Wow, so he flies in and it's, what, -5 degrees outside.  That should close the deal.
I was thinking the same thing.  Those visits are not going to leave the best impression on him.
 

Sampo Gida

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 7, 2010
5,044

snowmanny

Member
SoSH Member
Dec 8, 2005
15,747
Wow is that incredibly bad writing.  They say position players are more valuable and that Matsuzaka didn't produce that much extra income, but it seems like there are ways that some of Tanaka's cost could be offset with endorsements and vacation packages.
 

terrisus

formerly: imgran
SoSH Member
Sampo Gida said:
Fascinating paper here by the Harvard Business School on how MLB teams have marketed Japanese players.  Tanaka would pay for himself in NY and most places who have more seats to sell .
 
http://www.google.com.tw/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=2&ved=0CDEQFjAB&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.hbs.edu%2Ffaculty%2FPages%2Fdownload.aspx%3Fname%3D14-029.pdf&ei=dMfMUom5AYOVkwXbm4EY&usg=AFQjCNE5kiAyH62DxBb1mLpp9YQDK5ji9Q&sig2=-WFhZrpRQV9NlL3aWS45uQ
 
 
 
When a Major League Baseball club signs a Japanese star player, it obviously tries to
commercialize its investment in the player. The initial focus is on home attendance (ticket
sales) and television audiences, plus merchandise sales.
 
And here I thought that the goal of signing a player was to increase a team's opportunity to win games (which would then, in turn, have the effect of bringing in more money, of course). 
 

Hoplite

New Member
Oct 26, 2013
1,116
nvalvo said:
 
Precious little peer review over in those ends of academe. 
 
It seem to remember many of the worst students that I went to school with being business majors.
 

Sampo Gida

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 7, 2010
5,044
BoSox Rule said:
Any merchandise sales are split with all 30 teams anyways.
 
Not merchandise sold in stadium.  That goes to the team. 
 
 
terrisus said:
 
 
And here I thought that the goal of signing a player was to increase a team's opportunity to win games (which would then, in turn, have the effect of bringing in more money, of course). 
 
Yes, wins increase revenue. A+ for you.
 

Sampo Gida

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 7, 2010
5,044
snowmanny said:
Wow is that incredibly bad writing.  They say position players are more valuable and that Matsuzaka didn't produce that much extra income, but it seems like there are ways that some of Tanaka's cost could be offset with endorsements and vacation packages.
 
Not sure you read the whole thing.  Matsuzaka was not much of a money maker because the Red Sox were sold out anyways, and he became less popular in Japan when he did not perform well.  Nomo was a different story although had the advantage of being the 1st big Japanese star in the US .  Obviously, position players are better but they are much rarer to come by.
 
Package tours from Japan were planned to see the games Nomo pitched. The most
popular tour was a five-day trip visiting Dodger Stadium, Disneyland and Universal Studios.
The cost was approximately $1,000 to $2,400. Various kinds of merchandise related to
Nomo appeared and generated heavy demand (Sato, 1995). The gift shop at the Dodgers’
Stadium was selling Nomo Dodger jackets, T-shirts and sweatshirts (These in-park
revenues are not shared through MLB.)
Attendance rose 4% to an average of 38,311 per
game when Nomo took the mound (Whiting, 2004). Stockhamer also mentioned that Nomo
attracted an extra 5,000 to 8,000 people to the ballpark when he pitched although it was
difficult to estimate how much of the increase was from ethnic Japanese
.
 
Ichiro and Kuroda will both likely be gone after 2013, and with it a large Japanese business.
 
 
The other popular Japanese outfielder, Ichiro, now plays for the Yankees after leaving
the Mariners in July 2012. The Yankees signed him to a two-year contract at $13 million in seasons with 200 hits came to an end in the 2011 season and the number of game appearances has slightly decreased. However, the Yankees have succeeded in
commercializing their investment in Ichiro. He is still highly popular in Japan. For Japanese,
to see a game at Yankee Stadium is one of the top tourist attractions in New York. At the
Yankees’ team store, Ichiro’s T-shirts, jerseys, and sweatshirts are very popular items. When
he left the Mariners, one of their Japanese sponsors, Sato Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.,
followed him
.
 
 
Not every team is located in a city that can maximize the return on the investment

 
New York and Los Angeles are exciting cities which attract tourists well. When
Japanese tourists choose a destination to see the MLB game in the U.S., attraction points
other than MLB ballparks would become an influential factor, unless they are solely fans of
a specific player.
According to the 2007 survey by the International Trade Administration,10 Japanese
travelers’ favorite destinations are Honolulu, HI (33.4%), Los Angeles, CA (9.8%), New
York, NY (8.0%), San Francisco, CA (6.2%) and Las Vegas, NV (4.4% in 2005)11. The
MLB clubs based in these cities have advantages to attract Japanese travelers. (There are no
MLB clubs in Honolulu and in Las Vegas; the biggest attractions in the latter are gambling
and entertainment.)
Corporate sponsors may consider this factor to some extent
 
Dallas (Arlington) is a less familiar and less attractive tourist place for
Japanese travelers than are New York and Los Angeles, or even Boston and Chicago.
Neither Dallas nor Texas appears in the principal U.S. destinations for Japanese visitors in
the 2011 Market Profile (Japan), according to the International Trade Administration19. If
Japanese travelers want to see Darvish throw a pitch live, they would prefer to visit Yankee
Stadium in New York as an away game, not Rangers Ballpark in Arlington as a home game.
Dallas also does not have a big local Japanese community to tempt people to go to the
ballpark to see a Japanese star. On the other hand, Dallas has two non-stop flights from
Tokyo. As mentioned before, however, this is not an important factor. Of course, the
distance from Japan, which is further than the West Coast, is another disadvantage.
 

SumnerH

Malt Liquor Picker
Dope
SoSH Member
Jul 18, 2005
32,000
Alexandria, VA
terrisus said:
 
Which would imply that the initial focus is wins, with revenue being a result of that. 
The paper had presented revenue as the initial focus.
 
The paper is generally correct.  There are a few sports teams that are run as toys for rich owners, mainly in the EPL, but most are businesses first.  This isn't to say that the owners don't want to win, but making money is a primary goal and not just an afterthought.
 

snowmanny

Member
SoSH Member
Dec 8, 2005
15,747
Bob Nightengale
@BNightengale

The #Dodgers have let it be known they plan to go all-out in their efforts to sign Tanaka, saying they and certainly won't be out-bid.
6:46 p.m. Fri, Jan 10
 

soxhop411

news aggravator
SoSH Member
Dec 4, 2009
46,470
“@JohnSheaHey: I hear Masahiro Tanaka's three preferred spots going in are LA, NY and Boston, so five teams. #dodgers #angels #yankees #mets #redsox”
 

glennhoffmania

meat puppet
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Jul 25, 2005
8,411,677
NY
snowmanny said:
Bob Nightengale
@BNightengale

The #Dodgers have let it be known they plan to go all-out in their efforts to sign Tanaka, saying they and certainly won't be out-bid.
6:46 p.m. Fri, Jan 10
 
The Cubs said the same thing, so something's gotta give.
 

Snodgrass'Muff

oppresses WARmongers
SoSH Member
Mar 11, 2008
27,644
Roanoke, VA
Of course he's listing the Red Sox.  They are one of the biggest spenders in baseball and their involvement in the bidding will only drive up his price.  It doesn't hurt that they also just won a title.  I'm sure Ben will keep the team "involved" until this wraps up, but I'd be really surprised if they ended up being the ones to sign him.
 

Snodgrass'Muff

oppresses WARmongers
SoSH Member
Mar 11, 2008
27,644
Roanoke, VA
glennhoffmania said:
 
The Cubs said the same thing, so something's gotta give.
 
It's going to be awesome when Loria drops 24 million a year on him, then trades him a week later for laundry cart and some Big League Chew.
 

Hoplite

New Member
Oct 26, 2013
1,116
Snodgrass'Muff said:
Of course he's listing the Red Sox.  They are one of the biggest spenders in baseball and their involvement in the bidding will only drive up his price.  It doesn't hurt that they also just won a title.  I'm sure Ben will keep the team "involved" until this wraps up, but I'd be really surprised if they ended up being the ones to sign him.
 
It could also be that he legitimately wants to play here. He'd have a good chance of Winning a World Series and be with multiple fellow countrymen. I get the impression that Boston is a pretty comfortable place for Japanese players. While this is on an admittedly smaller scale, Tazawa took a discount to sign with us. And I don't think Tazawa is all about getting the most money possible if he planned on donating some of his contract to the Golden Eagles so they could build a new stadium.