2018-19 Offseason Thread

nvalvo

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 16, 2005
21,478
Rogers Park
JBJ and a minor league flier
or Devers straight up
for
J.T. Realmuto-2018 stats: .277 BA, 21 HR, 74 RBI, 125 G, 477 AB, .825 OPS

If JBJ ...you slide Benny to center...JDM and others (Pierce and Holt) platoon in left.
Outfield defense is worse but gets rid of two noodle bats at the end of the lineup.

If Devers you sign Donaldson or Beltre and roll with that.
Third base defense is better with about the same offense.
The offense is much better. Lineup is longer.
I really have trouble seeing how we improve the team by trading Bradley. He's hard to value, because he's either not hitting at all, in which case he's a no-hit, great glove CF (a 1-2 WAR complementary player), or else he's hitting .250/.330/.450, and thus one of the better two-way position players in the league (a 4-5 WAR All Star). After his mid-May benching, he posted a .774 OPS. We've seen him do both for full seasons. We've also seen him combine the two in varying proportions.

Your trade proposal valued him as the latter guy, the All Star, who's thus a comparable player to Realmuto. Both JBJ and Realmuto have the same service time remaining to FA, they were both Super 2, and they're paid comparably.

But I doubt the Marlins (or any trading partner) will accept that valuation of Bradley, which is why he's hard to trade. If JBJ's actually that guy going forward, we likely have a historic outfield that leads us to a few more division titles. It would be hard to let that chance go for the return on the 1-2 WAR version of Bradley.

(In any case, the whole point of the Marlins dealing Realmuto is that they're rebuilding. If they wanted a 4 WAR player under contract through 2020, they, uhh, already have one in Realmuto. They want players who will be under control when they're next planning to be good. Devers is thus a trade proposal that they'd be more likely to accept, but I'm guessing they want several high upside prospects — and we don't have many of those.)
 

Red(s)HawksFan

Member
SoSH Member
Jan 23, 2009
20,673
Maine
I really have trouble seeing how we improve the team by trading Bradley.
You make a great case and I agree. I'll take the quoted statement a step further and say I have trouble seeing how they improve the team by trading anyone on the 25 man roster. Proposing trades shipping out the likes of JBJ or Devers or Benintendi for a good player like Thor or Realmuto is a lateral move at best. Weakening one spot to upgrade another is zero sum.
 

SouthernBoSox

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 23, 2005
12,084
Bradley's batting profile is that of a breakout year. His babip the first half was absolutely insane. He has a breakout year and is a good hitter. I'd rather sign him long term at a discount than trade him.
 

Plympton91

bubble burster
SoSH Member
Oct 19, 2008
12,408
You make a great case and I agree. I'll take the quoted statement a step further and say I have trouble seeing how they improve the team by trading anyone on the 25 man roster. Proposing trades shipping out the likes of JBJ or Devers or Benintendi for a good player like Thor or Realmuto is a lateral move at best. Weakening one spot to upgrade another is zero sum.
If you look only at that move in isolation, yes. But suppose they traded ‘Tendi for Realmuto and then signed Pollack to play LF? That might be better than signing Ramos to C for too many years and too much money.
 

Papelbon's Poutine

Homeland Security
SoSH Member
Dec 4, 2005
19,615
Portsmouth, NH
Bradley's batting profile is that of a breakout year. His babip the first half was absolutely insane. He has a breakout year and is a good hitter. I'd rather sign him long term at a discount than trade him.
He’ll be going into his age 31 season when he’s a FA. X and Betts are bigger priorities and that’s before either resigning or replacing Sale after next year. I have trouble seeing JBJ here long term.
 

Bob Montgomerys Helmet Hat

has big, douchey shoulders
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
He’ll be going into his age 31 season when he’s a FA. X and Betts are bigger priorities and that’s before either resigning or replacing Sale after next year. I have trouble seeing JBJ here long term.
He'll also be a lot cheaper than those guys. What if he gets something like the 4/$52 that Gardner got when he was 31?
 

Yelling At Clouds

Post-darwinian
SoSH Member
Jul 19, 2005
3,405
I still think it’s unlikely that DD will trade anyone from the MLB roster, but FWIW, Rosenthal reports that the Mets would prefer to get major leaguers back for Thor rather than prospects.
 

sean1562

Member
SoSH Member
Sep 17, 2011
3,620
That sounds like a “no way are we trading you Thor without Torres” statement towards the yanks
 

InsideTheParker

persists in error
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
40,371
Pioneer Valley
I still think it’s unlikely that DD will trade anyone from the MLB roster. . .
What about Hector Velazquez? He seems valuable to me. I thought of him because I just saw him pitch a 1,2,3 inning in the MLB/Japan series to the heart of their order.
Haha. Typed too soon. He came in for a second inning and now looks not so hot. At all. (Joe Magrane thought the pitch selection was poor.)
 
Last edited:

Yelling At Clouds

Post-darwinian
SoSH Member
Jul 19, 2005
3,405
What about Hector Velazquez? He seems valuable to me. I thought of him because I just saw him pitch a 1,2,3 inning in the MLB/Japan series to the heart of their order.
Haha. Typed too soon. He came in for a second inning and now looks not so hot. At all. (Joe Magrane thought the pitch selection was poor.)
Sorry, I meant as the centerpiece of a trade for a top-flight starting pitcher that they arguably - arguably! - don’t need. But sure, maybe someone like that gets dealt at some point.
 

InsideTheParker

persists in error
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
40,371
Pioneer Valley
Sorry, I meant as the centerpiece of a trade for a top-flight starting pitcher that they arguably - arguably! - don’t need. But sure, maybe someone like that gets dealt at some point.
I wasn't replying to the "centerpiece" part, but as a major leaguer who might have value as a piece of a trade, as you said Mets preferred major leaguers rather than prospects. I have no idea if the Mets need relievers.
 

Dewey'sCannon

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 18, 2005
869
Maryland
If I'm the Mets talking to the Red Sox about Thor, I'm asking for Devers or EdRo, or both, just to start the conversation.

So no, I don't think he's coming to Boston.
 

Van Everyman

Member
SoSH Member
Apr 30, 2009
26,991
Newton
I’m late to this debate re. the catching situation, but I think you had a few things going on:

Vaz was clearly Plan A going into 2018. Then, he was bad on both sides of the ball, taking a huge step back from his 2017 season, and got hurt. That he was making a number of mental errors suggests something else was going on.

Leon started slowly at the plate but was ~.250 when Vaz got hurt. He eventually cratered at the dish and was completely gassed by the time the postseason. Leon is bad offensively. But he’s not as bad as he was in the second half when he caught almost ever day for six weeks and Swihart couldn’t sniff an inning at catcher.

If I had to guess, and it’s just a guess, they were willing to trade running Leon into the ground in return for him working with guys like Joe Kelly on their secondary stuff because they knew Vaz would be back.

So where does that leave them for 2019? Well, I don’t think they deal Leon unless they feel confident Vaz’s troubles are truly behind him. Whatever they actually were.
 

Cesar Crespo

79
SoSH Member
Dec 22, 2002
21,588
So where does that leave them for 2019? Well, I don’t think they deal Leon unless they feel confident Vaz’s troubles are truly behind him. Whatever they actually were.
I think it's a matter of whether they tender him a contract or not. I doubt Leon has any value on the trade market.
 

Mighty Joe Young

The North remembers
SoSH Member
Sep 14, 2002
8,401
Halifax, Nova Scotia , Canada
I come here daily looking for updates on Pedroia. I know that they will probably be able to patchwork second base again if he's unable to play, but man that's a question mark that I would like to see resolved sooner rather than later.
Just read a Bleacher Report notification that Dombrowski is saying Pedroia won’t have surgery - continuing his rehab and the club was expecting him to be ready to go in ST.
 

j44thor

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 1, 2006
10,961
Great article on FG today about the historic season Eovaldi just had.
Wonder if his agent is reading this rubbing his fingers together while he talks to teams.
Essentially no pitcher since at least 2002 (as far back as records go) has thrown as hard and had as high a strike % as Eovaldi just did.
Some have thrown harder but not close to strike % and those that match his strike % don't throw nearly as hard.
https://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/nathan-eovaldi-is-a-unicorn/
 

Sausage in Section 17

Poker Champ
SoSH Member
Mar 17, 2004
2,084
I come here daily hoping to see that Eovaldi has been signed. All this other stuff, eh....
That's why I'm here now.

This is the only move i'm worried about. If Pedroia can play, great. If not.....that worked out OK this year.:redwine: The bullpen needs attention, but the bullpen always needs attention, and will once next season begins most likely.

Sign Eovaldi. Don't let anyone else do it, especially not the MFY. Get it done DD!
 

Al Zarilla

Member
SoSH Member
Dec 8, 2005
58,867
San Andreas Fault
That's why I'm here now.

This is the only move i'm worried about. If Pedroia can play, great. If not.....that worked out OK this year.:redwine: The bullpen needs attention, but the bullpen always needs attention, and will once next season begins most likely.

Sign Eovaldi. Don't let anyone else do it, especially not the MFY. Get it done DD!
Get it done DD has finally replaced get it done Theo, huh? I agree, sign my goombah.
 

DJnVa

Dorito Dawg
SoSH Member
Dec 16, 2010
53,837
If I'm the Mets talking to the Red Sox about Thor, I'm asking for Devers or EdRo, or both, just to start the conversation.

So no, I don't think he's coming to Boston.
You wouldn’t discuss EdRo in trade for Thor?
 

E5 Yaz

Transcends message boarding
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Apr 25, 2002
90,014
Oregon
Ken Rosenthal‏ @Ken_Rosenthal 2m2 minutes ago
#Padres, in process of cleaning up their 40-man roster, are talking about moving RHPs Colton Brewer and Rowan Wick in separate deals, sources tell The Athletic. #Cubs, #RedSox among teams SD is engaged with.
Ken Rosenthal‏Verified account @Ken_Rosenthal 37s37 seconds ago
#RedSox on verge of getting RHP Colten Brewer from #Padres, source tells The Athletic. Return expected to be a non-40-man roster minor leaguer.
 

PrometheusWakefield

Member
SoSH Member
May 25, 2009
10,441
Boston, MA
That's why I'm here now.

This is the only move i'm worried about. If Pedroia can play, great. If not.....that worked out OK this year.:redwine: The bullpen needs attention, but the bullpen always needs attention, and will once next season begins most likely.

Sign Eovaldi. Don't let anyone else do it, especially not the MFY. Get it done DD!
I'm a NO on Eovaldi.

Not a no at any price obviously. But a no at the price he's likely to get - Fangraphs suggests 3 years $54M to $60M.

At that price he's too much of a risk. Eovaldi has never shown consistency at the major league level. He gives up too many home runs. And he's only thrown over 160 innings once in his career.

He was awesome in the post-season, and to a lesser extent down the stretch. Overreacting to that kind of small sample size with a World Series hero is how championship teams get saddled with too many big contracts. We have huge decisions coming up with superstar level players who will need big paydays and Eovaldi does not fill an obvious need in our rotation (and he will cost too much to be a closer). I'd have to have a lot more confidence to spend $20M on what amounts to a 5th starter on this club.
 

Dewey'sCannon

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 18, 2005
869
Maryland
You wouldn’t discuss EdRo in trade for Thor?
I would definitely discuss EdRo in a trade for Thor, but I think it would take him plus Devers. If Devers were not included, then it would have to be EdRo + Chavis + a lot more. I just don't think we have the pieces - at least not that we'd be willing to give up.
 

nvalvo

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 16, 2005
21,478
Rogers Park
You wouldn’t discuss EdRo in trade for Thor?
The objections wouldn't come from the Red Sox side.

Syndergaard has all of 19 days more ML service time than Rodriguez. They will both become FA at the same time. If the Mets are trading Syndergaard, it's because they don't expect to be competitive during the next three seasons; given the division they play in, that's probably the right bet. So why would they want a package built around Rodriguez?

I know you didn't come up with this crazy trade idea; it was @Dewey'sCannon, and even he wasn't really proposing it, so much as (rightly) pumping the brakes on talk of a Syndergaard trade acquisition.

But because we're a) in a Win Now moment on the success cycle, and b) in a dry spell on the farm due to trades and promotions, people are proposing trades from the 25 man roster for other players who would be on the 25 man roster. This makes some sense; that's where the value in the organization is. But they seem to be struggling with the fact that teams dealing established ML players are doing so to acquire more years of control — i.e. 2 years of James Paxton for 6+ years of Justus Sheffield, who will likely be called up for his Mariners debut around Memorial Day.
 

jon abbey

Shanghai Warrior
Moderator
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
70,713
f the Mets are trading Syndergaard, it's because they don't expect to be competitive during the next three seasons
FWIW, this isn't true. There have been a bunch of quotes in recent days saying that if NY traded Syndergaard, it would be because they couldn't resist the package of talent and if they got prospects, they would think about moving them immediately to help the team compete now. The new GM and the Wilpons both want to compete immediately, and they are wondering if trading Syndergaard and signing a replacement on the FA market might be the best way to go, which is where they are currently.

tl/dr: The Mets don't function like other teams, never assume common sense when it comes to them.
 

Savin Hillbilly

loves the secret sauce
SoSH Member
Jul 10, 2007
18,783
The wrong side of the bridge....
There are two things the Red Sox are notably short on; one is MLB-ready minor league talent, the other is LT space. Trading Edro+Chavis and/or whomever for Thor would make them even shorter on both, for a fairly modest upgrade (Edro is a good young pitcher, getting better; he ranked #10 out of 47 in the AL in SIERA this past year among pitchers with 120+ IP). This is a deal that really wouldn't make sense for the Sox, and might not make sense for the Mets either.
 

Murderer's Crow

Dragon Wangler 216
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
23,473
Garden City
Unfortunately for the Yankees and Sox, the Astros are in a perfect position to acquire any of the top pitchers who become available. I don't envy their rotation woes on November 20th, but they could easily build a new 3 headed beast if they match up with the Mets or Cleveland.
 

shaggydog2000

Member
SoSH Member
Apr 5, 2007
11,482
Evan Drellich of NBC Sports Boston reports (via Twitter) that the Red Sox will send minor league infielder Esteban Quiroz to San Diego in exchange for Brewer.
Sounds like a good deal to me. They traded a guy they picked up from the Mexican league as possible middle infield insurance for a guy the Padres signed as a minor league free agent last year to be bullpen insurance. But Brewer looks like he has some potential as a reliever left, and Quiroz is probably behind the rest of our middle infield players and not likely to develop much more at 26. It's a depth balancing move for the two teams, but I think the player we got looks better.
 

Yelling At Clouds

Post-darwinian
SoSH Member
Jul 19, 2005
3,405
The team added Chavis, Lakins, Hernandez, Josh Taylor, and Denyi Reyes to the 40-man today (which is at 39 people). They did not add Josh Ockimey, which is a little surprising. Cuevas is gone.


 

jon abbey

Shanghai Warrior
Moderator
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
70,713
It’s hard to stash a 1B only guy on the 25 man roster all season but not protecting Ockimey is still a bit surprising.
 

SemperFidelisSox

Member
SoSH Member
May 25, 2008
31,083
Boston, MA
Unfortunately for the Yankees and Sox, the Astros are in a perfect position to acquire any of the top pitchers who become available. I don't envy their rotation woes on November 20th, but they could easily build a new 3 headed beast if they match up with the Mets or Cleveland.
They wouldn’t give up their top prospect for Paxton. I remain skeptical the Indians will deal with an AL contender. deGrom isn’t going anywhere. They may have missed their shot with Paxton.
 

sean1562

Member
SoSH Member
Sep 17, 2011
3,620
IDK Ockimey wasnt lighting the world on fire in AA. He doesnt really seem like a decent flyer to produce at the MLB level, especially next season. Why even bother if you dont think he will be able to stick?
 

chawson

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 1, 2006
4,660
The team added Chavis, Lakins, Hernandez, Josh Taylor, and Denyi Reyes to the 40-man today (which is at 39 people). They did not add Josh Ockimey, which is a little surprising. Cuevas is gone.


Is Chandler Shepherd still on the 40-man? I think I’d rather Ockimey.
 

brandonchristensen

Loves Aaron Judge
SoSH Member
Feb 4, 2012
38,144
Apparently Edwin Diaz is on the block.

How do we get him? I loved watching him pitch. He's the anti Kimbrel. Gets the ball, throws it. He's like Mark Buehrle speed.
 

Yelling At Clouds

Post-darwinian
SoSH Member
Jul 19, 2005
3,405
IDK Ockimey wasnt lighting the world on fire in AA. He doesnt really seem like a decent flyer to produce at the MLB level, especially next season. Why even bother if you dont think he will be able to stick?
What's your definition of "lighting the world on fire?" He had an ~.870 OPS and 15 HRs in 90 games, which seems like something a team might want to keep around. Granted, he had a 30% K rate, but he also drew a lot of walks. He's far from a guaranteed success, but I'm surprised they'd be willing to lose him for nothing. Of course, the FO has a better sense of his value than I do, so who knows.
 
Last edited:

chrisfont9

Member
SoSH Member
Apparently Edwin Diaz is on the block.

How do we get him? I loved watching him pitch. He's the anti Kimbrel. Gets the ball, throws it. He's like Mark Buehrle speed.
I get the sense here in Seattle that he isn't really on the block. Of course, we never know, but here's what Di Poto said today:

• If Edwin Díaz is on the trading block: “Edwin’s exciting, he’s young, he’s coming off of truly one of the great seasons in the history of relief pitchers in our league. There’s really no reason why he can’t be part of the core of the next great Mariners team, but we’re going to be open-minded to anything we’re doing this offseason as we move forward. That being said, we would absolutely have to be blown away to move players like Edwin Díaz and Mitch Haniger and Marco Gonzales. These are the types of players we’re trying to acquire, but we do have to be open-minded to what happens across the board. We won’t shut our minds to anything.”