2018 AFCCG: Jags v. Pats (Non-Brady Edition)

dynomite

Member
SoSH Member
Bademosi?
Yep, that’s the option if they want a 4th CB for sure. That said, Jones was only on defense for 8 snaps against the Titans (and I think most of those came in garbage time in the 4th quarter before he was hurt). And as noted, he was a regular on Special Teams (66% of snaps).

I think it just depends on what the team needs more:
- a 4th CB (Bademosi)
- a 3rd/4th RB (Burkhead/Gillislee)
- more beef on the DL (Branch)

There’s probably only 1 spot for those 4 (or maybe 2 spots between those 4 & RJ Francois). Burkhead has played some special teams as well, so it could be that they think he’d be more valuable than a 4th CB against a team with Bortles at QB.
 
Last edited:

DJnVa

Dorito Dawg
SoSH Member
Dec 16, 2010
54,118
I think @BaseballJones is justified in being concerned about the game on Sunday. The Jags defense looks like a lot like units that have given Brady trouble in the past (e.g., 2011 Ravens, 2015 Broncos). Interestingly enough, the Jags defense also looks a lot like units that Brady has torched (e.g., 2004 Steelers, 2014 Seahawks).
But that's just it--*this* is how the argument should have been made. That a certain type of defense can give him trouble, not that he struggles in AFCCG and because of those struggles he may again.
 

lars10

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 31, 2007
11,872
The Jags stop the power running game, get decent pressure on the QB without bringing more than one extra rusher, and might have the best pair of CBs in the past decade.

I think the Pats are better positioned than most to attack that D. Gronk and the slot WRs will pose the same matchup problems for JAX as everyone else, the O-Line is playing exceptionally well right now, and of course Brady is Brady. But that shouldn’t diminish the Jags’ formidable strengths, which got them here despite playing one good half out of four in the playoffs.
They also didn't look particularly good against San Fran. They've had a good season, but have lost to the Titans(x2), Jets, Cardinals and 49ers. And lost to the Rams as well. They haven't done particularly well against good offenses other then Pitt the first time.. In fact looking at their schedule they've played about two above average offenses all season. Two teams have scored over 40 against them in the past four weeks. This isn't the Giants, Broncos or Ravens. I still think they'll cause some fits, but I wonder how well they'll cover White, Lewis and possibly Burkhead. Brady has become a master at getting LBs on RBs and I think that will be a major test. This is the most healthy the Pats offense has been possibly all season. Any given sunday and such, but this game to me comes down to Bortles against the NE D.. because I think they'll be doing all they can to shut down Fournette.
 

E5 Yaz

polka king
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Apr 25, 2002
90,613
Oregon
But that's just it--*this* is how the argument should have been made. That a certain type of defense can give him trouble, not that he struggles in AFCCG and because of those struggles he may again.
Dilly dilly
 

kenneycb

Hates Goose Island Beer; Loves Backdoor Play
SoSH Member
Dec 2, 2006
16,159
Tuukka's refugee camp
I was only able to watch the second half of the Steelers game in small bursts last Sunday but the eye test said that Fournette was struggling a good amount after he injured his ankle. A lot of his runs seemed to be two or three yards and down, very few of which were runs to the outside. Does that jive with other people's observations?
 

E5 Yaz

polka king
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Apr 25, 2002
90,613
Oregon
I was only able to watch the second half of the Steelers game in small bursts last Sunday but the eye test said that Fournette was struggling a good amount after he injured his ankle. A lot of his runs seemed to be two or three yards and down, very few of which were runs to the outside. Does that jive with other people's observations?
It did with mine, although a week off could improve the situation.

Whether he got a shot at halftime, or was just sucking it up and giving all he could, he didn't have full burst
 

johnmd20

mad dog
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Dec 30, 2003
62,085
New York City
I was only able to watch the second half of the Steelers game in small bursts last Sunday but the eye test said that Fournette was struggling a good amount after he injured his ankle. A lot of his runs seemed to be two or three yards and down, very few of which were runs to the outside. Does that jive with other people's observations?
100% accurate. He wasn't the same after he hurt his ankle.
 

dcmissle

Deflatigator
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Aug 4, 2005
28,269
I was only able to watch the second half of the Steelers game in small bursts last Sunday but the eye test said that Fournette was struggling a good amount after he injured his ankle. A lot of his runs seemed to be two or three yards and down, very few of which were runs to the outside. Does that jive with other people's observations?
With mine, yes. Big chunk runs before injury; none after. It’s comical that he gets 3 yards just by breathing. He’s a hoss.
 

RedOctober3829

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 19, 2005
55,483
deep inside Guido territory
I was only able to watch the second half of the Steelers game in small bursts last Sunday but the eye test said that Fournette was struggling a good amount after he injured his ankle. A lot of his runs seemed to be two or three yards and down, very few of which were runs to the outside. Does that jive with other people's observations?
It certainly jives with mine. This is his runs after he was hurt.
4
1
0
0
2
3(TD run)
2
3
1
2
1
3
5
 

m0ckduck

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 20, 2005
1,772
I do think there was a period of time where Brady put extra pressure on himself in playoff games and played a little tight. Specifically the 2010-2013 timeframe. He really wanted another title. I think 2014 was a huge breakthrough and he has generally played great since. The one awful performance was the 2015 AFCCG in Denver but there were so many key pieces to that - Edelman was banged up, that D was generationally good, they almost never play well in Denver, etc. That was opponent based.
Nothing of substance to add, but this is an excellent perspective.

The 2015 AFFCG is always a weird one, in that it was simultaneously nearly the worst game of his playoff career by passer rating (second only to the 2009 Ravens massacre), and yet also one of the first games that comes to mind when I think of Brady's toughness.
 

DJnVa

Dorito Dawg
SoSH Member
Dec 16, 2010
54,118
It's cool, but it's a style now--lots of teams in all sports have it.



 

mauf

Anderson Cooper × Mr. Rogers
Moderator
SoSH Member
They also didn't look particularly good against San Fran. They've had a good season, but have lost to the Titans(x2), Jets, Cardinals and 49ers. And lost to the Rams as well.
How good did the Pats look against the Dolphins? (Or the Chiefs. Or even the Bucs, whom they managed to beat.)

One game is one game.

I still think they'll cause some fits, but I wonder how well they'll cover White, Lewis and possibly Burkhead. Brady has become a master at getting LBs on RBs and I think that will be a major test.
The Jags did a pretty good job on Le’veon Bell before they went up 28-7 and lost their way trying to play not to lose. They’ve got a lot of matchup worries, but the Pats’ RBs aren’t one of them.

Any given sunday and such, but this game to me comes down to Bortles against the NE D.. because I think they'll be doing all they can to shut down Fournette.
I think this is right. Not sure if Fournette will be 100% (he didn’t look right after leaving the Steelers’ game with a minor injury), but even if it’s Ivory or Yeldon in the backfield, BB and Patricia will stack the box and make Bortles beat them through the air — as well they should.

I think the Pats will get it done, but I don’t think it will be the walkover a lot of folks are expecting.
 

Hoya81

Member
SoSH Member
Feb 3, 2010
8,494
Brady skipped his weekly press conference to meet with medical staff, will be on injury report
 

Ed Hillel

Wants to be startin somethin
SoSH Member
Dec 12, 2007
44,171
Here
How good did the Pats look against the Dolphins? (Or the Chiefs. Or even the Bucs, whom they managed to beat.)
Those games had something in common: No Gronk. Not saying it disproves your point, but it’s an important note.
 

Soxy

Member
SoSH Member
Dec 1, 2008
6,095
The Jags did a pretty good job on Le’veon Bell before they went up 28-7 and lost their way trying to play not to lose. They’ve got a lot of matchup worries, but the Pats’ RBs aren’t one of them.
Are you talking solely in the passing game? Because run defense is largely considered the biggest weakness of the Jags defense.They were 26th in run defense DVOA; 21st in rush yards allowed; 26th in yards per carry. I expect the Pats RBs to be huge parts of the gameplan, both in the run game and the passing game.

Also:

Bell before the fumble return TD that made it 28-7: 8 carries, 46 yards; 3 targets, 2 catches, 20 yards.

Bell the rest of the game: 8 carries, 21 yards; 10 targets, 7 catches, 68 yards.
 

mauf

Anderson Cooper × Mr. Rogers
Moderator
SoSH Member
Are you talking solely in the passing game? Because run defense is largely considered the biggest weakness of the Jags defense.They were 26th in run defense DVOA; 21st in rush yards allowed; 26th in yards per carry. I expect the Pats RBs to be huge parts of the gameplan, both in the run game and the passing game.

Also:

Bell before the fumble return TD that made it 28-7: 8 carries, 46 yards; 3 targets, 2 catches, 20 yards.

Bell the rest of the game: 8 carries, 21 yards; 10 targets, 7 catches, 68 yards.
I was definitely thinking about the 7 catches by LB. About half those 46 yards early came on a single carry.

But if the Jags are slightly below average in rushing yards allowed, I’m comfortable saying that’s in large part because teams absolutely don’t want to throw against them — they aren’t the ‘85 Bears by any stretch, but they’re more than good enough to keep the Patriots’ mediocre running game in check.

The Pats will absolutely hit them with Gronk and the slot WRs. I see that as a more potent line of attack than the RBs, even if White and Burkhead are healthy.
 

bagwell1

New Member
Jul 31, 2006
442
Jacksonville
I have seen all of the Jags games. The rushing defense weakness has been largely fixed adding Dareus but they can be gashed in the passing game by RB's. SF and SD come to mind and in the last Titans game, there was only one pass to a RB but it went for 60. Buffalo had nice success as well and was pleasantly surprised they didn't use the RB's more in the passing game.
 

DJnVa

Dorito Dawg
SoSH Member
Dec 16, 2010
54,118
I was definitely thinking about the 7 catches by LB. About half those 46 yards early came on a single carry.

But if the Jags are slightly below average in rushing yards allowed, I’m comfortable saying that’s in large part because teams absolutely don’t want to throw against them — they aren’t the ‘85 Bears by any stretch, but they’re more than good enough to keep the Patriots’ mediocre running game in check..
Pats were 10th in the NFL in rushing yards, 11th in ypc (.1 away from 7th), 6th in rushing TDs, and 6th in first downs via rushing.
 
Last edited:

DannyDarwinism

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 7, 2007
4,901
I was definitely thinking about the 7 catches by LB. About half those 46 yards early came on a single carry.

But if the Jags are slightly below average in rushing yards allowed, I’m comfortable saying that’s in large part because teams absolutely don’t want to throw against them — they aren’t the ‘85 Bears by any stretch, but they’re more than good enough to keep the Patriots’ mediocre running game in check.

The Pats will absolutely hit them with Gronk and the slot WRs. I see that as a more potent line of attack than the RBs, even if White and Burkhead are healthy.
I'm not so sure it's a mediocre running game. Dion Lewis was first overall this year in DYAR and second in DVOA. Patriots were third overall in rushing DVOA, which increased as Lewis saw a heavier workload. Looks to me like that when Lewis is healthy and getting the bulk of the workload, they have a very good running game.
 

johnmd20

mad dog
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Dec 30, 2003
62,085
New York City
I'm not so sure it's a mediocre running game. Dion Lewis was first overall this year in DYAR and second in DVOA. Patriots were third overall in rushing DVOA, which increased as Lewis saw a heavier workload. Looks to me like that when Lewis is healthy and getting the bulk of the workload, they have a very good running game.
I'm quite sure it's NOT a mediocre running game.
 

Pandemonium67

Member
SoSH Member
Apr 17, 2003
5,586
Lesterland
The article fails to mention that the Pats got the top seed by going into Pittsburgh and beating the Steelers. If they hadn't, the Pats would likely have faced Jacksonville at home then the Steelers in Pitt -- a far different scenario.
 

mauf

Anderson Cooper × Mr. Rogers
Moderator
SoSH Member
Pats were 10th in the NFL in rushing yards, 11th in ypc (.1 away from 7th), 6th in rushing TDs, and 6th in first downs via rushing.
9 of the top 10 teams in rushing yards made the playoffs, so the Pats are below-average for a playoff team.

Seriously, winning teams always have good rushing numbers, because they’re often playing with a lead and looking to shorten the game. The Pats aren’t a bad rushing team, but I’m not convinced they’re a good one either. If you’re on the Jacksonville staff, you’re worried about TB12; you’d be thrilled if the Pats decide to adopt a ground-and-pound game plan.
 

RedOctober3829

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 19, 2005
55,483
deep inside Guido territory
Injury Report
Brady(right hand)--LP
Branch(knee)--LP
Burkhead(knee)--LP
Gillislee(knee)--LP
Waddle(knee)--LP

Jags
Gipson DNP Foot
Omameh DNP Knee
Church LP Shoulder
Fournette LP Ankle
Malik Jackson LP Ankle
Bortles Right Wrist FP
Posluzny Abs FP

Updated with Waddle's status.
 
Last edited:

RedOctober3829

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 19, 2005
55,483
deep inside Guido territory

Hoya81

Member
SoSH Member
Feb 3, 2010
8,494
He was favoring it a few times in the Pittsburgh game that I can remember.
 

Harry Hooper

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Jan 4, 2002
34,614
Last edited:

lars10

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 31, 2007
11,872
How good did the Pats look against the Dolphins? (Or the Chiefs. Or even the Bucs, whom they managed to beat.)

One game is one game.

The Jags did a pretty good job on Le’veon Bell before they went up 28-7 and lost their way trying to play not to lose. They’ve got a lot of matchup worries, but the Pats’ RBs aren’t one of them.

I think this is right. Not sure if Fournette will be 100% (he didn’t look right after leaving the Steelers’ game with a minor injury), but even if it’s Ivory or Yeldon in the backfield, BB and Patricia will stack the box and make Bortles beat them through the air — as well they should.

I think the Pats will get it done, but I don’t think it will be the walkover a lot of folks are expecting.
With Miami I think a number of player were nursing injury and Gronk was out.. which was huge.

You can't really say 'look at how well they did against Bell' UNTIL... Bell had a great game at least catching the ball (9 for 88 yards). If the Jags aren't worried about Lewis and White well then congrats to them.. but I completely disagree that they just have that 'handled' and I think the evidence is there in their last game..let alone the last four or five.

Do you have numbers that show that Jax is very good at keeping RBs from catching the ball? (I don't know where people get those specific numbers in terms of Defenses against RBs catching and such.)
Also, isn't there any value in looking at the offenses that Jax played? Every good offense they've played has done well against them.

I don't think it will be a cake-walk either, but something has been off with Bortles the last few weeks (last week's score notwithstanding). He has not been finding his WRs (Westbrook, Lee, Cole) as he had been in previous weeks. Also, as you mentioned Fournette's ankle will be huge. He clearly couldn't cut late in the game.
 

jsinger121

@jsinger121
SoSH Member
Jul 25, 2005
17,686
With Miami I think a number of player were nursing injury and Gronk was out.. which was huge.

You can't really say 'look at how well they did against Bell' UNTIL... Bell had a great game at least catching the ball (9 for 88 yards). If the Jags aren't worried about Lewis and White well then congrats to them.. but I completely disagree that they just have that 'handled' and I think the evidence is there in their last game..let alone the last four or five.

Do you have numbers that show that Jax is very good at keeping RBs from catching the ball? (I don't know where people get those specific numbers in terms of Defenses against RBs catching and such.)
Also, isn't there any value in looking at the offenses that Jax played? Every good offense they've played has done well against them.

I don't think it will be a cake-walk either, but something has been off with Bortles the last few weeks (last week's score notwithstanding). He has not been finding his WRs (Westbrook, Lee, Cole) as he had been in previous weeks. Also, as you mentioned Fournette's ankle will be huge. He clearly couldn't cut late in the game.
He was effectively useless after the injury. If he has any issue with the ankle and can't cut then I can't see the Jags scoring more than 10-14 points in this game.
 

rodderick

Member
SoSH Member
Apr 24, 2009
12,851
Belo Horizonte - Brazil
The Patriots won't lose this game because of Fournette. Not only did he not have a great season, he's the type of big back Belichick's defenses have had little trouble dealing with. I'm hoping he's healthy enough for Marrone to lean on him a lot early so the Pats can build a lead and never look back. Everyone is talking about the Patriots offense x Jax defense matchup, but I think the real mismatch is the Patriots defense x Jax offense. Not that I think the Pats defense is anything special, but I don't see how the Jaguars score more than 17 points without the help of turnovers. That's what gives me confidence.
 

Ed Hillel

Wants to be startin somethin
SoSH Member
Dec 12, 2007
44,171
Here
He's been shaking his throwing hand for a few weeks now that I've seen. It's something he's been dealing with and may have just flared up a bit more after Saturday's game. From the naked eye, it hasn't affected his throwing.
I would certainly disagree, there were noticeable issues for about a month, especially against the Jets. I was hoping last game meant things were better.
 

RedOctober3829

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 19, 2005
55,483
deep inside Guido territory
I would certainly disagree, there were noticeable issues for about a month, especially against the Jets. I was hoping last game meant things were better.
I don't think there were major issues with the ball coming out of his hand. The issues IMO were him and the WRs(especially Cooks) not on the same page. I think something is wrong with his hand, but I haven't seen many indications that it's affecting his ball.
 

bradmahn

Member
SoSH Member
Apr 23, 2010
591
9 of the top 10 teams in rushing yards made the playoffs, so the Pats are below-average for a playoff team.

Seriously, winning teams always have good rushing numbers, because they’re often playing with a lead and looking to shorten the game. The Pats aren’t a bad rushing team, but I’m not convinced they’re a good one either. If you’re on the Jacksonville staff, you’re worried about TB12; you’d be thrilled if the Pats decide to adopt a ground-and-pound game plan.
Let me know when those goalposts stop moving. The Patriots do not have a mediocre running game. FO has them ranked 3rd, they are 10th in yards per game, and they scored the 6th most rushing TDs. They've got one of the best rushing offenses they've had throughout this entire run. Dion Lewis is what so many have been lamenting not having the last 7 or so years: a running and receiving combo back, if you will.

And they have a backup to him in Rex Burkhead.

When Gronk and Dion (or Burkhead) are on the field together, you can play quick tempo and dictate favorable matchups in the run or passing game.

In two of Brady's four worst AFCCGs, the lack of this versatility played a huge part in their losing:
  • In 2015, LeGarrette Blount and Dion Lewis were both on IR--they had to take on one of the best pass defenses of the last ten years with no choice but to pass (and their LT was on IR! No wonder Brady had a hard time and got destroyed by a pass rush that could just attack).
  • 2012's performance, as has been noted, was without Gronk and Julian Edelman and Brady's two INTs came after the halfway point of the fourth quarter when the Ravens were up 15. A defense that lost its best coverage guy forced the O into predictability and they couldn't overcome it.
Jacksonville needs to be concerned about this running attack, especially given that FO has their D Line as being 28th worst in run defense and have given up 6 of their 10 worst opposing rushing totals since the addition of Marcel Dareus.
 

RetractableRoof

tolerates intolerance
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Dec 1, 2003
3,836
Quincy, MA
I don't think there were major issues with the ball coming out of his hand. The issues IMO were him and the WRs(especially Cooks) not on the same page. I think something is wrong with his hand, but I haven't seen many indications that it's affecting his ball.
Wait, the hand bone is connected to the.... eh, nm.
 

mauf

Anderson Cooper × Mr. Rogers
Moderator
SoSH Member
Let me know when those goalposts stop moving. The Patriots do not have a mediocre running game. FO has them ranked 3rd, they are 10th in yards per game, and they scored the 6th most rushing TDs. They've got one of the best rushing offenses they've had throughout this entire run. Dion Lewis is what so many have been lamenting not having the last 7 or so years: a running and receiving combo back, if you will.

And they have a backup to him in Rex Burkhead.

When Gronk and Dion (or Burkhead) are on the field together, you can play quick tempo and dictate favorable matchups in the run or passing game.

In two of Brady's four worst AFCCGs, the lack of this versatility played a huge part in their losing:
  • In 2015, LeGarrette Blount and Dion Lewis were both on IR--they had to take on one of the best pass defenses of the last ten years with no choice but to pass (and their LT was on IR! No wonder Brady had a hard time and got destroyed by a pass rush that could just attack).
  • 2012's performance, as has been noted, was without Gronk and Julian Edelman and Brady's two INTs came after the halfway point of the fourth quarter when the Ravens were up 15. A defense that lost its best coverage guy forced the O into predictability and they couldn't overcome it.
Jacksonville needs to be concerned about this running attack, especially given that FO has their D Line as being 28th worst in run defense and have given up 6 of their 10 worst opposing rushing totals since the addition of Marcel Dareus.
The Pats’ defense is 31st in DVOA.

Which I don’t think means jack shit, but if you agree with that, then I don’t know why you’d cite their numbers about Jacksonville’s defense as though they are meaningful.

I mean, the Chiefs were 4th in offensive DVOA. Should we marvel that the Titans managed to slow that offensive juggernaut? Or should we instead question the validity of non-transparent statistical measures?
 

Soxy

Member
SoSH Member
Dec 1, 2008
6,095
The Pats’ defense is 31st in DVOA.

Which I don’t think means jack shit, but if you agree with that, then I don’t know why you’d cite their numbers about Jacksonville’s defense as though they are meaningful.

I mean, the Chiefs were 4th in offensive DVOA. Should we marvel that the Titans managed to slow that offensive juggernaut? Or should we instead question the validity of non-transparent statistical measures?
Nobody here has argued that DVOA is the be all, end all. But there are metrics that paint the Patriots' defense in a positive light. They finished 5th in the NFL in fewest points allowed. They finished 5th in the NFL in redzone defense. (Probably important to note the Jags finished with NFL's best redzone offense. Could be the match-up that determines who wins.)

I previously pointed out conventional metrics that make the Jags' run defense look just as poor as DVOA does. When every stat that I look at tells me that the Jaguars have a bad run defense (including DVOA), I don't see any possible conclusion besides the fact that the Jaguars have a bad run defense. Do you have anything to back up the argument that the Jags have a good run defense? Or that the Patriots have a mediocre rushing offense?

Also, the fact that Kelce was injured early in that game probably had a lot to do with the Chiefs' offense performing poorly.