Dismiss Notice
Guest, I have a big favor to ask you. We've been working very hard to establish ourselves on social media. If you like/follow our pages it would be a HUGE help to us. SoSH on Facebook and Inside the Pylon Thanks! Nip

2018 Gronk Watch

Discussion in 'Blinded by the Lombardis: Patriots Forum' started by LesterFan, Feb 4, 2018.

  1. Mystic Merlin

    Mystic Merlin Member SoSH Member

    Messages:
    29,180
    Based on past similar deals, wouldn't have been remotely enough, assuming the Browns ever considered trading out of that pick. Unless you're saying they'd trade like four first rounders?

    I'm skeptical to begin with the Pats would ever trade the kind of pick bounty that it would've taken to get to #1 when the team sitting at #1 liked a top-flight QB prospect at the spot and didn't have a long-term solution at the position. Why would CLE trade out of that spot for anything but a ridiculous package, and why would the Pats offer it? From the Pats perspective, as much as they may have liked Mayfield (and do we really know they "loved" him because they met with him?), that kind of trade would nonetheless leave them still putting a lot of chips into a guy who hasn't played a single NFL snap and likely won't help you for several years. That's a pretty risky bet for a contender who - like every other team - needs help at several positions over the next 1-3 years.

    I think it's more simple than that: the Pats were ready to move on from Gronk due to durability/contract demands/whatever and got a package they liked in and of itself, regardless of whether it would have secured them enough assets to get Baker Mayfield. And there's no evidence they had a preliminary agreement with the Browns contingent on securing the Detroit first rounder, or that the Browns even entertained such a deal.
     
  2. dcmissle

    dcmissle Deflatigator Lifetime Member SoSH Member

    Messages:
    26,008
    My recollection is they were eying the #2 pick for Mayfield. I don’t recall a story that they were willing to go to 1/1 ... if a team is sold on a QB at that spot, the pick is untouchable at anything but the most extreme cost.
     
  3. RedOctober3829

    RedOctober3829 Member SoSH Member

    Messages:
    35,380
    Schefter says it was nearly agreed to and that the Pats were still talking to a few other teams. It's essentially the same report as Mike Giardi and Tom Curran had back in April. Adam is making it seem that this is a new revelation that Gronk was almost traded which of course we all know it isn't.
     
  4. dcmissle

    dcmissle Deflatigator Lifetime Member SoSH Member

    Messages:
    26,008
    Well it’s timely because they are playing the Lions tonight, and I don’t recall any specific trade partner mentioned before Schefter’s report.
     
  5. Mystic Merlin

    Mystic Merlin Member SoSH Member

    Messages:
    29,180
    Right. If he or someone else like Giardi named specific teams before, then I admittedly missed it.

    I find the identity of the team/regime of some interest because it suggests that Gronk wasn't interested in playing on another team and/or starting over, period. Most players, especially offensive players, wouldn't be crushed to be traded to a team with Matthew Stafford at QB and get a pay raise, and certainly not to the extent that they'd threaten retirement. That's a pretty unusual move.

    We can infer from the specifics and tone of the report that Gronk wants to be a Patriot or not play football anymore. It's possible he'd accept a trade to some other team, but I don't get the sense reading this that something about Detroit in particular inspired him to threaten retirement. If he wanted to go to a different team, presumably he would've broached that topic rather than threaten retirement/try to work it out with the Patriots.

    Why he wanted to be here, period, is difficult to nail down. Maybe he didn't want to deal with the unknown of a new team/staff, maybe he didn't want to risk playing for a team that might not contend (again, the worst place a Pats team has finished in his time here is 14-2 with a loss in the divisional round), maybe any pay raise he got wouldn't be worth it net/net, maybe he knows playing with/for BB, Tom and McDaniels - which will help him punch his HOF ticket - is something he can't replicate elsewhere, etc. But it certainly punches a hole in the argument that Gronk finds playing for the Patriots intolerable; apparently not.
     
  6. nattysez

    nattysez Member SoSH Member

    Messages:
    3,255
    For those that missed it, Gronk affirmed tonight that he said he'd retire if traded.

     
  7. ConigliarosPotential

    ConigliarosPotential Well-Known Member Silver Supporter SoSH Member

    Messages:
    4,290
    After last night, maybe the Pats should try trading Gronk *and* Brady to Detroit, amirite?
     
  8. PaulinMyrBch

    PaulinMyrBch Don't touch his dog food Lifetime Member SoSH Member

    Messages:
    8,180
    Gronk was evaluating his return to football at all. Then posted that statement on April 24th where he confirmed he was returning to the Pats for 2018. So the trade talk would have been before that statement? If it was, then what could you expect to get for a guy that wasn't committed. Unless they had a trade agreed to and it was contingent on Matty P confirming that Gronk would show up and play, and when that contingency was explored, Gronk shut it down. I guess that is how it must have gone down. But I'm open to clarity on this, seems a bit odd.
     
  9. lexrageorge

    lexrageorge Member SoSH Member

    Messages:
    6,774
    It may have been as simple as Gronk had never seriously considered the possibility of being traded while he was mulling over whether he would return to play football. Pats and Lions start discussing contingencies around a trade, and the Pats then contact Gronk's agent to find out more about Gronk's plans. Gronk gets wind that he could be traded, and then, as you noted, he shuts it down by declaring his intention to play provided the Pats are willing to give him some additional coin in his contract.
     
  10. PaulinMyrBch

    PaulinMyrBch Don't touch his dog food Lifetime Member SoSH Member

    Messages:
    8,180
    That makes sense. Just seems a bit odd that the trade was that developed not sure if Gronk would play at all. Unless there was some internal issue (guessing money) that made BB think he'd play somewhere else without issue. So maybe that is it, we'll trade you to the Lions and they are ready to back up the Brinks truck, and he shut that down.
     
  11. dcmissle

    dcmissle Deflatigator Lifetime Member SoSH Member

    Messages:
    26,008
    Any word on the ankle? Thanks.
     
  12. RedOctober3829

    RedOctober3829 Member SoSH Member

    Messages:
    35,380
    To me it looked like a tweak of what he already had.
     
  13. GeorgeCostanza

    GeorgeCostanza Member SoSH Member

    Messages:
    5,302
    Short week too so wouldn’t be shocked if he sits Thursday.
     
  14. patoaflac

    patoaflac Member SoSH Member

    Messages:
    924
    He should. Edelman will be back and Gordon and Michel will play more important roles each day. Besides the game is home and against the putrid Colts.
     
  15. koufax32

    koufax32 He'll cry if he wants to... SoSH Member

    Messages:
    6,534
    You realize this now means NE will lose 35-21, right? GJGE
     
  16. GeorgeCostanza

    GeorgeCostanza Member SoSH Member

    Messages:
    5,302
    Nah. Indy will be up 24-21 with 30 seconds left from their own 15 and go for it on 4th down.
     
  17. Mugsy's Walk-Off Bunt

    Mugsy's Walk-Off Bunt lurker

    Messages:
    2,185
    Perhaps Hoolister being well rested will help make up a fraction of the production we won't have BECAUSE ON A SHORT WEEK GRONK SHOULD DEFINITELY SIT.
     
  18. Reggie's Racquet

    Reggie's Racquet Member SoSH Member

    Messages:
    5,117
    And the next game is against Kansas City where we will really need him.
     
  19. normstalls

    normstalls Member SoSH Member

    Messages:
    3,158
    I think it really depends on the severity of the injury... It's also quite possible it wasn't too bad of an injury/tweak but because of the lopsided score they just left him in the locker room. (Wishful thinking I know)
     
  20. steveluck7

    steveluck7 Member SoSH Member

    Messages:
    2,699
    i saw the locker room celebration video from pats.com. He was in there at that time and it looked like he was walking just fine. For whatever that's worth
    video here
     
  21. BigJimEd

    BigJimEd Member SoSH Member

    Messages:
    2,445
    This. We have little to no information to make a judgment about whether he should play or not.
     
  22. BusRaker

    BusRaker lurker

    Messages:
    426
    The only guarantee is that BB will have him "Limited" on the practice reports and "Questionable" heading into the game whether he's fine or not going to play.
     
  23. RedOctober3829

    RedOctober3829 Member SoSH Member

    Messages:
    35,380
    The thing I'm going on to say that I am not confident he will play is the short week. It looks like he's dealing with an ankle sprain. If he had a full week of treatment my guess is that he'd play. With the game on Thursday, the long-term smart play is to give him a full 2 weeks to get ready for a huge game with Kansas City.
     
  24. lexrageorge

    lexrageorge Member SoSH Member

    Messages:
    6,774
    +1. The Pats are usually conservative with regards to injured players in a short week.

    I'm less concerned that the ankle injury is anything serious; he was seen in the locker room by the media after the game, and noone reported anything troubling. I'm more concerned that this injury could be of the nagging variety that limits his effectiveness for a while. So I really wouldn't be upset if the team decided to give him a bye week at this point.
     
  25. BigJimEd

    BigJimEd Member SoSH Member

    Messages:
    2,445
    Just to be clear, I'm not saying Gronk should play or that I'd be upset if he didn't. Just stating that we don't have any information. If rest will help then yes I'd prerer he sit. But if not, I'd prefer he play. There are no automatic wins
     
  26. Ed Hillel

    Ed Hillel Wants to be startin somethin SoSH Member

    Messages:
    20,588
    Without knowing the specifics, Gronk was in a similar situation with a minor groin injury and they sat him for a Thursday game against Tampa last year that they barely won. I’d expect them to throw Gronk in bubblewrap until the KC game.
     
  27. E5 Yaz

    E5 Yaz Transcends message boarding Lifetime Member SoSH Member

    Messages:
    57,532
    Can't tell much from that though. Heck, Swihart looked like just a sprain after he hit the wall and came off the field
     
  28. BigSoxFan

    BigSoxFan Member SoSH Member

    Messages:
    29,514
    Probably important to keep in mind that Gronk has $4.3M in incentives this year:

    $1.1M for 70 catches (currently has 17)
    $1.1M for 1,085 yards (currently has 233)
    $1.1M for 80% playing time (no idea on current)
    $1.1M for 9 TDs (currently has 1)

    He has some real incentive to go out there and "suck it up" if it's not SB46 level debilitating. My guess is that he sits out but wouldn't be surprised if he tries to give it a go. Of course, going out there and hurting himself even more could have an even worse impact on reaching the incentives than sitting out 1 game so we'll just have to see.
     
  29. lexrageorge

    lexrageorge Member SoSH Member

    Messages:
    6,774
    The bonus amount is capped at $3.3M, so he will earn the max by meeting 3 of those 4 targets.

    He has played in 88.6% of snaps so far this year.
     
  30. BigSoxFan

    BigSoxFan Member SoSH Member

    Messages:
    29,514
    Gotcha. Thanks for the clarification.
     
  31. dcmissle

    dcmissle Deflatigator Lifetime Member SoSH Member

    Messages:
    26,008
    Per ESPN crawl, Schefter reports injury not serious, Gronk questionable for Thursday.
     
  32. tims4wins

    tims4wins PN23's replacement SoSH Member

    Messages:
    19,524
     
  33. tims4wins

    tims4wins PN23's replacement SoSH Member

    Messages:
    19,524
  34. InstaFace

    InstaFace MDLzera

    Messages:
    6,107
    Hilarious. I bet Brady's shoulder is bothering him again, too.
     
  35. axx

    axx lurker

    Messages:
    6,000
    Currently projected to get 69 catches (nice) and 1080 yards. That's oddly close to the incentive target.
     
  36. BaseballJones

    BaseballJones goalpost mover SoSH Member

    Messages:
    4,003
    It really doesn't feel like Gronk is producing like he normally does.

    Career numbers:
    - 4.6 receptions per game
    - 70.2 yards per game
    - 15.2 yards per reception

    2018 numbers:
    - 4.3 receptions per game
    - 67.5 yards per game
    - 15.6 yards per reception

    So yeah, I guess he's basically right on his usual numbers. The only thing he's way down in is touchdowns, where he's averaged 0.71 TD per game and a TD every 0.15 receptions. This year it's 0.16 TD per game and a TD every 0.04 receptions. To be at his career normal pace he'd need to have 4 TD at this point in the season instead of just 1.
     
  37. InstaFace

    InstaFace MDLzera

    Messages:
    6,107
    Pretty hard to keep up an average of getting 25 TDs per reception. :D
     
  38. Rough Carrigan

    Rough Carrigan reasons within Reason Lifetime Member SoSH Member

    Messages:
    18,742
    The Marx brothers did it at the end of Horse Feathers but it was their movie and so when they unloaded a series of footballs from Harpo's chariot they got six points for every football. Very hard to do.
     
  39. BaseballJones

    BaseballJones goalpost mover SoSH Member

    Messages:
    4,003
    Haha well yes, good point. Mayyyyyyyyybe I meant 0.15 and 0.04 TD per reception. Just a guess.
     
  40. BigSoxFan

    BigSoxFan Member SoSH Member

    Messages:
    29,514
    It's October. The little things matter. Do. Your. Job.
     
  41. BaseballJones

    BaseballJones goalpost mover SoSH Member

    Messages:
    4,003
    -hangs head in shame-
     
  42. KiltedFool

    KiltedFool has a terminal case of creeping sharia SoSH Member

    Messages:
    2,124
    Shrug

    2. Despite catches of 42 and 39 yards in the fourth quarter, Gronkowski doesn’t look quite right. The Chiefs saw on tape a player who wasn’t running all that well, and noticed that the Patriots were using play-action to help Gronk generate separation. Through 56 minutes they held him to a single 16-yard catch. New England got him free off play-action for the 42-yarder, and he beat his guy on the 39-yarder. But all this merits watching going forward.
     
  43. slamminsammya

    slamminsammya Member SoSH Member

    Messages:
    2,687
    This is not a parody?
     
  44. DrewDawg

    DrewDawg Dorito Dink SoSH Member

    Messages:
    30,974
    Does Peter King not realize play action is used to facilitate A LOT of Gronk's offense? Not all, but a lot.

    And he's so banged up he played all but 1 offensive play last night. GTFO here with this.
     
  45. KiltedFool

    KiltedFool has a terminal case of creeping sharia SoSH Member

    Messages:
    2,124
    Dunno. Don't care really, I watch almost no NFL these days, but in my morning reading I ran across the comment and dropped it in the thread.

    And I know hating Peter King is a SoSH tradition. That was Albert Breer.
     
  46. Papelbon's Poutine

    Papelbon's Poutine Homeland Security SoSH Member

    Messages:
    17,077
    Yeah isn’t King gone from MMQB all together?
     
  47. DrewDawg

    DrewDawg Dorito Dink SoSH Member

    Messages:
    30,974
    It's kinda worse if Breer doesn't know how Gronk is used.
     
  48. RGREELEY33

    RGREELEY33 Potty Mouth Gold Supporter SoSH Member

    Messages:
    3,539
    It’s kind worse if people who dunno and don’t care and don’t watch football don’t know how this thread is used.
     
  49. Deathofthebambino

    Deathofthebambino Drive Carefully SoSH Member

    Messages:
    28,960
    Did they happen to mention how many times Gronk was held back in pass protection, as opposed to running routes yesterday?
     
  50. bsj

    bsj Renegade Crazed Genius SoSH Member

    Messages:
    16,884
    So apparently he is (likely) out. Ankle?
     

Share This Page