The Red Sox have fired Chaim Bloom

Status
Not open for further replies.

chawson

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 1, 2006
4,680
In a league where every single team makes a significant profit every single year -- before they even get to revenue sharing, and to say nothing of the appreciation of team value over the duration of ownership -- tanking is nothing but a cynical and disgusting strategy that billionaire owners have convinced certain fans is "smart," when all it actually is a way to make more money. No fans should ever accept it, particularly fans of one of the single richest clubs in global sports.

And frankly, the very idea that "the only way to win is with cost controlled players" is the much the same thing, but American fans aren't ready for that conversation. We all love exploiting labor too much.
Couldn't agree more. And like everywhere else, labor's share of total revenue has shrunk across MLB.

Tanking is a scheme, and I'm glad that (outside of rare and conditional circumstances like 2020, maybe) it's simply not possible in Boston.

I think the "only way to win is with cost-controlled players" is largely true, however, given the rules around arbitration and team control and the aging curves of players within the system we're in. But those should be changed too.
 

moondog80

heart is two sizes two small
SoSH Member
Sep 20, 2005
8,312
I think the "only way to win is with cost-controlled players" is largely true, however, given the rules around arbitration and team control and the aging curves of players within the system we're in. But those should be changed too.
Yep. The system is no doubt rigged. But when players don't hit free agency until right around the time they start to dip downward on the aging curve, generally speaking, this is what happens. Are the players screwed? Some are. Others are wildly overpaid. If they got rid of all cost control and everyone was a free agent form day 1 -- no draft, just a total free for all --- but kept spending caps, I'm not sure if that would result in a net gain, net loss, or a push for the players.
 

Bob Montgomerys Helmet Hat

has big, douchey shoulders
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
I’ll be honest, if we purposefully tanked and lost 110 games for the last 4 years I wouldn’t be a baseball fan anymore.

Dead serious.

Life is too short, and I have too many other interests then to spend a second on a team that acts that way.

I 100% get that there are some seasons where a team can’t go all out, personnel-wise, to compete for a title. I understood 2023 to be exactly that. My expectation this season was to be a WC contender through Labor Day weekend (and we didn’t even pull that off). But a team should always be doing its best to compete within whatever parameters exist to achieve long term franchise success.

Sports is entertainment. There’s a million other ways to be entertained than endure a purposefully atrocious product for years. In fact I think people who do are suckers. You hear me 76ers fans? Suckers.
I think this perspective is really interesting and, to some degree, explains part of the divide here.

First, let me say that while I am not a huge fan of full tanking, I’m fine with a true rebuild that makes the major league team mediocre for a few years. I love and watch all sports(other than soccer, that sucks). It’s my release and my relaxation, and doesn’t require 100% focus. I would rather watch some random WNBA game than binge a season of some TV show.

And baseball is my favorite sport, and the Red Sox are my favorite team in all sports. Maybe because I grew up watching mostly mediocre teams of the 70s and 80s, maybe it’s just how I’m built, but I have no problem enjoying each baseball game as an individual event without needing the context of the overall season. Of course, I love winning championships, but really, I just love watching the Red Sox. I don’t feel like I wasted a couple hours watching last night, and certainly not years of my life when the team may be mediocre. I have plenty of stress in my life, and sports watching isn’t a part of that. At least, until the playoffs(still not over the Bruins).

I also enjoy following the whole organization, am a bit of a prospect humper, and love to project when the cavalry may be coming. I find that fun.

Organizations tank, players don’t, so even if the team tanked, I would still watch, and I don’t think that makes me a sucker. I can still find some level of enjoyment out of almost every one of their games, just watching individual performances. For me, life is about finding whatever makes one happy. It’s okay that it’s different things for different people.

I certainly don’t think that this makes me a better fan, and I definitely understand your perspective. I just look at sports, and especially the Red Sox, differently. I think plenty of people fall in each side of this divide, and I don’t see anything wrong with that.

Tl,dr. Sorry in advance.
 

Bob Montgomerys Helmet Hat

has big, douchey shoulders
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
So when does the statute of limitations run out for tanking?
Huh? My original post was in response to competing while rebuilding. Atlanta did not do this. They went into full rebuild mode for three years and sucked on the field while setting up their organization of the future. This is not particularly controversial, it’s just factual. I’m not really sure what your posts trying to attack these facts are getting at.
 

John Marzano Olympic Hero

has fancy plans, and pants to match
Dope
SoSH Member
Apr 12, 2001
24,693
The problem with tanking is that it's not just a "three or four year" process. It can go on for a long time if the prospects that are chosen by the FO are bad or unhealthy or unlucky. For every Astros there's a franchise like the Pirates who have been tanking since Barry Bonds left. The Cubs "dynasty" produced a grand total of one championship and a few years above 500 before they went into the toilet again. The boom-bust A's have done this more than a few times and they haven't won a World Series since 1989 when they had the highest payroll in the league and more stars than positions.

There are a number of people who think that bottoming out is some sort of purgatory, like we just have to take our lumps for three or four years and we'll be back on top, baby! And that's not true. Sports don't work that way. Because while you're trying to get better, unless you're in the AL Central, most of the teams around you are also trying to get better. The problem is, when you're tanking you start two steps behind them.

Tanking or gutting a team down to the studs is a really interesting thought experiment. What bothered my about Bloom (who I suspect got his orders from the FO) is that the Red Sox were chosen as a guinea pig. The problem is that there are a ton of variables that weren't accounted for; most importantly fan reaction. You can say that a fan who doesn't want to watch a multi-year build is "entitled" or "WEEI caller" and I'd say it's just a person who doesn't want to pay high premiums to watch sloppy, uninspired baseball. I think 8slim said it earlier in this thread, but it's a drum that I've been banging on for four years: baseball is entertainment. There are hundreds of things that we can do to pass our time on this planet, there is no need for our baseball to aggressively push us towards those other things to make some sort of point, or prove an experiment.

Don't cut corners (let your contending team go through July with three starting pitchers and then wonder why the bullpen shit the bed in August), put the best team on the field (maybe find outfielders with more range than Vin Diesel), stop obsessing about a future that you might not be around to see (talking directly to Bloom here).

And if you can get rid of a $50M albatross, just fucking do it. Or don't complain about your hands being tied fiscally.
 

chrisfont9

Member
SoSH Member
This is a big piece! Pitching now is max effort all the time, so injuries are way more prevalent. And far more often than in previous generations, elite production is more often the result of customized performance training systems (sometimes conducted privately by the player) than “true talent.”
OK, so if we are on to something here, then for Bloom, it points to the fact that without farm support he was forced to either make a go for it trade -- which is the most salient criticism of him, that he had no record of doing this -- or buy on the market, where the choices were cheap guys coming off injury or expensive guys who might be on their way to an injury. Weirdly, past injury can sometimes be an indicator of future health -- see Paxton's arm -- although sometimes they are indicative of future injuries -- see Paxton's knee.
 

chrisfont9

Member
SoSH Member
Great question, I think the answer is definitely yes. There are fewer starters in general (with the move towards openers), fewer good starters in general, I think, so fewer good free agent starters- and like you said, they all come with flaws. Bloom did a pretty good job, i suspect, at signing free agent starters- Kluber was the only real bust even if most guys he got were only average-ish.

It seems like the days of trading for a small market teams young starter (Pedro, Beckett, etc) before they get expensive is also much less of a thing- in large part, it seems like the weaker small market teams don’t even have guys like this and in the few instances in which they do, the prices are so high because such players are scarce.

The most wins for active pitchers under 30….Aaron Nola (90), Jose Berrios (83), EdRo (80), Blake Snell (71), Taijuan Walker (69), and German Marquez (65). Kind of a weird list, no? I guess the definition of a “top of the rotation” starter is probably none that need to be recalibrated.

So you really need to develop pitching form within, I think. But if you aren’t…and want to contend, what’s the solution? Delving into the FA marketplace that’s riskier than before? Trying to make trades which are harder to pull off (and probably more so when you don’t have pitching prospects to deal)?

good luck to the next guy.
Indeed. I'll probably bring this up again when the Yamamoto pitch begins. When you have 20+ teams in a market for something of which there is ONE... the prices can get way beyond all reason.
 

chrisfont9

Member
SoSH Member
It'll be interesting to see how your point plays out with the pitch clock. One reason games got so long was analytics. Someone figured out that taking more time between pitches allowed hurlers to throw harder for sustained periods. Now that starters can't do this anymore, maybe the injury trend will reverse itself.
Hitters can punish 93mph, but maybe where this goes is just a huge emphasis on movement. Four-seamers with some ride, cutters etc. over pure velocity. Baseball is endlessly interesting.

Apologies for being lazy and not doing one triple-answer instead of three posts.
 

Benj4ever

New Member
Nov 21, 2022
373
Tanking or gutting a team down to the studs is a really interesting thought experiment. What bothered my about Bloom (who I suspect got his orders from the FO) is that the Red Sox were chosen as a guinea pig. The problem is that there are a ton of variables that weren't accounted for; most importantly fan reaction. You can say that a fan who doesn't want to watch a multi-year build is "entitled" or "WEEI caller" and I'd say it's just a person who doesn't want to pay high premiums to watch sloppy, uninspired baseball. I think 8slim said it earlier in this thread, but it's a drum that I've been banging on for four years: baseball is entertainment. There are hundreds of things that we can do to pass our time on this planet, there is no need for our baseball to aggressively push us towards those other things to make some sort of point, or prove an experiment.
I think the front office understands fan reaction perfectly. That's why they fired Bloom....But they also want to get to where the Orioles are right now - the team that the vast majority of fans want the Red Sox to be right now. That's why they hired Bloom in the first place.
 

Rovin Romine

Johnny Rico
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Jul 14, 2005
24,874
Miami (oh, Miami!)
In a league where every single team makes a significant profit every single year -- before they even get to revenue sharing, and to say nothing of the appreciation of team value over the duration of ownership -- tanking is nothing but a cynical and disgusting strategy that billionaire owners have convinced certain fans is "smart," when all it actually is a way to make more money. No fans should ever accept it, particularly fans of one of the single richest clubs in global sports.

And frankly, the very idea that "the only way to win is with cost controlled players" is the much the same thing, but American fans aren't ready for that conversation. We all love exploiting labor too much.
Are they not ploughing their profits back into the franchise? Certainly. Could the players be better compensated for the value the bring? Certainly. Should the league pay minor league ballplayers more? I think so.

But the distribution of talent in the game isn't based on a free market (except for limited free agency.) There is a draft, in part to prevent one or two clubs from dominating the sport. Which would make (IMO) the entire sport stupid and pointless.

So, in the context of the draft, "Tanking" isn't categorically about simply not paying players in free agency (although it can be about that.) It's about trying to secure better draft picks to position the club for a future run. In part so the club can make money in so doing.

But hey, if this were a better run society, we wouldn't be over-valuing marginally-educated meat-heads with a hyper-specific skill-set of hitting and throwing orange-sized objects. Instead, some kid from a broken-down neighborhood in Kansas City (or wherever) would be having their musical talent nurtured, cultivated, and appreciated, no matter what non-commercial direction it happened to grow. And we'd probably all be better off for it.

(Not that I don't love my meat-heads.)
 

cannonball 1729

Member
SoSH Member
Sep 8, 2005
3,581
The Sticks
I’ll be honest, if we purposefully tanked and lost 110 games for the last 4 years I wouldn’t be a baseball fan anymore.

Dead serious.

Life is too short, and I have too many other interests then to spend a second on a team that acts that way.

I 100% get that there are some seasons where a team can’t go all out, personnel-wise, to compete for a title. I understood 2023 to be exactly that. My expectation this season was to be a WC contender through Labor Day weekend (and we didn’t even pull that off). But a team should always be doing its best to compete within whatever parameters exist to achieve long term franchise success.

Sports is entertainment. There’s a million other ways to be entertained than endure a purposefully atrocious product for years. In fact I think people who do are suckers. You hear me 76ers fans? Suckers.
This is well-put. A tanking period is absolutely when you start to see "season ticket holder since 1983"-types start to turn in their tickets because they don't want to pay exorbitant prices to watch Triple-A baseball. Once you break the contract with the fandom of "you give us your money and support, we give you something worth watching," even some of the diehards will find other things to do, and it can take time to get them to come back.

Like, I know many people are impressed with where the Orioles are right now, but here's how many fans have come to each home game in the last two homestands (the current one and the one at the end of August):

20,612
19,132
19,432
28,872
42,535
30,773
12,325
14,903
17,723
15,485
15,526
14,442
24,835
43,359

That's a playoff team in the midst of the division race for the first time in a decade. And they're still regularly having nights where they only draw 12-15k people. (Yes, I know, small geographic area, etc., but those are still terrible numbers for an MLB team.) Fandom isn't just a switch that turns off and on at the sign of a good or bad team - it has to be grown and nurtured, and tanking does the opposite.
 

Harry Hooper

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Jan 4, 2002
34,639
From Cotillo's article last evening:

One longtime baseball person with Boston connections made an interesting point shortly after the firing. Within the game, Bloom is thought to have a fatal flaw — indecisiveness — that may have prohibited him from being able to truly get the Red Sox over the hump. Bloom’s methodical, careful approach works when it comes to building the farm system over time but is seen as too tentative at times when aggressiveness is needed. Considering the Red Sox will need to outbid teams and fully embrace a get your guy mentality this winter, it’s fair if ownership viewed him as the wrong fit to do so.

I always thought Bloom would, at some point, strap on a Dave Dombrowski mask, jump out of his comfort zone and make some major, risky moves with a win-now mentality. Many in the game doubt he ever would. There’s a perception throughout baseball that Bloom has to win every move, leading to analysis paralysis. Case in point: multiple sources with knowledge of Bloom’s thinking have noted that he had privately obsessed over his two major free agent expenditures — Story and Yoshida — in each of the last two seasons, constantly wondering if he had made the right moves. It’s clear that those expenditures of $140 million and $90 million, respectively, made Bloom uncomfortable.
...
In the days leading up to the trade deadline, a veteran American League scout reached out to note that there were back-channel talks in baseball circles that the Red Sox might have given Bloom a “postseason or pink slip” ultimatum in late July. While still unconfirmed, it’s clear now the possibility of Bloom’s ouster was very real within the game as far back as two months ago.


Cotillo also notes that in late August 2022, Kennedy made a public pronouncement that Bloom and Cora would return for 2023, but Kennedy never responded to Cotillo's query early this month as to whther a similar statement for 2024 was forthcoming now. He also states his belief that Cora holds immense power with Kennedy and the owners.
 

RedOctober3829

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 19, 2005
55,634
deep inside Guido territory
Fair point - you can swap in Rafaela if you want. I'd note though that Duran's made a huge leap forward, mostly because, per various reports, he's gotten better coaching on how to play CF. So he's probably not done growing as a fielder.
I would trade Duran this offseason. I believe that he's in a similar position that Dalbec was at the end of '21 in terms of their value. Is Duran's level of play sustainable long-term? I would bank on the fact that it isn't and try to move him. Rafaela should be the CF of the future and Duran doesn't hit enough for power to play a corner.
 

tims4wins

PN23's replacement
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
38,076
Hingham, MA
While in general a big market team like the Red Sox should not be tanking, 2020-2022 was kind of a perfect storm for them to do it. I wouldn't advocate for a repeating cycle of a 3-5 year tank every 15 years, or however it would break down. But 2020 wasn't really a season, and then in 2021, the ballpark would have been more than half empty for at least half of that year anyway due to Covid. Hell, even if the Sox just tanked in 2020-2021, they might be in a better position than today.

Beyond the tanking discussion though, I don't think that selling at the deadline when you're mediocre constitutes tanking. Bloom could have had the exact same offseasons before both 2022 and 2023 that he did, in both years trying to remain competitive while rebuilding the farm. But what would the harm have been in selling at the deadline both years? You try your level best to field a competitive team, you see in the first 4 months that it's not good enough, and so you sell in order to get better for the future. They wouldn't have had to full scale tank the last few years to be in a better position than they are today.

And therein lies the majority of my frustration. I get why a team like the Red Sox should not be tanking for 4-5 years. But if they had admitted defeat at the trade deadline last year and this year, I don't think they would have lost any fans, and they'd seemingly be in a better position heading into 2024.
 

RedOctober3829

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 19, 2005
55,634
deep inside Guido territory
While in general a big market team like the Red Sox should not be tanking, 2020-2022 was kind of a perfect storm for them to do it. I wouldn't advocate for a repeating cycle of a 3-5 year tank every 15 years, or however it would break down. But 2020 wasn't really a season, and then in 2021, the ballpark would have been more than half empty for at least half of that year anyway due to Covid. Hell, even if the Sox just tanked in 2020-2021, they might be in a better position than today.

Beyond the tanking discussion though, I don't think that selling at the deadline when you're mediocre constitutes tanking. Bloom could have had the exact same offseasons before both 2022 and 2023 that he did, in both years trying to remain competitive while rebuilding the farm. But what would the harm have been in selling at the deadline both years? You try your level best to field a competitive team, you see in the first 4 months that it's not good enough, and so you sell in order to get better for the future. They wouldn't have had to full scale tank the last few years to be in a better position than they are today.

And therein lies the majority of my frustration. I get why a team like the Red Sox should not be tanking for 4-5 years. But if they had admitted defeat at the trade deadline last year and this year, I don't think they would have lost any fans, and they'd seemingly be in a better position heading into 2024.
At the least, they should've gotten under the luxury tax last deadline.
 

8slim

has trust issues
SoSH Member
Nov 6, 2001
25,080
Unreal America
I think this perspective is really interesting and, to some degree, explains part of the divide here.

First, let me say that while I am not a huge fan of full tanking, I’m fine with a true rebuild that makes the major league team mediocre for a few years. I love and watch all sports(other than soccer, that sucks). It’s my release and my relaxation, and doesn’t require 100% focus. I would rather watch some random WNBA game than binge a season of some TV show.

And baseball is my favorite sport, and the Red Sox are my favorite team in all sports. Maybe because I grew up watching mostly mediocre teams of the 70s and 80s, maybe it’s just how I’m built, but I have no problem enjoying each baseball game as an individual event without needing the context of the overall season. Of course, I love winning championships, but really, I just love watching the Red Sox. I don’t feel like I wasted a couple hours watching last night, and certainly not years of my life when the team may be mediocre. I have plenty of stress in my life, and sports watching isn’t a part of that. At least, until the playoffs(still not over the Bruins).

I also enjoy following the whole organization, am a bit of a prospect humper, and love to project when the cavalry may be coming. I find that fun.

Organizations tank, players don’t, so even if the team tanked, I would still watch, and I don’t think that makes me a sucker. I can still find some level of enjoyment out of almost every one of their games, just watching individual performances. For me, life is about finding whatever makes one happy. It’s okay that it’s different things for different people.

I certainly don’t think that this makes me a better fan, and I definitely understand your perspective. I just look at sports, and especially the Red Sox, differently. I think plenty of people fall in each side of this divide, and I don’t see anything wrong with that.

Tl,dr. Sorry in advance.
That’s an excellent post. I 100% agree that people should do whatever makes them happy.

I rescind my “sucker” comment. That was unfair to someone like yourself who simply enjoys the game.

Personally I can’t separate each game from the context of the total season. That’s why I haven’t watched a Sox game since Labor Day weekend. The Sox dropped out of realistic wild card contention (IMHO), football started, and I had TV shows I wanted to catch up on.
 

Bob Montgomerys Helmet Hat

has big, douchey shoulders
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
That’s an excellent post. I 100% agree that people should do whatever makes them happy.

I rescind my “sucker” comment. That was unfair to someone like yourself who simply enjoys the game.

Personally I can’t separate each game from the context of the total season. That’s why I haven’t watched a Sox game since Labor Day weekend. The Sox dropped out of realistic wild card contention (IMHO), football started, and I had TV shows I wanted to catch up on.
I have plenty of friends who think the same way that you do and only a few who think like I do.
Maybe I need more hobbies. :)
 

tims4wins

PN23's replacement
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
38,076
Hingham, MA
Personally I can’t separate each game from the context of the total season. That’s why I haven’t watched a Sox game since Labor Day weekend. The Sox dropped out of realistic wild card contention (IMHO), football started, and I had TV shows I wanted to catch up on.
Yeah this is likely a dividing line for some fans. I don't think I've watched them since early August when they lost 4 in a row and I figured that was that.
 

8slim

has trust issues
SoSH Member
Nov 6, 2001
25,080
Unreal America
Yeah this is likely a dividing line for some fans. I don't think I've watched them since early August when they lost 4 in a row and I figured that was that.
I always stick with them through the summer. I treasure summers here in New England, since it’s so damn short. And the Sox are a huge component of my summers. But once we hit fall I’m out if they’re not worth watching. Right now, for me, they’re not. I’m flipping between college football games and it’s fun.
 

RCheco56

New Member
Jul 20, 2023
106
Providence, RI
I'm a bit jealous of the people who can not watch the games. Was just thinking what am I doing watching this one? It helps that the weather is shit. But I'd still be watching

I see all the convo here. Good convo. I'm a lurker and not regular do to work .. I don't mind Bloom being fired. This offseason should be about acquisitions, trades and free agency. Chaim seemed to not want to pull the trigger on deals and the sox need someone who will now. I wish I had more confidence in Cora. Reading lately how he has all this trust from ownership makes me think of all the times he seems to concede losses, bringing in a lesser bullpen arm (Llovera) in close games. Just saying I'm not convinced AC is the right guy. He did have Moreland pinch hit in the 2018 world series. That should count for something. Did Cora help win that world series or did Dave Roberts lose it? I had issues w/ Francona. Perhaps I should not be judging.

Sale looking good today. O'Brien has the jinx machine gassed up
 

YTF

Member
SoSH Member
From Cotillo's article last evening:





Cotillo also notes that in late August 2022, Kennedy made a public pronouncement that Bloom and Cora would return for 2023, but Kennedy never responded to Cotillo's query early this month as to whther a similar statement for 2024 was forthcoming now. He also states his belief that Cora holds immense power with Kennedy and the owners.
Indecisiveness....Credit where credit's due @cantor44
 

pk1627

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
May 24, 2003
2,563
Boston
If the rationale is indeed that Bloom isn’t equipped for the next step, I can live with it. I note that even a very active off-season last winter was like pulling teeth. Every trade deadline has sucked, particularly this year.

But I don’t buy it. I think Henry’s an ass. Fortunately one that brought a handful of championships.
 

JM3

often quoted
SoSH Member
Dec 14, 2019
15,749

8slim

has trust issues
SoSH Member
Nov 6, 2001
25,080
Unreal America
If the rationale is indeed that Bloom isn’t equipped for the next step, I can live with it. I note that even a very active off-season last winter was like pulling teeth. Every trade deadline has sucked, particularly this year.

But I don’t buy it. I think Henry’s an ass. Fortunately one that brought a handful of championships.
You’ve seen evidence that supports the reasons suggested why Bloom was fired. But you don’t believe said evidence?
 

LogansDad

Member
SoSH Member
Nov 15, 2006
30,095
Alamogordo
Yeah, assuming the info about the Sale and Turner deals is true, that's enough for me to say that moving on is probably the right call. I still like the direction he was taking the organization, but either one of those should have been no brainers.
 

RS2004foreever

Member
SoSH Member
Dec 15, 2022
703
I was driving last night and I listened to Rays v. Baltimore. In the days before the Internet if you liked baseball you learned how to pick up am clear channel stations at night (From BTV you can pick up every team east of the Mississippi above the Mason Dixon line.)

And so I heard Zach Eflin throw 7 innings, strike out 10, retire 16 in a row at one point, and give up 1 hit - a solo home run in the 7th.

And this is in a game that very much mattered.

And I thought that was it. If Eflin had been a Red Sox we would have made the playoffs. Eflin is 15-8 and is 5th in baseball in xFIP. Had Bloom signed Eflin my guess he saves his job. But he was matched by Tampa and didn't up the ante.
 

BringBackMo

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
1,342
It’s a measure of progress, I suppose, that the Bloom-skeptics are now saying he’s a guy you’d hire without hesitation to rebuild your farm system but you definitely wouldn’t want him running your entire organization. Two months ago, the general sentiment among this contingent was that the system wasn’t very good at all once you got past Mayer, who’d simply fallen into Bloom’s lap anyway.

It’s disappointing to me that we never really got to the second half of Bloom’s strategy put into place, the part where serious resources were to be dedicated to the MLB roster. I think his two big mistakes were failing to offer Xander a Storyesque contract in the offseason, opening him up to the absurd Godfather offer from the Padres, and failing to get under the tax last year. Generally speaking, however, I think he’s a good baseball executive, and as I’ve stated previously in the thread, I think there’s a fair degree of scapegoating going on here from ownership.

That said, I continue to believe in Henry and Co. and I imagine they’ll bring in a skilled replacement who will wind up doing many of the same things Bloom would have anyway, but without the stink of Mookie and Xander fouling perceptions of his every move. I’m disappointed this is how his tenure ends but as others have stated, I do look forward to a new face who isn’t tied to the Mookie and Xander departures. Perhaps we’ll be able to start anew as a fanbase and begin to pull in the same general direction. Perhaps.
 

John Marzano Olympic Hero

has fancy plans, and pants to match
Dope
SoSH Member
Apr 12, 2001
24,693
It’s a measure of progress, I suppose, that the Bloom-skeptics are now saying he’s a guy you’d hire without hesitation to rebuild your farm system but you definitely wouldn’t want him running your entire organization. Two months ago, the general sentiment among this contingent was that the system wasn’t very good at all once you got past Mayer, who’d simply fallen into Bloom’s lap anyway.
If I’m being honest, I think that Bloom is getting a ton of credit for rebuilding the farm system that I’m not sure he totally deserves. Sure the young hitting looks decent but where’s the pitching? Because of that I think the fifth place ranking is very optimistic.

I think most people are being nice to a guy that just got fired and didn’t want to pigpile on him. And when Cherington got the axe people said the same thing about him. After four or five years he was seen as a bit of a disappointment, which I have a feeling that Bloom was be seen as.

So there you go.
 

Jinhocho

Moderator
Moderator
SoSH Member
Jul 31, 2001
10,295
Durham, NC
I still dont get how Henry and company arent seen as the ones signing off on every big deal (or lack thereof), who make the decisions on how much can be spent (or not) and so on. Bloom wasnt perfect by any means, but to think he really ran the red sox doesnt make much sense to me.
 

tims4wins

PN23's replacement
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
38,076
Hingham, MA
If I’m being honest, I think that Bloom is getting a ton of credit for rebuilding the farm system that I’m not sure he totally deserves. Sure the young hitting looks decent but where’s the pitching? Because of that I think the fifth place ranking is very optimistic.

I think most people are being nice to a guy that just got fired and didn’t want to pigpile on him. And when Cherington got the axe people said the same thing about him. After four or five years he was seen as a bit of a disappointment, which I have a feeling that Bloom was be seen as.

So there you go.
I’m a broken record, but anyone could have done what he did in 2020 and ended up with Mayer. I give him credit for the other guys in the system that he drafted.
 

moondog80

heart is two sizes two small
SoSH Member
Sep 20, 2005
8,312
I’m a broken record, but anyone could have done what he did in 2020 and ended up with Mayer. I give him credit for the other guys in the system that he drafted.
I'm not sure Bloom (or any exec at his level) is choosing the players. Isn't it largely the scouting director, with oversight from the GM/PBO?
 

JM3

often quoted
SoSH Member
Dec 14, 2019
15,749
If I’m being honest, I think that Bloom is getting a ton of credit for rebuilding the farm system that I’m not sure he totally deserves. Sure the young hitting looks decent but where’s the pitching? Because of that I think the fifth place ranking is very optimistic.

I think most people are being nice to a guy that just got fired and didn’t want to pigpile on him. And when Cherington got the axe people said the same thing about him. After four or five years he was seen as a bit of a disappointment, which I have a feeling that Bloom was be seen as.

So there you go.
How quickly do you expect pitching prospects to develop? Keeping in mind there was no Minor League season in 2020.
 

Auger34

used to be tbb
SoSH Member
Apr 23, 2010
9,837
It’s disappointing to me that we never really got to the second half of Bloom’s strategy put into place, the part where serious resources were to be dedicated to the MLB roster. I think his two big mistakes were failing to offer Xander a Storyesque contract in the offseason, opening him up to the absurd Godfather offer from the Padres, and failing to get under the tax last year. Generally speaking, however, I think he’s a good baseball executive, and as I’ve stated previously in the thread, I think there’s a fair degree of scapegoating going on here from ownership.

“The second half”…my god, how long do you think people should get? If I am reading this correctly, you think he should have got 8 years minimum?!
 

Auger34

used to be tbb
SoSH Member
Apr 23, 2010
9,837
If I’m being honest, I think that Bloom is getting a ton of credit for rebuilding the farm system that I’m not sure he totally deserves. Sure the young hitting looks decent but where’s the pitching? Because of that I think the fifth place ranking is very optimistic.

I think most people are being nice to a guy that just got fired and didn’t want to pigpile on him. And when Cherington got the axe people said the same thing about him. After four or five years he was seen as a bit of a disappointment, which I have a feeling that Bloom was be seen as.

So there you go.
IMO, I kind of agree with this, kind of disagree.

l think his strengths, and what some posters here as labeling as uniquely smart by Bloom, would have been done by literally any member of the Friedman tree.

The hope is that you can find someone with those strengths and not Bloom’s major weaknesses, inflexibility and hating to make any move with any sort of risk. IMO, I think there’s a good chance that Henry and crew can accomplish this
 

John Marzano Olympic Hero

has fancy plans, and pants to match
Dope
SoSH Member
Apr 12, 2001
24,693
How quickly do you expect pitching prospects to develop? Keeping in mind there was no Minor League season in 2020.
It’s been four seasons, man. I mean how long is Bloom going to have the training wheels on?

I’d fully expect some pitcher to stand out by now.
 

BigSoxFan

Member
SoSH Member
May 31, 2007
47,357
How quickly do you expect pitching prospects to develop? Keeping in mind there was no Minor League season in 2020.
Logan Allen was a 2nd round pick in 2020. Tanner Bibee 5th round pick in 2021. Gavin Williams 1st round pick (23rd overall) in 2021.

That’s 3 impact SP for one team in 2023 alone. It isn’t easy but it can be done with proper talent evaluation and development.
 

nvalvo

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 16, 2005
21,759
Rogers Park
You know, as grossed out as I am about the team smearing people on their way out, these stories are in fact pretty damning about Bloom’s limitations.

If — and it’s a big if — the Sale and Turner trade stories are substantially accurate, he had opportunities at the last two deadlines to *really* set us up, and didn’t take them, in order to preserve what he must have known were pretty long shots at the playoffs. I’ve generally been a Bloom defender, because I’ve liked most of his moves. It’s some of these non-moves that aren’t great.

The young talent in the organization is way better than it was when he took over, but imagine how much better it could be if he’d made a few more Vazquez trades.

(Of course, the press would have murdered him, but his job is to not give a shit about that.)
 

JM3

often quoted
SoSH Member
Dec 14, 2019
15,749
It’s been four seasons, man. I mean how long is Bloom going to have the training wheels on?

I’d fully expect some pitcher to stand out by now.
The 2 best pitchers in the system are 20 y/o & in A+... one who is a holdover from the very end of the DD regime. There are a few interesting guys closer. It's a process. Not everything needs to be handed to you on a platter yesterday.

But he's already been fired, I've already said I'm fine with it, & I was hoping for less misery, doom & gloom from you, but I never should have engaged & will smoothly go backwards into a hedge.
 

JM3

often quoted
SoSH Member
Dec 14, 2019
15,749
Logan Allen was a 2nd round pick in 2020. Tanner Bibee 5th round pick in 2021. Gavin Williams 1st round pick (23rd overall) in 2021.

That’s 3 impact SP for one team in 2023 alone. It isn’t easy but it can be done with proper talent evaluation and development.
Red Sox didn't have a 2nd round pick in 2020 :/

Bloom smashed the draft pretty hard. Shouldn't matter whether it's primarily hitters or pitchers, but I think there will definitely be some pitchers from these draft classes that will filter through & have an impact over the next few years.
 

BigSoxFan

Member
SoSH Member
May 31, 2007
47,357
Red Sox didn't have a 2nd round pick in 2020 :/

Bloom smashed the draft pretty hard. Shouldn't matter whether it's primarily hitters or pitchers, but I think there will definitely be some pitchers from these draft classes that will filter through & have an impact over the next few years.
I didn’t question the drafting. I was merely showing an example of a team drafting and developing promising SP during the time Chaim was hired.
 

JM3

often quoted
SoSH Member
Dec 14, 2019
15,749
But the problem is really bigger than Bloom. The sox have had issues developing home grown pitchers since the late Theo years.(iow spanning multiple GMS)
Well, if the conversation is developing young pitchers, & not drafting young pitchers, Bello, Houck, & Crawford are the best set of young homegrown pitchers in what, over 20 years? Which is admittedly a ridiculously low bar.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.