|
|||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||
|
purchase crap here Amazon.com |
![]() ![]() |
Nov 25 2009, 02:28 AM
Post
#1
|
|
![]() Yankee Mod Posts: 4,643 From: In The Quivering Forest |
New York Daily News
QUOTE Thanksgiving isn't until Thursday, but the Halladay season is officially underway. The Red Sox are "putting on a full-court press" to acquire Roy Halladay, according to a source, and are hoping to add the former Cy Young winner to the top of their rotation to go with Josh Beckett and Jon Lester. "They would love to get it wrapped up before the winter meetings (beginning Dec. 7)," the source said of the Red Sox, who made a big push to deal for Halladay last summer. If the Red Sox are serious about dealing for Halladay in the next two weeks, the Yankees will likely have their chance to get involved in the sweepstakes for the Blue Jays ace, although it will take a package of top prospects - as well as a sizeable contract extension for Halladay, who has a full no-trade clause - to get a deal done. QUOTE To land Halladay, Boston would likely have to give up Clay Buchholz, the organization's top young pitcher, as well as Casey Kelly, the pitcher/shortstop who signed with the Red Sox in 2008 after being recruited by Tennessee to play quarterback. Red Sox GM Theo Epstein is said to be smitten with Kelly, which could be a sticking point in talks with Toronto if Jays GM Alex Anthopoulos insists on the 20-year-old being included in a deal. The Yankees would love to acquire Halladay, although Cashman has been reluctant to deal away top prospects such as Austin Jackson and Jesus Montero for a player he would then have to sign for more than $100 million, such as Halladay. Toronto would also likely require either Phil Hughes or Joba Chamberlain in a deal. Other teams figure to be involved in the Halladay mix, including the Angels, who reportedly have stepped up their efforts this week as they prepare for the possibility that John Lackey will sign elsewhere. -------------------- "Ban 'em for the whole year." - David Ortiz
|
|
|
|
Nov 25 2009, 02:47 AM
Post
#2
|
|
![]() Posts: 275 From: Edmonton, 2076 miles from Fenway |
n/m. I'm going to need more details
This post has been edited by Mike Greenwall: Nov 25 2009, 02:49 AM -------------------- And if my thought-dreams could be seen
They'd probably put my head in a guillotine. Bob Dylan |
|
|
|
Nov 25 2009, 03:01 AM
Post
#3
|
|
![]() SoSH Member Posts: 14,363 |
QUOTE I'm going to need more details The only details I want are the ones of Epstein telling them to screw.
|
|
|
|
Nov 25 2009, 03:31 AM
Post
#4
|
|
![]() Vacationland Posts: 12,948 From: Row 14 |
The only details I want are the ones of Epstein telling them to screw. Telling who to screw? Toronto? Why? There isn't even a proposed trade in that article. Just a New York Sports writer naming the two prospects he knows in the Red Sox system. I would rather the Red Sox got this done sooner. Especially if Cabrera is available. -------------------- The godless say to themselves:
'Let us lie in wait for the virtuous man, since he annoys us and opposes our way of life, reproaches us for our breaches of the law and accuses us of playing false to our upbringing.' - Wisdom 2:12 "Back in the day, being offended was a daily occurence in P&G, but no one bitched about it. And if they did, they were hounded mercilessly. Hell, that's what P&G is for." - Mr. Weebles http://bookof2010.wordpress.com - Enjoy |
|
|
|
Nov 25 2009, 04:07 AM
Post
#5
|
|
![]() Yankee Mod Posts: 4,643 From: In The Quivering Forest |
Globe
QUOTE The Red Sox are making a push to obtain Toronto ace Roy Halladay before the start of baseball’s winter meetings Dec. 7, according to industry sources. But the Blue Jays reportedly want top prospect Casey Kelly along with young starter Clay Buchholz. -------------------- "Ban 'em for the whole year." - David Ortiz
|
|
|
|
Nov 25 2009, 06:10 AM
Post
#6
|
|
![]() Posts: 828 From: St. Croix, U.S.V.I. |
Oh boy.....here we go. Let the "Giving up the future for the present" comparisons begin.
I'll jump right in by saying that I feel incredibly uneasy with talks of trading a 25 year old major league pitcher with a prospectively big upside, and a 19 year old successful prospect pitcher (who's also a pretty good hitting shortstop) for a 32 year old ace. However, that's just me and I look forward to the pros and cons arguements. Nothing makes the winter go a little quicker like a really hot stove. -------------------- "Probably the best thing that ever happened to me was going nuts." -- Jimmy Piersall
|
|
|
|
Nov 25 2009, 06:28 AM
Post
#7
|
|
![]() Posts: 712 From: The Ville, CT. |
I've come to terms with trading Buchholz to acquire a big name player such as Halladay or Adrian Gonzalez, but Buchholz and Kelly? Come on, now. Maybe Kelly's ridiculous first half of the season last year was an abberation, and he comes back to earth, but his ceiling as a pitcher is huge. Not to mention the Sox are trading away 2+ potential cost-controlled studs to a division rival for a 32 year old ace that they'll have to pay 100 million.
Also, what would that contract mean for potential offensive upgrades? What does it mean for Beckett? -------------------- "I’m like okay and then Pedroia walks by, flexes and then says ‘Hey Murph check out these guns, man.’ The guy has the biceps of a six-year-old, he has no business wearing a shirt with cut-off sleeves and I’m getting blinded by the shine from the head of a college freshman that’s going bald; then he just proceeded to go out and make every play." - ASU coach Pat Murphy on Dustin Pedroia.
"I always got it, baby." -Papelbon |
|
|
|
Nov 25 2009, 06:30 AM
Post
#8
|
|
![]() Respects the Canine Penis Posts: 20,100 From: Mtigawi |
Make sure you guys sign into the chat room tomorrow night!
|
|
|
|
Nov 25 2009, 07:10 AM
Post
#9
|
|
![]() A New Frontier butt boy Posts: 5,251 From: East of the sun; west of the moon |
It comes down to the CHARACTER of Clay in my mind. He has the physical stuff, but does he have the mental acumen to be a top guy. If he does, no thanks.
-------------------- October 20, 2004 - Mike Francesa: "The Yankees will not lose on Mickey Mantle's birthday."
The next afternoon - Chris "Mad Dog" Russo: "Mike, you were right! Because of the length of the game, the Yankees didn't lose on Mickey Mantle's birthday. Instead, they lost on Whitey Ford's!" |
|
|
|
Nov 25 2009, 07:19 AM
Post
#10
|
|
![]() Posts: 1,119 |
|
|
|
|
Nov 25 2009, 07:27 AM
Post
#11
|
|
![]() Posts: 1,485 From: St. Louis, MO |
I was hoping this wasn't the centerpiece of their offseason, but if it takes Buchholz/Kelly it likely will be. I guess I'm OK with it if they get the extension done....that will allow them a lot of flexibility moving forward with Beckett, and Halladay will age well IMHO. Should have 4-5 more dominant years.
If this happens I guess the plan is to resign Bay, and build a brick wall on the left side of the infield for Halladay. Hello, Beltre and Scutaro. |
|
|
|
Nov 25 2009, 07:58 AM
Post
#12
|
|
![]() normal sized Posts: 11,790 |
You have to think about why this information is out there: Toronto is leaking it.
They want Kelly and Buchholz. Duh. Note that there have been recent rumors about the Yankees being interested as well as the Angels and maybe other teams, including rough specifics or at least articulating some urgency. Toronto needs to make up for last summer's dropped ball and want to generate as much interest as possible. Making sure everyone knows that teams are hot for him and a bunch of big packages are getting thrown around is going to help them out in that regard. A little marketing. Boston won't trade that package, so no big deal. If they can get a window and extend him, then this is obviously a wise move. Halladay is a great pitcher and it covers you against Beckett hitting free agency with huge demands, which he's likely to do. That said, I don't expect them to be the team to get him. This post has been edited by yecul: Nov 25 2009, 07:59 AM -------------------- ________________________
So many people have sussed this out correctly that I don't think there's a problem with my confirming they were right. |
|
|
|
Nov 25 2009, 08:14 AM
Post
#13
|
|
![]() Posts: 2,291 From: deep inside Guido territory |
If they want both Kelly and Buchholz I'd be asking for Adam Lind to be included in the deal. That's about the only way I'd give both of them up. I'm not sure you give up cost-controlled years of Clay without getting a window to extend Halladay. Also, if they do ink Halladay do you have enough money to extend Beckett as well?
OTOH, I have dreams of a Halladay-Lester-Beckett ALDS dancing in my head. -------------------- "People say, 'What will you do if you don't play football?' Why would I even think of doing anything else? What would I do instead of run out in front of 80,000 people and command 52 guys and be around guys I consider brothers and be one of the real gladiators? Why would I ever want to do anything else? It's so hard to think of anything that would match what I do: Fly to the moon? Jump out of planes? Bungee-jump off cliffs? None of that s--- matters to me. I want to play this game I love, be with my wife and son, and enjoy life."
--Tom Brady "I think Pap feels he was misunderstood," Epstein said. "He's not a Rhodes Scholar to begin with." --Theo Epstein |
|
|
|
Nov 25 2009, 08:32 AM
Post
#14
|
|
![]() Gag me with a Spooner Posts: 11,701 From: The Pascal's Wager tables at Foxwoods |
Of course, Clay Bucholz pitched, arguably, a better game than either Lester or Beckett did in the playoffs.
-------------------- "He's a fucking twat."--Mick Jagger summing up Jean-Luc Godard
|
|
|
|
Nov 25 2009, 08:35 AM
Post
#15
|
|
|
Posts: 720 From: Brookline |
|
|
|
|
Nov 25 2009, 09:07 AM
Post
#16
|
|
![]() secretly owns a gas grill Posts: 4,710 From: The gran facenda |
Of course, Clay Bucholz pitched, arguably, a better game than either Lester or Beckett did in the playoffs. Then that should answer the questions about his CHARACTER. -------------------- "BTW, the Sox are 43-22 in games started by Dice-K other than last year before September (including 3-1 in his September starts)." - EV
|
|
|
|
Nov 25 2009, 09:15 AM
Post
#17
|
|
![]() Nielsen Viewer Posts: 3,898 From: NH |
I can't stand discussions like these because of the inevitable "YOU CAN'T GET RID OF HOT MINOR LEAGUER X BECAUSE HE IS AN UBERPROSPECT" arguments. For all we know Casey Kelly is just as likely to be the next Andy Marte as he is the next Pedroia so if it takes Kelly and another minor leaguer for Halladay I'm fine with that. He is a proven AL East ace with no history of health problems and provides Beckett insurance.
IMO you never give up a lot to trade for a 32 year old pitcher with one year on his contract that the Sox will need to extend, especially when Toronto screwed the pooch last year when Halladay's stock was a lot higher (a full season and a half rather than one season). I've never been a big Buchholz fan so if the Sox want to use Buchholz in a trade that brings in a power bat like Cabrera or a young phenom like Gonzalez then you give up [Buchholz in a heartbeat. This post has been edited by HomeBrew1901: Nov 25 2009, 09:18 AM -------------------- What the fuck is this?
Cut the shit, ok? It's like being in charge of 2000 three-year-olds some times. JMOH on moderating P&G Nope. Ellsbury's got 2 walks all month and has scored 1 run in the last nine games. He is absolutely killing this ballclub. You don't get to point to Coco and say My Guy's Better. That's like saying cancer is better than AIDS. They both suck. Smiling Joe Hesketh |
|
|
|
Nov 25 2009, 09:22 AM
Post
#18
|
|
![]() He starts no new topics Posts: 11,968 From: Raleigh, NC |
Why is there a hang-up over a 32 year old pitcher? History favors the 32 year old having more success in the next five years than the 25 year old.
-------------------- ***New Episode*** THE Ginger Skinny Radio Hour podcast - http://gingerskinny.podbean.com/
|
|
|
|
Nov 25 2009, 09:25 AM
Post
#19
|
|
![]() Nielsen Viewer Posts: 3,898 From: NH |
Why is there a hang-up over a 32 year old pitcher? History favors the 32 year old having more success in the next five years than the 25 year old. The only hangup I have is what Toronto would want for a guy with 1 year left on his contract that is going to demand and is worthy of a long and expensive extension. If you give me a choice between a 32 Year Old Halladay and a 25 YO Buchholz, I'm taking Halladay every time. -------------------- What the fuck is this?
Cut the shit, ok? It's like being in charge of 2000 three-year-olds some times. JMOH on moderating P&G Nope. Ellsbury's got 2 walks all month and has scored 1 run in the last nine games. He is absolutely killing this ballclub. You don't get to point to Coco and say My Guy's Better. That's like saying cancer is better than AIDS. They both suck. Smiling Joe Hesketh |
|
|
|
Nov 25 2009, 09:28 AM
Post
#20
|
|
|
The Juggernaut Posts: 18,316 |
I don't really have a problem with giving up Buchholz but giving him up for a pitcher who is signed for just one year, even though he's a great pitcher, doesn't seem like the best use of him given the team's long term needs at other positions. If the Sox give up Buchholz for Halladay, and give Halladay a ton of money, what does that mean for Beckett? What does it mean for the 3B / LF situation? Is there a plan to flip Beckett to the Mets for Beltran or Reyes or someone? Moving Dice-K? Or is this all just a smokescreen designed to distract everyone from what the Sox are really trying to do- a somewhat public announcement that the Sox are in on Halladay increases the odds that the Yankees land him, doesn't it?
Will be a good test to see if Halladay's value is really half of what it was at the trading deadline, as the experts predicted. |
|
|
|
![]() ![]() |
|
|
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 9th February 2010 - 12:07 PM |