Bruins Offseason

Dummy Hoy

Angry Pissbum
SoSH Member
Jul 22, 2006
8,241
Falmouth
I thought McIntyre was real good in the A?

I think he's a great backup at some point, maybe even as soon as next season.
 

jk333

Member
SoSH Member
Feb 26, 2009
4,326
Boston
I thought McIntyre was real good in the A?

I think he's a great backup at some point, maybe even as soon as next season.
He was, .930 save percentage in Providence. But he put up .850 for the Bruins last year.

Khuodobin was bad but still .904, seeing as his contract is guaranteed, it makes sense to give the young guys a bit more seasoning. The stats said he was ready but he was really bad in Boston last year.
 

j44thor

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 1, 2006
11,013
Has anyone credible compiled his likely comps?
I'm sensing a walk away if/when he gets 3+M.
 

veritas

Member
SoSH Member
Jan 13, 2009
3,151
Somerville, MA
I'd be happy with a 2yr/$3m compromise, I really don't see either side budging enough though. I think they're both fairly unreasonable in their assessment of his value
 

lexrageorge

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 31, 2007
18,183
In Sunday's Hockey Notes in the Globe, Fluto explicitly mentions that the B's could walk away from the arb award and let Spooner become a UFA.
 

cshea

Member
SoSH Member
Nov 15, 2006
36,203
306, row 14
I would hope they wouldn't walk away. Unless I'm completely out to lunch on player value, there has to be some team out there that would give the Bruins something for Spooner in a trade, right?
 

PedroSpecialK

Comes at you like a tornado of hair and the NHL sa
SoSH Member
Dec 12, 2004
27,167
Cambridge, MA
In Sunday's Hockey Notes in the Globe, Fluto explicitly mentions that the B's could walk away from the arb award and let Spooner become a UFA.
Right you are

The outcomes can vary. Although unlikely, Spooner and the Bruins could conclude a pre-hearing extension. It could go to a hearing, where the arbitrator usually determines a value between the player’s and team’s asking prices. Even after the hearing, the sides could arrive at a separate agreement, such as the one P.K. Subban and the Canadiens shook hands on in 2014. They could accept the arbitrator’s ruling and proceed. If the Bruins consider the ruling too rich, they could walk away from the award, leaving Spooner unrestricted.
These are some dark times for Bruins-related hockey journalism...
 

j44thor

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 1, 2006
11,013
According to Elliot Friedman and some knowledgeable folks at HF boards (yes there are some) the walk away provision escalates just like RFA compensation tables and the salary cap in general.
Apparently last year the walk away amount was 3.9 so 4M this year would make sense.

Wonder if that was part of the reasoning for Spoons to ask for 3.85, eliminate the possibility of winning an award that could be walked away from.
 

PedroSpecialK

Comes at you like a tornado of hair and the NHL sa
SoSH Member
Dec 12, 2004
27,167
Cambridge, MA
Right you are - on the very next page, it's clarified that the $3.5m escalates by the same % as increase in Annual League Salary


TL;DR ignore me
 

kenneycb

Hates Goose Island Beer; Loves Backdoor Play
SoSH Member
Dec 2, 2006
16,148
Tuukka's refugee camp
As of tonight, they have about $13M in cap space with Pastrnak still unsigned. The D are basically set except for maybe a 6th/7th LHD to sit in the press box most nights. If they choose to go young, they're all set, but if they want to get a decent Stafford-esque depth winger, it looks like it will be a bit tight.
 

cshea

Member
SoSH Member
Nov 15, 2006
36,203
306, row 14
Sweeney says Pastrnak talks aren't as far a long and they'd like. It'd be nice to not have this drag out much longer. Other than heading into the last lockout with Seguin, Marchand and Lucic, these deals never seem to go smoothly for the Bruins.

 

Dummy Hoy

Angry Pissbum
SoSH Member
Jul 22, 2006
8,241
Falmouth
Holy fuck Sweeney. You've got one thing to do this offseason. I realize that Pasta's side of things may be causing the holdup, but we don't want to be reDing articles like this right now.
 

TheRealness

Member
SoSH Member
Feb 8, 2006
11,695
The Dirty Shire
Sweeney says Pastrnak talks aren't as far a long and they'd like. It'd be nice to not have this drag out much longer. Other than heading into the last lockout with Seguin, Marchand and Lucic, these deals never seem to go smoothly for the Bruins.

I suppose if he's demanding a Johansen type package that may cause some consternation. I figure he's more likely to get around $7m a year the way these RFA negotiations are going, and the Bruins may be trying to hold the line at $6-6.5m. Regardless, they have to sign him, so as long as they do I won't be bitter. Camp doesn't open until September 14th, so they have some time.
 

Salem's Lot

Andy Moog! Andy God Damn Moog!
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
14,610
Gallows Hill
Holy fuck Sweeney. You've got one thing to do this offseason. I realize that Pasta's side of things may be causing the holdup, but we don't want to be reDing articles like this right now.
J.P. Barry isn't an idiot, and he knows that Sweeney's boss is a reactionary fool. It makes no sense for him to make a deal now unless the team massively overpays. When we get into September and the PR heat gets turned up on the team and Barry's client starts worrying about missing game checks, someone will blink.
 

Salem's Lot

Andy Moog! Andy God Damn Moog!
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
14,610
Gallows Hill
FWIW, I'd probably give him the Johansen contract.
I would as well. Tarasenko got 8-$60, Johansen got 8-$64. I wouldn't have a problem with that. The agent is probably seeing how far the team will go. If he can set the bar higher for future clients he will. There is zero pressure on Barry to make a deal right now, and with the team's history of losing players in this situation, the PR pressure is all on them.
 

jk333

Member
SoSH Member
Feb 26, 2009
4,326
Boston
I would also do the Johansen deal for the 4 ufa years it would buy out.

I wonder if the big debate is term and Barry is asking about a 4-5 year contract. Sweeney should make sure he gets at least 6 years. If not, a 2-3 year deal is better.
 

burstnbloom

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 12, 2005
2,761
I still think the hold up here is lock out protection. Jacobs is the last owner that is going to sign off on a signing bonus heavy deal for big dollars with a labor negotiation looming. Marchand and Bergeron both have signing bonus heavy deals that very unsurprisingly drop down to $1mil in 2021 when we can expect another lockout. Many of the deals signed this offseason were very heavily weighted towards bonus payout instead of salary and I would guess JP Barry wants that. 8 years $54 mil but all of it structured as bonus gives Pasta a lot of safety net that I can't see the Bruins ownership signing off on.
 

Salem's Lot

Andy Moog! Andy God Damn Moog!
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
14,610
Gallows Hill
I still think the hold up here is lock out protection. Jacobs is the last owner that is going to sign off on a signing bonus heavy deal for big dollars with a labor negotiation looming. Marchand and Bergeron both have signing bonus heavy deals that very unsurprisingly drop down to $1mil in 2021 when we can expect another lockout. Many of the deals signed this offseason were very heavily weighted towards bonus payout instead of salary and I would guess JP Barry wants that. 8 years $54 mil but all of it structured as bonus gives Pasta a lot of safety net that I can't see the Bruins ownership signing off on.
If that's what's holding this up then their going to have a hell of a time trying to sign McAvoy in 2020.
 

lexrageorge

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 31, 2007
18,183
I still think the hold up here is lock out protection. Jacobs is the last owner that is going to sign off on a signing bonus heavy deal for big dollars with a labor negotiation looming. Marchand and Bergeron both have signing bonus heavy deals that very unsurprisingly drop down to $1mil in 2021 when we can expect another lockout. Many of the deals signed this offseason were very heavily weighted towards bonus payout instead of salary and I would guess JP Barry wants that. 8 years $54 mil but all of it structured as bonus gives Pasta a lot of safety net that I can't see the Bruins ownership signing off on.
Wow!! If Jacobs is already playing hardball around a lockout that is still 4+ years in the future (something he has a history of doing; and screwing the team in the process), then this is guaranteed to get very ugly. Not only for Pasta, but, as noted, for other UFA/RFA's as well. Remember that it took the team several years to recover from the 2004 lockout, and indirectly resulted in Joe Thornton being traded for table scraps.
 

burstnbloom

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 12, 2005
2,761
I just think it means he will want minimal guarantees for that season in terms of bonus payout. I don't think we're talking sea change, just won't want to guarantee $7mil in a year where there might not be hockey.
 

Luis Taint

Member
SoSH Member
Apr 7, 2012
5,883
I'm a casual Bruins fan, and don't really follow the offseason at all. Have the Bruins made any real attempts to get better since the end of the season?
 

kenneycb

Hates Goose Island Beer; Loves Backdoor Play
SoSH Member
Dec 2, 2006
16,148
Tuukka's refugee camp
Yes, they just haven't made any big or splashy moves because there are a bunch of kids down in Providence that hopefully pan out over the next couple of years.
 

Salem's Lot

Andy Moog! Andy God Damn Moog!
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
14,610
Gallows Hill
I'm a casual Bruins fan, and don't really follow the offseason at all. Have the Bruins made any real attempts to get better since the end of the season?
They're developing young players. If guys like McAvoy, Carlo & Pastrnak take the next step, they will be better. It's a long process and the worst thing that they could do is sign or trade for mid level veterans that may provide a small improvement next year but would block the development of younger, higher upside players. They're in a holding pattern with the Pastrnak contract right now, but that should get resolved after camp starts and both sides are motivated to get it done. It's a young mans' league right now, and I think they're doing the right thing by building it this way and not signing another Belesky type in free agency.
 

Jordu

Member
SoSH Member
Apr 30, 2003
8,994
Brookline
Not spending on mid-level free agents in the summer also gives the Bruins a chance to assess what they have in their youth over the first half of the season -- and leaves cap space for picking up a veteran or two with needed skills at the trade deadline.
 

cshea

Member
SoSH Member
Nov 15, 2006
36,203
306, row 14
Well, Eklund posted this 3 hours before Lawton did. Maybe I'm wrong, but I don't think Lawton has a credible track record as an "insider."
 
Last edited:

Salem's Lot

Andy Moog! Andy God Damn Moog!
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
14,610
Gallows Hill
Why wouldn't the agent float that out there to put public pressure on the Bruins to up their offer. Shit Felger & Mazz are already hammering him like he's already gone given their track record. It's the obvious play.
 

PedroSpecialK

Comes at you like a tornado of hair and the NHL sa
SoSH Member
Dec 12, 2004
27,167
Cambridge, MA
Agreed re: Pastrnak's agent being the source of this. In the end, the tea leaves all point to lockout protection / signing bonus % being the sticking point, which I can't blame Barry/Pastrnak on... or Sweeney for that matter.
 

TheRealness

Member
SoSH Member
Feb 8, 2006
11,695
The Dirty Shire
Agreed re: Pastrnak's agent being the source of this. In the end, the tea leaves all point to lockout protection / signing bonus % being the sticking point, which I can't blame Barry/Pastrnak on... or Sweeney for that matter.
Yeah, this is my read of it as well. It's a story planted by the agent to drive up pressure on the Bruins. I'm sure that will go over well with Jacobs, et al, who are just dying to find a way to screw this up as they have many times in the past.
 

cshea

Member
SoSH Member
Nov 15, 2006
36,203
306, row 14
They just brought him on their grow-the-game trip to China. I can't imagine them doing that if there was any sort of tension or animosity built up between him and the team over the contract. I understand the angst over this not being done yet, but I don't think it is time to panic.
 

cshea

Member
SoSH Member
Nov 15, 2006
36,203
306, row 14
In other news, Dave Goucher is leaving the B's and becoming the TV PbP for the Golden Knights. Awesome for him, really sucks for us. Goucher is excellent. The Sheriff will be his partner in Vegas.

 

Haunted

The Man in the Box
SoSH Member
Aug 23, 2006
6,220
And teaming up with The Sheriff!

Great for him. Bummer for us. Hockey on the radio is incredibly difficult and he does it very very well.
 

kenneycb

Hates Goose Island Beer; Loves Backdoor Play
SoSH Member
Dec 2, 2006
16,148
Tuukka's refugee camp
He'll always have his great calls on the B's winning and the Bergeron Leafs OT goal.

On a separate note, him doing PBP on the diarrhea scene in Dumb & Dumber on T&R like 5 years ago almost made me drive off the road.
 

NickEsasky

Please Hammer, Don't Hurt 'Em
Silver Supporter
SoSH Member
Jul 24, 2001
9,206
He'll always have his great calls on the B's winning and the Bergeron Leafs OT goal.

On a separate note, him doing PBP on the diarrhea scene in Dumb & Dumber on T&R like 5 years ago almost made me drive off the road.
Bergeron! Bergeron! still gives me chills and I didn't even hear it live because I was at the game. /humblebrag