Patriots Post-Draft Transactions

Super Nomario

Member
SoSH Member
Nov 5, 2000
14,013
Mansfield MA
Bostic was a big special teams contributor last year - 10th on the teams in special teams snaps even though he didn't play the first four games or the last three. That opens a spot for Grugier-Hill, Humber, Elandon Roberts, or one of the UDFA CBs to earn a role.
 

Super Nomario

Member
SoSH Member
Nov 5, 2000
14,013
Mansfield MA
No, just a lack of impending FAs who will be worth comp picks.
To be clear, it's not the impending FAs that determine the 2017 comp picks, it's the ones who just left - which is like, Tavon Wilson and Akiem Hicks - offset by the guys they signed (Long, McClellin, Hogan, Brown, Knighton). Well, some of the guys they signed might not factor in to the compensation formula, but at any rate, they definitely won't get any comp picks in 2017.

The impending free agent group - Hightower, Collins, Butler, Long, Knighton, Bennett, Logan Ryan, maybe even Dobson and Cannon - sets them up for comp picks in 2018, depending on what happens with those guys.
 

Papelbon's Poutine

Homeland Security
SoSH Member
Dec 4, 2005
19,615
Portsmouth, NH
Yeah I'm not 100% on which of those guys falls into which category but someone like Long, who was cut, doesn't factor in. Expired contracts or declined options are the guys that tilt the scales. While the formula is unknown, salaries and playing time also factor in, or so is speculated. So yes, with only Hicks and Wilson departing meant they weren't getting much no matter who they signed.

Let's hope next year is similar. If they get any pick worth having it means one of the defenders left town.
 

pappymojo

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 28, 2010
6,679
Yeah I'm not 100% on which of those guys falls into which category but someone like Long, who was cut, doesn't factor in. Expired contracts or declined options are the guys that tilt the scales. While the formula is unknown, salaries and playing time also factor in, or so is speculated. So yes, with only Hicks and Wilson departing meant they weren't getting much no matter who they signed.

Let's hope next year is similar. If they get any pick worth having it means one of the defenders left town.
Thats not necessary true. Bennett and Cooper among others are on one year deals.
 

SeoulSoxFan

I Want to Hit the World with Rocket Punch
Moderator
SoSH Member
Jun 27, 2006
22,098
A Scud Away from Hell

Pxer

Member
SoSH Member
Apr 16, 2007
1,729
Maine
As Reiss has reported, this was pre-arranged. Iosefa was released so NE can "shuffle" their roster spaces. In return, Iosefa declined worksouts for other teams.
Can someone explain this a bit more? Specifically, did they want a longer look at Steward? Was there another UDFA they thought they would be signing? Why wasn't he signed the same day Steward was cut? Just trying to understand exactly what's going on with these decisions because I'm obsessive like that. I understood the Ventrone shuffle because they brought other guys in. They don't save any cash with the timing, right, because players are paid game checks?
 

Super Nomario

Member
SoSH Member
Nov 5, 2000
14,013
Mansfield MA
Can someone explain this a bit more? Specifically, did they want a longer look at Steward? Was there another UDFA they thought they would be signing? Why wasn't he signed the same day Steward was cut? Just trying to understand exactly what's going on with these decisions because I'm obsessive like that. I understood the Ventrone shuffle because they brought other guys in. They don't save any cash with the timing, right, because players are paid game checks?
I think the timing was around rookie mini-camp; cutting Iosefa let them bring an extra UDFA to get a look. Presumably if one of the rookies had been awful, he might have been cut, but I guess Belichick / the coaches liked them all enough to make Steward the victim instead.
 

Deathofthebambino

Drive Carefully
SoSH Member
Apr 12, 2005
42,027
My one and only complaint with BB and the management rears it's head again (their draft picks). Don't think I've seen it mentioned yet, but very recent first rounder, Dominique Easley, was released by the Pats, and subsequently scooped up by the Rams. I have no issues with releasing him, seems there were some character issues, as well as injury concerns (again), but my issue goes back to drafting him in the first place.

http://www.nfl.com/news/story/0ap3000000663360/article/rams-sign-dominique-easley-to-oneyear-contract

I don't want to turn this thread into a discussion about the draft, but I'll argue to my dying breath that the Patriots have missed over and over again by not finding Brady a weapon on the outside, and the 2014 draft might very well be the brightest example. They take Easley with the 29th pick. Jordan Matthews gets picked by Philly with the 42nd pick. Man, how nice would he look in this offense right now. Then with the 62nd pick, the Pats take Jimmy G. (a pick that, IMO, has either been deemed a mistake by the team, which is why they took Brissett, or they just threw away the Brissett pick this year for no apparent reason). The pick right before them at 61, Allen Robinson. The pick right after them at 63, Jarvis Landry. This is the same draft that produced Sammy Watkins, OBJ, Mike Evans, Kelvin Benjamin, and Brandin Cooks in the 1st round. The Pats could have thrown darts at the board and hit a wide receiver, that IMO, would have made this team completely unstoppable offensively the last two years, and going forward. Instead, Easley, Garoppolo, Stork, James White, Fleming, Halamio, Zach Moore, Jemea Thomas and Jeremy Gallon. Man, that 2014 draft just haunts me, and cutting ties with Easley is like the cherry on the shit sundae.
 

amarshal2

Member
SoSH Member
Oct 25, 2005
4,913
Yeah, hard to like 2014 in hindsight.

But I think you have the QB logic wrong. Brady looks great. He signed an extension. Jimmy G is very likely not going to be the heir apparent - he can't wait that long to get a shot. There was no way to know Brady would look this good at this stage in his career and would get extended. They're going to have to trade JG. When they do, they're going to want a new backup QB and potential heir apparent. Plus, as BB says, qb is not a position you want to feel crappy about. It may take a few picks to find the next guy and quality starting QBs who come out from below the 3rd round are extremely rare so this is what you've got to do if you don't want to be the worst team in football the right year. The Brissett pick doesn't say anything about JG other than he's not good enough to steal Brady's job.

Plus throw in the #DG showcase for JG and they might get something good back for him.
 

( . ) ( . ) and (_!_)

T&A
SoSH Member
Feb 9, 2010
5,302
Providence, RI
My one and only complaint with BB and the management rears it's head again (their draft picks). Don't think I've seen it mentioned yet, but very recent first rounder, Dominique Easley, was released by the Pats, and subsequently scooped up by the Rams. I have no issues with releasing him, seems there were some character issues, as well as injury concerns (again), but my issue goes back to drafting him in the first place.

http://www.nfl.com/news/story/0ap3000000663360/article/rams-sign-dominique-easley-to-oneyear-contract

I don't want to turn this thread into a discussion about the draft, but I'll argue to my dying breath that the Patriots have missed over and over again by not finding Brady a weapon on the outside, and the 2014 draft might very well be the brightest example. They take Easley with the 29th pick. Jordan Matthews gets picked by Philly with the 42nd pick. Man, how nice would he look in this offense right now. Then with the 62nd pick, the Pats take Jimmy G. (a pick that, IMO, has either been deemed a mistake by the team, which is why they took Brissett, or they just threw away the Brissett pick this year for no apparent reason). The pick right before them at 61, Allen Robinson. The pick right after them at 63, Jarvis Landry. This is the same draft that produced Sammy Watkins, OBJ, Mike Evans, Kelvin Benjamin, and Brandin Cooks in the 1st round. The Pats could have thrown darts at the board and hit a wide receiver, that IMO, would have made this team completely unstoppable offensively the last two years, and going forward. Instead, Easley, Garoppolo, Stork, James White, Fleming, Halamio, Zach Moore, Jemea Thomas and Jeremy Gallon. Man, that 2014 draft just haunts me, and cutting ties with Easley is like the cherry on the shit sundae.
You seem to really over value the draft and the WR position in particular. Looking at the 2014 draft they got a starter in stork, a RB that looks like he has a role with team and their backup quarterback. In aggregate that is a pretty good draft. All those 5th and 7th round picks you listed were always only lottery tickets. The expectation should have been that guys like Moore, Thomas, Gallon we're going to flame out. Anything else would have been a surprise.

And you've spoke about the need for the pats to have a dominant outside WR before but I just don't see it. The only time in his career that Brady threw a good deep ball was when Randy Moss was here. While some of the WRs you listed are good players they are not Randy Moss. I'd much prefer that they continue to stick the field with WRs that are not the prototypical deep threat. While Brady can't not throw deep, every offense needs that 1-2 shots a game, I think on balance its better to give him less incentive to try. For all of his hall of fame skills throwing bombs is not one of them. I don't think lack of premium WR talent has cost this team Super Bowls outside of the reche Caldwell team. That position is overrated from a roster construction view. I'd argue they lost more big games do to poor OL play then they have because they lacked premium WR talent.
 
Last edited:

pappymojo

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 28, 2010
6,679
I don't want to turn this thread into a discussion about the draft, but I'll argue to my dying breath that the Patriots have missed over and over again by not finding Brady a weapon on the outside, and the 2014 draft might very well be the brightest example.
How is the 2014 draft an example of the Patriots missing over and over again by not finding Brady a weapon on the outside?
 

Stitch01

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
18,155
Boston
The Jimmy G/Brisset pick analysis is just flat wrong.

Easley pick was obviously a whiff and that draft looks bad. It happens.
 

Shelterdog

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Feb 19, 2002
15,375
New York City
My one and only complaint with BB and the management rears it's head again (their draft picks). Don't think I've seen it mentioned yet, but very recent first rounder, Dominique Easley, was released by the Pats, and subsequently scooped up by the Rams. I have no issues with releasing him, seems there were some character issues, as well as injury concerns (again), but my issue goes back to drafting him in the first place.

http://www.nfl.com/news/story/0ap3000000663360/article/rams-sign-dominique-easley-to-oneyear-contract

I don't want to turn this thread into a discussion about the draft, but I'll argue to my dying breath that the Patriots have missed over and over again by not finding Brady a weapon on the outside, and the 2014 draft might very well be the brightest example. They take Easley with the 29th pick. Jordan Matthews gets picked by Philly with the 42nd pick. Man, how nice would he look in this offense right now. Then with the 62nd pick, the Pats take Jimmy G. (a pick that, IMO, has either been deemed a mistake by the team, which is why they took Brissett, or they just threw away the Brissett pick this year for no apparent reason). The pick right before them at 61, Allen Robinson. The pick right after them at 63, Jarvis Landry. This is the same draft that produced Sammy Watkins, OBJ, Mike Evans, Kelvin Benjamin, and Brandin Cooks in the 1st round. The Pats could have thrown darts at the board and hit a wide receiver, that IMO, would have made this team completely unstoppable offensively the last two years, and going forward. Instead, Easley, Garoppolo, Stork, James White, Fleming, Halamio, Zach Moore, Jemea Thomas and Jeremy Gallon. Man, that 2014 draft just haunts me, and cutting ties with Easley is like the cherry on the shit sundae.
Or the dart could have hit Paul Richardson or Marquise Lee and we'd be in the same place we are. And if you throw in rookie free agents--which I do think is fair to do in evaluating a team's ability to bring in new cost controlled talent out of college-we did get a pro bowl cornerback that year, so all hope is not lost.

I don't think you can infer anything about Garoppolo's ability from the Brissett pick. Brady will likely miss four games this year and BB has consistently shown a preference for having draft picks as backup QBs (one assumes because of cost control and the argument is p[retty good, a slapdick backup like Scot Tolzien costs 1.75 million a year). The fact that Brady likely misses the first four compounds the problem because we'd have to pay a veteran QB their full salary for the year even if we only keep them for the four games.
 
Last edited:

pappymojo

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 28, 2010
6,679
For the sake of discussion....

I suspect that the Patriots would love to have a high quality outside receiver but that they don't feel that it is a critical need for how their team is constructed.

I think it is safe to say that a good part of Brady's success is due to the quickness of his release. We have an excellent quarterback who in particular is great at quickly getting the ball to his slot receivers. If you review Brady's career you will see how important high quality slot receivers are to his success: Troy Brown, Deion Branch, Wes Welker, Julian Edelman. The Patriots also happen to have the best tight end in football.

http://www.seahawks.com/news/2015/01/31/julian-edelman-carrying-patriots’-tradition-productive-slot-receivers

“Tom gets the ball out quick, and slot receivers are usually the ones getting out of their breaks the quickest,” said Richard Sherman, the Seahawks’ All-Pro cornerback. “And they’re usually the shorter routes.”

Sometimes, those routes are only a few yards beyond the line of scrimmage.

“And they’re usually the quicker reads, especially against the blitz,” Sherman added. “They play against a lot of blitzing teams in their division – Buffalo, the Jets, Miami. The slot receivers are going to get a lot of action in those games, and I think a lot of times that’s the focal point. People double-team Gronk. So now the slot receiver gets the lesser matchups.”
How much of an improvement to the team's current level of success will an upgrade at the outside receiver offer the team and how does that upgrade compare to the impact of an upgrade at another position? Unless we are talking about a player as great as Randy Moss, would an outside receiver ever be better than the third option on this team?
 

Super Nomario

Member
SoSH Member
Nov 5, 2000
14,013
Mansfield MA
I don't want to turn this thread into a discussion about the draft, but I'll argue to my dying breath that the Patriots have missed over and over again by not finding Brady a weapon on the outside, and the 2014 draft might very well be the brightest example. They take Easley with the 29th pick. Jordan Matthews gets picked by Philly with the 42nd pick. Man, how nice would he look in this offense right now.
Jordan Matthews has been almost exclusively a slot receiver, so I don't know what you're talking about.
 

dbn

Member
SoSH Member
Feb 10, 2007
7,785
La Mancha.
2014/15 plus 2015/16 receptions & yds
RG: 154, 2300
JE: 153, 1664
DA: 92, 848

same for WRs selected after Easly in first 5 rounds (with pick number indicated):
39 Marqise Lee 52 613
42 Jordan Matthews 152 1869
45 Paul Richardson 30 311
53 Devante Adams 88 929
56 Cody Latimer 8 82
61 Allen Robinson 128 1948
63 Jarvis Landry 194 1915
86 Josh Huff 35 410
90 Donte Moncrief 96 1177
91 John Brown 113 1699
104 Jalen Saunders 1 7
106 Bruce Ellington 19 215
115 Shaq Evans 0 0
118 Martavis Bryant 19 244
123 Kevin Norwood 9 102

Some good picks, some not-so-good picks. It gets worse in rounds 6-7.
 

Deathofthebambino

Drive Carefully
SoSH Member
Apr 12, 2005
42,027
I'm not overvaluing the impact of a outside receiver. If we were talking about the 49'ers or something, I wouldn't be asking for an outside receiver in the draft, because a fantastic outside receiver won't have much impact on that team.I think people are undervaluing the impact an outside threat will have on THIS team, not some hypothetical NFL team.

The Patriots are not the 49'ers. There are not a lot of holes to fill on this team, and there hasn't been for the better part of a decade. BB doesn't even seemingly try to fill the holes he does have when he drafts anyway. We're basically talking about trying to make a team that wins an average of 13 games a year better, and there are very, very few ways to do that, within the confines of the NFL system.

However, from where I sit, the Patriots have gone out once and got Brady a weapon on the outside, and not only did it improve upon an already great team. It turned them into a history making juggernaut. In my opinion, with the team as it is currently constructed (with weapons at tight end, slot, etc.), a true outside threat will do that again. There is no other position on the roster that I can look to and say that an improvement at that position will have that kind of effect. Sure, it'd be nice if they improved the offensive or defensive line, or found another good corner or safety, but would an upgrade of one player at any of those positions have the potential to do what a true outside threat could do immediately to the team's success? I don't think so, especially when your mainly starting your draft in the pick 30 range, and your philosophy isn't to go out and spend 100 million on a free agent.

An outside threat on this team changes the offense entirely. It frees up Gronk and Edelman and Amendola because safeties can't cheat up and double/triple those guys when they have to respect the possibility of someone on the outside. An outside threat can run deep and clear out that side of the field for the other receivers, and the backs. It turns guys who are already matchup nightmares into impossible to cover. Unlike the 2007 team, which was basically Welker, Stallworth and Ben Graham before Moss got here, this Patriots team is already stacked offensively, but we're stacked with guys essentially running the same routes and doing so within 10 yards of the LOS and between the hash marks. The field that opposing defenses need to defend against us is actually pretty small, and I believe the only reason it doesn't get exposed more often is because we're fortunate enough to have the GOAT at quarterback. We don't need this outside threat to come in and go for 23rd's and 1,500 yards, like the 2007 team did. We just need him to be someone opposing teams have to respect and plan for, unlike the Lafell's and Tims and Chad Jacksons and whatever other flotsam and Jetsam they've trotted out there for all but one of Brady's seasons.

The bottom line is that Brady's window is closing. We don't have that many more chances while he is still here. So, I feel like you have to maximize right now, and the one position on the field that can push this team in the most significant way is the true #1 receiver on the outside. If Dion Lewis comes back anywhere near what he was when he got hurt last year, and you had a true stud on the outside, how do opponents defend that? Teams can't get the same pressure on Brady because they won't be able to take away his quick reads anymore. It changes everything.

And it's ok guys. You can say it. The 2014 draft sucked. Bad.
 
Last edited:

Stitch01

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
18,155
Boston
If they can acquire Randy Moss circa 2007 at a reasonable price, they should definitely do that, and the 2014 draft looks bad.

The bottom line is that Brady's window is closing. We don't have that many more chances while he is still here. So, I feel like you have to maximize right now, and the one position on the field that can push this team in the most significant way is the true #1 receiver on the outside. If Dion Lewis comes back anywhere near what he was when he got hurt last year, and you had a true stud on the outside, how do opponents defend that? Teams can't get the same pressure on Brady because they won't be able to take away his quick reads anymore. It changes everything.

They weren't stoppable last year before Lewis, Gronk, Edelman, and every tackle on the roster got injured. They've had an elite offense every year since 2010 outside of a stretch in 2013 and last year when they had massive injury problems.

So, yeah, if they had a surefire outside guy available at a reasonable price, take him, no question (and the 2014 draft looks like it sucks, did I mention that) But given Brady's skillset and the team's history of elite offensive performance, Im having a hard time finding some sort of philosophical organizational mistake here. Yeah, I wish they had taken a good player instead of Easley and I wish now they'd taken Keenan Allen over Aaron Dobson, but Id hate to have taken Cordelle Patterson instead of making the Jamie Collins trade or taken Arrelious Benn rather than doing to Rob Gronkowski trade because the team was intent on finding Brady an outside receiver (obviously those are cherry picked bad outcomes, but its the same basic idea, Id rather take good players than bad players so Id rather have taken a good player instead of Easley)

Finally, maximizing the Brady window is not a primary goal of the Patriots. They won't be sacrificing more than marginal assets from outside the Brady window to compete better in the Brady window. You can certainly disagree with that philosophy, but its just not how this organization is going to operate.
 
Last edited:

( . ) ( . ) and (_!_)

T&A
SoSH Member
Feb 9, 2010
5,302
Providence, RI
Form the 2014 draft they got a starter in Stork, a contributor in White and a #2 QB. They also got a potential star in Butler. I'm sorry but that haul is the very definition of a B+/A- draft. Where and when each of those pieces were actually drafted is irrelevant, the overall outcome is what matters and the team added premium talent in Butler and two other role players in Stork and White. It's hard to say the entire draft sucked when a pretty reasonable gamble on a 1st round pick didn't pan out.

I also think what you are saying is that they should have a big time outside WR threat in addition to the WRs and TEs on the team not in place of. I just think that's poor roster management. Against Denver in the AFC champ game, Edelman was not 100%, Amendola was not 100% and the oline was decimated particularly at Tackle. I don't see how having a big time outside WR puts the Pats over the top in that game. Injuries suck and that's part of the deal, but you can't expect a roster to run 4-5 quality players deep at a position like WR. If Marcus Cannon were replaced with actual NFL 3rd tackle quality depth, then that game looks very different despite the injuries. If you keep Marcus Cannon in that role and added a Dez Bryant to the game, I don't see how the outcome would have been any different.
 

Stitch01

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
18,155
Boston
If you look at Butler as part of the draft class it looks better. DOB was talking strictly about the draft picks themselves and I mostly agree with him. Stork/White/Jimmy G is fairly underwhelming. I don't know gradewise, probably a C.
 

Shelterdog

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Feb 19, 2002
15,375
New York City
If you look at Butler as part of the draft class it looks better. DOB was talking strictly about the draft picks themselves and I mostly agree with him. Stork/White/Jimmy G is fairly underwhelming. I don't know gradewise, probably a C.
It's so hard to tell because Jimmy G. is such an unknown. If Jimmy G is Ryan Mallet (an adequate cheap backup who can't really start) then a C or lower is fair; if Jimmy G is actually a good starter in this league for the Pats (or if he shows enough to earn the Pats a good return) then there's a totally different answer.

We probably have our answer tot his question this season.
 

Super Nomario

Member
SoSH Member
Nov 5, 2000
14,013
Mansfield MA
An outside threat on this team changes the offense entirely. It frees up Gronk and Edelman and Amendola because safeties can't cheat up and double/triple those guys when they have to respect the possibility of someone on the outside. An outside threat can run deep and clear out that side of the field for the other receivers, and the backs. It turns guys who are already matchup nightmares into impossible to cover. Unlike the 2007 team, which was basically Welker, Stallworth and Ben Graham before Moss got here, this Patriots team is already stacked offensively, but we're stacked with guys essentially running the same routes and doing so within 10 yards of the LOS and between the hash marks. The field that opposing defenses need to defend against us is actually pretty small, and I believe the only reason it doesn't get exposed more often is because we're fortunate enough to have the GOAT at quarterback. We don't need this outside threat to come in and go for 23rd's and 1,500 yards, like the 2007 team did. We just need him to be someone opposing teams have to respect and plan for, unlike the Lafell's and Tims and Chad Jacksons and whatever other flotsam and Jetsam they've trotted out there for all but one of Brady's seasons.
Isn't 2014 LaFell basically the guy you describe? If defenses double-teamed Gronk or Edelman, he was effective enough to beat man coverage and make them pay. He ended up getting 953 yards and 7 touchdowns, which is a lot of production considering the other weapons. Obviously he fell off big-time last year. I'm just trying to get a sense for what caliber of guy you're talking about here.
 

dbn

Member
SoSH Member
Feb 10, 2007
7,785
La Mancha.
I think I agree with what DotB is saying, but not sure to what point. I mean, the Red Sox could improve their lineup or bench or bullpen, but what would really make them a great team this year is if they had another all-star level starter. Great. How would they have gotten one? They could have drafted one a couple/few years ago if they had a magic 8-ball, I guess.

I'm not knocking you, DotB; I agree with you. I'm just neither knocking the Patriots for not having a perfect roster.
 

RedOctober3829

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 19, 2005
55,430
deep inside Guido territory
Everyone wants the proverbial "deep threat" for this offense when in reality all they need is somebody to make plays outside the seams. It doesn't have to be a HOF'er like Moss either. As someone said, LaFell in 2014 was the perfect example of this. As I said in the Mitchell thread, they need a WR to run those comeback, post corner, and yes sometimes the 9 route to lessen the clutter in the middle of the field for the slot guys in the short/intermediate areas and Gronk/Bennett deep down the seam. Even guys like Lafell circa '14 don't grow on trees. Anquan Boldin would be someone I'd take a flyer on to see if he can do some of these things I describe. Throw him in the mix with Nate Washington, Malcolm Mitchell, and Aaron Dobson and see who comes out the other side.
 

Stitch01

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
18,155
Boston
It's so hard to tell because Jimmy G. is such an unknown. If Jimmy G is Ryan Mallet (an adequate cheap backup who can't really start) then a C or lower is fair; if Jimmy G is actually a good starter in this league for the Pats (or if he shows enough to earn the Pats a good return) then there's a totally different answer.

We probably have our answer tot his question this season.
Fair point too.
 

pappymojo

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 28, 2010
6,679
This seemed like a good place to post this:

http://www.nationalfootballpost.com/class-sleepers-afc-east/

New England Patriots – Malcolm Mitchell, WR 4th rd. 14th pick (#112 overall)

The Patriots undeniably knocked it out of the park with the selection of Malcolm Mitchell in the fourth round. Look for Mitchell too quickly garner Tom Brady’s confidence and give him a receiver on the outside who he can rely on to make plays for him.

Mitchell’s ability to go up and make a play on the ball in traffic is something Brady hasn’t really had at the receiver position. Although he is just six feet tall, Mitchell has long arms (33 inches) and big hands (10 ½) coupled with a 36 inch vertical, and that allows him to win those 50/50 balls downfield. Mitchell’s speed along with his route running, and run after the catch toughness will allow the Patriots to utilize him in a number of different ways within multiple sets. Mitchell’s character both on and off the field along with the toughness he will bring to the receivers group is sure to make him a fan favorite as well.

Concerns over Mitchell’s size and durability, as he has missed a number games with both minor and major injuries (torn right meniscus and ACL), allowed him to drop to New England in the fourth round.

Bill Belichick and the New England coaches will absolutely love the character, toughness, and versatility (started three games at cornerback in 2012) that Mitchell will bring to the team. If he manages to stay healthy there is no doubt in my mind that he will develop into a nice offensive weapon for the Patriots.
 

Deathofthebambino

Drive Carefully
SoSH Member
Apr 12, 2005
42,027
Isn't 2014 LaFell basically the guy you describe? If defenses double-teamed Gronk or Edelman, he was effective enough to beat man coverage and make them pay. He ended up getting 953 yards and 7 touchdowns, which is a lot of production considering the other weapons. Obviously he fell off big-time last year. I'm just trying to get a sense for what caliber of guy you're talking about here.
He is the kind of guy I'm describing. And not necessarily coincidentally, the Patriots won the Super Bowl. Obviously, the real Lafell has since reared his head, and he turned back into the guy that wasn't good enough for the Panthers dreadful receiving corp when they gave up on him. I think 2014 Lafell was his absolute ceiling, and I don't think even the Patriots could have hoped to get that kind of production from him when they got him. The problem is the Patriots have taken how many shots on guys like Lafell in free agency and the draft, and basically, barely any of them have worked out. I just wish at some point, before Brady is all done, they stop taking shots on guys like Lafell and hoping they work out, and they go and get someone through a trade or free agency, or gulp, the first round of the draft, and get a guy that they know can give them what Lafell gave them when he was at his best.
 

Deathofthebambino

Drive Carefully
SoSH Member
Apr 12, 2005
42,027
I said it at the time that I liked the Mitchell pick. However, I like the pick more than the player. I like the fact that they are at least taking a shot at someone that can truly play on the outside (although he's not really big, and not really fast), but I think he's just yet another guy that probably won't give them much when all is said and done. That said, I can't really blame the Patriots for not hitting on a wide receiver in this years' draft. It was a pretty terrible class for the position, particularly with respect to guys with the size and speed to be a true No. 1 on the outside in the NFL. I think Doctson will be the guy that will be the best of the bunch, and obviously, there was no way we were getting him, but aside from him, there really are question marks everywhere, so getting Mitchell in the 4th is what it is.

This has to make Pats fans happy though: Got a character guy, as expected:

http://www.patspulpit.com/2016/5/19/11716140/patriots-rookie-wr-malcolm-mitchell-ignores-endorsement-opportunity
 

Deathofthebambino

Drive Carefully
SoSH Member
Apr 12, 2005
42,027
Everyone wants the proverbial "deep threat" for this offense when in reality all they need is somebody to make plays outside the seams. It doesn't have to be a HOF'er like Moss either. As someone said, LaFell in 2014 was the perfect example of this. As I said in the Mitchell thread, they need a WR to run those comeback, post corner, and yes sometimes the 9 route to lessen the clutter in the middle of the field for the slot guys in the short/intermediate areas and Gronk/Bennett deep down the seam. Even guys like Lafell circa '14 don't grow on trees. Anquan Boldin would be someone I'd take a flyer on to see if he can do some of these things I describe. Throw him in the mix with Nate Washington, Malcolm Mitchell, and Aaron Dobson and see who comes out the other side.
I agree with this post. That's a lot of what I'm trying to say, except my original post was in regards to the draft where Easley came out of, and in that draft, guys like Lafell did actually grow on trees. Instead of grabbing Easley, and a back up QB that probably would have been available with our next pick, the Patriots essentially passed on a number of guys that squarely fit this mold. They could have taken a shot with either pick, and maybe hit a Landry or an Allen Robinson, or maybe packaged a couple picks, moved up in the 1st and hit one of the 4-5 absolute can't miss guys that were there. IMO, that draft was just a huge opportunity missed, and would have left this team with an offense that would be virtually unstoppable right now.

I would have loved Boldin two years ago. Or even a year ago. Not sure he really has enough left in the tank at this point. I think we've seen what Dobson can do, or more accurately, can't do, at this point. Nate Washington has great hands, but he isn't getting opposing defenses to worry, and change up their coverages on our other guys. Hope Mitchell is the guy...
 

Super Nomario

Member
SoSH Member
Nov 5, 2000
14,013
Mansfield MA
I agree with this post. That's a lot of what I'm trying to say, except my original post was in regards to the draft where Easley came out of, and in that draft, guys like Lafell did actually grow on trees. Instead of grabbing Easley, and a back up QB that probably would have been available with our next pick, the Patriots essentially passed on a number of guys that squarely fit this mold. They could have taken a shot with either pick, and maybe hit a Landry or an Allen Robinson, or maybe packaged a couple picks, moved up in the 1st and hit one of the 4-5 absolute can't miss guys that were there. IMO, that draft was just a huge opportunity missed, and would have left this team with an offense that would be virtually unstoppable right now.

I would have loved Boldin two years ago. Or even a year ago. Not sure he really has enough left in the tank at this point. I think we've seen what Dobson can do, or more accurately, can't do, at this point. Nate Washington has great hands, but he isn't getting opposing defenses to worry, and change up their coverages on our other guys. Hope Mitchell is the guy...
Where the Patriots were picking at 29, WR like LaFell don't grow on trees. The next WR were Marqise Lee, Jordan Matthews, Paul Richardson, Davante Adams, Cody Latimer, Robinson, and Landry. Robinson is awesome, Matthews and Landry have been good but are more inside guys - they don't fit your "mold," and the rest of the list is pretty underwhelming. This was a great WR draft if you were picking 10th, but not so impressive late in the first.

In hindsight pretty much anyone would have been better than Easley. I thought he was a reasonable injury gamble at the time but didn't know about his off-field / personality / coachability issues. I do think the Patriots should have done a better job evaluating this stuff and they clearly whiffed. The guy I wanted was Joel Bitonio from Nevada, who had a great rookie year as a LG for the Browns and a not-as-good sophomore campaign but would probably be their best interior lineman. He would have been a better fit, IMO, than any of the WR available at 29 other than Robinson.

If we take a broader view of the decision to pass on WR and invest in other positions, it's clearly been working out for the Pats. In 2013, they passed on the chance to take Cordarelle Patterson to move back and grab Jamie Collins and Logan Ryan, both of whom are better players. In 2012 they went for Chandler Jones and Hightower with their first two picks, costing them the chance to grab A.J. Jenkins, Brian Quick, Stephen Hill, Alshon Jeffery, Ryan Broyles, or Rueben Randle. Sure, Jeffery would look great, but the others? In 2011 it was Solder over Jonathan Baldwin, Titus Young, Torrey Smith, Greg Little, Randall Cobb. You're not talking great percentages in the aggregate where the Patriots select.

And even if they hit, then what? They could have taken Dez Bryant over Devin McCourty and I think most would agree Bryant is the more valuable player, but he also gets paid much more - $14 MM / season. The limits your ability to fill out the rest of the roster.
 

Shelterdog

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Feb 19, 2002
15,375
New York City
I agree with this post. That's a lot of what I'm trying to say, except my original post was in regards to the draft where Easley came out of, and in that draft, guys like Lafell did actually grow on trees. Instead of grabbing Easley, and a back up QB that probably would have been available with our next pick, the Patriots essentially passed on a number of guys that squarely fit this mold. They could have taken a shot with either pick, and maybe hit a Landry or an Allen Robinson, or maybe packaged a couple picks, moved up in the 1st and hit one of the 4-5 absolute can't miss guys that were there. IMO, that draft was just a huge opportunity missed, and would have left this team with an offense that would be virtually unstoppable right now.

I would have loved Boldin two years ago. Or even a year ago. Not sure he really has enough left in the tank at this point. I think we've seen what Dobson can do, or more accurately, can't do, at this point. Nate Washington has great hands, but he isn't getting opposing defenses to worry, and change up their coverages on our other guys. Hope Mitchell is the guy...
The best you could have done is package your 1 and 2 to get Cooks at about 20. He's more of an inside guy. There no way short of trading a few 2015 picks to move up and get Evans/Watkins/ODB. The draft was simply not a missed opportunity.
 
Last edited:

Deathofthebambino

Drive Carefully
SoSH Member
Apr 12, 2005
42,027
The best you could have done is package your 1 and 2 to get Cooks at about 20. He's more of an inside guy. There no way short of trading a few 2015 picks to move up and get Evans/Watkins/ODB. The draft was simply not a missed opportunity.
Kelvin Benjamin was taken with the 28th pick, and then we took Easley 29th. In my opinion, he was the big missed opportunity in that draft. As soon as New Orleans traded up and took Cooks at 20, Benjamin was going to be the next WR off the board, and at 6'5", he was the prototypical #1 outside threat. People seem to have forgotten about him because he was hurt this year, but people's memories will come back quickly when he and Newton start connecting again. He's going to change that offense completely.

Again though, you guys are focusing on just the draft here. I only brought up the draft, and specifically, the 2014 draft, due to the Easley release and signing, and because that was the draft where it made more sense than any other to use some picks and go get one of those guys. That 2014 team was good enough to win a Super Bowl, even while getting virtually nothing out of their draft picks that year, so that would have been the prime opportunity to take a shot. But really, this is a complaint I've had with the decision making going back to pre-Moss. IMO, it's just even more urgent in the past few years, as Brady's window closes, and our competition has built itself specifically to stop Brady and the guys we have/routes they run. There have been other receivers hit the market (Boldin for one) that would have fit in beautifully in this offense, and wouldn't have broken the bank, and they just haven't made it a priority. Can't argue too much with the results, but I think it's been a miss that could have given us more than 1 championship since 2004. Like I said way up above, this team doesn't have a lot holes. They win 12 games a year in their sleep, so there isn't a whole lot they can do to improve dramatically with one guy. They did it once with Moss. I'd argue they did it with Revis too. I think they should go and do it again with another wide receiver before Brady's tenure is over, whether it be through free agency, a trade or the draft. If I felt like there was another guy out there like a Revis, at another position, that could have the same affect, I'd argue for that too, but I think that's even harder and more expensive than getting a true #1 on the outside.
 

Deathofthebambino

Drive Carefully
SoSH Member
Apr 12, 2005
42,027
Where the Patriots were picking at 29, WR like LaFell don't grow on trees. The next WR were Marqise Lee, Jordan Matthews, Paul Richardson, Davante Adams, Cody Latimer, Robinson, and Landry. Robinson is awesome, Matthews and Landry have been good but are more inside guys - they don't fit your "mold," and the rest of the list is pretty underwhelming. This was a great WR draft if you were picking 10th, but not so impressive late in the first.

In hindsight pretty much anyone would have been better than Easley. I thought he was a reasonable injury gamble at the time but didn't know about his off-field / personality / coachability issues. I do think the Patriots should have done a better job evaluating this stuff and they clearly whiffed. The guy I wanted was Joel Bitonio from Nevada, who had a great rookie year as a LG for the Browns and a not-as-good sophomore campaign but would probably be their best interior lineman. He would have been a better fit, IMO, than any of the WR available at 29 other than Robinson.

If we take a broader view of the decision to pass on WR and invest in other positions, it's clearly been working out for the Pats. In 2013, they passed on the chance to take Cordarelle Patterson to move back and grab Jamie Collins and Logan Ryan, both of whom are better players. In 2012 they went for Chandler Jones and Hightower with their first two picks, costing them the chance to grab A.J. Jenkins, Brian Quick, Stephen Hill, Alshon Jeffery, Ryan Broyles, or Rueben Randle. Sure, Jeffery would look great, but the others? In 2011 it was Solder over Jonathan Baldwin, Titus Young, Torrey Smith, Greg Little, Randall Cobb. You're not talking great percentages in the aggregate where the Patriots select.

And even if they hit, then what? They could have taken Dez Bryant over Devin McCourty and I think most would agree Bryant is the more valuable player, but he also gets paid much more - $14 MM / season. The limits your ability to fill out the rest of the roster.
Again, not every draft is created equal at Wide Receiver. I could turn out to be wrong, but I had no issues with the Patriots not reaching in this year's draft for one of the top guys, or even taking any receiver at all. It was just a weak class, as have many others. The 2014 draft was another story altogether though, and everyone knew it going in. The fact that they didn't make an attempt to get any of those guys, and ended up coming away with what they did, is a miss. That's all. And some here like myself were saying just that at the time.

I think the Pats 2012 and 2013 drafts were two of their best, so I also have no issue with what they did there. 2010 is a question. Everyone talks about Dez Bryant, but we traded out of that pick twice. Dez was the 2nd time. IIRC, we first traded with Denver, and they took Demaryius Thomas. We moved back a couple spots, and then traded out again, and that's when Dallas took Dez. We then turned that 1st round pick into McCourty and Aaron Hernandez and Taylor Price. Sure, Dez might be more expensive now, but would he or Demaryius Thomas have cost us what McCourty and Hernandez would end up costing us (McCourty in salary, and Hernandez in every other way). Who knows? I don't even really like playing these games with the draft 6 years after the fact because you never know how careers change based on where guys end up, especially this far out. Again, this isn't just about the draft. It's a philosophical difference.
 

Shelterdog

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Feb 19, 2002
15,375
New York City
Kelvin Benjamin was taken with the 28th pick, and then we took Easley 29th. In my opinion, he was the big missed opportunity in that draft. As soon as New Orleans traded up and took Cooks at 20, Benjamin was going to be the next WR off the board, and at 6'5", he was the prototypical #1 outside threat. People seem to have forgotten about him because he was hurt this year, but people's memories will come back quickly when he and Newton start connecting again. He's going to change that offense completely.

Again though, you guys are focusing on just the draft here. I only brought up the draft, and specifically, the 2014 draft, due to the Easley release and signing, and because that was the draft where it made more sense than any other to use some picks and go get one of those guys. That 2014 team was good enough to win a Super Bowl, even while getting virtually nothing out of their draft picks that year, so that would have been the prime opportunity to take a shot. But really, this is a complaint I've had with the decision making going back to pre-Moss. IMO, it's just even more urgent in the past few years, as Brady's window closes, and our competition has built itself specifically to stop Brady and the guys we have/routes they run. There have been other receivers hit the market (Boldin for one) that would have fit in beautifully in this offense, and wouldn't have broken the bank, and they just haven't made it a priority. Can't argue too much with the results, but I think it's been a miss that could have given us more than 1 championship since 2004. Like I said way up above, this team doesn't have a lot holes. They win 12 games a year in their sleep, so there isn't a whole lot they can do to improve dramatically with one guy. They did it once with Moss. I'd argue they did it with Revis too. I think they should go and do it again with another wide receiver before Brady's tenure is over, whether it be through free agency, a trade or the draft. If I felt like there was another guy out there like a Revis, at another position, that could have the same affect, I'd argue for that too, but I think that's even harder and more expensive than getting a true #1 on the outside.
We're focusing on the draft because you brought it up.
 

Super Nomario

Member
SoSH Member
Nov 5, 2000
14,013
Mansfield MA
I think the Pats 2012 and 2013 drafts were two of their best, so I also have no issue with what they did there. 2010 is a question. Everyone talks about Dez Bryant, but we traded out of that pick twice. Dez was the 2nd time. IIRC, we first traded with Denver, and they took Demaryius Thomas. We moved back a couple spots, and then traded out again, and that's when Dallas took Dez. We then turned that 1st round pick into McCourty and Aaron Hernandez and Taylor Price. Sure, Dez might be more expensive now, but would he or Demaryius Thomas have cost us what McCourty and Hernandez would end up costing us (McCourty in salary, and Hernandez in every other way). Who knows? I don't even really like playing these games with the draft 6 years after the fact because you never know how careers change based on where guys end up, especially this far out. Again, this isn't just about the draft. It's a philosophical difference.
I agree it's a philosophical difference. I pointed out Dez's salary (and Demaryius Thomas makes about the same) because it's pretty clear to me that the Patriots aren't going to pay a WR that kind of money. They were able to get Moss for cheap, so they made the move (LaFell, Lloyd, and Johnson were cheap, too, with varying results), and they traded Moss when his contract became an issue. WR isn't the only position they take this approach on, either: they have only used one top-50 pick on an edge rusher in the Belichick era (fewest of any team) and they just traded that guy for a second-round pick before they had to pay him big money. They've had some top CBs, but that's another spot where they've been happier to let other teams give them the big contract.

The other thing I see with the teams that have the superstar receivers is that they lack depth throughout the rest of the roster, including at WR. Dallas' receivers were awful last year after Dez got hurt. Same with the Bengals in 2014. Atlanta had to give big money to Sanu because their non-Jones WR were awful. Arizona and Detroit struggled to complement Megatron and Fitzgerald for years. We saw this with the Pats in 2009, when they still had Moss but teams didn't have to respect Sam Aiken. It's very difficult to pay a WR big money and also have depth, so teams with a superstar WR are usually top-heavy.

FWIW, Boldin is mostly a slot guy, too.
 

Rudy's Curve

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 4, 2006
2,333
The other thing I see with the teams that have the superstar receivers is that they lack depth throughout the rest of the roster, including at WR. Dallas' receivers were awful last year after Dez got hurt. Same with the Bengals in 2014. Atlanta had to give big money to Sanu because their non-Jones WR were awful. Arizona and Detroit struggled to complement Megatron and Fitzgerald for years. We saw this with the Pats in 2009, when they still had Moss but teams didn't have to respect Sam Aiken. It's very difficult to pay a WR big money and also have depth, so teams with a superstar WR are usually top-heavy.
It's tangential to this discussion but to be fair, Jones and Eifert both missed the entire season (Eifert played one quarter) in 2014 in addition to Green missing a lot of time. When you take any team's top three options away, their passing game is probably going to suck.
 

Bergs

funky and cold
SoSH Member
Jul 22, 2005
21,685
The Browns have cut Brian Hartline, which sets the stage nicely for BB to assemble the whitest WR core in post-merger NFL history.
 

Deathofthebambino

Drive Carefully
SoSH Member
Apr 12, 2005
42,027
The other thing I see with the teams that have the superstar receivers is that they lack depth throughout the rest of the roster, including at WR. Dallas' receivers were awful last year after Dez got hurt. Same with the Bengals in 2014. Atlanta had to give big money to Sanu because their non-Jones WR were awful. Arizona and Detroit struggled to complement Megatron and Fitzgerald for years. We saw this with the Pats in 2009, when they still had Moss but teams didn't have to respect Sam Aiken. It's very difficult to pay a WR big money and also have depth, so teams with a superstar WR are usually top-heavy.

FWIW, Boldin is mostly a slot guy, too.
There is a bit of a chicken/egg thing going on here though, in fairness, which goes back to one of my earlier points in that a true #1 outside threat will not have the same impact on every team, as it does on a team like the Patriots. When you're talking about the quality of the wide receiving corps on a team, I don't think you can really do so without also mentioning their QB. Dallas' receiving corps looked awful last year, in large part, because they had to catch passes from Matt Cassell, Weeden, and Kellen Moore, and not Tony Romo. Tom Brady has done quite a bit with guys a lot less talented than Jason Witten, Terrence Williams and Cole Beasley. I'd venture to say that Brady could probably turn all three of them into 1,000 yard receivers (in Witten's case, again).Shit, Brady won a Super Bowl with David Givens as his #1 receiver, and two years later, he threw for 3,500 yards, 24 td's and 12 picks and went 12-4 with Reche Caldwell catching the most passes. For most of his career, the Patriots have not only not been top heavy at wide receiver, they've been downright shitty. You don't think Brady could turn a guy like Beasley into the next Welker/Edelman? If not them, then Amendola? I sure do. Has any Patriots receiver ever left New England and had the same success they had here? Nobody has done more with less, IMO, than Brady has in his career, and now, when they've given him a set of weapons on the inside and down the seam that makes it brutal to defend them, there is one more piece that could make them unstoppable (particularly if Dion Lewis returns to what he was to start last year). That's why a #1 on this team, at this point in time (and going back to when Gronk got here), would have a completely different effect than it would on most teams.

Atlanta had to go out and get someone because father time caught up to Roddy White. It was going to happen eventually. But again, Matt Ryan, Andy Dalton, Stafford, whoever Arizona had pre-Palmer, etc. These guys aren't Tom Brady. If you take away the #1 weapon from almost any QB not named Brady, the team will suffer. It's not a salary cap issue, or top heavy issue, it's a talent at QB issue. There are only a handful of guys like Brady that can lose their #1, and still succeed. In fact, Aaron Rodgers did just that when they lost Jordy Nelson last year. But we also saw Rodgers struggle (31 td's, 8 interceptions is weird to call a struggle) more than we have in many years. Nelson makes a huge difference to that team. They were still very good without him, but he gives them another dimension go along with Randall Cobb, Richard Rodgers, James Jones, Starks/Lacy out of the backfield, that takes them from a really, really good offense, to a borderline historically good offense. IMO, in that sense, they are a very good comp to the Pats, when you eliminate Nelson.

I don't want to keep beating a dead horse, so this will be my last post for now on this topic. This Patriots team should be an odds on favorite to win the Super Bowl until Brady retires. And that's just fine. I just honestly believe that the one position and the only position that could have, and still could, increase those odds dramatically is the #1 wide receiver. When I see Manning tossing ducks to Demaryius Thomas, Big Ben hitting Antonio Brown, Rodgers to Nelson, Eli to OBJ, Brees to Colston (when they were good), and then I think back to the Moss years, I just dream of what could be....Not coincidentally, those QB's account for every Super Bowl victory dating back to the Patriots run from 2001-2005, except for Russell Wilson and Joe Flacco. These are the guys that make that #1 wide receiver so, so much more important, than a #1 wide receiver would mean for a team like Atlanta or Detroit. These are QB's that already turn average receivers into weapons, but turn weapons into unstoppable juggernauts. Montana had Rice, Bradshaw had Swann, Aikman had Irvin...The champions and the true greats at QB, almost to a man, had a #1, except Brady. You know who didn't have that true #1 their entire career? Dan Marino. But I digress. Give TB those weapons just one more time, and he'll rip the doors off the defenses in this league.
 

( . ) ( . ) and (_!_)

T&A
SoSH Member
Feb 9, 2010
5,302
Providence, RI
So to win the Super Bowl you need a great outside WR.
This is not true. Look at the last 15 Super Bowl Winners, by my count only 6 of them had the true standout outside #1 WR position filled.

And you have to be very loose with the definition of #1 WR to even get to 6:
Colts/Wayne
Giants/Plaxico
Steelers/Holmes
Saints/Colston
Packers/Jennings
Denver/Thomas
(I may be mis-remembering how much guys like Wayne and Holmes actually played out of the slot).

the other 9 Super Bowl winners:
Pats X4, Bucs, Steelers, Giants, Ravens, Seahawks. these teams had some quality slot guys (Hines Ward, Victor Cruz) but they all lacked that big dominant WR presence outside the numbers.

Dominant outside WRs are almost a vanity position. It is sure as hell fun to watch and it's exciting for fantasy football, but it does not seem to translate to or be a requirement in any way to actually winning Super Bowls

To further illustrate this point pull up any pro bowl or all pro roster from the last 15 years and count the number of Super Bowls that WRs have won. I know it's a pro bowl but it's a good proxy for who are the best WRs in the game or at least the guys thought of as #1 WRs. I don't have time to aggregate them all now but you will find surprisingly few Super Bowl rings among them. Even less rings if you discount the guys that were purely slot WRs like Hines Ward.
 
Last edited:

BigSoxFan

Member
SoSH Member
May 31, 2007
47,211
Hakeem Nicks in 2011 was a 80/1200/7 guy. His career nosedived quickly but he was arguably a #1 calibre WR 5 years ago. But, I agree with the overall premise of the post. Yes, having Moss kicked ass for a couple seasons but Brady doesn't need a Dez Bryant on the outside to win, as he proved just 16 months ago. Between Gronk, Edelman, Bennett, Amendola, and hopefully some of the new guys, he has plenty of options to throw to. A big #1 WR on the outside isn't really needed as long as Gronk is healthy and an elite TE.
 

Super Nomario

Member
SoSH Member
Nov 5, 2000
14,013
Mansfield MA
There is a bit of a chicken/egg thing going on here though, in fairness, which goes back to one of my earlier points in that a true #1 outside threat will not have the same impact on every team, as it does on a team like the Patriots. When you're talking about the quality of the wide receiving corps on a team, I don't think you can really do so without also mentioning their QB. Dallas' receiving corps looked awful last year, in large part, because they had to catch passes from Matt Cassell, Weeden, and Kellen Moore, and not Tony Romo. Tom Brady has done quite a bit with guys a lot less talented than Jason Witten, Terrence Williams and Cole Beasley. I'd venture to say that Brady could probably turn all three of them into 1,000 yard receivers (in Witten's case, again).Shit, Brady won a Super Bowl with David Givens as his #1 receiver, and two years later, he threw for 3,500 yards, 24 td's and 12 picks and went 12-4 with Reche Caldwell catching the most passes. For most of his career, the Patriots have not only not been top heavy at wide receiver, they've been downright shitty. You don't think Brady could turn a guy like Beasley into the next Welker/Edelman? If not them, then Amendola? I sure do. Has any Patriots receiver ever left New England and had the same success they had here? Nobody has done more with less, IMO, than Brady has in his career, and now, when they've given him a set of weapons on the inside and down the seam that makes it brutal to defend them, there is one more piece that could make them unstoppable (particularly if Dion Lewis returns to what he was to start last year). That's why a #1 on this team, at this point in time (and going back to when Gronk got here), would have a completely different effect than it would on most teams.

Atlanta had to go out and get someone because father time caught up to Roddy White. It was going to happen eventually. But again, Matt Ryan, Andy Dalton, Stafford, whoever Arizona had pre-Palmer, etc. These guys aren't Tom Brady. If you take away the #1 weapon from almost any QB not named Brady, the team will suffer. It's not a salary cap issue, or top heavy issue, it's a talent at QB issue. There are only a handful of guys like Brady that can lose their #1, and still succeed. In fact, Aaron Rodgers did just that when they lost Jordy Nelson last year. But we also saw Rodgers struggle (31 td's, 8 interceptions is weird to call a struggle) more than we have in many years. Nelson makes a huge difference to that team. They were still very good without him, but he gives them another dimension go along with Randall Cobb, Richard Rodgers, James Jones, Starks/Lacy out of the backfield, that takes them from a really, really good offense, to a borderline historically good offense. IMO, in that sense, they are a very good comp to the Pats, when you eliminate Nelson.

I don't want to keep beating a dead horse, so this will be my last post for now on this topic. This Patriots team should be an odds on favorite to win the Super Bowl until Brady retires. And that's just fine. I just honestly believe that the one position and the only position that could have, and still could, increase those odds dramatically is the #1 wide receiver. When I see Manning tossing ducks to Demaryius Thomas, Big Ben hitting Antonio Brown, Rodgers to Nelson, Eli to OBJ, Brees to Colston (when they were good), and then I think back to the Moss years, I just dream of what could be....Not coincidentally, those QB's account for every Super Bowl victory dating back to the Patriots run from 2001-2005, except for Russell Wilson and Joe Flacco. These are the guys that make that #1 wide receiver so, so much more important, than a #1 wide receiver would mean for a team like Atlanta or Detroit. These are QB's that already turn average receivers into weapons, but turn weapons into unstoppable juggernauts. Montana had Rice, Bradshaw had Swann, Aikman had Irvin...The champions and the true greats at QB, almost to a man, had a #1, except Brady. You know who didn't have that true #1 their entire career? Dan Marino. But I digress. Give TB those weapons just one more time, and he'll rip the doors off the defenses in this league.
I agree with 90% of what you wrote, but I came to the opposite conclusion. I agree that Brady (and other elite QBs like Rodgers) can do more with less; no Brady Pats team has finished worse than 12th in points, and the 2006 and 2013 teams with terrible receiving groups finished 7th and 3rd in points, respectively. I see that as a competitive advantage over situations like Cincinnati and Atlanta where Dalton and Ryan need the #1 receivers. The Pats can spend their picks and cap room filling out the roster elsewhere. This is where I think Polian's Colts went awry - instead of asking Peyton to do more with less, he spent several first-round picks on offensive weapons (and signed them to big contracts). That helped Manning put up huge numbers, but those teams weren't as well-rounded as the Pats teams that won three out of four Super Bowls.

One note: Colston is a slot receiver. I'm not sure why you'd include him and not guys like Edelman and Welker. From where I'm sitting, one of the advantages the Patriots (and the Saints, for that matter) have exploited over the past 15 years is the idea that slot guys, tight ends, and receiving backs don't impact the game the way more conventional outside receivers do and their production somehow counts for less.
 

Deathofthebambino

Drive Carefully
SoSH Member
Apr 12, 2005
42,027
One note: Colston is a slot receiver. I'm not sure why you'd include him and not guys like Edelman and Welker. From where I'm sitting, one of the advantages the Patriots (and the Saints, for that matter) have exploited over the past 15 years is the idea that slot guys, tight ends, and receiving backs don't impact the game the way more conventional outside receivers do and their production somehow counts for less.
Colston is a slot guy now, but earlier in his career and when they won the Super Bowl, he was playing on the outside quite a bit, and quite often alone on one side of the field with Henderson and Meachem on the other side. It was in his first training camp that the Saints decided to trade old friend, Donte Stallworth to make room for Colston. (Stallworth then played one year in Philly before coming here). Joe Horn basically lasted one more season, and then Colston became the undisputed #1. That team also had Shockey in the middle of the field. He was listed at like 6-5, 225 lb's coming out of college, and ran a 40 in the 4.5 range. Yeah, he played at Hofstra, but just 10 years later, a kid with those kinds of numbers would never fall to the 7th round, barring some sort of character issues. Even in 2006, I'm surprised a team didn't take a shot on him much earlier than the Saints did. He was damn close to being an undrafted free agent, and went on to own basically every single Saints receiving record. One of the most underrated receivers in the NFL in the past two decades, IMO, and one of the biggest late round steals in draft history.