Edit - fixed linkIn other words, if a franchise joins a lawsuit against the league in any capacity, then said franchise is on the hook for the financial fallout if the NFL wins the case- and Goodell will be responsible for determining the final bill.
The link didn't work when I tried to click on it, but I wonder what the NFL's response would be if Kraft told Goodell to F**K off when/if Goodell tried to impose the financial penalty. Given the lack of process that owners have with the league, I assume Goodell would then impose the loss of a 1st, 2nd, 3rd and 4th round pick in successive drafts, in which instance, Kraft would gladly pay the fine.Hadn't seen this discussed here yet - apologies if this belongs in the other thread.. I figured since it's not directly relating to the case and its outcome I'd put it here.
http://www.patspulpit.com/2016/5/29/11782682/deflategate-robert-kraft-puts-money-where-his-mouth-is-patriots-potentially-on-hook-for-bill
From the article:
I think Kraft would have no choice but to take legal action against the league/Goodell if that ever happened. So please, make it so.Or couldn't the NFL withhold TV funds that the Pats are due?
Bullshit.You're not on the hook for the entire tab when you enter the game as a pinch runner in the 9th inning.
Well, he was safe by like a foot.My heart still skips a beat when I look at that
Isn't Jeter taking that throw in a really dumb way?Bullshit.
The question would be which would travel faster, the ball heading to the glove (per your suggestion), or his glove moving from the catch-point to the tag-area (Jeter's apparent plan). The ball is probably moving faster than his glove could?Isn't Jeter taking that throw in a really dumb way?
Why not wait over the bag and let the ball travel to you and only drop the glove after catching it rather than forcing yourself to have to make a much bigger motion to apply a tag?
It's absolutely the ball. You also have to account for human reaction time, making sure the glove is in the ball, and the fact that the glove at the end of an arm isn't going in a straight line. But again, you have to work with the throw you get. Depth is not great in this pic.The question would be which would travel faster, the ball heading to the glove (per your suggestion), or his glove moving from the catch-point to the tag-area (Jeter's apparent plan). The ball is probably moving faster than his glove could?
of course, ideally, his glove could take a more direct path from the intercept-point toward the tag, but that's probably not enough to compensate for the slower speed.It's absolutely the ball. You also have to account for human reaction time and making sure the glove is in the ball.
I don't know the relative speeds. I know that the relative speeds + the factors I listed make the sweep method slower. There is a reason that players always let the ball come to them vs. sweep when at all possible. at least, I'm reasonably certain of this from my ball playing days. Also, a pro catcher is throwing the ball across a diamond damn fast. It looks slower on TV.of course, ideally, his glove could take a more direct path from the intercept-point toward the tag, but that's probably not enough to compensate for the slower speed.
Because it's discussed just about everything else so why not.Why are we discussing baseball on this thread?
This is SoSH's most dedicated physics thread.Why are we discussing baseball on this thread?
There is no telling. The fork in the road is whether the Court asks for a response or simply rejects the petition. It is unlikely to grant the petition without a response.Haven't found a good timetable out there, and haven't seen it in this thread.
What are reasonable timeframes for the next couple of steps in this saga?
With JJ Watt's new logo, ESPN thought it would be funny to come up with some other personalized logos for players. Here's ONE OF Brady's THREE, BUT I"LL ONLY LINK THIS ONE BECAUSE THAT WAY IT MAKES THEM LOOK LIKE BIG MEANIES.
Sorry it's so big. Couldn't figure out how to downsize it.
Your post was fine, and inspired a salient point from pappymojo. The intervening post was the one completely devoid of value.Apologies PP. I just didn't think the other two were very interesting.
Your post was fine, and inspired a salient point from pappymojo. The intervening post was the one completely devoid of value.
Maybe if this were the ESPN thread in the media forum, but this is the DFG thread. That was the only logo that applied here, and pappymojo's point was right on the money. The Patriots were unfairly persecuted in this farce, so their fans have every right to scream that from the rooftops until the rest of the country understands what really happened. The pendulum has already started to swing the other way, so now is not the time for Pats fans to stoically accept the NFL's version of the "truth".Sure, if you want to ignore that the main criticism of ESPN is relaying partial accounts of the complete record. Otherwise its just hypocritical to post an incomplete record. I'm in no way defending ESPN (though I laughed at the logo and find nothing wrong with it, like it or lump it, it's attached to him now and I feel some people need to chill the f out and accept reality) but I'm saying if we are going to criticize them, let's live up to the same standards. Is that a lot to ask?
Felger and Mazz were talking about this yesterday and it actually sounds like a pretty fun and decently clever promotion. Most of the beneficiaries are charities so I say why the hell not.Buffalo Bisons AAA team holding Keep Brady Suspended Night.
Pretty funny. Love how much Brady owns Buffalo.Buffalo Bisons AAA team holding Keep Brady Suspended Night.
Sorry for continuing the off-topicalness nature, but if you don't catch the ball in front of the runner, you risk the ball hitting or being knocked out by the runner and traveling into left field and allowing the runner to advance. So you reduce the risk but also reduce the time by a few fractions of a second .Isn't Jeter taking that throw in a really dumb way?
Why not wait over the bag and let the ball travel to you and only drop the glove after catching it rather than forcing yourself to have to make a much bigger motion to apply a tag?
"As I said, we've had all those discussions," Goodell said. "We've had settlement discussions over the past year. At this stage, no, right now we're moving forward. The courts will make their decisions and we'll move forward on that basis."
I don't think it's anything more than some reporter asking Goodell if anything is happening with Brady/settlement in light of the Motion for En Banc Rehearing, and Goodell repeating his "integrity of the game/rules apply to all" mantra.Where are these talks of settlement coming from? The NFL would be foolish to entertain that at this point. They stood resolute during much more uncertain times that they face now.
It's like people don't understand the basic principles of negotiation.
You might be right in this case, but we've seen this kind of inside information and speculation reported on in the past, so obviously some people in the media don't get it.I don't think it's anything more than some reporter asking Goodell if anything is happening with Brady/settlement in light of the Motion for En Banc Rehearing, and Goodell repeating his "integrity of the game/rules apply to all" mantra.
That some reporter would ask him if anything is cooking regarding a settlement is unremarkable in my view. It beats asking whether he's going to get a reversal of his lobotomy.
That's not right.I thought that the NFL's continued and obnoxious references to the 'integrity of the game' were always about the CBA. Wasn't the term pulled from the CBA as a undefined catch-all? Godell is trying to use this section of the CBA to justify his consolidation of power to rule on all things including times when Godell wants to award a larger punishment than what was previously agreed to in the CBA?
I was so surprised that the password was "fuckthepats" that I couldn't come up with anything better.Unfortunately this was just a hack
Not particularly funny.Unfortunately this was just a hack