New Bullpen Spot: The Opener

The Talented Allen Ripley

holden
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Oct 2, 2003
12,739
MetroWest, MA
This was briefly discussed in the May MLB News thread, but I think it deserves its own topic: Sergio Romo started two games over the weekend against the Angels, throwing an inning and an inning-and-a-third, respectively.

The new terminology itself indicates the novelty of Romo’s weekend role. He started two games after making his first 588 career appearances as a reliever. But he was doing so on consecutive days, with the express purpose of clearing the top of the Angels’ lineup before making way for pitchers—normally starters—who would give Tampa Bay more innings. Romo was technically starting, but not in the traditional sense of the term. He was opening—the games, and, perhaps, a futuristic path to ordering a pitching staff.

The plan worked on Saturday, as the right-handed Romo pitched one perfect inning, then left-handed rookie Ryan Yarbrough tossed 6 1/3 innings of one-run ball in Tampa’s 5-3 win. It was ultimately less effective on Sunday, as the parade of Rays arms following Romo coughed up five runs and Shohei Ohtani shut down Tampa Bay’s bats, but let not the results impede analysis of the process. From a strategic standpoint, Rays manager Kevin Cash’s ploy was brilliant.

First, the Rays were the right team to conduct this experiment. Tampa Bay’s scheduled “starters” in those two contests were Yarbrough and Anthony Banda, both lefties, both youngsters, and both unlikely to go deep into games. Cash had already been employing a shortened rotation since the start of the season, and if Tampa Bay’s bullpen would need to pitch multiple innings both days anyway, it made sense to reorder those innings to maximize the relief corps’ value and effectiveness.

On days that Ohtani doesn’t hit, the Angels lineup begins with at least five, if not more, right-handed hitters in a row, and Romo is better-equipped than almost any pitcher to deal with them. Among 189 active pitchers who have faced at least 1,000 right-handed batters in their career, Romo ranks second in opposing OBPwith a .232 on-base rate, behind only Kenley Jansen. “It allows us in theory to let Sergio to come in there and play the matchup game in the first, which is somewhat unheard of—up until Saturday anyway,” Cash told reporters. “Then Yarbs can, in theory, have the availability to get deeper in the game. There’s no more secret about the third time through the order, everybody knows that. And that’s kind of what this is about.”
I think it's awesome that something like this was even attempted, let alone that it actually worked out.
 
Last edited:

Red(s)HawksFan

Member
SoSH Member
Jan 23, 2009
20,910
Maine
Maddon never really had the thin starting rotation to pull it off. By which I mean the Rays have been doing "bullpen" games all year so the notion of an Opener wasn't the stretch for them like it would be for a team boasting peak Shields/Garza/Kazmir/Price/Moore/Cobb/etc or Lester/Arrietta/Hendricks/Lackey/Quintana in their rotation.
 

VORP Speed

Member
SoSH Member
Apr 23, 2010
6,648
Ground Zero
Very cool. Not surprised a Maddon acolyte did this. Surprised Maddon himself never did.

And to be totally fair, this isn't far off from an old Eddie Andelman ploy.
The front office always drove everything. Maddon’s genius was embracing it and being willing to actually implement out of the box ideas and break the “unwritten rules.”

All their new-fangled pitching stuff is really well thought out. The third time through the order effect, limiting long starts to elite arms, 2-4 inning stints on shorter rest than a starter but longer than a single inning guy emerging as a new role, totally discarding stupid stats like wins as something that should have any effect on pitching resource allocation, putting average arms in the best spots to succeed, messing with opponents’ platooning, etc etc. I think you’ll gradually see a lot of this start to catch on.

They are baseball’s laboratory of new ideas. It makes them fun, even if they have no money or stars or hope of winning a title.
 

E5 Yaz

polka king
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Apr 25, 2002
90,589
Oregon
The entire concept is so simple and elegant that it's stunning that it's taken this long to be attempted.

To me, there's little difference between this and employing extreme defensive shifts -- increase the chances of recording outs.

I'm as old school as anyone on this board, but I really like this.
 

shaggydog2000

Member
SoSH Member
Apr 5, 2007
11,580
I think it works if you only have 3 guys you think are legit starting level talent, but 2-3 guys you think could be good long relievers. Then you can start with a setup-man level talent to get the 3-4 best hitters out, go to the long reliever equivalents, and go from there. It is basically a bullpen day, except with pitchers assigned to the long relief role ahead of time as semi-starters. But if you don't have enough long relief style talent, you can't get through those days. And if you don't have enough regular starters, you can't do this 3 times in 5 days, it's just too many innings to make up for. It has to be a particular combo of talent on your team, and the Rays are well set up for it.
 

timlinin8th

Member
SoSH Member
Jun 6, 2009
1,521
the Rays are well set up for it.
Well, is it that they are trying this because they had the players for it already, or in recognizing they couldn't get enough quality traditional starters, did they recognize a market inefficiency in "one time through the order" relievers that made a starter-by-committee idea plausible? A bit of both?
 

mauidano

Mai Tais for everyone!
SoSH Member
Aug 21, 2006
35,982
Maui

When you need your lead off to get on or a pinch hitter when the bases are loaded strategies.
 

Red(s)HawksFan

Member
SoSH Member
Jan 23, 2009
20,910
Maine
Well, is it that they are trying this because they had the players for it already, or in recognizing they couldn't get enough quality traditional starters, did they recognize a market inefficiency in "one time through the order" relievers that made a starter-by-committee idea plausible? A bit of both?
Seems to me a bit of both. I don't think they sought out to create a roster designed around the "starter-by-committee", but when a couple of their expected starters went down to injury, they went with this plan rather than spending money they didn't have to try to replace those injured starters.
 

jon abbey

Shanghai Warrior
Moderator
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
71,196
Seems to me a bit of both. I don't think they sought out to create a roster designed around the "starter-by-committee", but when a couple of their expected starters went down to injury, they went with this plan rather than spending money they didn't have to try to replace those injured starters.
VORP Speed is the expert, but I believe they were planning this even before guys like Eovaldi and Honeywell went down.
 

VORP Speed

Member
SoSH Member
Apr 23, 2010
6,648
Ground Zero
VORP Speed is the expert, but I believe they were planning this even before guys like Eovaldi and Honeywell went down.
They were originally planning to do it with one rotation slot and then switched to 2 slots after the injuries. They’ve been inching towards this for awhile with pulling starters earlier and earlier, trying to avoid the third time through the order for everyone other than the top guys and also with how they handle younger guys. I think the idea was the multi-inning role would be a way to break-in young guys, protect them some and essentially see who would earn a full starter slot. There definitely was an intentional implementation of the view that a team with constrained resources could get better overall production by spreading “starter” innings around differently.
 

chawson

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 1, 2006
4,677
I initially thought otherwise, but I wonder if this method would give traditional "starting pitchers" more chance of a win rather than less. Wins are a meaningless stat, but not when they're still linked to arbitration raises and free agency.

That speculative MLB article suggests Toronto could start Oh or Tepera against the Angels next week, on what would normally be a J.A. Happ start. If Happ comes in in the third inning, he only has to pitch three innings (and leave with a lead) to be in line for the win. Of course, if he goes his typical six, it would take them right to the closer.
 

joyofsox

empty, bleak
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Jul 14, 2005
7,552
Vancouver Island
Friday: Romo faces 5 guys: 5-3, 1B, F9, K/WP, 2B scores a run. Yarbrough comes in and goes 7. BAL wins 2-0 and Romo gets the L.
Saturday: Stanek goes 1.2, retires all 5 batters: 5-3, K, K. K, L8. Banda takes over, goes 6.1. He gets the W as TB wins 5-1. Time of Game: 2:28!