MLB Investigates Red Sox Over International Signings

soxhop411

news aggravator
SoSH Member
Dec 4, 2009
46,519
Major League Baseball is investigating the Red Sox over their 2015 international signings, focusing on whether the team signed multiple Venezuelan players in “package deals” and whether that would be considered a circumvention of MLB’s international bonus pools, according to multiple international sources.

During the process, MLB officials questioned players as young as 16 individually, according to multiple sources, and threatened to suspend them if they were not truthful. The commissioner’s office acknowledged the questioning but said no players were threatened with suspension.

The Red Sox were extremely aggressive in Venezuela last year, with the majority of their top signings coming from that country. Several of those players came from the same trainers, a common practice referred to as a package deal that involves signing multiple players from the same program.

During the 2015-16 signing period, which opened on July 2, 2015, the Red Sox were not allowed to sign any player subject to the international bonus pools for more than $300,000, a penalty for exceeding their bonus pool the previous signing period.

In spite of those restrictions, the Red Sox still signed two of Baseball America’s Top 30 international prospects for July 2 last year. Venezuelan outfielders Albert Guaimaro (ranked No. 15) and Simon Muzziotti (ranked No. 24) each signed for $300,000 bonuses. Guaimaro trained with Francisco Ortiz, while Muzziotti trained with Pascuale Fiorello and Pablo Leal. The Red Sox signed multiple players from those programs last year. They signed multiple players from the programs run by Felix Olivo and Jose Montero as well, most notably shortstop Antonio Pinero for $300,000 from Olivo’s program and shortstop Eduardo Torrealba for $300,000 from Montero’s program.

According to several sources, MLB officials—including Nelson Tejada, the league’s manager of investigations—went to the Red Sox academy in the Dominican Republic last week and questioned several of those Venezuelan players individually about their signings. MLB officials asked the players whether they signed in a package deal, whether they gave part of their signing bonus to another player or received part of another player’s bonus, or why they signed for more or less money than might have been expected. Some of those players, according to one source, did acknowledge that they signed as part of a package deal.

The players, most of whom are still 16 or 17 years old, did not have their parents or any representation with them. According to multiple sources, MLB officials told the players that if they lied, the commissioner’s office would suspend them. They asked the players to give them their banking information and said they would investigate their bank accounts, according to those sources. Some of the players broke down in tears.

“They put a lot of pressure on them, like they were criminals,” said one source. “They’re trying to put pressure on the kids to talk to them.”

When told about the assertions, an MLB official said players have an obligation to be truthful and cooperate with an investigation or they could be subject to discipline, which could mean a fine or a suspension. The official denied that anyone from MLB ever threatened a player with a suspension.

Aside from the particulars of how the questioning was handled, why MLB is investigating the Red Sox at all—as well as the timing of the investigation—is certainly curious. Package deals are not explicitly against MLB rules, and many teams sign multiple players from the same trainer, either at the same time or over a multi-year period. These deals took place before the bonus pools ever existed and have continued since the bonus pool era began in 2012. No team has ever been penalized for doing any type of package deal, according to the commissioner’s office.


Read more at http://www.baseballamerica.com/international/mlb-investigates-red-sox-over-international-signings/#6LrezWiVkGJrrdvw.99
more at the link
 

Van Everyman

Member
SoSH Member
Apr 30, 2009
27,109
Newton
Finally the real reason for Ben's departure is unearthed.

More seriously, regardless of whether the Sox skirted the rules or the spirit of them, this seems like a gross system.
 

joe dokes

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 18, 2005
30,614
Finally the real reason for Ben's departure is unearthed.
More seriously, regardless of whether the Sox skirted the rules or the spirit of them, this seems like a gross system.
The treatment (or exploitation) of young & poor players from the DR, PR, and South America has long been an issue in MLB. My sense is that the only time anyone really cares is when one team appears to have an advantage and then another team gets pissed. All the owners want the limited bonus pool and an international draft.
There are both documentary and fictional treatments of the system. ("Sugar" & "Pelotero" come to mind; and Ken Burns had an "inning" of it, IIRC).
 

Jed Zeppelin

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 23, 2008
51,536
The aggressive approach to questioning the kids seems a wee bit out of proportion to what's at stake here, doesn't it? (Never mind the fact that if there has been any wrongdoing, it certainly wasn't theirs.)
Anybody, never mind a teenager, is liable to confess to anything under the threat of punishment. Have to appreciate that BA covered this aspect of the story in some detail rather than a simpleton "INVESTIGATION!" clickbait piece. Of course, BA is plenty aware of the way things work in the world of international free agents so it makes sense that their immediate reaction would be "okay, so what?"
 

smastroyin

simpering whimperer
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Jul 31, 2002
20,684
I don't think a confession from any of the kids is going to gain them anything. Why even bother with this. They should be able to get the Red Sox to open their books, why do they need the other end.

anyway, I'm sure this will be a lead up to MLB trying to put rules around the package deals. The whole business does seem pretty slimy.
 

Savin Hillbilly

loves the secret sauce
SoSH Member
Jul 10, 2007
18,783
The wrong side of the bridge....
I don't think a confession from any of the kids is going to gain them anything. Why even bother with this. They should be able to get the Red Sox to open their books, why do they need the other end.
If the package deals were implemented through unwritten agreements that Player A would funnel some of his money directly to Player B, then presumably that wouldn't show up in the organization's books at all, right? In fact, wouldn't that be the whole point?
 

simplicio

Member
SoSH Member
Apr 11, 2012
5,280
Wait, why are they talking to the kids instead of the trainers who allegedly organized the deals? Because they're easier targets?
 

smastroyin

simpering whimperer
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Jul 31, 2002
20,684
If the package deals were implemented through unwritten agreements that Player A would funnel some of his money directly to Player B, then presumably that wouldn't show up in the organization's books at all, right? In fact, wouldn't that be the whole point?
Sure, but how are some kids being out of their country going to know all of the ins and outs and have access to their bank accounts?

Go to Venezuela and talk to the trainers, etc. if you're so fucking concerned. Talk to the parents, who probably have the access to the accounts. This just seems like intimidation tactics. Or I suppose a fear of ending up dead in a ditch because you're a shithead investigator trying to screw around with people's attempts to make it in MLB. (understanding what they are investigating from here, I think they would not be charitably looked upon by the families and friends, though I don't really think they would end up dead)

BTW I think the Red Sox probably skirted the rules and wouldn't be surprised if they are punished within Manfred's general ability to do so.
 

Buzzkill Pauley

Member
SoSH Member
Jun 30, 2006
10,569
Sure, but how are some kids being out of their country going to know all of the ins and outs and have access to their bank accounts?

Go to Venezuela and talk to the trainers, etc. if you're so fucking concerned. Talk to the parents, who probably have the access to the accounts. This just seems like intimidation tactics. Or I suppose a fear of ending up dead in a ditch because you're a shithead investigator trying to screw around with people's attempts to make it in MLB. (understanding what they are investigating from here, I think they would not be charitably looked upon by the families and friends, though I don't really think they would end up dead)

BTW I think the Red Sox probably skirted the rules and wouldn't be surprised if they are punished within Manfred's general ability to do so.
Both of these points are where I'm at right now. Although I'm sure the Sox aren't the only offender about skirting the rules as written, they may be one of the most active.
 

Pilgrim

Member
SoSH Member
Mar 24, 2006
2,407
Jamaica Plain
I'm sure this is a common practice, but the Red Sox are one of only a few teams that are subject to hard spending caps right now, and that's why MLB cares. They don't want anyone undermining the intl FA system.
 

Bowlerman9

bitchslapped by Keith Law
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Feb 1, 2003
5,227
I'm sure this is a common practice, but the Red Sox are one of only a few teams that are subject to hard spending caps right now, and that's why MLB cares. They don't want anyone undermining the intl FA system.
If not for the spending caps, though, why would any other team do this? I think its common practice among all teams who have a spending cap, but there's no point in doing it if you have no constraints.
 

Bigpupp

Member
SoSH Member
Jun 8, 2008
2,415
New Mexico
If not for the spending caps, though, why would any other team do this? I think its common practice among all teams who have a spending cap, but there's no point in doing it if you have no constraints.
Signing bonuses up to a certain amount (I believe it's 100k) aren't counted against a teams bonus pool. So every team has a point in doing it in order to stay under their allotment for the year, although you're right that it is probably less likely that they would want to risk it.
 

Bowlerman9

bitchslapped by Keith Law
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Feb 1, 2003
5,227
Signing bonuses up to a certain amount (I believe it's 100k) aren't counted against a teams bonus pool. So every team has a point in doing it in order to stay under their allotment for the year, although you're right that it is probably less likely that they would want to risk it.
You're thinking about the June amateur draft. We're talking about international free agents.
 

Pilgrim

Member
SoSH Member
Mar 24, 2006
2,407
Jamaica Plain
My guess is it has something to do with how the trainers operate. If you sign on with so-and-so at age 14, he will make sure you get hooked up with at least a 50 k bonus if any if his clients ends up a decent prospect.
 

Bigpupp

Member
SoSH Member
Jun 8, 2008
2,415
New Mexico
You're thinking about the June amateur draft. We're talking about international free agents.
I was positive that this was an international signing rule as well (and it was!) but I should have done more digging before I brought it up. International players who signed for under 50k didn't count against the bonus pool but according to the CBA that was only for the 2012-2014 signing period.
 

Harry Hooper

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Jan 4, 2002
34,614
Anybody, never mind a teenager, is liable to confess to anything under the threat of punishment. Have to appreciate that BA covered this aspect of the story in some detail rather than a simpleton "INVESTIGATION!" clickbait piece. Of course, BA is plenty aware of the way things work in the world of international free agents so it makes sense that their immediate reaction would be "okay, so what?"

Yes, there are numerous cases of people confessing under pressure to things like being employees who pocketed money out of a cash register when in fact they never took anything.
 

phenweigh

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 8, 2005
1,379
Brewster, MA
If the Sox are guilty, then clearly the right thing to do would be to suspend David Ortiz for a quarter of the season.
Since this is a Venezuelan investigation, Sandoval is more likely on the hot seat. It would be a shame if the Sox lost his services and didn't have to pay him. Hey, maybe that's the plan. Genius!
 

nvalvo

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 16, 2005
21,684
Rogers Park
Soooo... there are no rules against "package deals," except insofar as they are a means of subverting the cap?
 

soxhop411

news aggravator
SoSH Member
Dec 4, 2009
46,519
Some updates
“‪@EvanDrellich‬: Can confirm the players have been questioned last week as BA reported, but the club has not been. https://t.co/gpJycrJ652”

“‪@EvanDrellich‬: MLB sources believe accusation of threats comes from ”people trying to cover this up.” The players aren’t the ones who would get in trouble.”

“‪@EvanDrellich‬: Fines, suspensions and loss of future signing rights are all possible outcomes of attempts to circumvent MLB’s international bonus system.”
 

Harry Hooper

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Jan 4, 2002
34,614
Some updates
“‪@EvanDrellich‬: Can confirm the players have been questioned last week as BA reported, but the club has not been. https://t.co/gpJycrJ652”

“‪@EvanDrellich‬: MLB sources believe accusation of threats comes from ”people trying to cover this up.” The players aren’t the ones who would get in trouble.”

“‪@EvanDrellich‬: Fines, suspensions and loss of future signing rights are all possible outcomes of attempts to circumvent MLB’s international bonus system.”

Who knows what's what yet, but that MLB statement might carry more weight if MLB investigators hadn't bulldozed through legal niceties in the past {Biogenesis}.
 

joe dokes

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 18, 2005
30,614
Some updates
“‪@EvanDrellich‬: Can confirm the players have been questioned last week as BA reported, but the club has not been. https://t.co/gpJycrJ652”

“‪@EvanDrellich‬: MLB sources believe accusation of threats comes from ”people trying to cover this up.” The players aren’t the ones who would get in trouble.”

“‪@EvanDrellich‬: Fines, suspensions and loss of future signing rights are all possible outcomes of attempts to circumvent MLB’s international bonus system.”
But the players dont know that. Thats how shit like that works. The cops show up at your door to ask some questions......."well, we wouldn't want the authorities to know that you didnt cooperate with us." LEGAL residents cower at that stuff. I can only imagine how some 17yr old trying to get out of where he is to MLB would react when asked anything by someone from MLB That's not to say there's nothing to any of this, but the bolded statement is a red herring.
 

JimBoSox9

will you be my friend?
SoSH Member
Nov 1, 2005
16,677
Mid-surburbia
But the players dont know that. Thats how shit like that works. The cops show up at your door to ask some questions......."well, we wouldn't want the authorities to know that you didnt cooperate with us." LEGAL residents cower at that stuff. I can only imagine how some 17yr old trying to get out of where he is to MLB would react when asked anything by someone from MLB That's not to say there's nothing to any of this, but the bolded statement is a red herring.
It also contradicts itself in literally the next sentence, unless I suppose they're talking about suspending Dombrowski.
 

Sampo Gida

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 7, 2010
5,044
MLB investigators have to get access to the players bank accounts to prove anything. The fact they can intimidate players into cooperating suggests they could get the evidence they need, if indeed there was any wrong doing. For example, transfers of some of that 300K out of accounts of those players who probably don't deserve the 300K, and additional transfers into accounts from the players who probably were worth more on the open market. This still would not directly implicate the Red Sox. For that they probably need the trainer since the players would not have received any instructions direct from the Red Sox, but only the "trainer". If the trainer does not talk, MLB probably does not have much of a case against anyone but the trainer. The trainer probably gets banned and MLB looks to close this loophole, unless they just go to the draft.
 

alwyn96

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 24, 2005
1,351
EDIT: Whoops, never mind. Nothing to see here.
 
Last edited:

geoduck no quahog

not particularly consistent
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Nov 8, 2002
13,024
Seattle, WA
No one's linked to this article yet:

Major League Baseball's investigation into contracts given to international amateur free agents by the Boston Red Sox after last July 2 is routine and ongoing, according to a source familiar with the process...

...Given the volume of contracts received in the first few days of the signing period, the commissioner's office approves most of them right away and investigates any questionable deals afterward as information or evidence appears. Thus, according to the source, an investigation at this time of deals from last July is not unusual...

...Although this investigation involved asking players about the terms of their contracts and whether they were involved in any financial transfers after signing, Major League Baseball does not, as a general rule, punish players for their involvement, limiting such punishments to teams, team executives and trainers or agents. Therefore, any claims that players were threatened with discipline, including suspensions, would be suspect.
 

amfox1

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Aug 6, 2003
6,827
The back of your computer
“‪@EvanDrellich‬: MLB sources believe accusation of threats comes from ”people trying to cover this up.” The players aren’t the ones who would get in trouble.”

“‪@EvanDrellich‬: Fines, suspensions and loss of future signing rights are all possible outcomes of attempts to circumvent MLB’s international bonus system.”
If there is any punishment (and I expect that there will be), I would not be surprised if it were announced in the next few days, given the new signing period begins Saturday.
 

JBJ_HOF

Member
SoSH Member
Apr 5, 2014
540
Major League Baseball could penalize the Red Sox over their 2015 international signings before this year’s signing period opens on Saturday, international baseball sources have told Baseball America.

The penalties being considered, according to those sources, include signing restrictions for the upcoming 2016-17 international signing period, and possibly making several of Boston’s top 2015 international signings free agents, who would then be available to sign with any team.

The timing of the disciplinary action is significant. Several Venezuelan players were expected to sign contracts with the Red Sox on July 2, but if these penalties are imposed, those players would no longer be able to sign with Boston. That includes 16-year-old outfielder Roimer Bolivar, the No. 31 international prospect on Baseball America’s Top 50 international prospects list.

...

Two of their most prominent signings last year were Venezuelan outfielders Albert Guaimaro and Simon Muzziotti for $300,000 bonuses each on July 2. Guaimaro was BA’s No. 15 international prospect last year, while Muzziotti ranked No. 24. They have both been playing in the Dominican Summer League.
http://www.baseballamerica.com/international/mlb-penalties-red-sox-international-signings/#f0xfHJwlYgTJm4ym.97
 

Dogman

Yukon Cornelius
Moderator
SoSH Member
Mar 19, 2004
15,201
Missoula, MT
From the link:

Baseball America will have more information on the full extent of penalties as they’re revealed. The commissioner’s office had been investigating the Red Sox over whether they signed several Venezuelan players from the same training programs last year in “package deals,” which are not uncommon for Latin American signings. The Red Sox were limited to signings of no more than $300,000 last year as a result of exceeding their bonus pool during the previous signing period.
 

BaseballJones

ivanvamp
SoSH Member
Oct 1, 2015
24,719
I can't help but wonder about "unprecedented penalties" for something that every team does, and compare it to the current lack of discipline held against the Cardinals for the hacking scandal.
This is one thing I still just cannot fathom. The Cardinals committed a federal crime, and not just a non-baseball related federal crime. Things that directly impacted the competition among teams in MLB.

And.....nothing. Nothing at all. The guy involved pled guilty back in January. No word from MLB.
 

smastroyin

simpering whimperer
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Jul 31, 2002
20,684
The leagues are consistent. They care much more about their own rules and bylaws than they do the law of the land. This is why deflated footballs are more scandalous than beating your girlfriend and why taking steroids is worse than killing someone in a DUI. If MLB had a no hacking rule written into the CBA and their own rules, then they'd be on top of it.
 

amfox1

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Aug 6, 2003
6,827
The back of your computer
Penalties should be announced later today or tomorrow. I believe the Red Sox signed 20 players from Venezuela last year, including ranked-internationals Alberto Guaimaro and Simon Muzziotti. I would not be surprised if Guaimaro and Muzziotti (and every other Venezuelan signed last year) are declared free agents and I would be even less surprised if the Red Sox are shut out of Venezuela for at least the upcoming signing year.
 

BaseballJones

ivanvamp
SoSH Member
Oct 1, 2015
24,719
The leagues are consistent. They care much more about their own rules and bylaws than they do the law of the land. This is why deflated footballs are more scandalous than beating your girlfriend and why taking steroids is worse than killing someone in a DUI. If MLB had a no hacking rule written into the CBA and their own rules, then they'd be on top of it.
But no CBA can specifically mention every single possible way teams or players can break the rules. So you have some general guidelines. I mean, isn't it completely ludicrous that a team can actually commit a federal crime whereby one club hacks the database of another club, but the league can't do anything about it because it's not specifically mentioned in the CBA?