NLCS: Cubs vs. Dodgers

Bergs

funky and cold
SoSH Member
Jul 22, 2005
21,695
That may have been a foul tip, but there is no way a 3B ump should be overriding the HP ump on that. The umps all suck, and they ruin baseball.
 

The Needler

New Member
Dec 7, 2016
1,803
They only showed the view I thought was conclusive once. Front view is not the best.

When a catcher misses like that there is usually a reason and the side view confirmed it for me at least.
What do you mean misses like that? He turned his mitt (and used his throwing hand) expecting a ball in the dirt, and it was. It's not that easy to catch a shorthop cleanly.
 

DennyDoyle'sBoil

Found no thrill on Blueberry Hill
SoSH Member
Sep 9, 2008
42,839
AZ
Announcers piss me off on ump issues. That worked exactly like you want it to on a nonreviewable call. This bullshit about which ump gets to call it sucks.

HPU admitted he wasn't sure and asked for help. That's step 1. If he doesn't do that, 3B holds his tongue and does nothing. But he asked for help. Step 2 is whether anyone else has more information. 3B said that he did. Step 3 is crew chief asks if anyone else wants to weigh in. That's the fucking procedure and that's what we want, as every Red Sox fan knows.

Also, as Darling just noted, we don't know why HPU asked. He may well have had it as a tip but thought it was caught but needed help on whether it hit the ground, which is a 3BU call.
 

DennyDoyle'sBoil

Found no thrill on Blueberry Hill
SoSH Member
Sep 9, 2008
42,839
AZ
That may have been a foul tip, but there is no way a 3B ump should be overriding the HP ump on that. The umps all suck, and they ruin baseball.
He didn't overrule him. Umps never volunteer information on another ump's primary call unless the primary asks for help, which HPU clearly did.
 

The Needler

New Member
Dec 7, 2016
1,803
Announcers piss me off on ump issues. That worked exactly like you want it to on a nonreviewable call. This bullshit about which ump gets to call it sucks.

HPU admitted he wasn't sure and asked for help. That's step 1. If he doesn't do that, 3B holds his tongue and does nothing. But he asked for help. Step 2 is whether anyone else has more information. 3B said that he did. Step 3 is crew chief asks if anyone else wants to weigh in. That's the fucking procedure and that's what we want, as every Red Sox fan knows.

Also, as Darling just noted, we don't know why HPU asked. He may well have had it as a tip but thought it was caught but needed help on whether it hit the ground, which is a 3BU call.
Well, I mean, we saw the initial conversation and it was clear he was telling Granderson he didn't tip it. I don't think the home plate umpire needed help there. I think he caved to Roberts' demand that he ask for help. He probably figured there was nothing to lose, but he was wrong.
 

DanoooME

above replacement level
SoSH Member
Mar 16, 2008
19,882
Henderson, NV
I hope the Cubs blow this. Leaving a burned out Davis in is crazy. I mean, LA is using their 5th/6th best relievers right now. This needs to bite Maddon in the ass so he can get roasted over the coals all winter.
 

Bob Montgomerys Helmet Hat

has big, douchey shoulders
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
I hope the Cubs blow this. Leaving a burned out Davis in is crazy. I mean, LA is using their 5th/6th best relievers right now. This needs to bite Maddon in the ass so he can get roasted over the coals all winter.
He burned out Chapman last post-season and it came oh so close to biting him in the ass. Chapman finished on fumes.
 

strek1

Run, Forrest, run!
SoSH Member
Jun 13, 2006
31,889
Hartford area
I hope the Cubs blow this. Leaving a burned out Davis in is crazy. I mean, LA is using their 5th/6th best relievers right now. This needs to bite Maddon in the ass so he can get roasted over the coals all winter.
Not going to happen. He won the WS last year after a million year drought.
That's going to buy him a ton of leeway in that town for a LONG time.
 

DennyDoyle'sBoil

Found no thrill on Blueberry Hill
SoSH Member
Sep 9, 2008
42,839
AZ
Well, I mean, we saw the initial conversation and it was clear he was telling Granderson he didn't tip it. I don't think the home plate umpire needed help there. I think he caved to Roberts' demand that he ask for help. He probably figured there was nothing to lose, but he was wrong.
The way it worked, whether he "caved" or not, is exactly how you want it to work if you want the best chance of the best call on a nonreviewable play. Any call can get kicked, including by 6 guys or 1. Bullshit like Darling was spewing is old constipated thinking about which ump should always call this or that, which took 50 years for umps and MLB to get past.

The ump conference was one of the best developments ever in Major League Baseball umpiring and if it maybe got a call wrong there (which I don't think it did) that isn't a reason to go back to territorial 1970s ump nonsense.
 

The Needler

New Member
Dec 7, 2016
1,803
The way it worked, whether he "caved" or not, is exactly how you want it to work if you want the best chance of the best call on a nonreviewable play. Any call can get kicked, including by 6 guys or 1. Bullshit like Darling was spewing is old constipated thinking about which ump should always call this or that, which took 50 years for umps and MLB to get past.

The ump conference was one of the best developments ever in Major League Baseball umpiring and if it maybe got a call wrong there (which I don't think it did) that isn't a reason to go back to territorial 1970s ump nonsense.
Actually, the way it's probably supposed to work is that Roberts gets warned, then ejected. Managers are not allowed to come out and argue judgment calls. They can "appeal" incorrect rule interpretations, and a catcher can make the umpire ask for help on a check swing called a ball. But here, there shouldn't really be discretion to argue.
 

DennyDoyle'sBoil

Found no thrill on Blueberry Hill
SoSH Member
Sep 9, 2008
42,839
AZ
Actually, the way it's probably supposed to work is that Roberts gets warned, then ejected. Managers are not allowed to come out and argue judgment calls. They can "appeal" incorrect rule interpretations, and a catcher can make the umpire ask for help on a check swing called a ball. But here, there shouldn't really be discretion to argue.
Respectfully, You're moving the goalposts. Second, bullshit. Every one of these guys has thousands of games under his belt. Every one of them has developed a rapport with managers about which magic words cross over from questioning a call to arguing it. There is way more latitude than you seem to acknowledge, other than ball/strike and replay decisions.
 

canyoubelieveit

Member
SoSH Member
Apr 8, 2006
7,903
Fine. A sweep would have meant too long a layoff for LA, and we'll need them to be sharp to beat the Yankees.
 

The Needler

New Member
Dec 7, 2016
1,803
Respectfully, You're moving the goalposts. Second, bullshit. Every one of these guys has thousands of games under his belt. Every one of them has developed a rapport with managers about which magic words cross over from questioning a call to arguing it. There is way more latitude than you seem to acknowledge, other than ball/strike and replay decisions.
With all due respect, nope. He made a call. Strike, out. Then Roberts came out to argue that judgment call. And then he caved, and that's not how it's supposed to work under the rules.

9.02

  1. Any umpire's decision which involves judgment, such as, but not limited to, whether a batted ball is fair or foul, whether a pitch is a strike or a ball, or whether a runner is safe or out, is final. No player, manager, coach or substitute shall object to any such judgment decisions.
    Rule 9.02(a) Comment: Players leaving their position in the field or on base, or managers or coaches leaving the bench or coaches box, to argue on BALLS AND STRIKES will not be permitted. They should be warned if they start for the plate to protest the call. If they continue, they will be ejected from the game.

  2. If there is reasonable doubt that any umpire's decision may be in conflict with the rules, the manager may appeal the decision and ask that a correct ruling be made. Such appeal shall be made only to the umpire who made the protested decision.
  3. If a decision is appealed, the umpire making the decision may ask another umpire for information before making a final decision. No umpire shall criticize, seek to reverse or interfere with another umpire's decision unless asked to do so by the umpire making it.
 

OnWisc

Microcosmic
SoSH Member
Apr 16, 2006
6,907
Chicago, IL
Cool. Let's bring on the heartbreak.
If the Cubs lose are they going to take away last year's Championship?

As much as you guys like to pretend otherwise in these threads, Cubs fans are generally well aware that this team was a heavy dog going into the playoffs and were playing with house money after squeaking past Washington in a series that a minority expected to win prior to Game 1.

When you're under .500 at the All-Star break, fighting for your playoff lives against the Brewers in late September, and advancing past the first round on smoke and mirrors, losing in the NLCS to this Dodger team is hardly heartbreaking no matter how badly you guys seem to want it to be. Sheesh.
 

DennyDoyle'sBoil

Found no thrill on Blueberry Hill
SoSH Member
Sep 9, 2008
42,839
AZ
With all due respect, nope. He made a call. Strike, out. Then Roberts came out to argue that judgment call. And then he caved, and that's not how it's supposed to work under the rules.
I'm reading a rule that suggests it worked exactly like it should, other than your claim to know what was in HPU's head and whether Robers used magic words that took it beyond a request for information and an appeal to arguing.
 

jon abbey

Shanghai Warrior
Moderator
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
71,135
No way the Cubs win tomorrow, I can’t even guess how they would try to hold a lead if they got one.
 

The Needler

New Member
Dec 7, 2016
1,803
I'm reading a rule that suggests it worked exactly like it should, other than your claim to know what was in HPU's head and whether Robers used magic words that took it beyond a request for information and an appeal to arguing.
It has nothing to do with magic words. 9.02(a) concerns judgment calls. B and C concern rules interpretations/application. There is a difference. The latter are things that form the basis of a protested game, the former don't.
 

DennyDoyle'sBoil

Found no thrill on Blueberry Hill
SoSH Member
Sep 9, 2008
42,839
AZ
It has nothing to do with magic words. 9.02(a) concerns judgment calls. B and C concern rules interpretations/application. There is a difference. The latter are things that form the basis of a protested game, the former don't.
So Tito should have been run when he came out of the dugout, gesticulating wildly, and asked 1BU to ask for help?
 

The Needler

New Member
Dec 7, 2016
1,803
So Tito should have been run when he came out of the dugout, gesticulating wildly, and asked 1BU to ask for help?
Nope. That's a rules decision. Look, I'm not going to fight with you any more. You're right. Everyone followed the rules. And anyway, the instant replay clearly showed a foul tip. Enjoy your night.
 

DennyDoyle'sBoil

Found no thrill on Blueberry Hill
SoSH Member
Sep 9, 2008
42,839
AZ
Nope. That's a rules decision. Look, I'm not going to fight with you any more. You're right. Everyone followed the rules. And anyway, the instant replay clearly showed a foul tip. Enjoy your night.
First, taking the ball and going home is horseshit.

That was a rules decision? You think 1BU forgot the interference rule? Of course he didn't. He just missed it. That was a judgment call.

Managers come out all the time on judgment calls. They are always allowed to get an explanation. They also use that right to argue a little. And they are usually given latitude. Especially in the playoffs. They also can always ask for primary to ask for help. Most of the time they say no. Tonight he said yes.
 

DennyDoyle'sBoil

Found no thrill on Blueberry Hill
SoSH Member
Sep 9, 2008
42,839
AZ
Calls get kicked. I kicked the call on replay.

Here is what I am arguing, which you know: conferences are good; managers come out all the time on judgment calls; twice famously for Red Sox fans; slappy's play was not a rules question and is exactly what we want even if it led to a wrong call tonight; umps asking for help is a very positive development even if it sometimes over complicates it, at least until we have 100 percent replay.

Here's what's horseshit: drive by "you're wrong" posts, "but I am done arguing". Do one or the other. If you want someone to have the last word, great. If you want to continue a discussion, great. "You're wrong, I'm done, but I'm back because I found a tweet I like" is, well, lots of words. I will say inappropriate.
 

The Needler

New Member
Dec 7, 2016
1,803
There's a reason foul tips are not reviewable with instant replay, and it's not because the cameras aren't good enough. It's the same reason balls and strikes aren't reviewable. And for the same reason you're not allowed to argue either one of them under 9.02(a), and neither is appropriate for help from the 3rd base umpire. And that's why Ron Darling, who so infuriates you, didn't like it, and why Joe Maddon says the process was wrong, and why every former player in the TBS studio said they've never seen an umpire ask for help on one of those calls.

You're wrong about the process, just like you were wrong about the tip. But you're just going to come back with a bunch of insults and cursing, so yeah, I'll take my ball home, knowing you're wrong, and I'm, well, lots of words.