Chat S--- Get Banged: Leicester Have Won the League!

coremiller

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 14, 2005
5,852
I'm not a Leicester supporter, but I think this team deserves its own thread, and they don't seem to have one yet. This is clearly THE story of the season so far. They are on fire right now, having taken 26 of their last 30 points. They were listed at 2000:1 to win the title before the season; that has dropped to 10:1.

So can they win the league? Probably not. But I would have thought it was nearly impossible for them to be top at Christmas, too, and yet here they are. They've been helped some by relative struggles of the other traditional big clubs, but they're on an 85-point pace, which is no slouch. And their good form really dates back to the end of last season; they finished last year 7-1-1 and so are 18-6-2 for 60 points in their last 26 matches, and they are third in the 2015 calendar year table, over 36 matches.

Interestingly, they have been successful despite deviating from the current vogue for pressing/possession. Instead they are all about pacey counters. They are 18th with only 43.6% possession and they are dead last in pass completion %. But they are 7th in shots per game and 4th in shots on target per game. They have by far the highest shot conversion rate, and I suspect that's likely to regress. I know in hockey it is well established that shooting percentages regress heavily to the mean, does anyone know of similar evidence in soccer?

They have been heavily reliant in attack on Vardy and Mahrez; those two have combined for 28 goals and 10 assists. Okazaki has three goals, no one else has more than 1. If those two slow down or get injured, they could be in real trouble.

Reasons to think they can't win the title:

1) Regression to the mean.
2) Most of their players have never been through anything resembling a real title chase before. The pressure and media spotlight will be immense and something new for them. An inexperienced team could crack.
3) They lack depth and their performances will suffer when they can't rotate to keep key players fresh.
4) They have had pretty good luck with injuries so far. That might not continue.
5) Teams will eventually figure out how to defend against their counterattacking system and they may not have a Plan B.
6) Nothing like this has even remotely come close to occurring in the big money era.

Reasons to think they can win the title:

1) They've been pretty awesome so far.
2) EVERYONE in England is going to be pulling for them. Who wouldn't want Leicester to win?

They have @Liverpool, Manchester City, and @Spurs in their next four. A tricky stretch. We'll know a little more about their title credentials after that.

Also, if you're Leicester and someone offers you 50m for Mahrez or Vardy in January, what do you do? Probably turn it down, because the money should still be there in June (assuming no injuries), but it's not an easy call.
 

Dummy Hoy

Angry Pissbum
SoSH Member
Jul 22, 2006
8,241
Falmouth
I wouldn't move either guy- they're just to close to some serious glory for a club of their stature.

Depth will be the biggest issue, but they will punt the FA Cup and aren't in europe (unlike their contending opponents), so I would think they still have an outside chance and a good shot at Europe, which is cool.

Nigel Pearson did a very good job with them; I'm biased obviously, but a few off field issues clouded a great on field record. He gave them some great defensive focus, and staying up allowed them some extra $ to not have to sell some key guys and even to bring in a Mahrez. Ranieri has obviously taken them to another level though.
 

teddykgb

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 16, 2005
11,065
Chelmsford, MA
The possession stats are the biggest issue I see. It's really really really hard to generate enough goals with so little of the ball. You have to be so lethal on the counter and I just don't see the conversion rate as sustainable. Whether through injury or simple luck, I think there's an inevitable bad spell in their future. Especially as the table gets tighter and teams see a single point versus Leicester as helping them in their own battles in the table.
 

Morgan's Magic Snowplow

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 2, 2006
22,373
Philadelphia
The possession stats are the biggest issue I see. It's really really really hard to generate enough goals with so little of the ball. You have to be so lethal on the counter and I just don't see the conversion rate as sustainable. Whether through injury or simple luck, I think there's an inevitable bad spell in their future. Especially as the table gets tighter and teams see a single point versus Leicester as helping them in their own battles in the table.
I think this is pretty big. To win the league you have to beat the mid and lower table teams consistently and once those teams start seeing a point as a victory, then you have to be able to score from established possession and break down packed defenses. I don't see much from Leicester that suggests they'll be able to do that consistently.

This is basically covered by the idea that they have an unsustainable conversion rate, but the advanced stats here suggest that Leicester should have about a +5.6 goal differential based on the chances they've had and conceded, which is 5th best in the league and well behind Arsenal and City (and a decent ways behind Spurs as well).

In the end, I think Arsenal, City, or both will hit form in the second half and Leicester just won't be able to keep up. But I think they will be right in the thick of competition for a Top 4 place and are much better positioned in that respect than a team like Southampton last year, which never hit the same heights in terms of league position and also simply lacked the firepower that Leicester possesses.
 

Zomp

Moderator
Moderator
SoSH Member
Aug 28, 2006
13,953
The Slums of Shaolin
Isn't Leicester making top 4 worth more than anything Vardy or Mahrez will bring in? If they can make top 4, sell those two and invest in some more youth they could be well positioned for the future. Lets not forget last year at this time they were bottom of the table. I'd imagine setting the club up for a long, long run in the Premiership is worth much more than selling Vardy while he's hot.
 

Morgan's Magic Snowplow

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 2, 2006
22,373
Philadelphia
Isn't Leicester making top 4 worth more than anything Vardy or Mahrez will bring in? If they can make top 4, sell those two and invest in some more youth they could be well positioned for the future. Lets not forget last year at this time they were bottom of the table. I'd imagine setting the club up for a long, long run in the Premiership is worth much more than selling Vardy while he's hot.
I doubt they'll get that much for Vardy. He will be 29 in January and doesn't really have the all around game to fit into how most of the wealthier clubs play. Mahrez, however, could be sold for a bundle given his age and technical ability.

All that said, it still doesn't make sense to sell either player in January. Not only would that sink their chances of Top 4 (participating in the CL group stage is probably worth like 20-30m for an English next year, more if they advance to the knockouts), but the reality is that if they can sell a player like Mahrez for 35m in January then they can probably sell him for roughly the same amount in July.
 

CodPiece XL

Member
SoSH Member
Jun 4, 2007
2,427
Scottsdale, AZ.

If someone told me there would be a thread about Leicester winning the League a year ago I would have said they must be smoking crack. What a crazy season so far.

I was having a conversation yesterday about what was the bigger story, Chelsea getting relegated of Leicester winning the league, which made good happy hour banter. Unfortunately, I just can’t see either happening but I can hope.

I’m a bit of a dinosaur when it comes to stats, my coaches always told me just take more shots on goal and good things happen and keep it simple at the back. This probably explains why I seldom post in the baseball forum, I’m just not a stats person but I’m not lazy-jeebus, that advanced stat link makes my eyes bleed.

My biggest concern for Leicester is their complete reliance on Vardy and Mahrez, if one or God forbid both get injured the title chase is over for them. They just don’t have the squad depth of Man City or Arsenal. Both players account for around 75% of Leicester’s goal tally. Surprisingly, they are not the best partnership in the league, Ighalo and Deeney have contributed more as far as goal ratios for Watford. As already mentioned in previous posts, teams are going to try and change tactics as the dog fight for getting out of the relegation zone heats up. More teams are going to be “parking the bus” in the hopes of getting at least a point which could prove priceless to their survival. This probably won’t suit their counter attacking style, where they use Vardy and Mayrez to turn defence into attack in the blink of an eye. If other teams are going to change how they game plan against Leicester and give up more possession, can Leicester adopt other tactics and if they do, will they have the same success? It’s certainly going to be interesting to keep an eye on.

The one thing that does worry me is their defence, 24 GA…compare to Arsenal’s 14. They rank #13. Is that the caliber of defence that wins you a championship? I have my doubts but maybe someone more adept than I can dig out some historical data for EPL champs and how they ranked in GA. Actually, the highest GA for any EPL champion is 45..I did some digging.

How does their conversion rate at this point compare to previous champions? Is there a good site to get that type of stat? I know that the general consensus is that they will regress.

So..what do they have going for them?
a) No distractions as far as European football
b) An experienced coach
c) 38 Points
d) A nothing to lose mentality, just a few points and they are safe from relegation!
e) Some of the usual suspects, top clubs with big $$$ under performing
f) A decent bench with experience
g) History: out of the last 11 seasons, the top team at Christmas has won 8 times

Just my take, I think Arsenal win the league this year ( I can't believe I'm saying that) , Leicester will finish in the top 4. The good news is that teams leading at the EPL at Christmas have finished in the top 4 all but once, Villa finished 6th in 98-99. If nothing else, they stand a very good chance of getting a European Champions League place and all the cash that comes with it, which would be phenomenal . This is assuming the English coefficient remains high enough for 4 teams?

Hopefully they don’t sell, all chips are in at this point , strengthen the squad a bit but nothing drastic during the transfer window. Go for it….I hope to see them still top around Easter but the cynic in me thinks otherwise.

Liverpool and Man City next over the festive break..

A big shout out to Watford and Crystal Palace too, it makes a nice change seeing some less “fashionable” teams doing well….
 

swiftaw

Member
SoSH Member
Jan 31, 2009
3,440
This is assuming the English coefficient remains high enough for 4 teams?
Number of spots for the 2016/17 season have already been determined based on the coefficients at the end of last season.

Coefficients at the end of this season determine number of spots for Europe in 2017/18.

However if English teams outside the top 4 win both the champions league and Europa league then the 4th place team in England would end up in the Europa league next season.
 

Morgan's Magic Snowplow

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 2, 2006
22,373
Philadelphia
Number of spots for the 2016/17 season have already been determined based on the coefficients at the end of last season.

Coefficients at the end of this season determine number of spots for Europe in 2017/18.

However if English teams outside the top 4 win both the champions league and Europa league then the 4th place team in England would end up in the Europa league next season.
The bigger concern for Leicester in this respect is that finishing 4th is likely to leave them a substantial underdog to win their playoff tie and advance to the CL group stage. They'll be in the unseeded side of the pool and seeded non-English teams this year were Leverkusen, Valencia, Shakhtar, and Sporting Lisbon. Even if they keep all their players, Leicester will have an uphill fight against clubs of that quality. While the difference between 3rd and 4th hasn't been that substantial for the bigger English clubs, which are almost always seeded in the playoff round and basically always advance, for Leicester it would be huge.
 

soxfan121

JAG
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Dec 22, 2002
23,043
However if English teams outside the top 4 win both the champions league and Europa league then the 4th place team in England would end up in the Europa league next season.
Thanks for telling us how Spurs season is gonna end.
 

cjdmadcow

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 16, 2005
1,478
St Albans, UK
There are two opposing points of view when it comes to what's happening this season; either the overall quality is crap hence the ability of teams such as Leicester, Crystal Palace & Watford to compete or the amount of cash sloshing around the Premier League has actually allowed said clubs - and others - to invest in scouting, training & other areas of infrastructure behind the scenes that we don't get to see and so have actually improved the abilities of their playing staff.

Even as a fan of one of the 'big' teams I'm really enjoying what Leicester are doing - though valid points are raised above as to whether they can continue through the second half of the season. I see their two biggest issues being staying free from injuries - such a difficult thing to do these days - and the psychological effect of passing the 38-40 point mark. All season the mantra coming out of everyone at the club has been about getting to the stage where they believe they will be free from relegation concerns, so what happens to the mind-set once that's been done? Do they relax - even unconsciously - and a couple of drawn games then lead to a couple of defeats and so the downward cycle begins?

There's some great stories coming out of this season - it's such a refreshing change and the old romantic in me hope it continues (but not until after Leicester come to Anfield on Saturday, of course) and I really hope they keep hold of Mahrez in particular and decide to invest further in the January transfer window and really go for it.

My two candidates for Player of the Season so far - Mahrez & Ozil
 

coremiller

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 14, 2005
5,852
Leicester had a tough Christmas period, with a loss at Anfield followed by two home scoreless draws. But they righted the ship today with a 1-0 win over Spurs, and are still tied on points for first place, trailing Arsenal only on goal difference.

Leicester lost at home to Arsenal 5-2 in October; I wonder if Ranieri would have played that match more conservatively if he had known the Foxes would end up in a title race with Arsenal. That six-goal swing in GD represents the entirety of Arsenal's GD advantage.

Leicester's problem lately has been that the goals have dried up. Huth's winner today was their first goal in four games. After scoring in 11 games in a row, Vardy now has just one goal in 7 and none in his last five.
 

Morgan's Magic Snowplow

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 2, 2006
22,373
Philadelphia
I still don't think they can win the league but this result was pretty huge for their Top 4 chances. They are now 8 ahead of West Ham, 9 ahead of United, and 12 ahead of Liverpool with 17 to play. Its hard to make up lots of ground in this year's Premier League because every match is difficult. If Leicester can even pull ~25 points out of their last 17 matches, I have a hard time seeing anybody currently out of the Top 4 catching them.
 

Senator Donut

post-Domer
SoSH Member
Apr 21, 2010
5,522
It's been mentioned elsewhere, but they really need to aim for the top three, because qualification is hell for an unseeded side in Europe.
 
Which is why getting a win at Spurs is that much more important. (Their lead over fourth-place Tottenham is now 7 points.)

I still don't see them hanging on even for fourth - the weight of history argues too heavily against them. But the strongest argument in their favor is just how dreadful the other main contenders have been - Chelsea, Man Utd and Liverpool have all been awful (and/or injury-ridden) for large stretches this season. If they keep struggling, and nobody from the WHam/Palace/Stoke/Watford group embarks upon an even more unlikely run of form, Leicester could finish third or fourth almost by default.
 
Despite Leicester's disappointing draw at (a suddenly in-form) Aston Villa today, I find myself asking this question: how many more points does Leicester need to win this season for Ranieri to be the Premiership's manager of the year? Or to put it another way, how bad a tailspin would Leicester need to suffer in the second half of the season for Ranieri not to win that honour? I mean Leicester have won 12 and drawn 8 games out of 22 played; back in August, Leicester fans would have deemed it a pretty good season if they won 12 and drew 8 after all 38 games were played.

By the by, as an entirely random dream, I would love it - love it - if Leicester finished fourth and played in the Champions League qualifying round against Sassuolo.
 

Titans Bastard

has sunil gulati in his sights
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Dec 15, 2002
14,455
By the by, as an entirely random dream, I would love it - love it - if Leicester finished fourth and played in the Champions League qualifying round against Sassuolo.
Alas, that won't happen because both will almost certainly be in the unseeded pot and wouldn't be drawn together.
 

Schnerres

Member
SoSH Member
Apr 28, 2009
1,554
Germany
Despite Leicester's disappointing draw at (a suddenly in-form) Aston Villa today, I find myself asking this question: how many more points does Leicester need to win this season for Ranieri to be the Premiership's manager of the year? Or to put it another way, how bad a tailspin would Leicester need to suffer in the second half of the season for Ranieri not to win that honour? I mean Leicester have won 12 and drawn 8 games out of 22 played; back in August, Leicester fans would have deemed it a pretty good season if they won 12 and drew 8 after all 38 games were played.

By the by, as an entirely random dream, I would love it - love it - if Leicester finished fourth and played in the Champions League qualifying round against Sassuolo.
It probably depends where the other lower name or lower expectation teams plus Arsenal and Tottenham finish. I think City (2nd, Pellegrini), United (6th, LvG) and Liverpool (9th, Klopp) and their coaches will have no chance to win Manager of the year (is that something special in England?).
So it´s:
1) Leicester/Ranieri, 22g, 44p, +13, L6: 9p, 8th;
3) Arsenal/Wenger, 21g, 43p, +16, L6: 13p, 2nd;
4) Tottenham/Pochettino, 22g, 39p, +20, L6:13p,1st;
5) West Ham/Bilic, 22g, 35p, +8, L6: 11p, 4th;
7) Stoke City/Hughes, 21g, 32p, +2, L6: 10p, 5th
8) Cristal Palace/Pardew, 22g, 31p, -1, L6: 5+, 20th

Palace seems to be dropping out. Maybe even Stoke can make a run, but i would say West Ham has a good schedule to put some pressure on Leicester, if they drop some more points against bottom-of-the-table teams. (Yes, Tottenham should also be pressuring Leicester, while Arsenal and City could duel it out for the title. It could be very fascinating.)
 

Senator Donut

post-Domer
SoSH Member
Apr 21, 2010
5,522
Alas, that won't happen because both will almost certainly be in the unseeded pot and wouldn't be drawn together.
Also Sassuolo is sitting seventh, nine points behind third place Inter with a game in hand. I really can't see them making a run at the top three at this point.
 

coremiller

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 14, 2005
5,852
Bad draw for Leicester at the weekend -- being 1-0 up, having won a penalty, against the worst team in the league, you really need to take 3 points. But Mahrez missed the penalty and they let Villa back into the match. They've now dropped four crucial points just from missed penalties in their last three games (Mahrez missed one in the 0-0 draw against Bournemouth as well).
 

sachmoney

Member
SoSH Member
Jun 14, 2008
9,513
Tim Thomas' Bunker
I think that Wenger gets it if Arsenal wins the league and only that. I'm not sure what it would take for Pochettino to get it, but he definitely should be in the conversation. Like if Spurs finish top three and Leicester is out of the top four. If there is a one spot difference, I would probably defer to Ranieri just because of how many more points than last year they'll have versus what Pochettino or any of the other contenders have done. Those are my contenders for Manager of the Year.

It looks like Mahrez is struggling which may hurt his player of the year status. Yes, I am fully aware Ozil did nothing this past week, since he was out. I wouldn't be surprised if it was given to someone like Harry Kane if he has a good second half. The FA loves giving stuff to their own, deserving or not.
 

coremiller

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 14, 2005
5,852
A comfortable 3-0 win at home over Stoke combined with Arsenal losing means Leicester go 3 points clear at the top. And they are up to 3rd in Goal Differential, behind only City and Spurs. They needed the 3 points there because their next three are Liverpool, @Man City, @Arsenal. If they are still ahead after that stretch, things will start getting really interesting.
 

Dummy Hoy

Angry Pissbum
SoSH Member
Jul 22, 2006
8,241
Falmouth
I think things are already really interesting. ;)

edit to add a remotely worthwhile comment: You're right about the next three games though. If they come out still on top or just a point or two off, they've got to be seen as legit contenders for the title, let alone Europe which would be basically locked up barring disaster.
 
Dec 21, 2015
1,410
So today they avenged one of their only two (!) League losses on the season... and a week from Sunday they'll get a chance to avenge the other, at the Emirates.

I'm trying to think of a US sports analogy. Maybe if the 1960 world series had played out over the course of a season.
 
Dec 21, 2015
1,410
Was there the kind of payroll disparity or structural advantages that the pre-draft Yankees had, though? The 1967 Sox were a great story, but they were more or less on a level playing field at the time, I thought.

The most remarkable thing to me about LCFC's success is that Chelsea, Arsenal, ManU and City are all above or near £200M in player payroll, and Leicester is at £48M, less than a quarter of them. Even the 2003 Marlins ($49M) were less disadvantaged in the WS against the 2003 Yankees ($153M). And that was in 7 games against one team they matched up well against, not 38 against a diverse spectrum of some of the best teams in the world.

I guess in the pre-salary cap era in the NFL, there might be some analogues. And maybe if Milwaukee or Miami win the WS, despite having ~31% of the average salary of the Red Sox, Yankees, Tigers and Dodgers, there'd be some valid comparisons made. But it's very nearly unprecedented, if not entirely so.
 

PedroSpecialK

Comes at you like a tornado of hair and the NHL sa
SoSH Member
Dec 12, 2004
27,167
Cambridge, MA
The flipside is that the Marlins & Yankees played essentially the same amount of games - Leicester could end the season having played 20-25 fewer games than some of their competitors given that they're only remaining competition is the Premier League.

That being said, this is easily the most incredible display by a relative minnow that I've ever seen.
 

coremiller

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 14, 2005
5,852
I don't think there is any real precedent.

Before the season started, it was pretty widely believed, not just that it was unlikely for a club like Leicester to win the league, but that it was fundamentally impossible. That's the difference with the single elimination upsets -- no one thought it was impossible for Nova to beat Georgetown in one game if everything broke right, or for the Jets to beat the Colts in Super Bowl III, just that it was very unlikely. And in England/Europe we've seen all kinds of upsets in cup competitions -- Wigan won the FA Cup a few years ago and got relegated at the same time, and Denmark and Greece have won the Euros, although neither of those teams were anywhere close to underdogs on the scale of Leicester (Greece had betting odds of 200:1 or 250:1, which is low but an order of magnitude difference from 2000:1).

It's kind of like if the 1980 Miracle on Ice had played out over the course of a season, but without the geopolitical overtones. The Miracle on Ice differed from most of those cases in that most informed observers really did think it was impossible to beat the Soviets, that a team of amateurs from a country that hardly cared about ice hockey could never beat a team of experienced, elite quasi-professionals who had trained together for years from a big country that cared about hockey a lot. But that was only one game, pretty clearly if they had played a full season's worth of games the Soviets would have won a huge percentage of the time. That Leicester is doing this over a full 38-game season is amazing.
 

DLew On Roids

guilty of being sex
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Aug 30, 2001
13,906
The Pine Street Inn
I think maybe Leicester is legitimately the best side in the EPL. Maybe not the best talent, but the best team. Villanova and USA Hockey maybe win those games 10% of the time.

Not that I think they know about each other, but they remind me of Golden State in that both love to create chaos and then capitalize on it with creative individuals.
 

DennyDoyle'sBoil

Found no thrill on Blueberry Hill
SoSH Member
Sep 9, 2008
42,731
AZ
Today is officially holy shit day -- the day when critical mass has developed in the world for true belief that they might actually win this thing. Today's the day when coverage turns from bemused amazement to expectation, and the English press just as happy to write the they-are-who-we-thought-they-were story as the better story. Going to be interesting to see how they handle it.
 

fletcherpost

sosh's feckin' poet laureate
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
12,164
Glasgow, Scotland
I think maybe Leicester is legitimately the best side in the EPL. Maybe not the best talent, but the best team. Villanova and USA Hockey maybe win those games 10% of the time.

Not that I think they know about each other, but they remind me of Golden State in that both love to create chaos and then capitalize on it with creative individuals.
They're a proper team. They all play for each other. They're so well organised, everyone knows their job and they all do it without any fuss, any egos, they just get on with it. They don't keep the ball as well as other teams, but they are lightening on the break, and make the most of the space available. Vardy is lightening fast, and the midfielders know he's going to make those runs all day and Vardy knows he's going to get balls played over the top or through. Kante is all over the pitch; as a box to box midfielder he's everything you want. He breaks up the play, distributes the ball, runs all day, chases lost causes, wins way more 50/50s than he has a right to. They defend well as a unit, the central defenders are strong, take good postions defending set pieces and Huth is no slouch in the oppositon box at corners and set pieces.

Mahrez is a quality player, every team needs some real quality to contend and Leicester have that, his touch, vision and weight of pass is just quality. His step over just before he shot on goal to create a bit of space was beautiful and effortless. Drinkwater is having a great season too. In fact every player in the first 11 seems to be having the season of their life. It would be wrong to pass them off as journeyman players, they're far from that. To add to what you say they know what their strengths are and play to them.

After the Arsenal game they have a run of ten games that they'd expect to get results from. The issue might be getting results in matches where teams might sit back against them, and there'll be less space to exploit. They've got score more goals away from home. I still think it's hard to imagine them winning the thing, cos they're Leicester, but that's what's been so much fun, being proved wrong week in week out.
 

LondonSox

Robert the Deuce
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
8,956
North Bay California
The bookies finally make them favourites to win here in the UK after yesterday.

The pressure will build from here. I think they're lucky in that man city just submarined their manager, man utd may be doing the same and Chelsea had this season and changed coach. Liverpool also changed coach. Arsenal and spurs who didn't are in the running but neither is a 100% ready team. Leicester has in their hands now but I can tell you as a Newcastle fan shit can get heavy when you need to cross that finish line
 

fletcherpost

sosh's feckin' poet laureate
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
12,164
Glasgow, Scotland
That's a good point, and everyone seems to be saying it...it's gonna get squeaky bum time at some point, can they keep the heed? What they have got going for them is they are playing with house money. A top 3 finish is still dreamland for them and their fans. The target at the start of the season was survival, they got that out the way around Christmas, top half is a certainty and top six is pretty much nailed on. So whatever happens, this is their best season. If they can play like they have nothing to lose, manage their mental game...they really could do it.
 
The other thing Leicester have going for them is that each of the other contenders also haven't been there or thereabouts in the title race for ages - Man City is the one exception, but they have their own issues (Pellegrini on his way out, lots of injuries, team not gelling the way such a deep squad ought to on paper). The bums of Arsenal and Spurs in particular will surely be just as squeaky if not moreso...not least because the weight of expectation on them both is higher.

That said, I reckon Arsenal defeats Leicester next weekend. Just a feeling.
 

coremiller

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 14, 2005
5,852
Arsenal themselves haven't been in a true title race in a while, but they do have same players who have (Ozil, Sanchez, Cech, plus Giroud won Ligue 1 at Montpelier and Mertesacker has played in a Euro final and World Cup semifinal for Germany).
 
The thought recently occurred to me...how much of Leicester's season is down to unadulterated luck? Rainieri now seems like an inspired hire, but he'd last been seen managing Greece to the bottom of its Euro qualifying group. For all of these bargain-basement buys who have turned into superstars, sure, great scouting has something to do with their success (Arsenal certainly seem to think so), but isn't this the equivalent of getting lucky and hitting on a bunch of 5th and 6th round draft picks in the NFL? The comparison to Atletico Madrid cited above indirectly implies that other less fancied clubs might look at their tactics and work to fit players into that system going forward, but this wasn't a system years in the making - everything has happened incredibly swiftly.

I want Leicester to win the league so badly - almost as much as, or maybe even more than, I want Arsenal to win it - because of what it would symbolize. But I really don't think Leicester is that much smarter than every other club in the league. Better? For the moment, yes. But cleverer? I'm not so sure.
 

SoxFanInCali

has the rich, deep voice of a god
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Jun 3, 2005
15,599
California. Duh.
Regardless of tactics, I've seen people compare what Leicester City is doing to Atletico a couple years back. That doesn't even come close to doing justice to Leicester. Yes, Atletico has far less money than Barca/Real, but they get a far bigger piece of the rest of the La Liga pie than anyone else does. The 3rd-biggest club in Spain beating out the top 2 is nothing compared to Leicester going from relegation candidate to champions overnight.

Leicester is less than 3 years removed from being knocked out of the Championship playoffs in one of the more remarkable sequences in the history of the sport, and now have a chance to win the Premier League. Unreal.

 

coremiller

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 14, 2005
5,852
SFIC, I agree. I do think the tactical comparison though is interesting and worth making. Both succeeded by going against the current vogue for possession and pressing high up the pitch, instead opting for a narrow, aggressive counteratttacking system. Atletico did it with more money and therefore better players and more depth, which is why they were not only able to win La Liga but came a minute or two away from winning the European Cup as well.

The most underrated key to this sort of system is finding forwards who are both willing to work very hard without the ball and can also actually score goals. You can't play a 4-4-2 with minimal defensive contribution from the forwards anymore or your midfield will get outnumbered and pulled out of position. Vardy has gotten a lot of justified praise for his pace and goal-scoring but not nearly enough for his work rate.
 

bosox4283

Well-Known Member
Gold Supporter
SoSH Member
Mar 2, 2004
4,691
Philadelphia
Atletico's league title is, unquestionably, one of the greatest seasons in history of La Liga, if not the absolute greatest. Atletico has Spain's third highest budget and one of the top 20 or so budgets in Europe (fake edit: 15th according to Deloitte), but the gap between Real Madrid and Barcelona is huge.

That said, Leicester winning would be an even more remarkable achievement.

It's interesting to note the gaps in the leagues. Real Madrid and Barcelona had revenues of 439 million pounds and 426 million pounds, respectively, according to Deloitte. Atletico was at 142 million pounds -- a three-hundred million gap between these teams! Leicester is at 104 million pounds, perhaps around 12th in the Premiership and certainly in the bottom half of the league. The top five clubs (sorry, Tottenham) average about 340 million pounds, so Leicester is roughly 240 million pounds behind the biggest club.

But the competition is also stiffer in the Premiership. 17 clubs(!) make Deloitte's top-30 list, while only three Spanish clubs make the list.

http://www.skysports.com/football/news/11095/10137534/manchester-united-highest-earning-premier-league-club-in-201415-season