 NFL re-interviews Brian Daboll |
|
|||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||
purchase crap here Amazon.com  Buy.com |
  |
 May 15 2008, 04:33 PM
Post
#1
|
|
  Posts: 338 From: Somewhere in the desert near Gilbert, AZ (by the way of Lowell)  |
NFL responds on Daboll
QUOTE Our security department re-interviewed Brian Daboll on Wednesday and he has no recollection of a conversation with Matt Walsh about the Rams’ walk-through practice.
This post has been edited by Sille Skrub: May 15 2008, 06:47 PM |
 |
 
|
|
May 15 2008, 06:46 PM
Post
#2
|
|
|
un bello rostro  Posts: 614 From: The Blade |
breaking out....
-------------------- "dude, you are on fire w/your blog. it's now in the comscore top 500 most visited sites." - rskelley75
www.truthaboutmike.com |
|
|
|
|
May 16 2008, 02:04 PM
Post
#3
|
|
 impossible to put on ignore, suckers Posts: 15,677 From: Deep inside Muppet Labs |
Look guys, can we at least TRY to post intelligently in this forum? I think we've been pretty good this week in the midst of all the news that's gone down, but PLEASE try to keep the comments intelligent.
Here's the crux of the statement for me: QUOTE "Even if such a conversation occurred, it would not be a violation of NFL rules. Matt Walsh was authorized to be in the stadium to perform his job duties along with other members of the Patriots’ video department, members of the Rams’ video department, and other people preparing for the Super Bowl. So if it wasn't in violation of NFL rules, why the need to speak to Daboll? -------------------- DotB: "Have you not met the Skrub? Women want him, men want to be him, and of course, tranny hookers choose both. He's a rolling party of frollicking fun. The man makes HRB look like a 13 year old fumbling with a bra strap for the first time."
THE IGNORE BUTTON IS YOUR FRIEND |
|
|
|
|
May 16 2008, 03:33 PM
Post
#4
|
|
 Posts: 337 |
QUOTE(Smiling Joe Hesketh @ May 16 2008, 02:04 PM) [snapback]1562897[/snapback] So if it wasn't in violation of NFL rules, why the need to speak to Daboll? I think because of the conflicting statements. The League apparently interviewed all of the coaches from that time period, and Walsh said something that contradicted what Daboll had already told them, namely that Walsh told Daboll what the Rams were up to in their walkthrough. Turns out even if Daboll had corroborated what Walsh said it still wouldn't have been a big deal, but one of them is lying. |
|
|
|
|
May 16 2008, 03:43 PM
Post
#5
|
|
 not Zomp  Posts: 17,253 From: someday |
QUOTE(jcd0805 @ May 16 2008, 04:33 PM) [snapback]1563025[/snapback] Turns out even if Daboll had corroborated what Walsh said it still wouldn't have been a big deal, but one of them is lying. Well, actually Daboll just says he doesn't remember. Wiggle room. -------------------- "Strikeouts matter and home-runs are overrated, if you don't believe me than just ask Ty Cobb." ---mrj171
|
|
|
|
|
May 16 2008, 03:43 PM
Post
#6
|
|
  Posts: 2,066 From: New York City |
QUOTE(jcd0805 @ May 16 2008, 04:33 PM) [snapback]1563025[/snapback] I think because of the conflicting statements. The League apparently interviewed all of the coaches from that time period, and Walsh said something that contradicted what Daboll had already told them, namely that Walsh told Daboll what the Rams were up to in their walkthrough. Turns out even if Daboll had corroborated what Walsh said it still wouldn't have been a big deal, but one of them is lying. Or Daboll doesn't remember talking to Walsh for five minutes six years ago. -------------------- “I can’t speak for any other coaches, but that’s something I haven’t had a lot of opportunity to do, no. I probably couldn’t name one team in the England premier national soccer league or whatever it is – federation.”
Bill Belichick's response to British media questions about whether he's ever sought advice from soccer coaches. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 9th February 2010 - 09:58 AM |