2015 Dolphins: Fire the Lazor!

sodenj5

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Jul 14, 2005
6,621
CT
Started a new thread. 
 
Dolphins have been rumored to be looking at WRs quite a bit at the Senior Bowl, which may or may not bode well for the future of Mike Wallace. I personally feel like Wallace should be kept because Miami has enough holes to fill this offseason without creating another one at WR. The defense needs a lot of attention at LB, CB, FS, and possibly DT. 
 
Another guy that's seeing his stock shoot up at the Senior Bowl so far is DT Danny Shelton. He could be an option if MIami decides to let Jared Odrick walk in free agency. 
 
 
 

Clears Cleaver

Lil' Bill
SoSH Member
Aug 1, 2001
11,370
Wallace is gone from what all the local reporters are saying. Typical dolphins. Get rid of the better player because they don't want to deal or don't have infrastructure in place to deal with him off the field.
 
Theya re going to draft a DT or a LB in first round then get WR/CB/S etc etc
 

pdaj

Fantasy Maven
SoSH Member
Dec 15, 2002
3,385
From Springfield to Providence
 Thanks for starting a new thread!
 
Clears Cleaver said:
Wallace is gone from what all the local reporters are saying. Typical dolphins. Get rid of the better player because they don't want to deal or don't have infrastructure in place to deal with him off the field.
 
Theya re going to draft a DT or a LB in first round then get WR/CB/S etc etc
 
And many of these players have gone on to be very successful with other teams. Marshall, Dansby, Vontae, Sean Smith, etc.
 
If "we" don't get a high pick for Wallace, I'll be peeved. Sure, Mikey's a little high maintenance, but in many ways, he's proven to be a great teammate, and the type of no-excuse player this organization needs more of.
 
There was a soxfan post I wanted to reply to; it involved Ross' recruitment of Harbaugh to Michigan. I can't seem to find it in the old thread. Am I missing something?
 

mcaqua

Member
SoSH Member
Apr 15, 2011
306
pdaj said:
 Thanks for starting a new thread!
 
 
And many of these players have gone on to be very successful with other teams. Marshall, Dansby, Vontae, Sean Smith, etc.
 
If "we" don't get a high pick for Wallace, I'll be peeved. Sure, Mikey's a little high maintenance, but in many ways, he's proven to be a great teammate, and the type of no-excuse player this organization needs more of.
 
There was a soxfan post I wanted to reply to; it involved Ross' recruitment of Harbaugh to Michigan. I can't seem to find it in the old thread. Am I missing something?
 
You can't actually believe this, right?
 
In other news, we just lost the most talented coach on our staff.  Things are clearly trending up for this organization:
 
 
The Jets have officially tabbed their defensive and special teams coordinators.
 
The hiring of the 45-year-old Rodgers was expected. He had spent the previous seven seasons as the Dolphins’ defensive line coach, the first four of which were with new Jets head coach Todd Bowles, who was Miami’s assistant head coach/secondary coach from 2008 through 2011.
 
http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2015/01/23/jets-hire-kacy-rodgers-as-defensive-coordinator/
 

pdaj

Fantasy Maven
SoSH Member
Dec 15, 2002
3,385
From Springfield to Providence
mcaqua said:
 
You can't actually believe this, right?
 
In other news, we just lost the most talented coach on our staff.  Things are clearly trending up for this organization:
 
 
 
http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2015/01/23/jets-hire-kacy-rodgers-as-defensive-coordinator/
 
I absolutely do.
 
And Rodgers is a huge loss.
 
It'll be interesting to see how Bowles does in NY. He was offered the DC job when Philbin came on board, but decided to jettison once he was was passed over for HC. 
 

singaporesoxfan

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Jul 21, 2004
11,882
Washington, DC
I really thought Wallace did as well as he could for the Fins. The problem seems to be that what Wallace is really good at is catching the deep ball, and Tannehill for all his improvements this season can't seem to air it out.
 

mcaqua

Member
SoSH Member
Apr 15, 2011
306
pdaj said:
 
I absolutely do.
 
And Rodgers is a huge loss.
 
It'll be interesting to see how Bowles does in NY. He was offered the DC job when Philbin came on board, but decided to jettison once he was was passed over for HC. 
If you're going to make the assertion that Wallace is some sort of terrific teammate and a no-nonsense type personality in that locker room, then the onus is on you to provide some evidence supporting this claim. From my view, his last professional appearance consisted of whining to coaches about a lack of targets following a drive in which the Dolphins had just put the ball in the end zone. This in light of the fact that his target, reception and touchdown totals all basically mimicked his most productive seasons in Pittsburgh. All of this despite the fact that he is the (or one of) the highest paid WRs in the league. I couldn't disagree more with your assertion. This organization needs less of the overpaid, leaderless types.

The Rodgers departure is a colossal mistake. We will regret everything about the decision to retain Coyle's services. It's absolutely ridiculous.
 

Corsi

isn't shy about blowing his wad early
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Dec 3, 2010
12,955
Boston, MA
The Miami Herald reports the Dolphins were high on Wisconsin coach Bret Bielema before hiring Joe Philbin in 2012, but the sides disagreed on whether Russell Wilson could be an NFL starting quarterback.
 
This is an amazing story, and it's a slow news week ahead of the Super Bowl, so we'll shout it out. Per ace beat writer Armando Salguero, Dolphins owner Stephen Ross was high on Bielema for the head-coaching job, but Bielema and the personnel department led by ex-GM Jeff Ireland hit a wall when Bielema suggested the Dolphins take Wilson in the second round of the 2012 draft. Bielema allegedly even promised the Dolphins a Super Bowl within five years if they take Wilson, who was Bielema's quarterback at Wisconsin. Bielema pulled out of the running for the job over "personnel issues," and the rest is history. Ireland took Ryan Tannehill with the No. 8 overall pick, and Wilson went to Seattle in the third round. The Dolphins remain doormats, while Wilson is going to back-to-back Super Bowls.
 
http://www.rotoworld.com/player/nfl/9457/stephen-ross
 
http://miamiherald.typepad.com/dolphins_in_depth/2015/01/russell-wilson-could-have-been-a-miami-dolphin.html
 

mcaqua

Member
SoSH Member
Apr 15, 2011
306
Corsi said:
Bielema pulled out of the running for the job over "personnel issues," and the rest is history. Ireland took Ryan Tannehill with the No. 8 overall pick, and Wilson went to Seattle in the third round. The Dolphins remain doormats, while Wilson is going to back-to-back Super Bowls.
 
That's a hot take and all, but is Wilson even a superior QB?  Its certainly not the slam dunk the aforementioned quote would lead you to believe.
 

sodenj5

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Jul 14, 2005
6,621
CT
mcaqua said:
 
That's a hot take and all, but is Wilson even a superior QB?  Its certainly not the slam dunk the aforementioned quote would lead you to believe.
This story is like saying "Dolphins could have drafted Brady." No shit. Every team passed on Wilson at least twice. Every team in the NFL could have had Russell Wilson. To put out a report that says Wilson's college coach told Ireland to draft Wilson is the dumbest thing I've read in a long time.

And I would agree with your point. I don't even think it's close. Tannehill is the better quarterback. Wilson makes special plays with his feet and extending plays, but he is not an above average quarterback. He's propped up by an elite defense and elite running game. Tannehill has neither of those.
 

Soxy

Member
SoSH Member
Dec 1, 2008
6,095
Not sure if that last post is serious or not, but if it is I would love to hear the argument for Ryan Tannehill being a better QB than Russell Wilson.  I'm looking at the stats and you're right that it's not close, but not in the favor of Tannehill.  I guess you could point to sack %, though they're both below average at that.  And that's it.  Whether it's completion %, QBR, WPA, EPA, TD%, INT%, ANY/A, DVOA.... I mean, Wilson ranks better than Tannehill at everything.  What, exactly, does Tannehill do better?
 
Sure, Wilson plays with a better defense and a better running game.  But I don't think that alone can explain Wilson being better in, like, every meaningful statistical category you can look at over their 3-year careers.  And it's not like Wilson is playing with more talented pass catchers than Tannehill has either.  
 
If the stats were closer, there might be an argument.  But the stats aren't close.  Wilson is better.
 

Toe Nash

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 28, 2005
5,623
02130
Also, making special plays with one's feet is a pretty important skill and part of Wilson's game that makes him the quarterback he is. It can't just be glossed over. Maybe if you forced both players to stay in the pocket every play Tannehill would be better (maybe not), but that's obviously not happening.
 

Devizier

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 3, 2000
19,569
Somewhere
Yeah, Tannehill's a fine quarterback, definitely better than league average, but WIlson is arguably top five. And it's not like Wilson's had a great o-line, either.
 

sodenj5

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Jul 14, 2005
6,621
CT
Apart from Tannehill throwing for more TDs, more yards, a higher DYAR, and a higher completion percentage this year while learning a new offense, you can see that the two have different skill sets pretty quickly. 
 
Looking at PFF, Tannehill and Wilson are pretty closely graded overall, with Tannehill rated at 9.7 over Wilson's 7.3. Tannehill's rating as a passer is 10th best in the league at 8.5, Wilson is 19th at -1.1. Wilson is the league's highest rated rusher at the QB position, with a 9.0 to Tannehill's 0.3.
 
Tannehill dropped back to pass 645 times to Wilson's 546, yet Wilson scrambled on 58 drop backs this season to Tannehill's 8. Wilson scrambled on 10.6% of his drop backs this season while Tannehill scrambled on just 1.2%.
 
You can argue that Wilson's offensive line wasn't great, but Miami's was worse. Miami had the second worst rating as an offensive line in pass protection in the league at -67.8. Seattle finished with a -31.1, 14 spots higher than Miami. Seattle also happened to have the highest rated rushing attack in the league with a 35.0 grade compared to Miami's 9.0.
 
While they are closer than my initial assumption would indicate, my assertion that most of Wilson's value is in his legs and not his arm isn't invalid. Wilson also has the superior supporting cast surrounding him on both offense and defense. It's an interesting topic to debate as to what makes the "better quarterback." Tannehill is more of a classic pocket passer, only running when necessary and on the occasional designed run, whereas Wilson is much more of a scrambler/improviser. 
 
It'll be very interesting to see what happens should they let Lynch go after this season and put more on Wilson's plate.
 

mcaqua

Member
SoSH Member
Apr 15, 2011
306
Ultimately, I think Wilson has been the better quarterback through their initial three years in the league. I don't think the delta between the two is all that large and I think Tannehill is closing the gap pretty quickly. The fact is Wilson entered the league having been the more polished product when you consider that Tannehill was playing WR during the early portion of his tenure at A&M and simply lacked repetitions at the position to match.

All that said, my issue with the article is that it's more than a bit disingenuous to insinuate that the reason for the Dolphins having been doormats lies solely with their preference for Tannehill over Wilson. I cannot envision a scenario where Wilson ends up in Miami and out produces Tannehill's production or improves the fortunes of this franchise in any material way over the last three years. Certainly they're not contenders in the AFC, never mind SB champions, and I'm skeptical they even make the playoffs.

If the story is indeed accurate, I do chuckle at the thought of Ireland's condescending response to Bielema's notion that Russell Wilson was a SB champion in the making.
 

Toe Nash

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 28, 2005
5,623
02130
sodenj5 said:
 
While they are closer than my initial assumption would indicate, my assertion that most of Wilson's value is in his legs and not his arm isn't invalid. Wilson also has the superior supporting cast surrounding him on both offense and defense. It's an interesting topic to debate as to what makes the "better quarterback." 
The better quarterback is the player who provides more value from the QB position. Given the huge edge in running, it is clearly Wilson. Comparing them solely on throwing the ball would be like ignoring every time Darren Sproles catches a ball.
 
Wilson is AT WORST an equal passer as well. You conveniently leave out the PASSING metrics that Wilson is better at: QBR, DVOA (Tannehill's big edge in usage gives him the DYAR lead), YPA, plain ol' Passer Rating...
 
If you look at 2013 as well, Wilson blows Tanny completely out of the water.
 
Do we have to find the thread about PFF's ratings? 
 

Mugsy's Jock

Eli apologist
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Dec 28, 2000
15,106
UWS, NYC
Addressing the question posed by the thread, some friends were at a party chatting with Tannehill yesterday and he claimed he barely looked at his footballs before or after they were sent to officials.

As to your other questions... a.) he doesn't think it's a big deal, b) "the Patriots. By a lot", and c.) she wasn't there.
 

Soxy

Member
SoSH Member
Dec 1, 2008
6,095
 

Toe Nash said:
Do we have to find the thread about PFF's ratings? 
 
And using counting stats instead of rate stats in the same post where it's noted that Tannehill dropped back to pass almost 100 more times than Wilson. He attempted 138 more passes. I would hope his counting stats were higher. (For the record I was looking at career numbers in my original post, not just this past season.)

I think one can definitely make the argument that Tannehill could surpass Wilson if he continues improving. I don't think you can say he's there yet. Nor do I think one can simply assume continued progression because his numbers have improved each year. That his numbers have gotten better every season he's been in the league definitely has to be encouraging for Dolphins fans, but if this is who he is, I think it's stretching to consider him to be better than what Russell Wilson has been for 3 seasons. And Wilson could also improve.
 

JMDurron

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
5,128
My takeaway from that article was less about the difference between particular players and how 20/20 hindsight might or might not make the Dolphins look stupid on that particular choice, and was more about the difference in approach between teams that actually let their head coaches build their systems and their rosters around the players that they want, and management/ownership groups that meddle and chase off coaching candidates that they are interested in.  The quality of the coaching staff and the rest of the roster may have as much to do with why Wilson has outperformed Tannehill, and the Seahawks have outperformed the Dolphins, but that's the point!  If you don't let your field-level staff have significant input into/control over the players that they have to coach, you'll never have the kind of coaching staff or roster that leads to the kind of success that Russell Wilson has enjoyed in Seattle.  
 

sodenj5

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Jul 14, 2005
6,621
CT
I certainly by no means take PFF's ranking as the gospel, just trying to illustrate the point that:
  • Wilson's supporting cast is far better than Tannehill's in Miami. Having an elite rushing attack eases the burden and opens up the passing game as defenses have to respect Marshawn Lynch at all times. Wilson also has a better, but not great, offensive line.
  • Most of Tannehill's value is in his arm. Most of Wilson's value is in his ability to make plays with his legs and extend plays. Both are valuable, but I'd personally take the long term value of the guy who's improved every year and who's skill set won't largely decline as he loses his athleticism vs the guy who relies heavily on his. 
That's not to say that Wilson can't improve either, I just feel more comfortable in the long term value of Tannehill over Wilson.
 

CouchsideSteve

Member
SoSH Member
Apr 16, 2013
438
Norwalk, CT
As Dolphins fans, I think we're very fortunate to be in a place where we can even feign an argument of Tannehill vs. Wilson. Our QB took a big step forward this year, and that's a huge piece of the puzzle in building the next contending team. 
 
My wishlist for the off-season, acknowledging limited cap space: 
 
Offense
- Invest in the O-line: If Albert returns at full strength, investing an early round draft pick could turn this nagging weakness into a strength; if he doesn't, it will be critical to bring in reinforcements just to keep Tannehill upright.  
- Retain Mike Wallace: He's still a dynamic playmaker (albeit an inconsistent one), and we can't place Tannehill's struggles stretching the field at his feet. Find new and inventive ways to get him the ball next season (e.g., screens, jet sweeps). 
- Re-sign Charles Clay: His stock probably suffers from a down season, but he's still young (entering age-26 season) and a good fit for this offense as the receiving.
- Sign a buy-low WR: Michael Crabtree or Cecil Shorts would be good complements to Wallace/Landry/Clay
- Find a cheap, change-of-pace RB:  Miller had a fantastic 2014 - pair him with a versatile 3rd down complement, either via the draft or with a guy like Roy Helu Jr. 
 
Defense
- Revamp the LB corps: Ellerbe is gone (good riddance). Wheeler has been a huge disappointment, but cutting him doesn't grant much cap relief - he probably stays in a diminished role. That leaves you with Jordan, Misi, and Jenkins as likely starters, absent any FA or draft additions. Jordan is an unknown quantity at OLB and Misi isn't a natural fit inside, so I'd like to see us target 2 LBs in rounds 2-5.
- Re-sign Jared Odrick: This is an obvious priority; will likely mean cutting Starks in the process. 
- Patch the secondary with FAs: It's actually a pretty deep FA class at CB, which is a good thing, since we're likely to be shopping for a starter opposite of Grimes (assumes Finnegan is jettisoned; Jamar Taylor rehabbing from a fairly significant injury). Safety is also a question mark, with Reshad Jones the only established contributor on the roster. I'd like to see Delmas brought back as he recovers from ACL surgery. 
 
Specialists
- Cut both Sturgis & Fields: Neither performed well in 2014, and Fields carries too large of a cap number. I'd be fine bringing in minimum salary rookies at both position. 
 

sodenj5

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Jul 14, 2005
6,621
CT
I would actually love to see them go slightly outside the box. Running backs aren't nearly as valuable as they once were, but Gurley, if he recovers fully from his ACL, has the look of a Lynch type of workhorse back.

Miller had a very good season, however, it looks like he's better in a rotation. Miami could use a power back to compliment Miller, and they're pretty shallow at RB. Miller and Damian Williams are it.

If you're looking at #14, and someone like Danny Shelton is there, and you figure you can have a good DT for maybe 7-10 years or have a really good, possibly great RB for 5-7 years, I think Miami needs to pull the trigger on that guy that has the ability to be elite and not make the safe pick.

I know RB isn't as glaring a hole as others, but I believe a guy like Gurley can take some of the load off Tannehill and really open up the offense.
 

sodenj5

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Jul 14, 2005
6,621
CT
Dolphins are reportedly working on a 7 year extension for Tannehill in the neighborhood of 105 million.
 
http://www.sun-sentinel.com/sports/dave-hyde-blog/sfl-hyde5-are-dolphins-working-on-tannehill-extension-20150209-story.html

I would personally prefer them to pick up his option for 2016 before taking the plunge into the deep end, but they also run the risk of getting "Flaccoed" if Tannehill puts up a big season then.

At around 15 mil/season, it seems like a reasonable compromise to lock Tannehill up without being completely crippled by a huge contract.
 

Clears Cleaver

Lil' Bill
SoSH Member
Aug 1, 2001
11,370
Wallace's days appear numbered. Fish are trying to trade him, no one will bite and they will end up releasing him. What a bad organization this is. One step forward, two steps back, two steps forward, one step back....rinse, lather, repeat. Getting rid of talent is not how you build winning teams.
 
Given the defense needs a complete overhaul, the o-line needs one or two starters and there are zero elite weapons on offense, this is looking like 5 wins next year. Then Philbin will be fired and Hickey will be demoted and Tannenbaum will be GM. And process starts anew 
 

sodenj5

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Jul 14, 2005
6,621
CT
Clears Cleaver said:
Wallace's days appear numbered. Fish are trying to trade him, no one will bite and they will end up releasing him. What a bad organization this is. One step forward, two steps back, two steps forward, one step back....rinse, lather, repeat. Getting rid of talent is not how you build winning teams.
 
Given the defense needs a complete overhaul, the o-line needs one or two starters and there are zero elite weapons on offense, this is looking like 5 wins next year. Then Philbin will be fired and Hickey will be demoted and Tannenbaum will be GM. And process starts anew 
 
To be honest, I think the Wallace trade runors are the FIns feeling the waters. It's highly unlikely anyone is willing to part with anything of value for Wallace given MIami's cap situation and his current contract. Teams will wait for him to be cut or not worry about him. This combined with the reports that Wallace seems unwilling to restructure his contract give the indications that the odds of Wallace returning in 2015 are slim. I've stated previously and I'll reiterate, I'm in favor of keeping Wallace stictly from the standpoint that Miami has a lot of holes and they don't need to create another large void by releasing their best receiver.
 
That in turn would make WR a high priority in the draft. There is certainly some talent available, but there's no guarantee that any of the "Big 3" of Cooper, White, or Parker fall to Miami at 14. There are pure speed guys like Dorsett from MIami or Smith from Ohio State that could be a potential Wallace replacement in the second round.
 

Clears Cleaver

Lil' Bill
SoSH Member
Aug 1, 2001
11,370
"Let's sign Tannehill to a $100m contract and have his top receivers be slot guys in Landry and Matthews. He can't throw deep anyways." - Dolphins front office

Hartline to the Pats works

They'll probably let Clay go, too. He causes mismatches.
 

rymflaherty

Member
SoSH Member
Jun 27, 2010
3,420
Norfolk
The Dolphins are now the shining example of why "need" as it pertains to the off-season and especially the draft is a fallacy.
 
The only "need" this team (and all teams) have is talent. How many times has this team now rebuilt the offensive line in the past decade?  The Receiving corps? 
Outside of QB (depending on how you feel about Tannehill) you could take an off-season thread from anytime in the past decade, remove the players names, and you'd have no idea what year it was from.
It never ends, and it's beyond frustrating.
 
I suppose the one shred of hope at the moment is that the Wallace and Hartline contracts we're Ireland-specials and not on Hickey. While the situation doesn't look great at the moment I will try to retain some patience and see how he and Tannenbaum figure everything out. As an isolated move, letting go of Hartline does make some sense, so me being upset is really just the lack of direction as a whole, building up over time.  They have the whole off-season...but they have an awful lot of work to do.
 

sodenj5

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Jul 14, 2005
6,621
CT
Mugsy's Walk-Off Bunt said:
Didn't Clay just re-sign with Miami?
 
No.
 
 
RedOctober3829 said:
Brian Hartline has been released.
 
This is sort of surprisng, but not really. Hartline is a good player, he's just not a good fit for the offense that they're running now. His salary far outweighs his production. I wouldn't be surprised to see Gibson gone as well as Landry is basically a younger, cheaper, probably better version of the same player.
 

Clears Cleaver

Lil' Bill
SoSH Member
Aug 1, 2001
11,370
Gibson is absolutely gone. Clay is a free agent
 
I saw a chart yesterday that showed since 2010 Miami has spent more in cash to players than every other team except SF. A horrible, horrible talent evaluation process.
 

Ed Hillel

Wants to be startin somethin
SoSH Member
Dec 12, 2007
43,973
Here
Question: Who pays guaranteed base salary when a trade is consummated? I know Bonus money sticks with the trading team, since it's already paid, but I'm not sure how it works with guaranteed base salary. That may be the difference between Wallace being tradeable and untradeable. He has a base of nearly ten million, three of which is guaranteed. He gets too expensive after that, unless he's absolutely elite next season, but you may find a taker for a 1-year 7 million dollar deal.
 

Super Nomario

Member
SoSH Member
Nov 5, 2000
14,013
Mansfield MA
Ed Hillel said:
Question: Who pays guaranteed base salary when a trade is consummated? I know Bonus money sticks with the trading team, since it's already paid, but I'm not sure how it works with guaranteed base salary. That may be the difference between Wallace being tradeable and untradeable. He has a base of nearly ten million, three of which is guaranteed. He gets too expensive after that, unless he's absolutely elite next season, but you may find a taker for a 1-year 7 million dollar deal.
The receiving team. Pats got stuck with $1 MM guaranteed salary for Isaac Sopoaga this year, for example.
 

Ed Hillel

Wants to be startin somethin
SoSH Member
Dec 12, 2007
43,973
Here
Super Nomario said:
The receiving team. Pats got stuck with $1 MM guaranteed salary for Isaac Sopoaga this year, for example.
 
Got it, thanks. So it's really just money that's already been paid out, kind of like Aaron Hernandez.
 

PayrodsFirstClutchHit

Bob Kraft's Season Ticket Robin Hoodie
SoSH Member
Jun 29, 2006
8,320
Winterport, ME
Almost every post season ranking of coaches has Philbin at the bottom of the those that remained employed after last season.  Rotoworld has a brutal review.
 
The grandest of mediocrities, Joe Philbin is not an NFL coach. He is a shrinking violet garbed in an aqua polo and adorned with a headset. He is a man unloved by his players, outwitted by his rivals and overwhelmed by his duties. An “offensive mind,” Philbin does not call his own plays. That leaves his primary function as “leading.” This is not good because Philbin’s primary failing is leadership. Not every NFL coach is going to be Pete Carroll or Mike Ditka. Loud does not equal “lead.” But if you’re going to be the quiet type, you better have a firm grasp on the pulse of your team. This is something Philbin insisted he didn’t have when he pled ignorance again and again in the Dolphins’ “Bullygate” scandal. Philbin’s locker room was fracturing into factions, and whether it was willful or intentional, he had no idea. Once Philbin finally does discover his problems, he ships them out instead of coaching them up. Brandon Marshalland Vontae Davis have both thrived since Philbin sent them packing, while the Dolphins have spent millions and many draft picks trying to replace them.
 
Not that Philbin’s failures all come behind closed doors. As a game manager, his top innovation has been calling late timeouts on defense in one-score games. This brilliant tactic helped produce two wins in 2014 … for the Packers and Lions. Philbin’s other speciality is dialing up field goals. Unfortunately for Dolphins fans, only five teams had worse field-goal percentages last season. Philbin is John Harbaugh if he never won. He’s Mike Tomlin if he never showed fire. He’s Jason Garrett if he never smiled. He is the worst coach in the NFL. 
 

singaporesoxfan

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Jul 21, 2004
11,882
Washington, DC
I still think Wallace has talent and will produce in the right offense. Short passes from Tannehill just aren't a good fit for his skills.
 

sodenj5

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Jul 14, 2005
6,621
CT
singaporesoxfan said:
I still think Wallace has talent and will produce in the right offense. Short passes from Tannehill just aren't a good fit for his skills.
It's really Tannehill not the offense. Earlier in the season they were trying to take shots deep more frequently. If something consistently does not work, why keep forcing it? Lazor is a smart coach and he quickly realized his strategy needed to be adjusted. They still took 2-3 deep shots per game to keep defenses honest, but really Tannehill thrives on the short to intermediate game, which explains why Jarvis Landry came in as a rookie and lead the team in receptions.

It's a drag because Wallace consistently torches defenses still. At least one per game he would get behind the coverage and Tannehill would routinely miss him. For all the crap Wallace gets, for two years he's basically been turned into a possession receiver/red zone threat which is not at all his game. I agree that if Wallace moved to another team with a QB that can hit the deep ball he can still very much be an elite receiver. Think what Russell Wilson and Mike Wallace could do together. Terrifying. Wilson is a master of extending plays with his feet and hitting big plays, much like Roethlisberger was in Pittsburgh.
 

dwainw

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 20, 2005
2,405
Minneapolis, MN
PayrodsFirstClutchHit said:
Almost every post season ranking of coaches has Philbin at the bottom of the those that remained employed after last season.  Rotoworld has a brutal review.
 
The grandest of mediocrities, Joe Philbin is not an NFL coach. He is a shrinking violet garbed in an aqua polo and adorned with a headset. He is a man unloved by his players, outwitted by his rivals and overwhelmed by his duties. An “offensive mind,” Philbin does not call his own plays. That leaves his primary function as “leading.” This is not good because Philbin’s primary failing is leadership. Not every NFL coach is going to be Pete Carroll or Mike Ditka. Loud does not equal “lead.” But if you’re going to be the quiet type, you better have a firm grasp on the pulse of your team. This is something Philbin insisted he didn’t have when he pled ignorance again and again in the Dolphins’ “Bullygate” scandal. Philbin’s locker room was fracturing into factions, and whether it was willful or intentional, he had no idea. Once Philbin finally does discover his problems, he ships them out instead of coaching them up. Brandon Marshalland Vontae Davis have both thrived since Philbin sent them packing, while the Dolphins have spent millions and many draft picks trying to replace them.
 
Not that Philbin’s failures all come behind closed doors. As a game manager, his top innovation has been calling late timeouts on defense in one-score games. This brilliant tactic helped produce two wins in 2014 … for the Packers and Lions. Philbin’s other speciality is dialing up field goals. Unfortunately for Dolphins fans, only five teams had worse field-goal percentages last season. Philbin is John Harbaugh if he never won. He’s Mike Tomlin if he never showed fire. He’s Jason Garrett if he never smiled. He is the worst coach in the NFL. 
Fun read.  At least with all the changing personnel heading into next season, Philbin will get to put his stamp of mediocrity on a team of players acquired almost entirely on his watch--before his inevitable firing at season's end.  I'm especially looking forward to the rebuilding process that will ensue next year at this time so we can start the clock on whatever 2/3/4-year plan the next regime implements so the current hopelessness can morph back into a sense of indifference and resignation, thus restoring order to the world Dolphins fans have grown so accustomed to in the past 20 years.
 

pdaj

Fantasy Maven
SoSH Member
Dec 15, 2002
3,385
From Springfield to Providence
Mike Wallace is a bit of a diva -- no question. But he busted his ass last season and "brought it" every single game last year; well, except, maybe, for the final one. Despite being reduced to more of a short-to-intermediate possession receiver last year, he made it work, said all the right things to the press, and never made excuses when the team disappointed. His teammates love him. Brandon Albert, one of the team's top leaders and a Philbin favorite, tweeted something similar to, "Mike better be back with us; that's my boy" several weeks back. I don't think there's a single player that wants to win more than he does.
 
I want to see the Dolphins add more players like Wallace, not less. 
 
As others have brought up in this thread, if Tannehill had just an average deep ball, MW might have had his best season ever. I lost count as to how many TDs were left on the field due to RT's deep ball inaccuracy. I won't deny that he's overpaid, but he's a bonafide playmaker, and the Fins don't nearly have enough as it is ...
 
I want to see Philbin and the Miami coaching staff make it work. You know, like the Bears have with Marshall, and how the Colts are doing with Vontae Davis (per Rotoworld). We're not talking about an Albert Haynesworth here.
 
The way this team has been run in the last few years, I fully expect Wallace to be cut, and Cobb to be signed. You know, since Cobb and Jarvis Landry essentially play the same position.
 
But I still have hope Tannenbaum's addition will be a positive one.
 

sodenj5

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Jul 14, 2005
6,621
CT
pdaj said:
Mike Wallace is a bit of a diva -- no question. But he busted his ass last season and "brought it" every single game last year; well, except, maybe, for the final one. Despite being reduced to more of a short-to-intermediate possession receiver last year, he made it work, said all the right things to the press, and never made excuses when the team disappointed. His teammates love him. Brandon Albert, one of the team's top leaders and a Philbin favorite, tweeted something similar to, "Mike better be back with us; that's my boy" several weeks back. I don't think there's a single player that wants to win more than he does.
 
I want to see the Dolphins add more players like Wallace, not less. 
 
As others have brought up in this thread, if Tannehill had just an average deep ball, MW might have had his best season ever. I lost count as to how many TDs were left on the field due to RT's deep ball inaccuracy. I won't deny that he's overpaid, but he's a bonafide playmaker, and the Fins don't nearly have enough as it is ...
 
Agreed. The "good" news in cutting Hartline and Gibson is Miami almost certainly is drafting a receiver and this draft is flush with talent. I don't expect Cooper or White to be available when Miami drafts, but there is a chance that Devante Parker could be there, and he would add a different dimension that MIami hasn't had in a long time. A big receiver that has drawn favorable comparisons to AJ Green and can win contested balls and be a viable red zone target. A receiving corps of Wallace, Landry, and Parker would have me feeling pretty good.
 
My best guess right now is they go WR round 1 and LB in round 2, but who knows how the rest of the roster shakes out. I expect more cuts to come with Ellerbe and Wheeler almost certain to be cap casualties as well.
 

Shelterdog

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Feb 19, 2002
15,375
New York City
pdaj said:
Mike Wallace is a bit of a diva -- no question. But he busted his ass last season and "brought it" every single game last year; well, except, maybe, for the final one. Despite being reduced to more of a short-to-intermediate possession receiver last year, he made it work, said all the right things to the press, and never made excuses when the team disappointed. His teammates love him. Brandon Albert, one of the team's top leaders and a Philbin favorite, tweeted something similar to, "Mike better be back with us; that's my boy" several weeks back. I don't think there's a single player that wants to win more than he does.
 
I want to see the Dolphins add more players like Wallace, not less. 
 
 
 
What is your source for any of this? There were various reports of dissent in the locker room, arguments between Wallace and Lazor, he bitched about how he didn't like the play calls after the Jaguar game.  
 
It looks like pure wishcasting.
 

Clears Cleaver

Lil' Bill
SoSH Member
Aug 1, 2001
11,370
I agree with the assessment of Wallace. He plays hard, made plenty of big plays and was constantly open. He's a PITA sometimes, but the guy brought it all year, except in the final half of the final game
 
they release him its a big mistake
 

pdaj

Fantasy Maven
SoSH Member
Dec 15, 2002
3,385
From Springfield to Providence
Shelterdog said:
 
What is your source for any of this? There were various reports of dissent in the locker room, arguments between Wallace and Lazor, he bitched about how he didn't like the play calls after the Jaguar game.  
 
It looks like pure wishcasting.
 
There's been conflicting reports on the Wallace situation in Miami. Prior to final game of the year, several writers relentlessly praised Wallace for his approach to the game. He was arriving early to practice, staying late to work with Tanny, helping the younger players, etc. One writer from the sentinel, Omar Kelly, named MW his favorite player to interview, because he was "100 percent real" and "never made excuses". It's generally accepted that he's a well liked teammate. 
 
Some of the behind-the-scenes info came out after the final game debacle, but Lazor, Miami's OC, has gone on record as stating he really enjoys coaching Wallace; it's been stated that Wallace's issues are primarily with Philbin.
 
http://www.miamiherald.com/sports/nfl/miami-dolphins/article11335148.html#storylink=cpy
 
The word around the league is there’s a true difference of opinion about Wallace within the team’s braintrust. Philbin, who famously has a no-drama philosophy when it comes to players, is believed to be in favor of letting Wallace go. Hickey, meanwhile, is apparently more sympathetic to keeping him.
 
Left unclear: What exactly Tannenbaum wants ‒ for both 2015 and beyond.
 
The Dolphins have far too much talent to be in complete rebuild mode this year. But again, every move the Dolphins makes now will be weighed against what it costs them down the road.
 
 
 
With Hartline and Gibson now gone, the view is that Wallace's chances of staying have now improved. But who knows ...
 

sodenj5

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Jul 14, 2005
6,621
CT
Odrick returning would be a good thing. It makes DT a want, not a need for the upcoming draft/free agency. They have enough needs already:

Need:
WR
LB
FS
TE (if Clay signs elsewhere)
CB

Want:
DT
OG
RB