Red Sox Select LHP Jason Groome 12th Overall

Bowlerman9

bitchslapped by Keith Law
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Feb 1, 2003
5,227
LAD or STL would probably be the only teams that picked below BOS that could have pulled that off given their pool allotments and I don't believe STL has a history of going way over slot which would be the case. I suspect this is the tears of a certain GM and nothing more.
Has to be the Dodgers, who would have loved to get Groome at #20 and then go under-slot with their other first round picks.
 

chrisfont9

Member
SoSH Member
Is this legit? Doesn't that simply open the door for multiple teams to enter into an array of more or less informal contingent agreements with any number of prospects? Or can it be considered tampering in advance with the ability of the ultimate drafting team to consummate a deal?

Maybe it's common and I've just been asleep at the wheel. (I know, an invitation for high level snark.)
"Teams believe" is essentially gossip.
 

moondog80

heart is two sizes two small
SoSH Member
Sep 20, 2005
8,234
The Dodgers and Groome can signal one another and "agree" to a deal, but if another team drafts him first, Groome's choices are to strike a deal with that team or re-enter he draft next year, at the risk of injury or sub-par performance hurting his stock. Years back, Matt Harringiton was picked 5th overall but didn't sign, came back next year but was picked 58th, against didn't sign and was picked in the 13th round the following year, still didn't sign, and ended up never making it out of the independent league.
 

Omar's Wacky Neighbor

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Jul 14, 2005
16,720
Leaving in a bit to the studio :)
It's very common and has been happening for years, there may be rules against it but if there are they are ignored.
A team will call an agent and say that we will take your guy here but only if he'll sign for $X, if the agent says no they'll go to the next guy on the list.

This is answering Otis of course.
Yeah, wasnt it even covered in Moneyball?
 

j44thor

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 1, 2006
11,026
Is this legit? Doesn't that simply open the door for multiple teams to enter into an array of more or less informal contingent agreements with any number of prospects? Or can it be considered tampering in advance with the ability of the ultimate drafting team to consummate a deal?

Maybe it's common and I've just been asleep at the wheel. (I know, an invitation for high level snark.)
Red Sox had a handshake deal with Porcello his draft year, until DD and DET swooped in and picked him ahead of us.
 

RedOctober3829

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 19, 2005
55,476
deep inside Guido territory
Jim Callis weighs in on Groome and says SD promised him $5 million if he made it to either 24 or 25.

San Diego hoped Groome would fall all the way to its pair of extra first-round picks at Nos. 24 and 25, and multiple industry sources say the Padres promised him a $5 million bonus if he got there. That didn't happen, with the Red Sox stepping in at No. 12. With a winning big league club that has a strong core of young talent, not to mention several blue-chip prospects rising through the Minors, it may be years before Boston has an opportunity to draft a player with as much upside as Groome.

I don't believe the Red Sox care what the Padres offered, and I don't think they're going to scrape together every dollar they can in their $6,997,400 bonus pool and just hand it to Groome. He'll likely get more than the $3,192,800 assigned pick value at No. 12, but Boston may get all of its other signings done and offer him whatever remains in its allocation. The Red Sox would get the No. 13 choice in the 2017 Draft if he doesn't sign, and I don't see them exceeding their pool by more than 5 percent to land him and forfeiting a future first-rounder as a penalty.

http://m.mlb.com/news/article/184402554/pipeline-inbox-2016-mlb-draft-picks-on-rise?topicid=151437456
 

NoXInNixon

Member
SoSH Member
Mar 24, 2008
5,330
So the Sox can exceed their draft allotment, at the cost of losing a future first round pick? Seems like an easy choice since they're not likely to be picking 12th or worse again for a while, if that's what it takes to get it done and they conclude he's worth $5M
 

NoXInNixon

Member
SoSH Member
Mar 24, 2008
5,330
Random off topic question: Is it allowed to add a no trade clause to a minor league contract? I'm not aware of any ever, but is that because a team amd player have never wanted to do it, or that it can't be done.
 

Bowlerman9

bitchslapped by Keith Law
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Feb 1, 2003
5,227
So the Sox can exceed their draft allotment, at the cost of losing a future first round pick? Seems like an easy choice since they're not likely to be picking 12th or worse again for a while, if that's what it takes to get it done and they conclude he's worth $5M
Yes they can, but I think its an easy choice that having the 13th and, say, 30th pick next year is better than one high school arm this year. There's a reason no team has ever given up an additional pick under the new system. Unless you think Groome is the second coming of Strasburg, you stick to your offer and take the comp pick if he doesnt sign.
 

Bowlerman9

bitchslapped by Keith Law
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Feb 1, 2003
5,227
Random off topic question: Is it allowed to add a no trade clause to a minor league contract? I'm not aware of any ever, but is that because a team amd player have never wanted to do it, or that it can't be done.
No, ML contracts are uniform and cant include a NTC.
 

chrisfont9

Member
SoSH Member
Yes they can, but I think its an easy choice that having the 13th and, say, 30th pick next year is better than one high school arm this year. There's a reason no team has ever given up an additional pick under the new system. Unless you think Groome is the second coming of Strasburg, you stick to your offer and take the comp pick if he doesnt sign.
Plus everyone who seems to know such things will swear that the 2017 draft will be loaded with quality college pitchers. Sox won't want to miss out on that.
 

Papelbon's Poutine

Homeland Security
SoSH Member
Dec 4, 2005
19,615
Portsmouth, NH
Jack: Why did Groome back out of his Vandy commitment?
Klaw: He was never going to Vandy. I think the ploy was for him to threaten to go back into next year’s draft, but that class is so loaded with college arms that it’s not a credible alternative to signing
 

soxhop411

news aggravator
SoSH Member
Dec 4, 2009
46,504
The majority of this year’s first-round draft picks have signed contracts that have them ready to start their pro careers this summer. Red Sox top selection Jason Groome is not among them.

That development comes as little surprise. After all, signability questions likely were the biggest factor in the 17-year-old lefthander’s availability at the No. 12 slot.

The Red Sox, according to major league sources, decided to select Groome as the best available talent on their board without having discussed a signing number with him or his adviser, Jeff Randazzo.

The Sox did not assume that signing the tremendously talented lefthander — who features an advanced three-pitch mix with a fastball that tops out in the upper 90s — was a foregone conclusion. Instead, they hoped that with the bonus pool money available to them with the No. 12 pick (and adding to it with under-slot deals for other players in their top 10 rounds), and with Groome’s desire to become a member of the Red Sox, they’d be able to find common ground.

That process has yet to commence in earnest. According to major league sources, there haven’t been substantive conversations about Groome’s signing bonus between the team and Randazzo. Groome wasn’t eligible to sign until after his graduation from Barnegat (N.J.) High School Wednesday, so the Sox viewed the end of this week as a likely time to initiate dialogue, well in advance of the July 15 deadline.
One major league source said a bonus more in line with the roughly $4.4 million available to the No. 5 pick would get a deal done.
more at the link

http://www.bostonglobe.com/sports/redsox/2016/06/23/signing-jason-groome-sure-thing-for-red-sox/EDr49oXFdjpGy3d4NC03IP/story.html
 

Plympton91

bubble burster
SoSH Member
Oct 19, 2008
12,408


“‪@WEEI‬: ESPN’s Keith Law: Teams believe Jason Groome was ‘upset’ to be drafted by Red Sox https://t.co/iannbBysgu

The Red Sox made one of the most interesting selections in the 2016 MLB draft as they selected high school left-hander Jason Groome No. 12 overall. Groome was once thought as a No. 1 overall pick, but slid all the way down to No. 12.

Being the No. 12 overall pick, the slot value for that pick is $3,192,800 and many believe he’s seeking top five draft pick money, which may have scared some teams away.

Appearing on Buster Olney’s podcast, ESPN’s Keith Law said teams believe Groome was upset to be selected by the Red Sox as he had a deal with another team picking after the Red Sox for more money. He did add he believes eventually Groome will sign for around $4 million.
Keith Law talking about the Red Sox is like Sean Hannity talking about Barack Obama.
 

Papelbon's Poutine

Homeland Security
SoSH Member
Dec 4, 2005
19,615
Portsmouth, NH
I love it when you talk out of your ass. Glad to see it permeates every subforum on the board.

Maybe you can cite something to show that - other than over a decade ago him questioning Pedroia. How often do you even read Law?
 

Spelunker

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 17, 2005
11,967
I love it when you talk out of your ass. Glad to see it permeates every subforum on the board.

Maybe you can cite something to show that - other than over a decade ago him questioning Pedroia. How often do you even read Law?
Don't you know that Law had an incorrect scouting profile for Dustin Pedroia and has yet to grovel enough for our forgiveness?
 

burstnbloom

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 12, 2005
2,761
Didn't we see video of the kid after the draft that showed the opposite of this? Either way, he's likely to sign at around $4 mil, which is what the Red Sox can offer. The potential positive payoff if everything goes his way next year and he goes back into the draft isn't so much more money that it's worth giving up a year of professional development.
 

Boggs26

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 12, 2005
1,152
Ashburnham, MA
Didn't we see video of the kid after the draft that showed the opposite of this? Either way, he's likely to sign at around $4 mil, which is what the Red Sox can offer. The potential positive payoff if everything goes his way next year and he goes back into the draft isn't so much more money that it's worth giving up a year of professional development.
This seems to be the right answer. If he can get 4 million this year and the best case next year is 6 or 7 million that's a huge gamble. Injury or ineffectiveness at the juco level could easily lose him millions.

I'd also be interested in how a year of juco affects the time-line of a top prospect. It seems possible that it could be likely to push back a players mlb debut - something that could cost a player 10s of millions in the long run (all theoretical of course since the most likely outcome for all prospects is a career in the minors).
 

Papelbon's Poutine

Homeland Security
SoSH Member
Dec 4, 2005
19,615
Portsmouth, NH
Law slots him in at #5, as expected:


12. Jason Groome, LHP
Boston Red Sox
New No. 5 prospect


The Red Sox got the No. 2 prospect in the draft class, but he's not getting into their top four with Boston's elite quartet of prospects atop their system in Andrew Benintendi, Rafael Devers, Yoan Moncada, and Anderson Espinoza.
 

LondonSox

Robert the Deuce
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
8,956
North Bay California
I love it when you talk out of your ass. Glad to see it permeates every subforum on the board.

Maybe you can cite something to show that - other than over a decade ago him questioning Pedroia. How often do you even read Law?
Not only is law fair about red Sox prospects he has done multiple Mia culpa on pedroia. He has brought it up multiple times as something he got really wrong.

He's been positive about groome and played down the supposed character issues. He's also said he things he will sign. Saying that he heard groome had an agreement if he fell with another team is not a criticism.

I can understand why people don't like him. I enjoy his chats and snark personally.
 

soxhop411

news aggravator
SoSH Member
Dec 4, 2009
46,504
Not close yet.

“@ChrisCotillo: Source: Red Sox not close to deal with #12 overall pick Jason Groome at this point. Still time before 7/15 deadline.”

 

smastroyin

simpering whimperer
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Jul 31, 2002
20,684
I think they are going to want a really good idea of how much Anderson, Dalbec, and Shawaryn cost before they really get engaged with Groome. They don't have a lot of time, but I think it helps explain the whole "not close" business.

At the end of the day, they may prefer Quintana and Shawaryn and a comp pick next year to Groome, for instance.
 

JBJ_HOF

Member
SoSH Member
Apr 5, 2014
540
1. Before July 15th it's absolutely clickbait bullshit to write about the Sox and Groome not being close

2. Quintana and Shawaryn and bumping back the pick a year is asinine to want over Groom. It's HORRIFYING that they would offer Shawaryn over slot (BY 40%???) that the Herald suggested. His arm is going to explode.
 

mauidano

Mai Tais for everyone!
SoSH Member
Aug 21, 2006
35,982
Maui
Lot of posturing here over a 'workable" amount, maybe $750K? Groome can go play JC ball. He'll end up quite possibly getting picked about the same spot next year for about the same dough. I thought he really wanted to play for the Sox, a dream come true thing. Who blinks first?
 

PaulinMyrBch

Don't touch his dog food
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Dec 10, 2003
8,316
MYRTLE BEACH!!!!
I'm not a big fan of the slot values at the top of the round 1. It drops off so quick. When Groome is rumored to want top 4 money, how much of that is a hard line and how much in set up for negotiation. Because if it is really top 6 money it changes things dramatically in our favor. There's about a $1.2M difference b/w 4 and 6, and less than $1M difference b/w 6 and the Sox slot at 12. If he wanted to take a super hard "pay me or I'm going to JC" line, he'd be saying top 3 money. Anyway just putting some stuff here.

Looking at the slot values and how many picks you go before the slot is nearly half of the original value.
1. 9M
4. 4.4M
24. 2.2M
59. 1.1M
108. 550K

2016 Slot values (putting top 12 here)

1. Phillies: $9,015,000
2. Reds: $7,762,900
3. Braves: $6,510,800
4. Rockies: $5,258,700
5. Brewers: $4,382,200
6. Athletics: $4,069,200
7. Marlins: $3,756,300
8. Padres: $3,630,900
9. Tigers: $3,505,800
10. White Sox: $3,380,600
11. Mariners: $3,286,700
12. Red Sox: $3,192,800
 
Last edited:

Savin Hillbilly

loves the secret sauce
SoSH Member
Jul 10, 2007
18,783
The wrong side of the bridge....
Callis theorized that the Sox approach will be to sign the rest of their draft and then offer Groome as much as they can pay without losing a pick. It would be the epitome of making your best offer first.
Am I the only one to whom that seems like an incredibly perverse way to approach the situation they're in?

EDIT: I guess it could make sense if they have a very high confidence that Groome will sign when push comes to shove. I hope they're right.
 

Cuzittt

Bouncing with Anger
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Nov 20, 2001
20,301
Sinister Funkhouse #17
How else can they approach it. The maximum amount of money that can be used to pay him comes from getting everyone else (top 10) signed. Otherwise, that money goes away and the 5% kicker goes to a lower number.

And if they can't sign him... then they can use their extra money to try to sign someone in the later rounds.

They don't really have much choice.
 

Papelbon's Poutine

Homeland Security
SoSH Member
Dec 4, 2005
19,615
Portsmouth, NH
Am I the only one to whom that seems like an incredibly perverse way to approach the situation they're in?

EDIT: I guess it could make sense if they have a very high confidence that Groome will sign when push comes to shove. I hope they're right.
Or if they are quite confident he won't sign for what they can offer without penalty. If that's the case, offer the minimum to secure the pick next year, sign the later round bonus babies with their savings from elsewhere and then go into next year's draft with the #13 pick in a draft expected to be stocked with college arms. They could conceivably get just as good a pitcher who is closer to the majors as well. Otherwise they lose out on everyone.
 

semsox

Member
SoSH Member
Mar 14, 2004
1,744
Charlottesville
How else can they approach it. The maximum amount of money that can be used to pay him comes from getting everyone else (top 10) signed. Otherwise, that money goes away and the 5% kicker goes to a lower number.

And if they can't sign him... then they can use their extra money to try to sign someone in the later rounds.

They don't really have much choice.
I believe Callis' implication was including players drafted after the 10th round (Quintana, etc.) and then simply offer the remains, which he spitballed at around 3.5M, which to Savin's point, might not be the best approach if it means essentially prioritizing some of these late round lottery tickets over Groome.
 

Papelbon's Poutine

Homeland Security
SoSH Member
Dec 4, 2005
19,615
Portsmouth, NH
I believe Callis' implication was including players drafted after the 10th round (Quintana, etc.) and then simply offer the remains, which he spitballed at around 3.5M, which to Savin's point, might not be the best approach if it means essentially prioritizing some of these late round lottery tickets over Groome.
But if he won't sign for slot + their savings on everyone else + 5% kicker, than you either use the savings to sign the later guys or you lose everyone. If you're not signing Groome in either scenario, why wouldn't you do your best to sign the Quintana types?
 

semsox

Member
SoSH Member
Mar 14, 2004
1,744
Charlottesville
But if he won't sign for slot + their savings on everyone else + 5% kicker, than you either use the savings to sign the later guys or you lose everyone. If you're not signing Groome in either scenario, why wouldn't you do your best to sign the Quintana types?
The order in which things happens impacts the calculations of this scenario though. Once they sign all of the rest of the first 10 rounds, they'll presumably have something like 1 million+ in overslot money to pay between Groome and any post-10th rounders. Let's say for the sake of argument that they have 900K remaining and all that remains to be signed is Groome and Quintana. Groome could certainly demand the entirety of that 900K, and it might be worthwhile from the Red Sox perspective (the certainty of signing Groome vs. the loss of Quintana). But if you do it the other way, and sign Quintana for say 600K, and then you can only offer Groome slot + 300K, from his perspective, that isn't as good an offer as the Red Sox could have made, so maybe he simply walks. Groome has to be the priority, and unless the FO is 1000% certain he'll sign in the end, I think they need to make a competitive offer to him rather than simply offering him the remainder after taking care of everyone else first.
 

Papelbon's Poutine

Homeland Security
SoSH Member
Dec 4, 2005
19,615
Portsmouth, NH
The order in which things happens impacts the calculations of this scenario though. Once they sign all of the rest of the first 10 rounds, they'll presumably have something like 1 million+ in overslot money to pay between Groome and any post-10th rounders. Let's say for the sake of argument that they have 900K remaining and all that remains to be signed is Groome and Quintana. Groome could certainly demand the entirety of that 900K, and it might be worthwhile from the Red Sox perspective (the certainty of signing Groome vs. the loss of Quintana). But if you do it the other way, and sign Quintana for say 600K, and then you can only offer Groome slot + 300K, from his perspective, that isn't as good an offer as the Red Sox could have made, so maybe he simply walks. Groome has to be the priority, and unless the FO is 1000% certain he'll sign in the end, I think they need to make a competitive offer to him rather than simply offering him the remainder after taking care of everyone else first.
I agree Groome should be the top priority, but if there is speculation that the Sox might take this route instead, I assume that is based in knowledge that Groome won't accept slot + the hypothetical $900k + 5%. I don't think Callis was suggesting this was strategy from jump street. I think this coming out is probably borne of reports of it not looking good for Groome to accept what they can offer without sacrificing next year's first rounder. And in that case, I say follow through and sign the guys you can.

Fake edit: I'm working off the assumption that they know what it would take to sign Quintana, etc and likely have handshake deals in place. Once they sign the remaining 1st rounders, they will leave the remaining offer on the table for Groome until minutes before the July 15th deadline and if he takes it, great, if not submit the minimum and sign the other guys.
 

OCD SS

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Actually, IIRC Callis said that shortly after the draft (on the Sox Prospects podcast). It's not that Groome isn't the number one priority, just that the Sox aren't going to let him hold their draft hostage. It really comes down to if the difference between the extra overage they might give to Quintana is really enough of a difference between Groome signing and going to Juco. Given how the pool numbers shake out vs Groome's reported demands, its probably not.
 

smastroyin

simpering whimperer
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Jul 31, 2002
20,684
And they've already made that choice, given that they drafted guys like Shawaryn and Dalbec as opposed to a couple of college seniors they could have gotten for 50K or less.
 

threecy

Cosbologist
SoSH Member
Sep 1, 2006
1,587
Tamworth, NH
It may not be a bad strategy, signing as many as possible now, in that they can go into every negotiation with the premise that their priority is to sign their #1 and thus need to save every penny possible on every pick.
 

Plympton91

bubble burster
SoSH Member
Oct 19, 2008
12,408
It may not be a bad strategy, signing as many as possible now, in that they can go into every negotiation with the premise that their priority is to sign their #1 and thus need to save every penny possible on every pick.
Sort of dovetails nicely with the "Red Sox don't pay their minor leaguers enough" thread. They're conspiring to hold down the payments to 3 very valuable assets based on a labor agreement to which those players had no input or choice to accept. The epitome of insiders screwing over outsiders that happens with all agreements between unions and politically protected crony capitalist businesses.
 

nighthob

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
12,706
Given that they just had a handful of international prospects pried loose, and were stripped of the right to sign any for the current period, though, getting Groome inked might be a little more important now.
 

P'tucket rhymes with...

Member
SoSH Member
Dec 12, 2006
11,638
The Coney Island of my mind
Given that they just had a handful of international prospects pried loose, and were stripped of the right to sign any for the current period, though, getting Groome inked might be a little more important now.
You could just as easily say they need to prioritize getting as many prospects on board as possible rather than putting all of their eggs in one basket.

If the Sox only have something like #5.5 or #6 money even if Groome wants something like #4 money, the ball is in his court. He dropped through no fault of the Sox, and his situation is what it is. It would be foolish for him to say no to $4m because everyone tells him he's worth $5-6, although one senses he hasn't been getting the best advice so far.
 

nighthob

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
12,706
You could just as easily say they need to prioritize getting as many prospects on board as possible rather than putting all of their eggs in one basket.

If the Sox only have something like #5.5 or #6 money even if Groome wants something like #4 money, the ball is in his court. He dropped through no fault of the Sox, and his situation is what it is. It would be foolish for him to say no to $4m because everyone tells him he's worth $5-6, although one senses he hasn't been getting the best advice so far.
I don't think we substantially disagree here, I was more responding to the people that felt that the other players were more important. I agree that that they should be getting as close to four million as they can and make that offer. Because increasingly it looks like the alternative will be two top 20 picks next year.
 

soxhop411

news aggravator
SoSH Member
Dec 4, 2009
46,504
“@KnuckleballFRS: Jason Groome and the #RedSox are in a stare down with a $3.5 million offer on the table, @JonHeyman reports: https://t.co/qhwzLJjRqV


SAN DIEGO — Is it possible the Red Sox fail to sign their No. 1 pick, who by some accounts was the most talented player in the draft?

The odds are that lefty prodigy Jason Groome, the No. 12 overall pick in last month’s draft, still signs by the July 15 deadline to sign drafted players. But it certainly appears to be going right to the wire.

The Red Sox have offered Groome $3.5 million, sources say, which is $372,000 more than the $3,128,000 slot for the No. 12 position. But for now Groome, only 17, seems to be holding out for a bit more.

He was thought to be seeking at least $4 million pre-draft, and sources suggest he had a deal for $5 million worked out with the Padres had he fallen all the way down to the No. 24 spot, so it’s understandable why he’d be waiting to see if the Red Sox improve their offer.

The Red Sox are believed to have something close to $400,000 left in their draft allotment, so it’s possible they sweeten their offer. It’s also possible they will try to wait it out, and see if he passes on them to go to Chipola J.C.
 

soxhop411

news aggravator
SoSH Member
Dec 4, 2009
46,504
Imo it doesn't hurt to see if he would have taken 3.5. And I doubt they screw around with him given that we really should have had no shot at him given where we drafted. Still think it gets done
 

Savin Hillbilly

loves the secret sauce
SoSH Member
Jul 10, 2007
18,783
The wrong side of the bridge....
If $4M is what the Sox can offer, it makes good tactical sense to wait until the eleventh hour to get there--make it seem like a concession and a win for Groome, rather than putting Groome in the position of giving in to take it.
 

Snodgrass'Muff

oppresses WARmongers
SoSH Member
Mar 11, 2008
27,644
Roanoke, VA
With the slotting system in place that simply isn't the case. There is a set amount they can offer. If you put that amount out there now he'll either take it or he won't. If doesn't, you we're never going to be able to afford him. And if he says no you still have time to offer that money to other players holding out for a bit more like Dalbec or Shawaryn.

There Red Sox know what they can offer. Groome's camp knows what they can offer. Dalbec and Shawaryn aren't worth losing Groome over. Put your best offer on the table and make him decide if it's going to be enough to sign. Playing stupid games by upping it at the last second is how you lose a top of the draft talent and maybe the other two guys, too.