Cano Gets the Starbucks Endorsement!

EastCoasterOutWest

Viva zapatos!
SoSH Member
Jan 23, 2009
5,293
New York City
santadevil said:
 
Did he name his son Cano? Or Robinson.
 
Because Robinson Cano was named after Jackie Robinson.
 
Robinson is his first name. So there's that.
 
In 5 years Yankee fans will be gloating about how they don't have to pay Cano the same way Sox fans have been talking about not overpaying for ARod for the last 4 years.
 

Average Reds

Member
SoSH Member
Sep 24, 2007
35,420
Southwestern CT

Wingack

Yankee Mod
Moderator
SoSH Member
Jul 14, 2005
34,572
In The Quivering Forest
glennhoffmania said:
 
But why do you guys care?  Except for this year because of the revenue sharing issue, when has a bad contract ever had an impact on future moves?  That's what I don't get about Yankee fans' opinion of stuff like this.  The reality is that it never actually matters.
Personally I am tired of these contracts on the roster. It makes the Yankees boring. The more Yankees there are making 20+ mil when they are 36 and older the better.
 

bankshot1

Member
SoSH Member
Feb 12, 2003
24,796
where I was last at
10/240 is a huge contract for this guy, and can't blame him for bolting for that deal. IMO this is a lose/lose for MFY/Cano. He will never win with that team. The win/win would have been a Teixeira type deal offered initially, (versus the 7/140) and then go from there.
 

cannonball 1729

Member
SoSH Member
Sep 8, 2005
3,578
The Sticks
ThePrideofShiner said:
I think this is insane by both parties. After all those years of letting their top flight talent leave, the M's decide the big payday should go to Robinson Cano?
 
In fairness, most of the top-flight talent that left the M's did so about ten years ago.  The biggest free agent who's walked in the Zduriencik era was Beltre, and he was coming off an abysmal five-year stint.
 

hbk72777

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 19, 2005
1,945
glennhoffmania said:
 
But why do you guys care?  Except for this year because of the revenue sharing issue, when has a bad contract ever had an impact on future moves?  That's what I don't get about Yankee fans' opinion of stuff like this.  The reality is that it never actually matters.
 
 
 
The Yankees have spent this off season praying that A-Rod gets suspended. What does that tell you about these deals?
 

Murderer's Crow

Dragon Wangler 216
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
23,571
Garden City
But why do you guys care? Except for this year because of the revenue sharing issue, when has a bad contract ever had an impact on future moves? That's what I don't get about Yankee fans' opinion of stuff like this. The reality is that it never actually matters.


Why shouldn't fans care about this stuff? It directly affects the team.

I'll meet you half-way though in saying that I think Arod has turned off a lot of Yankee fans to mega mega deals for a long time.
 

TOleary25

New Member
Sep 30, 2011
358

TomRicardo

rusty cohlebone
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Feb 6, 2006
20,683
Row 14
crow216 said:
Every Yankee fan I spoke to, and I agree, isn't upset about this. Too much money and too long of a deal.
 
First time Yankee fans ever were on this side.
 

StuckOnYouk

Member
SoSH Member
Jun 26, 2006
3,542
CT
crow216 said:
Every Yankee fan I spoke to, and I agree, isn't upset about this. Too much money and too long of a deal.
 
yes and no. 2 of my friends are NY fans. They're happy they didn't match but they're devastated that Robbie Cano dontcha know is all gone.
 

Harry Hooper

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Jan 4, 2002
34,614
jacklamabe65 said:
Caller on the FAN: "Maybe Jacoby can play second base."  LOL
 
 
I can;t decide what's funnier about this comment:
 
1) Jacoby has no infield experience.
2) Jacoby throws left-handed
3) His arm is too weak for 2B.
 

PrometheusWakefield

Member
SoSH Member
May 25, 2009
10,448
Boston, MA
TOleary25 said:
https://twitter.com/RobertMurrayMLB/status/409006293215506432
 
 
 
If the M's trade Walker for Price then flip Franklin for a bat (Billy Butler?) they're all of a sudden a pretty good team. A Felix-Price-Iwakuma starting trio with a middle of the order Cano-Seager-Butler is a pretty solid core. 
I think the way to look at this from Seattle's perspective is that this amounts to a very, very high risk bet that Cano is going to help turn the franchise into a contender in the near term, and that becoming a contender over the next five years is going to have such a positive impact on their long-term revenue that they'll be able to survive the back end of this deal. 
 
Sometimes I think people on this board understate the importance of future discounting on deals like this.  Yes, this signing will almost certainly be a problem for the Seattle Mariners 2023 team, and for that matter, it will probably be a problem as soon as 2019 or so.  But if they can establish themselves as a premier franchise over the next few years and build a loyal fan base then it will have been worth the money.  With revenues looking to go nowhere but up, especially in a city with a booming economy like Seattle, there's lots of growth potential for this franchise.  
 

Laschelle Tarver

Member
SoSH Member
Jan 23, 2006
103
It is a silly contract, but this is an odd time to show fiscal restraint in light of what they just shelled out for Ellsbury (a good player, but one who in four of seven seasons in MLB has put up an OPS+ below 100).  They swapped out the significant competetive advantage of having their best offensive player at a middle infield position for a less accomplished offensive player who is far less of a given at the plate.  Cano was the guy they should have been overpaying, not Ellsbury.
 

RedOctober3829

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 19, 2005
55,480
deep inside Guido territory
"We understand that John Henry Hal Steinbrenner must be embarrassed, frustrated and disappointed by his failure in this transaction," Steinbrenner said Mariners CEO Howard Lincoln said. "Unlike the Yankees Mariners, he chose not to go the extra mile for his fans in Boston New York. It is understandable, but wrong that he would try to deflect the accountability for his mistakes onto others, and to a system for which he voted in favor. It is time to get on with life and forget the sour grapes."
 

glennhoffmania

meat puppet
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Jul 25, 2005
8,411,683
NY
hbk72777 said:
 
 
 
The Yankees have spent this off season praying that A-Rod gets suspended. What does that tell you about these deals?
 
2014 is a totally different situation than any other year because of the revenue sharing issue.  If it wasn't for that, whether they pay ARod or not would've had zero impact on their offseason moves.
 

Mooch

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
4,540
RedOctober3829 said:
"We understand that John Henry Hal Steinbrenner must be embarrassed, frustrated and disappointed by his failure in this transaction," Steinbrenner said Mariners CEO Howard Lincoln said. "Unlike the Yankees Mariners, he chose not to go the extra mile for his fans in Boston New York. It is understandable, but wrong that he would try to deflect the accountability for his mistakes onto others, and to a system for which he voted in favor. It is time to get on with life and forget the sour grapes."
 
I want to have sex with this post.
 

hbk72777

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 19, 2005
1,945
glennhoffmania said:
 
2014 is a totally different situation than any other year because of the revenue sharing issue.  If it wasn't for that, whether they pay ARod or not would've had zero impact on their offseason moves.
 
Not even for the penalty issue. A-Rod is still going to be a Yankee for 3 years after this one, regardless if he's gone this year. I don't want to watch that. They can't release him, they can't trade him, we're stuck with him.
 
We don't need more of those
 

Wingack

Yankee Mod
Moderator
SoSH Member
Jul 14, 2005
34,572
In The Quivering Forest
PrometheusWakefield said:
I think the way to look at this from Seattle's perspective is that this amounts to a very, very high risk bet that Cano is going to help turn the franchise into a contender in the near term, and that becoming a contender over the next five years is going to have such a positive impact on their long-term revenue that they'll be able to survive the back end of this deal. 
 
Sometimes I think people on this board understate the importance of future discounting on deals like this.  Yes, this signing will almost certainly be a problem for the Seattle Mariners 2023 team, and for that matter, it will probably be a problem as soon as 2019 or so.  But if they can establish themselves as a premier franchise over the next few years and build a loyal fan base then it will have been worth the money.  With revenues looking to go nowhere but up, especially in a city with a booming economy like Seattle, there's lots of growth potential for this franchise.  
 
 
Yeah, I agree with this. It is kind of like the Nationals signing Jayson Werth, except for a much better player. Either way though, it tells the league and the rest of MLB baseball that they are willing to do what it takes to win even if it means overspending.
 

Rustjive

Member
SoSH Member
Dec 30, 2009
1,048
hbk72777 said:
 
Not even for the penalty issue. A-Rod is still going to be a Yankee for 3 years after this one, regardless if he's gone this year. I don't want to watch that. They can't release him, they can't trade him, we're stuck with him.
That's because of the ARod sideshow. Huge contracts can be moved if the team wants to pitch in the money to move them.
 

Laschelle Tarver

Member
SoSH Member
Jan 23, 2006
103
canderson said:
This frees NYY to spend a crapload of money on a pitcher (which they need more than anything), Phillips and even more.
 Maybe next year, but that happening was in play with or without Cano (given Lester and Price and maybe Scherzer hitting the market).  Just baffling to sign Ellsbury and let this happen.
 

moly99

Member
SoSH Member
Jun 28, 2007
939
Seattle
ThePrideofShiner said:
I think this is insane by both parties. After all those years of letting their top flight talent leave, the M's decide the big payday should go to Robinson Cano?
 
Other than A-Rod, I don't know who they've actually let walk. They paid Ichiro and Felix Hernandez, while Griffey and Randy Johnson forced trades to get out of Seattle.
 
TheGoldenGreek33 said:
Even with Cano and (presumably) Price, this is not a playoff team. El Oh El, Jack Z. This is why you don't let a lame duck GM make big decisions.
 
Yes. I don't think Cano will decline as rapidly as Pujols, but the Mariners don't have as much ability to absorb bad contracts as the Angels. In four or five years their rebuilding process should have given them another chance to compete, but by then Cano will be deteriorating.
 

hbk72777

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 19, 2005
1,945
moly99 said:
 
Other than A-Rod, I don't know who they've actually let walk. They paid Ichiro and Felix Hernandez, while Griffey and Randy Johnson forced trades to get out of Seattle.
 
 
Yes. I don't think Cano will decline as rapidly as Pujols, but the Mariners don't have as much ability to absorb bad contracts as the Angels. In four or five years their rebuilding process should have given them another chance to compete, but by then Cano will be deteriorating.
 
 
MLB Network said Seattle has a 2 billion dollar tv contract over 17 years.
 

hbk72777

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 19, 2005
1,945
Rustjive said:
That's because of the ARod sideshow. Huge contracts can be moved if the team wants to pitch in the money to move them.
 
 
Even if A-Rod was a saint, they could never move him now. Fielder, A-Rod 2k4, Gonzales/Crawford, were moved early in their deals.
 

EvilEmpire

paying for his sins
Moderator
SoSH Member
Apr 9, 2007
17,290
Washington
Yaz4Ever said:
Similar to Red Sox fans and the Ellsbury deal.  It's hard for the hometown fans to get too worked up when the offer is too excessive.
This is where I've been. There is a good chance that Cano won't be playing good ball at year 7 of this deal. Year 10? I'm glad the Yankees finally drew a line and stuck to it.
 

rembrat

Member
SoSH Member
May 26, 2006
36,345
EvilEmpire said:
This is where I've been. There is a good chance that Cano won't be playing good ball at year 7 of this deal. Year 10? I'm glad the Yankees finally drew a line and stuck to it.
 
But it's a silly to do this with Cano when he has been a more consistent player than Ellsbury. I would place all my shiny pennies on Cano stringing together more solid years than Ellsbury by the time it's all said and done. 
 

patinorange

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 27, 2006
31,025
6 miles from Angel Stadium
I am shocked the Yankees didn't sign him. And there is no reason to think Seattle can't win the division next year. An agent just needs to point to the 2013 Sox to show his client how quickly things can turn around.
 

EvilEmpire

paying for his sins
Moderator
SoSH Member
Apr 9, 2007
17,290
Washington
rembrat said:
 
But it's a silly to do this with Cano when he has been a more consistent player than Ellsbury. I would place all my shiny pennies on Cano stringing together more solid years than Ellsbury by the time it's all said and done. 
They would have been happy to do with Cano what they did for Ellsbury. It wasn't either/or. It's the years at the back end of the deal where the chance of an unproductive player is high that the Yankees balked.

I'm glad.
 

rembrat

Member
SoSH Member
May 26, 2006
36,345
EvilEmpire said:
They would have been happy to do with Cano what they did for Ellsbury. It wasn't either/or. It's the years at the back end of the deal where the chance of an unproductive player is high that the Yankees balked.

I'm glad.
 
Dave Cameron puts it better than I ever could:
 
That said, we generally know how these deals work: teams take on a lot of dead money at the end of long term contracts in exchange for getting early contract AAVs that are significant bargains relative to a player’s performance. Cano, for the next 3-5 years, is likely going to be worth far more than the $24 million per year he’ll be making, and if they backload the contract, the value up is going to be shifted even more to the front. For the next few seasons, Robinson Cano is going to be a huge bargain.
 
And that he’s going to be a huge albatross. The last few years of this deal are going to suck for the Mariners. It’s why the Yankees drew a line in the sand at seven years; they didn’t want to pay Cano $25 million per year age ages 38-40, because they’ve witnessed the negative effects of spending huge chunks of money on near useless players, even if you have a lot of money to spend. The Yankees decided that Cano’s short term value simply wasn’t worth the long term cost. The Mariners have decided that it is.
 
 
Article
 
Who cares about years 7-10 if the first 6 were fucking awesome? All I'm saying is I would have rather give Cano (160 games per year like clockwork) his money than Ellsbury. 
 

teddywingman

Looks like Zach Galifianakis
SoSH Member
Jul 31, 2009
11,247
a basement on the hill
I think this whole offseason has been remarkable, in part because the Yankees have spent a ton of money, and lost two top draft picks, and yet have not improved their team.
 
I doubt WAR numbers support this, but I honestly feel that the downgrade from Cano to Kelly Johnson (the likely replacement) is far greater than the upgrade of Ellsbury over Granderson. The McCann upgrade at catcher just about makes it a wash.
 

EvilEmpire

paying for his sins
Moderator
SoSH Member
Apr 9, 2007
17,290
Washington
rembrat said:
 
Dave Cameron puts it better than I ever could:
 
 
Article
 
Who cares about years 7-10 if the first 6 were fucking awesome? All I'm saying is I would have rather give Cano (160 games per year like clockwork) his money than Ellsbury. 
I agree with Cameron. When you factor in that the Yankees won't be very competitive for next year and possibly another, that 3-5 years of awesomeness turns into a window of 1-3 years of good, competitive teams with Cano in his prime out of a contract of 10.
 

phrenile

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Aug 4, 2005
13,896
Pozo the Clown said:
Ironically, it's 46 degrees and raining in NY right now, but it's sunny in Seattle.
It's 23 degrees and cloudy in Oklahoma City.
 

Fred in Lynn

Member
SoSH Member
Jan 3, 2013
4,905
Not Lynn (or Ocean Side)
[pardon the snip]
 
rembrant wrote:
Who cares about years 7-10 if the first 6 were fucking awesome? All I'm saying is I would have rather give Cano (160 games per year like clockwork) his money than Ellsbury. 
It reads like you'd be willing to accept four hours of taking it up the ass if you could get six hours banging a supermodel to start. Hey, I'm not judging.
 

rembrat

Member
SoSH Member
May 26, 2006
36,345
The price you pay for being at the party and the M's clearly want to be invited to the party.
 

DanoooME

above replacement level
SoSH Member
Mar 16, 2008
19,895
Henderson, NV
The Mariners can afford this because the only guys they are paying over $2M are King Felix, Iwakuma and Willie Fucking Bloomquist.
 
Mariners look like this:
 
C - Zunino
1B - Smoak
2B - Cano
SS - Miller or Franklin
3B - Seager
LF - Bloomquist?
CF - Saunders
RF - Ackley?
DH - Montero
 
BN - Franklin or Miller
BN - ?
BN - ?
BN - ?
 
They aren't done yet.  They still need to fill in their bench.  if Ackley isn't going to the OF, then they have that spot and Bloomquist's (if he's going to be a UTIL) to fill, plus either Miller or Franklin to deal.  I'm saying they could be in on any of the top FA OF and a few trade chips to get more bats.  If they did something crazy like sign Cruz and Choo, their lineup could look a lot better.
 

Greg29fan

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 14, 2005
20,502
NC
Ken Rosenthal ‏@Ken_Rosenthal 58s
Cano at Safeco since 05: .309/.350/.487. All of MLB: .251/.315/.383. Only player in SEA history better than .309 BA at Safeco: Ichiro .320.
 

AlNipper49

Huge Member
Dope
SoSH Member
Apr 3, 2001
44,906
Mtigawi
Fred in Lynn said:
[pardon the snip]   rembrant wrote:
 
It reads like you'd be willing to accept four hours of taking it up the ass if you could get six hours banging a supermodel to start. Hey, I'm not judging.
 
 

brandonchristensen

Loves Aaron Judge
SoSH Member
Feb 4, 2012
38,563
It's nice to see a non-Yankee team make a splash signing, especially someone like Seattle who has been relatively quiet for the last while. I like them as a franchise.
 
I wish the Yankees had signed him just to cripple them in the future, so that sucks...they got Ells and McCann for the same price as Cano and don't have the 3 years at the end.