2017 General NFL Transactions and News

Status
Not open for further replies.

RedOctober3829

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 19, 2005
55,453
deep inside Guido territory
So one of the owners comes out and says that he was on board with Eli's benching, they then fire the coach who did it, and Eli is back under center? How can you run your organization based on fan reaction? Is this the University of Tennessee?
 

koufax32

He'll cry if he wants to...
SoSH Member
Dec 8, 2006
9,106
Duval
I believe it’s Ed H. around here who would put it: “choooo chooooo!!!!”


Referring to the ownership down tire fire in Mara-a-lago
 

bankshot1

Member
SoSH Member
Feb 12, 2003
24,761
where I was last at
So does Big Blue start Eli at home vs Dallas in a wnnable game,?

And a feel-good blast from the past that fans will be screaming for all week?

Would Eli be on board?

Or would Webb be handed the keys to finish up tankathon '17?
 

dcmissle

Deflatigator
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Aug 4, 2005
28,269
So one of the owners comes out and says that he was on board with Eli's benching, they then fire the coach who did it, and Eli is back under center? How can you run your organization based on fan reaction? Is this the University of Tennessee?
Yup. There was huge blowback. Reese and McAdoo are the fall guys, but latter on record that ownership was on board with the move.

Both deserving of getting replaced. Reese was with them 23 years.
 

Ed Hillel

Wants to be startin somethin
SoSH Member
Dec 12, 2007
43,978
Here
Now McDaniels can go to NY, draft a QB, and personally fire Eli. Will be somewhat cathartic for him, I guess.

Also, CHOOO CHOOOOO.
 

InstaFace

The Ultimate One
SoSH Member
Sep 27, 2016
22,151
Pittsburgh, PA
Josh McDaniels working for this ownership group after what they just pulled is somewhat less than the odds of Bill Belichick going to coach the Giants. At least Belichick has sentimental history there.
 

Kliq

Member
SoSH Member
Mar 31, 2013
22,807
Are there any male grandchildren? No way Archie cares about Peyton or Eli anymore.
Everyone’s favorite Manning (Cooper) I think has a 14 year old son who is supposedly a big QB prospect.

His name is Archie too.
 

RedOctober3829

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 19, 2005
55,453
deep inside Guido territory
Browns are firing Sashi Brown. So they are seemingly overhauling their personnel department again. The Moneyball approach was a disaster.

Scheffer also adds that Hue Jackson is staying(for now).


 
Last edited:

Hoya81

Member
SoSH Member
Feb 3, 2010
8,494
Browns are firing Sashi Brown. So they are seemingly overhauling their personnel department again. The Moneyball approach was a disaster.

Scheffer also adds that Hue Jackson is staying(for now).


I think this is a poor move. The Browns have no internal consistency. They’ll have had 18(!) head coaches and GMs since coming back.

Their roster wouldn’t have been able to take advantage of any of the QBs that they passed on over the last few years.

Wentz/Watson went to teams that had solid defenses and enough pieces on offense to ignite a quick turnaround. If either were on the Browns right now, I don’t think they’d have had anywhere near the success as they’ve had.
 

BigSoxFan

Member
SoSH Member
May 31, 2007
47,218
I think this is a poor move. The Browns have no internal consistency. They’ll have had 18(!) head coaches and GMs since coming back.

Their roster wouldn’t have been able to take advantage of any of the QBs that they passed on over the last few years.

Wentz/Watson went to teams that had solid defenses and enough pieces on offense to ignite a quick turnaround. If either were on the Browns right now, I don’t think they’d have had anywhere near the success as they’ve had.
Well, the new guy is going to have a very good opportunity to make an impact so I'm fine with this move if you don't have faith in Brown's ability to draft. Browns currently have the following picks in the 2018 draft:

#1
#7 (from Houston)
#33
#40 (from Houston)
#62 (from Philly)
#65
#97

And that's before trading down, which would give them even more picks. If this crap franchise ever turns it around, it's going to start in this draft.
 

BigSoxFan

Member
SoSH Member
May 31, 2007
47,218
Maybe Haslam was watching Garoppolo last weekend and decided Brown let him down by not acquiring him.
Possible. Browns with Jimmy at QB, Gordon/Coleman at WR, Njoku at TE would have been on the right track. And they would have been able to use their 2 top 10 picks on their defense or OL.
 

Marciano490

Urological Expert
SoSH Member
Nov 4, 2007
62,314
Possible. Browns with Jimmy at QB, Gordon/Coleman at WR, Njoku at TE would have been on the right track. And they would have been able to use their 2 top 10 picks on their defense or OL.
No way - those 2 top 10 picks would've been how they got JG in the first place!
 

Super Nomario

Member
SoSH Member
Nov 5, 2000
14,015
Mansfield MA
Well, the new guy is going to have a very good opportunity to make an impact so I'm fine with this move if you don't have faith in Brown's ability to draft. Browns currently have the following picks in the 2018 draft:

#1
#7 (from Houston)
#33
#40 (from Houston)
#62 (from Philly)
#65
#97

And that's before trading down, which would give them even more picks. If this crap franchise ever turns it around, it's going to start in this draft.
Even if they turn it around, it's only a matter of time before Haslam screws it up again.
 

johnmd20

mad dog
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Dec 30, 2003
62,078
New York City
After a long and exhaustive search that of course involved minority candidates, I'm sure.
I mean, sure. Cleveland's coach is black and he has won a single game with the team, with 27 losses. Yet he kept his job. But the team was definitely looking for the most racist option.
 

InstaFace

The Ultimate One
SoSH Member
Sep 27, 2016
22,151
Pittsburgh, PA
Just noting the ongoing farce that is the Rooney Rule. The real criticism of Cleveland here would be obvious, panicked haste in making a crucially important decision.

I mean, the Boston Celtics set out to hire their current coach and focused on him like a laser beam. The recruitment process took well over a month. In that span of time they did interview other people. They had a hypothesis that Stevens was the choice, they did their due diligence, they validated that hypothesis, and they indeed hired him. But there was nothing hasty about it.

Meanwhile, the Browns' move resembles more of a papering-over, "nothing to see here!" sign on the wall, symbolizing nothing so much as their dysfunction.
 

johnmd20

mad dog
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Dec 30, 2003
62,078
New York City
Just noting the ongoing farce that is the Rooney Rule. The real criticism of Cleveland here would be obvious, panicked haste in making a crucially important decision.

I mean, the Boston Celtics set out to hire their current coach and focused on him like a laser beam. The recruitment process took well over a month. In that span of time they did interview other people. They had a hypothesis that Stevens was the choice, they did their due diligence, they validated that hypothesis, and they indeed hired him. But there was nothing hasty about it.

Meanwhile, the Browns' move resembles more of a papering-over, "nothing to see here!" sign on the wall, symbolizing nothing so much as their dysfunction.
Ok, so is your point that the Browns are dysfunctional or the Browns are racist? Or is it the Rooney Rule that is racist? I'm trying to understand what your post meant.

And now you're saying the Browns are disfunctional and not run as well as the Celtics. Damn, that's a tremendous take. I'm sure you would have trouble bringing people together to agree with you about that.
 

Adrian's Dome

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 6, 2010
4,424
Just noting the ongoing farce that is the Rooney Rule. The real criticism of Cleveland here would be obvious, panicked haste in making a crucially important decision.

I mean, the Boston Celtics set out to hire their current coach and focused on him like a laser beam. The recruitment process took well over a month. In that span of time they did interview other people. They had a hypothesis that Stevens was the choice, they did their due diligence, they validated that hypothesis, and they indeed hired him. But there was nothing hasty about it.

Meanwhile, the Browns' move resembles more of a papering-over, "nothing to see here!" sign on the wall, symbolizing nothing so much as their dysfunction.
Or, this is all a massive overreaction and assumption with a somewhat illogical cross-sport, no-context comparison thrown in.

They probably had their eye on Dorsey for a while. Evaluations and process don't always come front-and-center. I'm sure they didn't just shrug their shoulders and go "welp, this guy's available, might as well hand the keys to him", but...it is the Browns, so who the hell knows.
 

snowmanny

Member
SoSH Member
Dec 8, 2005
15,749
Ok, so is your point that the Browns are dysfunctional or the Browns are racist? Or is it the Rooney Rule that is racist? I'm trying to understand what your post meant.

And now you're saying the Browns are disfunctional and not run as well as the Celtics. Damn, that's a tremendous take. I'm sure you would have trouble bringing people together to agree with you about that.
I thought he meant the Rooney rule isn't followed very reliably and the league lets it slide.

Edit: and he doesn't trust that the Browns made the right choice.
 

singaporesoxfan

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Jul 21, 2004
11,882
Washington, DC
Eric Galko with a different opinion on Sashi Brown’s drafting:
“Here's Sashi Brown's last two NFL Drafts. Our of his 24 picks, 20 might be multi-year NFL contributors. That's an ABSURD success rate.

Plus, they have 2018 Draft 1st and two 2nds coming.

If not for ownership, this would be the most coveted GM job in recent memory. #Browns”
 

InstaFace

The Ultimate One
SoSH Member
Sep 27, 2016
22,151
Pittsburgh, PA
Ok, so is your point that the Browns are dysfunctional or the Browns are racist? Or is it the Rooney Rule that is racist? I'm trying to understand what your post meant.

And now you're saying the Browns are disfunctional and not run as well as the Celtics. Damn, that's a tremendous take. I'm sure you would have trouble bringing people together to agree with you about that.
I was going to honestly answer your question, but then you decided to be a dick for no reason, so why bother.
 

kelpapa

Costanza's Hero
SoSH Member
Feb 15, 2010
4,653
I don't know enough about the actual talent on the Browns, but using a barometer like "multi-year NFL contributors" seems flawed. If there is shit for talent on the team, and they have no hopes of winning this year (or last year, or the year before, etc) then their draft picks are going to play. That doesn't mean they were good picks.
 

InstaFace

The Ultimate One
SoSH Member
Sep 27, 2016
22,151
Pittsburgh, PA
Or, this is all a massive overreaction and assumption with a somewhat illogical cross-sport, no-context comparison thrown in.

They probably had their eye on Dorsey for a while. Evaluations and process don't always come front-and-center. I'm sure they didn't just shrug their shoulders and go "welp, this guy's available, might as well hand the keys to him", but...it is the Browns, so who the hell knows.
The process of a GM hunt is not that different between sports. I was picking a very familiar example of a situation where the team president had someone in mind from the beginning - so, like Cleveland here - but nevertheless did a thorough, proper job of considering alternatives and questioning their choices. In other words, if you're going to start with something other than a blank slate, there's a way to do it right, and Cleveland's haste makes it obvious that they didn't do it right.
 

Adrian's Dome

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 6, 2010
4,424
I don't know enough about the actual talent on the Browns, but using a barometer like "multi-year NFL contributors" seems flawed. If there is shit for talent on the team, and they have no hopes of winning this year (or last year, or the year before, etc) then their draft picks are going to play. That doesn't mean they were good picks.
Was going to say something similar. It also entirely overlooks quality (IE: drafting Kizer, Kessler, Manziel, etc.)
 

Adrian's Dome

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 6, 2010
4,424
The process of a GM hunt is not that different between sports. I was picking a very familiar example of a situation where the team president had someone in mind from the beginning - so, like Cleveland here - but nevertheless did a thorough, proper job of considering alternatives and questioning their choices. In other words, if you're going to start with something other than a blank slate, there's a way to do it right, and Cleveland's haste makes it obvious that they didn't do it right.
That's a blatant assumption, and one you don't exactly have any evidence behind. The timeline was quick, yeah...but there's absolutely nothing to substantiate your claim. We know nothing of the due process.
 

E5 Yaz

polka king
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Apr 25, 2002
90,506
Oregon
That's a blatant assumption, and one you don't exactly have any evidence behind. The timeline was quick, yeah...but there's absolutely nothing to substantiate your claim. We know nothing of the due process.
Exactly right. Rich Eisen broached this topic this morning on his radio show -- but handled it, as usual, with class and simply said that the presence of the Rooney Rule leaves some questions unanswered about how Cleveland approached it.

He didn't, however, jump on the Hot Take Express and said they went about it the way they did because of incompetence or bigotry. And that's the difference between how Eisen approached it and what spurred this discussion here
 

Ed Hillel

Wants to be startin somethin
SoSH Member
Dec 12, 2007
43,978
Here
Eric Galko with a different opinion on Sashi Brown’s drafting:
“Here's Sashi Brown's last two NFL Drafts. Our of his 24 picks, 20 might be multi-year NFL contributors. That's an ABSURD success rate.

Plus, they have 2018 Draft 1st and two 2nds coming.

If not for ownership, this would be the most coveted GM job in recent memory. #Browns”
Of course, a lot of the reason the Browns’ picks are playing is that their roster is terrible, so anyone wearing the correct uniform gets a spot on the team. Obviously a QB is key to any team’s success, and they lack one, but going 1-31 or 2-30 doesn’t scream “absurd success” in the last two drafts. Take a look at Kizer, for example. Is he a “successful” draft pick?
 

Reverend

for king and country
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Jan 20, 2007
64,448
Well wouldja look at that... maybe they were hasty. Quelle surprise.
In fairness, your initial post made more sense if one reads the “imaginary interlocutor” part which you left out.

I was able to follow it, only working out the hypothetical conversation between the lines.

That said, yeah, I’m glad I don’t follow a team that feels the need to make a mad dash towards small promise.
 

Reverend

for king and country
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Jan 20, 2007
64,448
This should probably die, but I don’t think he actually meant to imply racism.

The problem is he left out the several logical moves he made between his two paragraphs and people filled in the blank where yes, a lot of people would knee jerk be claiming racism.

I was only able to read the whole post by holding my monitor over a stove to reveal the typing done in lemon juice.
 
Last edited:

Ed Hillel

Wants to be startin somethin
SoSH Member
Dec 12, 2007
43,978
Here
Couldn’t happen to a nicer guy:
Panthers announced they've hired outside counsel (quinnemanuel.com) to investigate workplace misconduct allegations against owner Jerry Richardson. @JimTrotter_NFL had it 1st.

CHOOO CHOOOOOO
 

Hoya81

Member
SoSH Member
Feb 3, 2010
8,494
Couldn’t happen to a nicer guy:


CHOOO CHOOOOOO
Not that it’s likely to happen, but if there was any situation that would serve to rehab Goodell’s image, throwing an prominent owner out of the league for being a creep would be it.
 

kelpapa

Costanza's Hero
SoSH Member
Feb 15, 2010
4,653
Isn't having the minority owner overseeing the investigation of the majority owner a conflict of interest?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.