Dismiss Notice
Guest, I have a big favor to ask you. We've been working very hard to establish ourselves on social media. If you like/follow our pages it would be a HUGE help to us. SoSH on Facebook and Inside the Pylon Thanks! Nip

2014 Draft Game Day 2

Discussion in 'Wait, Who???' started by SeoulSoxFan, May 9, 2014.

  1. SeoulSoxFan

    SeoulSoxFan Dope Dope

    Messages:
    18,683
    2nd round draft order as of end of round 1:
    1. #33: Texans
    2. #34: Snyders
    3. #35: Browns
    4. #36: Raiders
    5. #37: Falcons
    6. #38: Buccaneers
    7. #39: Jaguars
    8. #40: Seahawks (via Vikings)
    9. #41: Bills
    10. #42: Titans
    11. #43: Giants
    12. #44: Rams
    13. #45: Lions
    14. #46: Steelers
    15. #47: Cowboys
    16. #48: Ravens
    17. #49: Jets
    18. #50: Dolphins
    19. #51: Bears
    20. #52: Cardinals
    21. #53: Packers
    22. #54: Eagles
    23. #55: Bengals
    24. #56: 49ers (via Chiefs)
    25. #57: Chargers
    26. #58: Saints
    27. #59: Colts
    28. #60: Panthers
    29. #61: 49ers
    30. #62: Patriots
    31. #63: Broncos
    32. #64: Seahawks
    As with round 1, NO SPOILERS -- please wait until each announcement from the podium before posting the pick. 
     
    P.S. Bit of a sad news for me -- my flight is early Saturday morning Seoul time so will miss all of day 2. (I am still befuddled that we don't have intercontinental net access for all seats). Will be checking back furiously once I land back in the States.
     
  2. SMU_Sox

    SMU_Sox loves his fluffykins SoSH Member

    Messages:
    6,181
    3 Should read Browns, SSF.
     
  3. SeoulSoxFan

    SeoulSoxFan Dope Dope

    Messages:
    18,683
     
    Doh -- thanks SMU!
     
  4. Mugsy's Jock

    Mugsy's Jock Longtime Member Lifetime Member Gold Supporter SoSH Member

    Messages:
    9,942
    Very disappointed the Pats didn't trade down to get an extra pick I what I think will be an excellent 2nd and 3rd round today.

    Now I'm terrified they will trade out of the second (where they could certainly get a stud TE or OL)!

    First thoughts for #62:

    OL: have to believe Bitonio, Xua-Filo, and Moses will be long gone. Mewhort and Trai Turner and Richardson and Gabe Jackson and Yankey could be there, and Martin or Richburg could make sense.

    TE: ASJ might last to 62, but I wouldn't bet on it. Amaro won't. Probably too early for Niklas or CJF.

    RB: they'll pretty much all be there, but I don't see RB as a big enough need to use 62.

    DL: so much depth here (Jernigan, Hageman, Nix, Tuitt, Ealy, Crichton) a stud may be there and you could double down. A little high for DaQuan Jones?

    P: Kirby Van Der Camp will be long gone. Probably to Bills.

    Me, I wouldn't go DB or LB or WR unless there really was a surprise there...figure LBs Chris Boreland, Van Noy or Attoachu are gone, WRs Lee and Robinson and Lattimer are gone (one of them to NYJ?). Maybe Lamarcus Joyner?
     
  5. mwonow

    mwonow Well-Known Member Gold Supporter SoSH Member

    Messages:
    4,876
    Could be worse. In the AFC East, the Jets got the only "thumbs up", but they picked a safety with both Manziel and Bridgewater available. How are they going to feel for however many more years they get Geno or Vick at QB, followed by ?, when they see these guys in other unis?
     
  6. zimmy

    zimmy lurker

    Messages:
    1
    I loved the Easley pick. Aside from being an impact player he gives us some flexibility on the D-line with his ability to play multiple positions. 
     
    Using CBS rankings, and assuming we don't trade up, I would like to see one of 3 players at 62:
     
    Weston Richburg
    Troy Niklas
    Bruce Ellington
     
    I'm particularly in love with Ellington. He's young and could turn into a Cobb/Austin/Harvin type player. 
     
  7. mascho

    mascho Kane is Able SoSH Member

    Messages:
    14,951
  8. SeoulSoxFan

    SeoulSoxFan Dope Dope

    Messages:
    18,683
  9. jsinger121

    jsinger121 @jsinger121 SoSH Member

    Messages:
    14,365
    I want OL today badly
     
  10. SeoulSoxFan

    SeoulSoxFan Dope Dope

    Messages:
    18,683
     
    I'd be willing to double-dip on DL. My "wishlist" today, provided they do not trade up nor down. Round 2:
    1. DE Scott Crichton: a true 5-tech in a 4-3 scheme, with great anticipation and good build. Lots of production at Oregen State
    2. TE Troy Niklas: with so many good values left on OL and DL, hoping Niklas falls after ASJ and Amaro are picked
    3. OL Xavier Su'a-Filo: won't likely to fall, like Kony Ealy, but would be fantastic to get at end of round 2
    And in round 3:
    1. DT Will Sutton: bowling ball of a interior lineman who would be a great rotational talent -- nice value at round 3
    2. TE CJ Fiedorowicz: rumors have CJF not meeting BB's football intelligence standard, but I think he's a great backup to Gronk. Underrated pass catcher IMHO
    3. OL Brandon Thomas: most have him going at 4, but I think smarter teams will snatch him up a bit early. Hope that's the Pats
    4. TE Arthur Lynch: if CJF are taken, reaching a bit for the local boy Arthur Lynch wouldn't be bad at all. His hands are worrisome (this is where CJF wins over Lynch as well as blocking skills), but a it'll be hell of a fun to have him break a few tackles after the catch
     
  11. Mugsy's Jock

    Mugsy's Jock Longtime Member Lifetime Member Gold Supporter SoSH Member

    Messages:
    9,942
    I'm on board with these names, maybe adding DaQuan Jones.
     
    Brings up an interesting question though -- if Pats are already taking one injury risk with Easley, does that make it less likely they'll consider another injury risk or redshirt candidate -- like Brandon Thomas or Aaron Colvin?
     
  12. HomeRunBaker

    HomeRunBaker bet squelcher SoSH Member

    Messages:
    17,495
    The RB position obviously is not an emphasis in today's game but when teams are completely ignoring the position you get 1st round talent dropping to you. Carlos Hyde or Jeremy Hill wouldn't shock me.....seems like the type of value play Belichick relishes. This replaces Blount while providing Ridley fumblicious protection.
     
  13. SeoulSoxFan

    SeoulSoxFan Dope Dope

    Messages:
    18,683
     
    Not sure if Easley's injury concerns will take on anyone else like Thomas or Colvin more of a risk. It seems to me that's a luxury that teams like Niners, Seahawks, and Patriots can -- and should -- take at multiple opportunities.
     
  14. SMU_Sox

    SMU_Sox loves his fluffykins SoSH Member

    Messages:
    6,181
    I don't see much upside in CJF or Niklas. I'd rather go DL again or OLine. Now, if ASJ is available and BB is OK with his football IQ, off field issues, and intangibles I'd be OK with him as well. Richburg in the 2nd or 3rd would be fine too (C). BPA for OL or DL is the best possible choice in 2 and/or 3 with the possible exception of ASJ.
     
  15. SoxVindaloo

    SoxVindaloo Well-Known Member Lifetime Member SoSH Member

    Messages:
    909
    You think Sankey is sitting there at #62?
     
  16. SeoulSoxFan

    SeoulSoxFan Dope Dope

    Messages:
    18,683
     
    You know I think highly of your takes SMU, but I think you're underrating CJF's overall value -- he's arguably the best blocking TE available, and can be a nice red zone/3rd down target. He has relatively soft hands and will grow as a route runner.
     
    He's really not a move TE by any stretch, so I'm not going to fault him for not being an Ebron/Hernandez/Amaro.
     
    I agree with DD'ing on DL however. I'd be curious who BB takes to pair up with Easley if that happens.
     
  17. Mugsy's Jock

    Mugsy's Jock Longtime Member Lifetime Member Gold Supporter SoSH Member

    Messages:
    9,942
  18. SeoulSoxFan

    SeoulSoxFan Dope Dope

    Messages:
    18,683
  19. j-man

    j-man Member

    Messages:
    1,335
    ne needs a OL or pass rusher i am hoping denver gets borland at 62 or 95
     
  20. j-man

    j-man Member

    Messages:
    1,335
    my dream ser Hyde at 62 Borland at 95
     
  21. Rico Guapo

    Rico Guapo lurker

    Messages:
    1,330
    I'd prefer to see interior OL now, or another DL depending on who is available.
     
  22. Super Nomario

    Super Nomario Member SoSH Member

    Messages:
    11,898
    I think your analysis of CJF is more-or-less correct, but I question how much playing time a player like that will get when Gronk is healthy. The genius of the Gronk / Hernandez offense was that they could run against nickel D and pass against base. With CJF / Gronk, teams are just going to line up in base and put a LB on Fiedorowicz. Is he a good enough pass-catcher to take advantage of that? Is CJF on a LB a better mismatch in the passing game than a nickel CB on a slot receiver? I'm not convinced, which leads to the logical conclusion that they'll pass on all the Niklas / CJF / Lynch blocking types and probably address the position late, unless Amaro or ASJ slips to 62.
     
    Less a priority than QB or OT? And for 2015, the only RB under contract is Jonas Gray; it's absolutely a long-term need. Not sold on Sankey at 62 though; the Twitter draft nerds all pretty much hate him.
     
  23. ElcaballitoMVP

    ElcaballitoMVP Member SoSH Member

    Messages:
    3,053
    Keep building those lines. I'm happy with the Easley pick and would be fine adding a DE to compliment him. I think interior OL is the spot I'd be targeting though. I'd really like one of Bitonio, Su'a-Filo, Martin, Richburg, maybe Yankey. 
     
  24. DrewDawg

    DrewDawg Dorito Dink SoSH Member

    Messages:
    33,358
    For laughs, her is Favre getting the call:
     
    [​IMG]
     
  25. RedOctober3829

    RedOctober3829 Member SoSH Member

    Messages:
    37,747
    I want a pass-catcher today whether it'd be WR or TE in the 2nd.  Amaro, ASJ, or Niklas as TEs or Latimer/Matthews/Landry at WR.  In the 3rd, Will Sutton is a binkie of mine.  His career track reminds me of his former teammate Vontaze Burfict.  Great early in his career, then either performance or off the field issues plummet his stock.  The talent is there with Sutton.
     
  26. RedOctober3829

    RedOctober3829 Member SoSH Member

    Messages:
    37,747
    NFL.com mocks Tre Mason to the Pats at 62.
     
  27. DrewDawg

    DrewDawg Dorito Dink SoSH Member

    Messages:
    33,358
     
    That seems....wrong. RBs aren't "important", the Pats don't have a big need for one...
     
  28. Super Nomario

    Super Nomario Member SoSH Member

    Messages:
    11,898
    Jonas Gray is the only RB under contract for 2015.
     
    I'd be OK with Mason at 62 ... but I'd probably rather go OL and take a RB later.
     
  29. Dgilpin

    Dgilpin Member SoSH Member

    Messages:
    3,774
    I will be really excited if Van Noy or Ealy make it to the Lions at 45, would also be thrilled with Marquise Lee but I don't there's anyway he lasts that long.
     
  30. Morgan's Magic Snowplow

    Morgan's Magic Snowplow Well-Known Member Gold Supporter SoSH Member

    Messages:
    16,204
     
    This is where I'm at too.
     
    My biggest fear for next year at this point involves injuries and/or further regression on the interior OL blowing up our offense.  Drafting an interior OL and shoring up that unit would be a huge plus.  I'm not a big fan of Yankey but the other guys would be fantastic, although they may not last.  I'd be fine with moving a 4th or 5th to jump up in the 2nd round if that's what it takes to secure a really good player.
     
    OL here, then look at RB (I am a Sankey fanboy) or TE in the 3rd.
     
    It'll probably be a safety nobody's heard of though.
     
  31. Pxer

    Pxer Member SoSH Member

    Messages:
    1,393
    Not that interested in having another Hoo-man on the roster. That's who he is to me. Rosterable, but there's other directions the Pats should go.
     
  32. brandonchristensen

    brandonchristensen mad photochops SoSH Member

    Messages:
    22,843
    So what are we thinking for Round 2? A TE?
     
  33. RIrooter09

    RIrooter09 Member SoSH Member

    Messages:
    4,371
     
    Interior OL or DE is my hope. 
     
  34. thehitcat

    thehitcat Well-Known Member Silver Supporter SoSH Member

    Messages:
    1,536
    Best available Rutgers...or Interior Offensive line. 
     
  35. EL Jeffe

    EL Jeffe Member SoSH Member

    Messages:
    575
    I'm still holding out hope for De'Anthony Thomas to be a Patriot. Yeah, he's a luxury pick when they have some legit depth needs, but Thomas is just so electrifying and explosive. 41 TDs in just 356 plays from scrimmage is pretty insane. I get that he's 5'9", 176lbs and doesn't have a real position... BUT...with the ball in his hands, he's a genuine threat to take it to the house from anywhere. Plus he instantly fixes the KR game. I'd take him in the 3rd and trust that Belichick and McDaniels can figure out a way to take advantage of his skills.
     
  36. ( . ) ( . ) and (_!_)

    ( . ) ( . ) and (_!_) T&A SoSH Member

    Messages:
    5,188
    Honestly the more I think about it the "right" approach in a deep draft like this seems to me to be someting like:
     
    1. Rounds 1, 2, (and maybe 3) take the best talent on the board when your pick comes up
    2. Figure out how it all fits together later
    3. Target areas where you know you need depth in rounds 4 to 6 (specifically TE, LB, RB and S)
    I almost don't care what position they pick in round 2.  I just want them to get the best talent they can.
     
  37. RedOctober3829

    RedOctober3829 Member SoSH Member

    Messages:
    37,747
    This is my feelings too.  BPA in Rd 2 is a good plan because they have so many areas they could address.
     
  38. Morgan's Magic Snowplow

    Morgan's Magic Snowplow Well-Known Member Gold Supporter SoSH Member

    Messages:
    16,204
     
    I'd love Thomas but not before the late 4th or 5th.  I think he's a pure luxury item for the Pats - he doesn't fit the mold of what Belichick has generally wanted in his third down backs (ie, good blocker, good route runner, tough customer types like Faulk and Woodhead) - and I can't see spending a 3rd on that kind of specialist in a deeper draft when you have potential long term starters still available.
     
  39. Freddy Linn

    Freddy Linn Member SoSH Member

    Messages:
    8,472
    DAT is supposedly off of a number of boards (size, one-cut runner, no clear position, third agent, DeSean connection, etc.).
     
  40. E5 Yaz

    E5 Yaz Transcends message boarding Lifetime Member SoSH Member

    Messages:
    58,947
    Don Banks, SI.com, says Tom Savage to the Pats in his Rd 2 Mock
     
  41. dynomite

    dynomite Member SoSH Member

    Messages:
    6,616
    This boils down to how much you trust the Pats as evaluators.

    The Pats were apparently highly committed to getting Easley and reports are that they could not wait. Both NESN (Kyed) and the Seattle PI reporting that the Seahawks were all over Easley (their DC coached him at Florida), furious they lost him, and as soon as he went to the Pats they traded out of the 1st Round altogether.
     
  42. DrewDawg

    DrewDawg Dorito Dink SoSH Member

    Messages:
    33,358
     
    Using a second round pick on a QB would tell me (although I could be wrong) that Mallett might be moving on.
     
  43. E5 Yaz

    E5 Yaz Transcends message boarding Lifetime Member SoSH Member

    Messages:
    58,947
     
    Roundup from Reiss
     
    http://espn.go.com/blog/new-england-patriots/post/_/id/4762661/gathering-up-some-second-round-mocks?ex_cid=espnapi_public
     
  44. soxhop411

    soxhop411 Member SoSH Member

    Messages:
    34,006
    [​IMG]
     
    http://deadspin.com/leaked-internal-scouting-report-the-patriots-do-not-li-1574040417?utm_campaign=socialflow_deadspin_twitter&utm_source=deadspin_twitter&utm_medium=socialflow
    http://www.brobible.com/sports/article/johnny-manziel-scouting-report-new-england-patriots/
     
     
  45. Jungleland

    Jungleland Well-Known Member Silver Supporter SoSH Member

    Messages:
    938
    Wow, that's fascinating stuff. Thanks for the link.
     
  46. wibi

    wibi Member SoSH Member

    Messages:
    10,207
     
    I havent seen much outside of those two reports that say they were furious that they lost him.    Seattle was looking to move out of the first round before the draft even started given their lack of true pressing needs. 
     
  47. Mugsy's Jock

    Mugsy's Jock Longtime Member Lifetime Member Gold Supporter SoSH Member

    Messages:
    9,942
  48. dcmissle

    dcmissle Deflatigator Lifetime Member SoSH Member

    Messages:
    27,112
    Doubt authenticity as Pats insiders are not generally leakers, especially when leaking does the team no good.

    This would do the team no good. "Outlaw bloodlines". Let the ridicule begin.
     
  49. E5 Yaz

    E5 Yaz Transcends message boarding Lifetime Member SoSH Member

    Messages:
    58,947
    nah, too dumb ... even for me
     
  50. DanoooME

    DanoooME Well-Known Member Gold Supporter SoSH Member

    Messages:
    15,241
     
    And the fact that they only had 6 picks in this draft backs that up.  I have read reports that Seattle was getting ready to deal the pick before the Pats picked, so there's no guarantee that they had to have Easley.  I don't think they would have taken the chance on losing him if that was true.
     

Share This Page