Bruins fire Claude Julien

veritas

Member
SoSH Member
Jan 13, 2009
3,151
Somerville, MA
I like the idea of having very unbalanced 3/4th lines that can be used situationally. I just don't want Jimmy Hayes on the one that is supposed to score. That 4th line is actually pretty useful for playing an extremely low scoring game, offensively and defensively.
 

reggiecleveland

sublime
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Mar 5, 2004
28,000
Saskatoon Canada
I admit I am influenced heavily by the fact the most knowledgeable hockey guys I know like him, but I have trouble thinking of a better Bruins coach than Claude.

I also admit the Bruins, post Neely the player are the team I follow the least.
 

cshea

Member
SoSH Member
Nov 15, 2006
36,207
306, row 14
Q and Babcock are the only 2 I'd consider better than Julien. Julien is probably on a tier with Sutter and Laviolette. Boudreau and Trotz after than, then the rest are mostly junk.
 

NYCSox

chris hansen of goats
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
May 19, 2004
10,476
Some fancy town in CT
Q and Babcock are the only 2 I'd consider better than Julien. Julien is probably on a tier with Sutter and Laviolette. Boudreau and Trotz after than, then the rest are mostly junk.
I think I'd add at least Todd McLellan and Mike Sullivan to the third tier with Trotz and Boudreau. Also, despite some of his crazy antics, maybe Torts as well.
 

kenneycb

Hates Goose Island Beer; Loves Backdoor Play
SoSH Member
Dec 2, 2006
16,149
Tuukka's refugee camp
Forgot about Babcock.

Although, I think he's taken a step back since leaving Detroit. I'd put him on the same level as Julien. Generally agree with your analysis though.
I mean he's in his second year in Toronto, so not sure I'd pin last year's shitty team on him.
 

Maximus

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 18, 2005
5,774
Q and Babcock are the only 2 I'd consider better than Julien. Julien is probably on a tier with Sutter and Laviolette. Boudreau and Trotz after than, then the rest are mostly junk.
Agreed and Q and Babcock are clearly the top 2 in the league.
 

Smiling Joe Hesketh

Throw Momma From the Train
Moderator
SoSH Member
May 20, 2003
35,848
Deep inside Muppet Labs
Bruins recalled Khudobin yesterday, again. Have to think he's up to back up the rest of the way. Might be smart to give him a few scheduled starts as Rask has struggled a bit recently. Maybe that's one thing where the FO and Claude differed, Claude probably didn't trust any of the backups (for pretty good reasons, to be sure) and the FO might have wanted him to play them anyway.

Just spitballing.
 

cshea

Member
SoSH Member
Nov 15, 2006
36,207
306, row 14
Bruins recalled Khudobin yesterday, again. Have to think he's up to back up the rest of the way. Might be smart to give him a few scheduled starts as Rask has struggled a bit recently. Maybe that's one thing where the FO and Claude differed, Claude probably didn't trust any of the backups (for pretty good reasons, to be sure) and the FO might have wanted him to play them anyway.

Just spitballing.
Would you really blame Claude? His job is on the line. If he keeps losing, he's gone. If I'm him, I'd go down by running Rask into the ground too.
 

lexrageorge

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 31, 2007
18,186
Juilen was on notice from the beginning of the season that his job was on the line if the Bruins did not make the playoffs. If anything, Tuesday's events proved the management wasn't bluffing when they trotted out "unacceptable" and "accountability" every few weeks. So I can understand why Julien gave the backup goaltenders a very short leash.

One advantage that Cassidy will have is that he will probably be given more leeway. If the Bruins make the playoffs, Cassidy is their hero. If they miss, they can always blame the dead guy. So, as SJH noted, we may very well see more of AK. And that will probably be OK; better than having Rask get fatigued to the point that he either gets hurt or totally loses his confidence going forward.

And, as always, Julien taking the high road in his final statement to Bruins fans.
 

allstonite

Member
SoSH Member
Oct 27, 2010
2,491
I'm just listening to this week's Puck Soup and I completely forgot Chiarelli was fired the same day as the Aaron Hernandez verdict. That wasn't Sweeney's call. So is this Cam making both of these cowardly moves?
 

lexrageorge

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 31, 2007
18,186
I'm just listening to this week's Puck Soup and I completely forgot Chiarelli was fired the same day as the Aaron Hernandez verdict. That wasn't Sweeney's call. So is this Cam making both of these cowardly moves?
I don't consider the Chiarelli announcement to be anywhere close to the fiasco that was Tuesday. I certainly would not expect the Bruins to defer to any news announcement related to a totally unrelated matter.
 

PedroSpecialK

Comes at you like a tornado of hair and the NHL sa
SoSH Member
Dec 12, 2004
27,168
Cambridge, MA
Neely on 98.5 in 25 minutes

Good start by Felger calling him the Yeti.

Felger: Tough times for the team, you've got a lot of criticism, a lot of it justified, for holding it during the Pats' victory parade

Neely:
  • Saw Shaughnessy's article calling us a coward, which is easy from behind a keyboard...
  • Points to Sweeney saying they wanted two full days of practice
  • Sweeney was asking himself, "am I gonna extend Claude?" / fish or cut bait
  • Sweeney deciding if they're going to ride it out or get rid of Claude
  • Scheduled day off Monday for the players, which was when Sweeney wanted to address the players instead of firing Claude on Monday and waiting a day to meet with them.
Felger: More about the timing / doing so the day of the parade

Neely: We knew we were going to get hammered about this. Don't understand the accusations of "hiding" as they can't hide anything in this day and age.

Felger: OK, why'd you do it?

Neely: Not giving up on playoffs, that's our goal with this season. We've lost 4 games with 90 seconds or less where we've got 0 points out of it. We know this isn't on Claude, we weren't in a position to blow up the core of this team.

Massarotti: Do you feel you waited too long?

Neely: Don had talked about it earlier, PP picking up, picked up a few wins, you can say we were better than anyone expected us to be defensively (?!?!?!?!?!??!?!?!)

Felger: How do you think Claude handled young players? Did he still have 'the room'?

Neely: Claude was the ultimate professional, we wanted to implement some younger players... there are some times where Claude feels the players aren't ready, where we believe the players were going to make some mistakes and we were willing to live with that. That's one of the areas where Claude and Donnie disagreed a bit

Felger: Why weren't you there the other day?

Neely: Don's the GM, I supported his decision

Felger: Don't you have final say?

Neely: Yes, I supported his decision to let Claude go... how many Presidents are there when coaches get fired? It's not on me to be there and address the media when the GM has fired the coach.

...

Neely: Our home record is an issue for me, and it has been

Massarotti: Do you have a theory there? Why can't you win in this building?

Neely: On the road, we just put our lines out and play. At home, some matchup and strategy concerns may handcuff you so to speak. We're talking about this happening for a season and a half at this point.


Felger: Do you feel that you're next?

Neely: Yeah, if we don't do our jobs well enough, I feel we are next.

Felger: (i missed this)

Neely: Need backup goalie, need another left-shot D that can log minutes and chip in offensively

Felger: If you don't make it again this year, do you think you're next?

Neely: Hard to say, I haven't had that conversation, I would never have that conversation

Felger: What is the plan around here? Confusing, youth but sign Backes, youth and draft picks but you give up picks for Stempniak and LIles

Neely: Last year, we were in the playoffs and we felt we needed to add. Didn't happen, tanked down the stretch. Should have been in the playoffs. We are trying to add some youth... Backes is a guy we feel could help our top 6 today and moving forward, bring some leadership, etc. We felt he would help us today, tomorrow, next year while these younger players are still getting integrated.

Felger: Do you think he has?

Neely: He has not played up to expectations, he will tell you himself, he knows he needs to do more. Krejci the same way, nowhere near where he's capable of playing in my opinion


Massarotti: Krug, Krejci, Backes, Beleskey not playing up to their contracts

Neely: I don't agree with Krug

Massarotti: Ok with the rest, do you feel you're handcuffed with contracts?

Neely: No, I don't think so. We've gotta deal with Pastrnak's contract (thanks Stripes & BMHH), thought Sweeney did a great job with the Marchand contract. We have to continue improving our club, didn't expect Carlo to make this contribution, hopefully some other younger players can help, we have to do a better job of supplementing core players we have now.

Felger: Rebuilding from the middle - better to do this or to tear it down?

Neely: Maybe it is, but are we going to trade away Bergeron, Marchand, Krejci (Felger: "Maybe"), Rask (Felger: "Maybe")... when Don put this plan together, we didn't think we'd be competing for the championship this year, but we thought we would be a playoff team. Do we need to get better? 100%

(missed a bit - talk about Sacco and Cassidy)

Massarotti: Cassidy's stint with Washington - does that concern you?

Neely: I think he's grown a lot in the past dozen years, we'll have to see, gives Sweeney and opportunity to evaluate, will he continue to be a candidate, etc

Felger: Trade deadline in 3 weeks. If you fall out of it and it's clear you fall out of it, would you be more open to trading veterans for future pieces than we've been in the past?

Neely: We'll look at what's the best way to improve our club. Is it going to be harder decisions? Yes... etc... Cassidy's current stint is an audition (Massarotti's words)
 
Last edited:

NortheasternPJ

Member
SoSH Member
Nov 16, 2004
19,336
Neely "I'm not sure why people can't figure out that I'm not the general manager"

Probably because you couldn't tell F&M last year who was in charge of the Bruins and who makes the decisions and then quit talking to the media.
 

cshea

Member
SoSH Member
Nov 15, 2006
36,207
306, row 14
He's laying everything off on Sweeney. This is bad. Don's decision, Don's decision, etc. no accountability.
 

PedroSpecialK

Comes at you like a tornado of hair and the NHL sa
SoSH Member
Dec 12, 2004
27,168
Cambridge, MA
I think he meant they have to deal with his contract not that they have a deal.
Not sure I agree - the way he said it, it sounded like they have an extension in place.

Maybe wishful on my part, but I'm wondering if he'll get an angry call from Pastrnak's agent after this.
 

BoSoxFink

Stripes
SoSH Member
Jul 31, 2006
7,662
South Park
Someday they'll realize Krejci is playing with junk.
Thank god somebody else sees it. Krejci gets so much underserved shit from the fans and media. He may not be playing his nest, but he's playing with dog shit. Bergeron gets fucking Marchand and Pastrnak. Put Bergeron with the garbage that Krejci gets and see how he performs.
 

BoSoxFink

Stripes
SoSH Member
Jul 31, 2006
7,662
South Park
Not sure I agree - the way he said it, it sounded like they have an extension in place.

Maybe wishful on my part, but I'm wondering if he'll get an angry call from Pastrnak's agent after this.
You wrote it is "we've got a deal with Pastrnak's contract." Pretty sure he said it like this tho, "we've gotta deal with Pastrnak's contract". Who knows tho I guess.
 

cshea

Member
SoSH Member
Nov 15, 2006
36,207
306, row 14
Doesn't do the weekly interviews because he doesn't want to be aggravated.

The Boston Bruins!!!

Felger is ripping on them for the lack of interviews.
 

PedroSpecialK

Comes at you like a tornado of hair and the NHL sa
SoSH Member
Dec 12, 2004
27,168
Cambridge, MA
Wow... Neely saying facing questions from the press is painful, doesn't cite any unfair questions from F&M. Doesn't want to get aggravated every week.
 

PedroSpecialK

Comes at you like a tornado of hair and the NHL sa
SoSH Member
Dec 12, 2004
27,168
Cambridge, MA
Bit of a false equivalency from Felger citing Farrell / Steven / Belichick as doing interviews regularly but the point stands. Every other executive has more availability.

Neely: Who's getting paid? (WTF?!)
 

NortheasternPJ

Member
SoSH Member
Nov 16, 2004
19,336
As much as Felger can be a giant douche, that was a great interview. He asked the hard questions and didn't act like an asshole doing it.

It's incredible how uncomfortable Neely is in front of the media, no wonder why he doesn't do it anymore. It seems like their plan is they have no plan.