2016 AL East Champion Boston Red Sox

JimD

Member
SoSH Member
Nov 29, 2001
8,695
Is Cleveland playing that makeup game no matter what, or will it be dependent on what the Sox an/or Tribe do this weekend?
 

BaseballJones

ivanvamp
SoSH Member
Oct 1, 2015
24,714
In other words, Cleveland will have to sweep the Royals in KC plus win a game against Detroit on Monday if we can manage to win a game against Toronto this weekend. Possible, yes? Probable, unlikely.
No, if Boston wins one this weekend, then Cleveland would need to take three of these four in order to pass the Sox.

Is Cleveland playing that makeup game no matter what, or will it be dependent on what the Sox an/or Tribe do this weekend?
Great question. Not sure how they'd handle it if the game meant nothing to either team. Probably then, they'd not bother. But if even one of them needed it, maybe they'd play it?
 

TheoShmeo

Skrub's sympathy case
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Jul 19, 2005
12,890
Boston, NY
The day after Yankees Elimination Day is always glorious. Even after getting swept by those miscreants. Enjoy the view of October, MFYs.

Now, Red Sox, win a few games* this weekend and get that two seed.

* Or maybe just one game.
 

uk_sox_fan

Member
SoSH Member
Nov 11, 2006
1,273
London, England
No, if Boston wins one this weekend, then Cleveland would need to take three of these four in order to pass the Sox.



Great question. Not sure how they'd handle it if the game meant nothing to either team. Probably then, they'd not bother. But if even one of them needed it, maybe they'd play it?
If it matters to the postseason - either for Detroit making it or not or for Cleveland or Detroits seeding and home field - then they will play it Monday.

As a result of a clarification that became effective for this season, Major League Baseball requires all 162 games to be played, if a game impacts seeding or home-field advantage for the postseason. If a game would have no impact on seeding or home-field advantage, then it would not have to be played.

If a game proves necessary in any way -- for either club or for seeding purposes -- then it will be rescheduled for Monday.

For the game to matter for the Indians, they would need to be a half-game ahead of Texas or Boston through Sunday, because both the Rangers and Red Sox own a tiebreaker over Cleveland. A win would then secure home field for the Tribe for at least the ALDS. If the Indians were a half-game behind either team, playing Monday's game would not impact the postseason seeding.
http://m.indians.mlb.com/news/article/204098818/indians-rained-out-will-play-monday-if-needed/
 

LeoCarrillo

Do his bits at your peril
SoSH Member
Oct 13, 2008
10,441
Scenario question: Does MLB make Detroit and Cleveland play the Monday makeup game if Detroit is eliminated but Cleveland still could get the 2 seed (and home-field vs. Boston, say) in the ALDS?

Would Cleveland want to add that game, or would they rather rest -- and could they opt out and take the 3 seed?

You'd think they'd want home field, sure. But no way they burn Kluber to do it. And Bauer goes Saturday and even Tomlin on Sunday. So, what, they want a Clevenger game to maybe get home field? Part of me feels like they'd rather blow it off.

Edit: Ah, answered by UK while I was typing. They'd have to play it.
 

BaseballJones

ivanvamp
SoSH Member
Oct 1, 2015
24,714
If it matters to the postseason - either for Detroit making it or not or for Cleveland or Detroits seeding and home field - then they will play it Monday.



http://m.indians.mlb.com/news/article/204098818/indians-rained-out-will-play-monday-if-needed/
Ok thanks for the info about Monday. And it looks like my gut was right. If the Sox win one game this weekend, Cleveland would need to win 2 of 3 against KC, and then would play at Detroit and would have to win THAT game too.

What would be interesting would be to see if Cleveland would go balls to the wall to win that game in order to get HFA over Boston. Would they use their top pitcher (if they could line him up) or would they save him for game 1 of the ALDS? Not using him increases the risk of losing HFA to Boston. Using him increases the chances of gaining HFA but then you only get your top pitcher for one game in the series.

That would be fascinating to see how Tito handles that, should it come to that.

But I want the Sox to go all out to win at least one of these next three games.

EDIT: And as I'm typing this, I see that LeoCarillo already posed the same question.
 

SpaceMan37

Member
SoSH Member
Dec 30, 2013
225
I'm sorry I invaded your safe space. It's true that the performance of the team has nothing to do with the awkwardness of NESN's forced celebration, but it's still the worst clinch I've ever seen.

Has a team ever clinched on a rainout?
Every team that ever won clinched over 162 games. Worrying about how it happened at the one moment in time while ignoring the rest of the season is pretty silly. In the grand scheme of things, who cares? I forgot about it already.
 

SpaceMan37

Member
SoSH Member
Dec 30, 2013
225
I wonder if Tito would forfeit or effectively forfeit that last game to rest his players (and maybe not even take them to Detroit). That's a pretty brutal schedule to head into the playoffs with.
 

Savin Hillbilly

loves the secret sauce
SoSH Member
Jul 10, 2007
18,783
The wrong side of the bridge....
Every team that ever won clinched over 162 games. Worrying about how it happened at the one moment in time while ignoring the rest of the season is pretty silly. In the grand scheme of things, who cares? I forgot about it already.
Or to put it another way, every clinch that has ever occurred in the modern era has occurred in the context of a season that featured at least 36 losses. Losses are normal and routine in baseball, even for the most elite teams. And at least some of those losses will come by blowing a lead late in the game, because that too is normal and routine. That this unpleasant but normal and routine thing occurred on the night when the Red Sox' 2016 division title became a certainty is a fact whose insignificance is almost impossible to overstate.
 
Last edited:

JimD

Member
SoSH Member
Nov 29, 2001
8,695
Wednesday night:
Red Sox learn during their game that another team's loss means Boston has won AL East title
Sox proceed to lose their game
Team experiences momentary disappointment, followed by gradual elation for their achievement.
Celebration ensues.

Thursday night:
Yankees learn during their game that another team's victory means New York eliminated from postseason contention
Yanks proceed to win their game
Team experiences momentary elation, followed by gradual disappontment for their failure.
Depression ensues.
 

Mighty Joe Young

The North remembers
SoSH Member
Sep 14, 2002
8,462
Halifax, Nova Scotia , Canada
Yeah, and it's only one extra home game if the series goes seven. I'm 100% fine with not winning another regular season game if it's the best thing for getting guys ready for some straight-up mowing down of pricks, as they say. However, there was an interesting article in the Toronto media about the misery of the Blue Jays, so I suspect they won't come to town in great shape.

http://www.torontosun.com/2016/09/29/whats-going-on-inside-the-blue-jays-clubhouse
Well .. that's mostly media griping about media access. I don't see any evidence of internal dissent. On the contrary its very much a case of US vs. THEM

That being said it does appear they are a tad on edge.There two main problems are a bullpen implosion and lack of hitting.
 

dcmissle

Deflatigator
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Aug 4, 2005
28,269
Or to put it another way, every clinch that has ever occurred in the modern era has occurred in the context of a season that featured at least 36 losses. Losses are normal and routine in baseball, even for the most elite teams. And at least some of those losses will come by blowing a lead late in the game, because that too is normal and routine. That this unpleasant but normal and routine thing occurred on the night when the Red Sox' 2016 division title became a certainty is a fact whose insignificance is almost impossible to overstate.
The criticism is a joke. I can't remember another instance of the Red Sox nailing September like this. Ever. It typically is white knuckle time -- win one, lose one, win one, lose two -- with scoreboard watching all the way. And, of course, they won a bunch in a row in Sept 1978 to square a season and force a playoff -- but they lost the playoff, and all this was after blowing a 15.5 game lead from mid-July forward.

Here they were nails. There was a huge bag of cash in the middle of a table populated by them, the blue Jays and the Orioles, who were effectively tied. And the Red Sox just grabbed it.
 

uncannymanny

Member
SoSH Member
Jan 12, 2007
9,105
Wednesday night:
Red Sox learn during their game that another team's loss means Boston has won AL East title
Sox proceed to lose their game
Team experiences momentary disappointment, followed by gradual elation for their achievement.
Celebration ensues.

Thursday night:
Yankees learn during their game that another team's victory means New York eliminated from postseason contention
Yanks proceed to win their game
Team experiences momentary elation, followed by gradual disappontment for their failure.
Depression ensues.
One thing I can't recall seeing is a swept team clinching a division and the sweeping team be eliminated. Kind of bizarre.
 

Van Everyman

Member
SoSH Member
Apr 30, 2009
27,108
Newton
Is there any video of Farrell's expletive laden speech to the team after they clinched? According to Chad Finn, it sounds like it was fucking awesome:

But that was nothing compared to the postgame scene in the clubhouse, the portion of the program in which Red Sox players had to briefly pretend that they were bothered by losing the game. NESN carried the scene live, and it paid off when manager John Farrell implored his team to enjoy the moment with a commanding speech that served as insight into his true strengths as a manager.

“You guys are going to enjoy tonight,’’ he said. “You marched through six straight [expletive] months. You busted your [expletive]. You defied some of the [expletive] that people will say about you. You went about . . . there are a lot of people in here that have a lot to be proud off. Guys that were knocked down, came back, busted your [expletive] and got us to this point. Do not let one inning take away from the fact that we’re sitting atop of this division as AL East champions.

“This is one stop,’’ he continued. “This is one stop. There are three more to go. This team is prepared. You’re tough. You’re smart. And more than anything you care for one another. And that’s the most important thing.”
http://www.bostonglobe.com/sports/redsox/2016/09/29/bizarre-celebration-made-for-interesting-viewing/piD8kZJmFF1m20hHqfu2qL/story.html
 
Last edited:

Savin Hillbilly

loves the secret sauce
SoSH Member
Jul 10, 2007
18,783
The wrong side of the bridge....
Is there any video of Farrell's expletive latest speech to the team after they clinched? According to Chad Finn, it sounds like it was fucking awesome:


http://www.bostonglobe.com/sports/redsox/2016/09/29/bizarre-celebration-made-for-interesting-viewing/piD8kZJmFF1m20hHqfu2qL/story.html
I can't help picturing him looking straight at Hanley for this part:

You defied some of the [expletive] that people will say about you. You went about . . . there are a lot of people in here that have a lot to be proud off. Guys that were knocked down, came back, busted your [expletive] and got us to this point.
 

wade boggs chicken dinner

Member
SoSH Member
Mar 26, 2005
30,809
The criticism is a joke. I can't remember another instance of the Red Sox nailing September like this. Ever. It typically is white knuckle time -- win one, lose one, win one, lose two -- with scoreboard watching all the way. And, of course, they won a bunch in a row in Sept 1978 to square a season and force a playoff -- but they lost the playoff, and all this was after blowing a 15.5 game lead from mid-July forward.

Here they were nails. There was a huge bag of cash in the middle of a table populated by them, the blue Jays and the Orioles, who were effectively tied. And the Red Sox just grabbed it.
They won 11 games in a row - three series sweeps of division rivals, including a sweep of the MFYs while coming from behind in every game.

Without looking, I'm pretty confidant that's never been done before. (They won 8 straight in 1978).

Lost within all of the "Fire Farrell" shouting and a number of admittedly bad losses even up to August is a historically good September. I'll think we'll be discussing this for years to come.

There's only one thing better for team building than going First, last, last, First - WS, last, last, WS. Make it so John.