2024 NFL Draft 4th through 7th round gamethread WITH SPOILERS

Justthetippett

New Member
Aug 9, 2015
2,568
My list of BB's WTF picks:

2005 QB Cassel - worked out fine
2008 WR Slater - obviously worked out great as they only ever intended for him to be a ST player but at the time it was like, ehhhh...ok?
2010 P Mesko - always is at least a bit of WTF when you take a K or P higher than 7th round
2012 S Ebner - rugby player
2015 S Richards - I guess they had a need but basically EVERYONE thought WTF when that pick was made
2015 LS Cardona - nice to have a quality LS but using a 5th rounder on a LS seemed kinda nuts
2018 RB Michel - less of a true WTF but I think most people were like, wow a RB here in the first round??
2019 P Bailey - see K/P comment with Mesko
2020 K Rohrwasser - just a terrible, awful, needless WTF pick
2020 S Dugger - I put him on there because most non-draft experts had never heard of him or even of Lenoir-Rhyne...taking a D-IAA guy in the second round?
Vollmer too. R2 and if I remember right ESPN had no tape on him. Obviously worked out great.
 

wilked

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 17, 2005
4,102
lol at grading the 3rd pick

what grade did they give Chi for Caleb?

realistically in my opinion about the only real thing you can grade in a draft is trades. Anything about players is simple TBD, come back in 3-5 years
 

j44thor

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 1, 2006
11,166
My list of BB's WTF picks:

2005 QB Cassel - worked out fine
2008 WR Slater - obviously worked out great as they only ever intended for him to be a ST player but at the time it was like, ehhhh...ok?
2010 P Mesko - always is at least a bit of WTF when you take a K or P higher than 7th round
2012 S Ebner - rugby player
2015 S Richards - I guess they had a need but basically EVERYONE thought WTF when that pick was made
2015 LS Cardona - nice to have a quality LS but using a 5th rounder on a LS seemed kinda nuts
2018 RB Michel - less of a true WTF but I think most people were like, wow a RB here in the first round??
2019 P Bailey - see K/P comment with Mesko
2020 K Rohrwasser - just a terrible, awful, needless WTF pick
2020 S Dugger - I put him on there because most non-draft experts had never heard of him or even of Lenoir-Rhyne...taking a D-IAA guy in the second round?
No JoeJuan Williams or Tyquan?
 

BaseballJones

ivanvamp
SoSH Member
Oct 1, 2015
24,869
No JoeJuan Williams or Tyquan?
Yeah I thought about those guys and N’Keal too. They were a little perplexing but they did make SOME sense and to me weren’t true WTF picks. The king of them all was Rohrwasser. They didn’t need that pick, he wasn’t even close to the best K available, and they used a real pick on him (not like a late 7th). It was utterly insane.
 

BaseballJones

ivanvamp
SoSH Member
Oct 1, 2015
24,869
Maybe I’m just the eternal optimist but the more I think and read about Polk and Baker, the more amped I am to have them both. I think they could become a tremendous pair of WRs for years to come, especially with a good QB throwing them the ball, which we all hope Maye is.

I think it’s possible that we look back on this draft as one of the most significant in franchise history. No joke.

I know I need to pump the brakes a little but I’m really starting to love the potential of these guys.
 

NomarsFool

Member
SoSH Member
Dec 21, 2001
8,321
Not sure how a draft class with a potential franchise QB and "lots of other guys that have the potential to hit it big" gets a B.
For draft grades the question is always whether the grade is absolute or relative to what they did with the resources / picks they had? I don’t think the Pats get a lot of credit for taking Maye with the third pick. Any 6th grader would have made that choice. The assessment should be what they did with their other picks.
 

soxpatscelts1524

New Member
Apr 26, 2024
30
I'd give them a B-. The biggest factor being the Maye pick which was an A+ pick but I was worried for a second wouldn't happen.

I'd give them a failing grade on day 2. I keep trying to come around on the Polk pick, but I can't. He has a lot of flags in his profile and I didn't like him where he was mocked, let alone where we picked him. I don't like contested catch slower receivers and he was the 3rd best WR on his own college team with a late breakout age. You like to see guys who are studs at WR break out early and always be the best player on the field. The Wallace pick was a clear reach as well. Reaches can work out, but they've failed more often than not, so I'm not optimistic. Shouldn't have gone WR in R2 in my opinion after 9 went off the board before them. And it's pretty difficult to find a real LT in R3, let alone reaching for one. I suspect that people happy that we filled our holes will realize next offseason that the holes weren't addressed at all because the players won't be great. But I hope I'm wrong.

Day 3 they did a good job taking high upside bets, so I bump up the grade slightly, but day 3 doesn't matter much.
 

Van Everyman

Member
SoSH Member
Apr 30, 2009
27,226
Newton
I think Kiper had a 4th-5th round grade on McCourty, didn’t he?
Has anyone ever got back to see whether these assholes had any idea what they were talking about? I get not knowing 40 years ago but now we promote every mock draft like it’s Columbia University research for the atom bomb.

Has anyone graded these guys even 5 years later to see how things shook out?
 

Eddie Jurak

canderson-lite
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Dec 12, 2002
44,921
Melrose, MA
The perils of grading before dudes actually play in the NFL

View attachment 81690
So what jumped out at me in reading this is that... aren't the criticism of Drake Maye basically the same as this? Bad mechanics and a tendency to bail from the pocket? (I'm not suggesting you were making this analogy or that Mahomes success predicts that Maye will succeed or anything dumb like that, but it is sort of funny.)

I'd give them a B-. The biggest factor being the Maye pick which was an A+ pick but I was worried for a second wouldn't happen.

I'd give them a failing grade on day 2. I keep trying to come around on the Polk pick, but I can't. He has a lot of flags in his profile and I didn't like him where he was mocked, let alone where we picked him. I don't like contested catch slower receivers and he was the 3rd best WR on his own college team with a late breakout age. You like to see guys who are studs at WR break out early and always be the best player on the field. The Wallace pick was a clear reach as well. Reaches can work out, but they've failed more often than not, so I'm not optimistic. Shouldn't have gone WR in R2 in my opinion after 9 went off the board before them. And it's pretty difficult to find a real LT in R3, let alone reaching for one. I suspect that people happy that we filled our holes will realize next offseason that the holes weren't addressed at all because the players won't be great. But I hope I'm wrong.

Day 3 they did a good job taking high upside bets, so I bump up the grade slightly, but day 3 doesn't matter much.
I think the obvious thing to say here concerning Polk is that Wolf is looking for certain things in WRs and you are looking for different things, and so you obviously don't like the guy they took. In particular, Wolf isn't looking for burners and you are. So, for better or worse, there is no way you are ever going to like what the Pats do at WR as long as Wolf is running the show.

The tackle position is more concerning, but, again, Wolf and the Pats were high on this player - it sounds like they considered trying to move back for him specifically, but then decided the safer course was just to take him. So, even though it looked like a "we missed the run and need to grab someone here" situation it was not quite that.

Overall, I'm ecstatic about what the Pats did at QB, satisfied at WR (I'm more inclined to trust Wolf than you, and I think Polk + Baker is a nice mix of going for immediate help and rolling the dice on a risker player with upside), worried about T. So, I'd go B+ as a grade.
 

soxpatscelts1524

New Member
Apr 26, 2024
30
So what jumped out at me in reading this is that... aren't the criticism of Drake Maye basically the same as this? Bad mechanics and a tendency to bail from the pocket? (I'm not suggesting you were making this analogy or that Mahomes success predicts that Maye will succeed or anything dumb like that, but it is sort of funny.)


I think the obvious thing to say here concerning Polk is that Wolf is looking for certain things in WRs and you are looking for different things, and so you obviously don't like the guy they took. In particular, Wolf isn't looking for burners and you are. So, for better or worse, there is no way you are ever going to like what the Pats do at WR as long as Wolf is running the show.

The tackle position is more concerning, but, again, Wolf and the Pats were high on this player - it sounds like they considered trying to move back for him specifically, but then decided the safer course was just to take him. So, even though it looked like a "we missed the run and need to grab someone here" situation it was not quite that.

Overall, I'm ecstatic about what the Pats did at QB, satisfied at WR (I'm more inclined to trust Wolf than you, and I think Polk + Baker is a nice mix of going for immediate help and rolling the dice on a risker player with upside), worried about T. So, I'd go B+ as a grade.
I'm looking for great WRs, no matter what type of profile. If Polk turns about to be great, I'll admit I was wrong. It's not just the speed to me, it's the speed combined with the lack of production until this year. But hope I'm wrong
 

Jimbodandy

Member
SoSH Member
Jan 31, 2006
11,654
around the way
Maybe I’m just the eternal optimist but the more I think and read about Polk and Baker, the more amped I am to have them both. I think they could become a tremendous pair of WRs for years to come, especially with a good QB throwing them the ball, which we all hope Maye is.

I think it’s possible that we look back on this draft as one of the most significant in franchise history. No joke.

I know I need to pump the brakes a little but I’m really starting to love the potential of these guys.
I'm super amped that the team saw the gap with the offensive talent and went out and got guys. Of course nobody knows if they're the right guys, but there's reason for hope. If we had loaded up on DTs, a couple of LBs, and ST guys, we would have reasons to be depressed today.

They addressed the right areas. We'll find out the hit rate on the players, but it seems statistically unlikely that they struck out across the board.
 

NortheasternPJ

Member
SoSH Member
Nov 16, 2004
19,477
Dude, EVERYBODY knows they could have traded back to #37 and still gotten him.
I can’t decide My favorite thing about the Mahomes pick is Sean Payton years later still being upset he was jumped or the fact the Bills gave it to KC and have spent years not getting past Kc.

Then this year Buffalo again trades a first rounder to KC to draft a WR when they needed a WR.
 

Eddie Jurak

canderson-lite
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Dec 12, 2002
44,921
Melrose, MA
Maybe I’m just the eternal optimist but the more I think and read about Polk and Baker, the more amped I am to have them both. I think they could become a tremendous pair of WRs for years to come, especially with a good QB throwing them the ball, which we all hope Maye is.

I think it’s possible that we look back on this draft as one of the most significant in franchise history. No joke.

I know I need to pump the brakes a little but I’m really starting to love the potential of these guys.
Interestingly, Mike Giardi reported that the Pats tried to move up into the first round, including trying to get pick #32 from Buffalo. (Buffalo sent it to Carolina). Since Caroline took Legette at #32 and Buffalo took Coleman at #33, Giardi surmises that Wolf wanted one of the two, probably Legette. Polk must have been their next choice and they thought they could drop back a bit and still get him.